Effects of stocking density of Chinese soft‐shelled turtle and interactions between cultivated species on growth performance and the environment in a turtle–rice coculture system

Experiments were performed to investigate the effects of stocking density (6, 8, 10, and 12 turtles/m2) of Chinese soft‐shelled turtles (Pelodiscus sinensis) and coculture interactions on growth performance and environment in a turtle–rice coculture system. The average yields of rice grain and rice...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 2020-06, Vol.51 (3), p.788-803
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Jing, Zou, Yiyi, Chen, Hanxiang, Xu, Jiehao, Liang, Zhenzhen, Xu, Haisheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 803
container_issue 3
container_start_page 788
container_title Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
container_volume 51
creator Zhao, Jing
Zou, Yiyi
Chen, Hanxiang
Xu, Jiehao
Liang, Zhenzhen
Xu, Haisheng
description Experiments were performed to investigate the effects of stocking density (6, 8, 10, and 12 turtles/m2) of Chinese soft‐shelled turtles (Pelodiscus sinensis) and coculture interactions on growth performance and environment in a turtle–rice coculture system. The average yields of rice grain and rice straw in four turtle–rice coculture (TR) groups were significantly higher than those in a rice monoculture with fertilizer (RMF) group and a rice monoculture (RM) group (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jwas.12665
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2416713128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416713128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-471d34ff861c394c59dedf29b147935e7a52a24dff76ccebe4f71d597454131e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1KxDAUhYMoOP5sfIKAO6HaNEnTLmXwF8GFisuSSW-cjJ1kTNIZZucjCL6LD-STmLGuvZsLl--cc-EgdETyU5LmbLaS4ZQUZcm30IgIVmeCMr6NRnlV06yqWL2L9kKY5XnBOS9H6OtCa1AxYKdxiE69GvuCW7DBxPXmNp4aCwFwcDp-v3-EKXQdtDj2PnaApW2xsRG8VNE4G_AE4grAYtV30SxlTGhYgDKQAix-8W4Vp3gBXjs_l1YNDnEKGOzSeGfnYGNyxPIv4fv905uEKbdx7H16ZB0izA_QjpZdgMO_vY-eLi8ex9fZ3f3Vzfj8LlOUCp4xQVrKtK5KomjNFK9baHVRTwgTNeUgJC9kwVqtRakUTIDppOC1YJwRSoDuo-PBd-HdWw8hNjPXe5sim4KRUiSoqBJ1MlDKuxA86GbhzVz6dUPyZtNLs-ml-e0lwWSAV6aD9T9kc_t8_jBofgB2AJe2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416713128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of stocking density of Chinese soft‐shelled turtle and interactions between cultivated species on growth performance and the environment in a turtle–rice coculture system</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Zhao, Jing ; Zou, Yiyi ; Chen, Hanxiang ; Xu, Jiehao ; Liang, Zhenzhen ; Xu, Haisheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jing ; Zou, Yiyi ; Chen, Hanxiang ; Xu, Jiehao ; Liang, Zhenzhen ; Xu, Haisheng</creatorcontrib><description>Experiments were performed to investigate the effects of stocking density (6, 8, 10, and 12 turtles/m2) of Chinese soft‐shelled turtles (Pelodiscus sinensis) and coculture interactions on growth performance and environment in a turtle–rice coculture system. The average yields of rice grain and rice straw in four turtle–rice coculture (TR) groups were significantly higher than those in a rice monoculture with fertilizer (RMF) group and a rice monoculture (RM) group (p &lt; .05). The yield of turtles increased gradually with increasing stocking density until reaching 10 turtles/m2, and the yield of TR10 was 1,297.51 ± 106.31 g/m2. The death rate in TR6, TR8, and TR10 groups was significantly lower than that in the turtle monoculture (TM) group (p &lt; .05), whereas the specific growth rate and weight gain in TR6, TR8, and TR10 groups were significantly higher than those in the TM group (p &lt; .05). The nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in the TR groups were significantly higher than those in the TM and RM groups (p &lt; .05). The water environment was improved in the TR group. The results suggest that an appropriate stocking density (10 turtles/m2) of turtles in the coculture system can effectively increase the yield of turtles and reduce the impacts on the environment compared with the TM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-8849</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-7345</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jwas.12665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Density ; Environmental impact ; Fertilizers ; growth performances ; Growth rate ; interactions ; Monoculture ; Monoculture (aquaculture) ; Pelodiscus sinensis ; Phosphorus ; Physical growth ; Reptiles &amp; amphibians ; Rice ; Rice straw ; Stocking ; Stocking density ; Turtles ; turtle–rice coculture</subject><ispartof>Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 2020-06, Vol.51 (3), p.788-803</ispartof><rights>Copyright by the World Aquaculture Society 2019</rights><rights>2020 World Aquaculture Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-471d34ff861c394c59dedf29b147935e7a52a24dff76ccebe4f71d597454131e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-471d34ff861c394c59dedf29b147935e7a52a24dff76ccebe4f71d597454131e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3190-3777</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjwas.12665$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjwas.12665$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Yiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hanxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jiehao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Zhenzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haisheng</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of stocking density of Chinese soft‐shelled turtle and interactions between cultivated species on growth performance and the environment in a turtle–rice coculture system</title><title>Journal of the World Aquaculture Society</title><description>Experiments were performed to investigate the effects of stocking density (6, 8, 10, and 12 turtles/m2) of Chinese soft‐shelled turtles (Pelodiscus sinensis) and coculture interactions on growth performance and environment in a turtle–rice coculture system. The average yields of rice grain and rice straw in four turtle–rice coculture (TR) groups were significantly higher than those in a rice monoculture with fertilizer (RMF) group and a rice monoculture (RM) group (p &lt; .05). The yield of turtles increased gradually with increasing stocking density until reaching 10 turtles/m2, and the yield of TR10 was 1,297.51 ± 106.31 g/m2. The death rate in TR6, TR8, and TR10 groups was significantly lower than that in the turtle monoculture (TM) group (p &lt; .05), whereas the specific growth rate and weight gain in TR6, TR8, and TR10 groups were significantly higher than those in the TM group (p &lt; .05). The nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in the TR groups were significantly higher than those in the TM and RM groups (p &lt; .05). The water environment was improved in the TR group. The results suggest that an appropriate stocking density (10 turtles/m2) of turtles in the coculture system can effectively increase the yield of turtles and reduce the impacts on the environment compared with the TM.</description><subject>Density</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>growth performances</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>interactions</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Monoculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Pelodiscus sinensis</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Rice straw</subject><subject>Stocking</subject><subject>Stocking density</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>turtle–rice coculture</subject><issn>0893-8849</issn><issn>1749-7345</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1KxDAUhYMoOP5sfIKAO6HaNEnTLmXwF8GFisuSSW-cjJ1kTNIZZucjCL6LD-STmLGuvZsLl--cc-EgdETyU5LmbLaS4ZQUZcm30IgIVmeCMr6NRnlV06yqWL2L9kKY5XnBOS9H6OtCa1AxYKdxiE69GvuCW7DBxPXmNp4aCwFwcDp-v3-EKXQdtDj2PnaApW2xsRG8VNE4G_AE4grAYtV30SxlTGhYgDKQAix-8W4Vp3gBXjs_l1YNDnEKGOzSeGfnYGNyxPIv4fv905uEKbdx7H16ZB0izA_QjpZdgMO_vY-eLi8ex9fZ3f3Vzfj8LlOUCp4xQVrKtK5KomjNFK9baHVRTwgTNeUgJC9kwVqtRakUTIDppOC1YJwRSoDuo-PBd-HdWw8hNjPXe5sim4KRUiSoqBJ1MlDKuxA86GbhzVz6dUPyZtNLs-ml-e0lwWSAV6aD9T9kc_t8_jBofgB2AJe2</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Zhao, Jing</creator><creator>Zou, Yiyi</creator><creator>Chen, Hanxiang</creator><creator>Xu, Jiehao</creator><creator>Liang, Zhenzhen</creator><creator>Xu, Haisheng</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-3777</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Effects of stocking density of Chinese soft‐shelled turtle and interactions between cultivated species on growth performance and the environment in a turtle–rice coculture system</title><author>Zhao, Jing ; Zou, Yiyi ; Chen, Hanxiang ; Xu, Jiehao ; Liang, Zhenzhen ; Xu, Haisheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-471d34ff861c394c59dedf29b147935e7a52a24dff76ccebe4f71d597454131e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Density</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>growth performances</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>interactions</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Monoculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Pelodiscus sinensis</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Rice straw</topic><topic>Stocking</topic><topic>Stocking density</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>turtle–rice coculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Yiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hanxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jiehao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Zhenzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haisheng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the World Aquaculture Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Jing</au><au>Zou, Yiyi</au><au>Chen, Hanxiang</au><au>Xu, Jiehao</au><au>Liang, Zhenzhen</au><au>Xu, Haisheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of stocking density of Chinese soft‐shelled turtle and interactions between cultivated species on growth performance and the environment in a turtle–rice coculture system</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the World Aquaculture Society</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>788</spage><epage>803</epage><pages>788-803</pages><issn>0893-8849</issn><eissn>1749-7345</eissn><abstract>Experiments were performed to investigate the effects of stocking density (6, 8, 10, and 12 turtles/m2) of Chinese soft‐shelled turtles (Pelodiscus sinensis) and coculture interactions on growth performance and environment in a turtle–rice coculture system. The average yields of rice grain and rice straw in four turtle–rice coculture (TR) groups were significantly higher than those in a rice monoculture with fertilizer (RMF) group and a rice monoculture (RM) group (p &lt; .05). The yield of turtles increased gradually with increasing stocking density until reaching 10 turtles/m2, and the yield of TR10 was 1,297.51 ± 106.31 g/m2. The death rate in TR6, TR8, and TR10 groups was significantly lower than that in the turtle monoculture (TM) group (p &lt; .05), whereas the specific growth rate and weight gain in TR6, TR8, and TR10 groups were significantly higher than those in the TM group (p &lt; .05). The nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in the TR groups were significantly higher than those in the TM and RM groups (p &lt; .05). The water environment was improved in the TR group. The results suggest that an appropriate stocking density (10 turtles/m2) of turtles in the coculture system can effectively increase the yield of turtles and reduce the impacts on the environment compared with the TM.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jwas.12665</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-3777</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-8849
ispartof Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 2020-06, Vol.51 (3), p.788-803
issn 0893-8849
1749-7345
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2416713128
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Density
Environmental impact
Fertilizers
growth performances
Growth rate
interactions
Monoculture
Monoculture (aquaculture)
Pelodiscus sinensis
Phosphorus
Physical growth
Reptiles & amphibians
Rice
Rice straw
Stocking
Stocking density
Turtles
turtle–rice coculture
title Effects of stocking density of Chinese soft‐shelled turtle and interactions between cultivated species on growth performance and the environment in a turtle–rice coculture system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20stocking%20density%20of%20Chinese%20soft%E2%80%90shelled%20turtle%20and%20interactions%20between%20cultivated%20species%20on%20growth%20performance%20and%20the%20environment%20in%20a%20turtle%E2%80%93rice%20coculture%20system&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20World%20Aquaculture%20Society&rft.au=Zhao,%20Jing&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=788&rft.epage=803&rft.pages=788-803&rft.issn=0893-8849&rft.eissn=1749-7345&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jwas.12665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416713128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416713128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true