Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe
Increasing problems regarding pollution and climate change have long been demonstrated by scientific evidence. An important portion of carbon emissions are produced by the building sector. These emissions are directly related not only to the building’s energy consumption, but also other building att...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energies (Basel) 2020-01, Vol.13 (1), p.66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 66 |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Sánchez Cordero, Antonio Gómez Melgar, Sergio Andújar Márquez, José Manuel |
description | Increasing problems regarding pollution and climate change have long been demonstrated by scientific evidence. An important portion of carbon emissions are produced by the building sector. These emissions are directly related not only to the building’s energy consumption, but also other building attributes affecting the construction and operation of existing buildings: materials selection, waste management, transportation, water consumption, and others. To help reduce these emissions, several green building rating system (GBRSs) have appeared during the last years. This has made it difficult for stakeholders to identify which GBRSs could be more suitable to a specific project. The heterogeneity of the GRBS scenario requires the creation of a transparent and robust indicator framework that can be used in any country within the European Union (EU), which is a common EU framework of core sustainability indicators for office and residential buildings Level(s) with the goal to provide a solid structure for building sustainability certification across all countries of the EU. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the most common GBRSs within the EU: Building Research Establishment Assessment Method (BREEAM), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQE), and Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED), and a bottom up comparison of the influence in the final score produced by the indicators stated by Level(s). The indicators studied show a different influence of Level(s) indicators on every GBRS, where LEED and BREEAM were most affected while HQE and DGNB were less so. This paper demonstrates the heterogeneity of current GRBSs in the EU scenario and the difference between sustainability assessments, where DGNB seems to be more aligned to the current EU framework. Finally, the paper concludes with the need to work to achieve alignment between the GBRS and Level(s). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en13010066 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2416718633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416718633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-8ba69d1cb758c6456841a75cf5f77183f4f8dceae2ca740286ea1f6436ca48b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEFLwzAYhoMoOOYu_oKAFxWqSdOmrbdZtikMhU3PJU2_uMwunUm6soP_3Y4J-l3e7_DwvvAgdEnJHWMZuQdDGaGEcH6CBjTLeEBJwk7__edo5Nya9McYZYwN0PfMAhj82Oq60uYDL4Q_xHLvPGwcFqbCfgX4BTo8tWIDXWM_8Rx2UF-7mwc8xrnVXktR4wXsdE81Ci9b54U2otS19nucg_Va9YzXjcGd9itt8KS1zRYu0JkStYPRbw7R-3Tylj8F89fZcz6eBzLMYh-kpeBZRWWZxKnkUczTiIoklipWSUJTpiKVVhIEhFIkEQlTDoIqHjEuRZSWGRuiq2Pv1jZfLThfrJvWmn6yCCPK-w7e2xii2yMlbeOcBVVsrd4Iuy8oKQ6Giz_D7AfAtm5N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416718633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sánchez Cordero, Antonio ; Gómez Melgar, Sergio ; Andújar Márquez, José Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Cordero, Antonio ; Gómez Melgar, Sergio ; Andújar Márquez, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing problems regarding pollution and climate change have long been demonstrated by scientific evidence. An important portion of carbon emissions are produced by the building sector. These emissions are directly related not only to the building’s energy consumption, but also other building attributes affecting the construction and operation of existing buildings: materials selection, waste management, transportation, water consumption, and others. To help reduce these emissions, several green building rating system (GBRSs) have appeared during the last years. This has made it difficult for stakeholders to identify which GBRSs could be more suitable to a specific project. The heterogeneity of the GRBS scenario requires the creation of a transparent and robust indicator framework that can be used in any country within the European Union (EU), which is a common EU framework of core sustainability indicators for office and residential buildings Level(s) with the goal to provide a solid structure for building sustainability certification across all countries of the EU. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the most common GBRSs within the EU: Building Research Establishment Assessment Method (BREEAM), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQE), and Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED), and a bottom up comparison of the influence in the final score produced by the indicators stated by Level(s). The indicators studied show a different influence of Level(s) indicators on every GBRS, where LEED and BREEAM were most affected while HQE and DGNB were less so. This paper demonstrates the heterogeneity of current GRBSs in the EU scenario and the difference between sustainability assessments, where DGNB seems to be more aligned to the current EU framework. Finally, the paper concludes with the need to work to achieve alignment between the GBRS and Level(s).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en13010066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Certification ; Climate change ; Construction ; Construction materials ; Emissions ; Energy consumption ; Environmental engineering ; Green buildings ; Green development ; Heterogeneity ; Indicators ; Materials selection ; Residential areas ; Residential buildings ; Sustainability ; Sustainable design ; Sustainable development ; Waste management ; Water consumption ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2020-01, Vol.13 (1), p.66</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-8ba69d1cb758c6456841a75cf5f77183f4f8dceae2ca740286ea1f6436ca48b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-8ba69d1cb758c6456841a75cf5f77183f4f8dceae2ca740286ea1f6436ca48b93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0865-3607 ; 0000-0002-2637-4364</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Cordero, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Melgar, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andújar Márquez, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Increasing problems regarding pollution and climate change have long been demonstrated by scientific evidence. An important portion of carbon emissions are produced by the building sector. These emissions are directly related not only to the building’s energy consumption, but also other building attributes affecting the construction and operation of existing buildings: materials selection, waste management, transportation, water consumption, and others. To help reduce these emissions, several green building rating system (GBRSs) have appeared during the last years. This has made it difficult for stakeholders to identify which GBRSs could be more suitable to a specific project. The heterogeneity of the GRBS scenario requires the creation of a transparent and robust indicator framework that can be used in any country within the European Union (EU), which is a common EU framework of core sustainability indicators for office and residential buildings Level(s) with the goal to provide a solid structure for building sustainability certification across all countries of the EU. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the most common GBRSs within the EU: Building Research Establishment Assessment Method (BREEAM), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQE), and Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED), and a bottom up comparison of the influence in the final score produced by the indicators stated by Level(s). The indicators studied show a different influence of Level(s) indicators on every GBRS, where LEED and BREEAM were most affected while HQE and DGNB were less so. This paper demonstrates the heterogeneity of current GRBSs in the EU scenario and the difference between sustainability assessments, where DGNB seems to be more aligned to the current EU framework. Finally, the paper concludes with the need to work to achieve alignment between the GBRS and Level(s).</description><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Green development</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Residential buildings</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable design</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEFLwzAYhoMoOOYu_oKAFxWqSdOmrbdZtikMhU3PJU2_uMwunUm6soP_3Y4J-l3e7_DwvvAgdEnJHWMZuQdDGaGEcH6CBjTLeEBJwk7__edo5Nya9McYZYwN0PfMAhj82Oq60uYDL4Q_xHLvPGwcFqbCfgX4BTo8tWIDXWM_8Rx2UF-7mwc8xrnVXktR4wXsdE81Ci9b54U2otS19nucg_Va9YzXjcGd9itt8KS1zRYu0JkStYPRbw7R-3Tylj8F89fZcz6eBzLMYh-kpeBZRWWZxKnkUczTiIoklipWSUJTpiKVVhIEhFIkEQlTDoIqHjEuRZSWGRuiq2Pv1jZfLThfrJvWmn6yCCPK-w7e2xii2yMlbeOcBVVsrd4Iuy8oKQ6Giz_D7AfAtm5N</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Sánchez Cordero, Antonio</creator><creator>Gómez Melgar, Sergio</creator><creator>Andújar Márquez, José Manuel</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-3607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-4364</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe</title><author>Sánchez Cordero, Antonio ; Gómez Melgar, Sergio ; Andújar Márquez, José Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-8ba69d1cb758c6456841a75cf5f77183f4f8dceae2ca740286ea1f6436ca48b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Green development</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Residential buildings</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable design</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Cordero, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Melgar, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andújar Márquez, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez Cordero, Antonio</au><au>Gómez Melgar, Sergio</au><au>Andújar Márquez, José Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>66</spage><pages>66-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Increasing problems regarding pollution and climate change have long been demonstrated by scientific evidence. An important portion of carbon emissions are produced by the building sector. These emissions are directly related not only to the building’s energy consumption, but also other building attributes affecting the construction and operation of existing buildings: materials selection, waste management, transportation, water consumption, and others. To help reduce these emissions, several green building rating system (GBRSs) have appeared during the last years. This has made it difficult for stakeholders to identify which GBRSs could be more suitable to a specific project. The heterogeneity of the GRBS scenario requires the creation of a transparent and robust indicator framework that can be used in any country within the European Union (EU), which is a common EU framework of core sustainability indicators for office and residential buildings Level(s) with the goal to provide a solid structure for building sustainability certification across all countries of the EU. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the most common GBRSs within the EU: Building Research Establishment Assessment Method (BREEAM), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQE), and Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED), and a bottom up comparison of the influence in the final score produced by the indicators stated by Level(s). The indicators studied show a different influence of Level(s) indicators on every GBRS, where LEED and BREEAM were most affected while HQE and DGNB were less so. This paper demonstrates the heterogeneity of current GRBSs in the EU scenario and the difference between sustainability assessments, where DGNB seems to be more aligned to the current EU framework. Finally, the paper concludes with the need to work to achieve alignment between the GBRS and Level(s).</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en13010066</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-3607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-4364</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2020-01, Vol.13 (1), p.66 |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2416718633 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Certification Climate change Construction Construction materials Emissions Energy consumption Environmental engineering Green buildings Green development Heterogeneity Indicators Materials selection Residential areas Residential buildings Sustainability Sustainable design Sustainable development Waste management Water consumption Water pollution |
title | Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Green%20Building%20Rating%20Systems%20and%20the%20New%20Framework%20Level(s):%20A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20Sustainability%20Certification%20within%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez%20Cordero,%20Antonio&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=66&rft.pages=66-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en13010066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416718633%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416718633&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |