Urban Green Space Distribution Related to Land Values in Fast-Growing Megacities, Mumbai and Jakarta–Unexploited Opportunities to Increase Access to Greenery for the Poor
Many studies on disparities in the distribution of urban green space (UGS) focus on the quantity and accessibility of designated open spaces. However, when all types of UGS, including unmanaged green areas, are accounted for, claims of green space distributive injustice become more complicated. We c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.4982 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4982 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Hwang, Yun Hye Nasution, Ivan Kurniawan Amonkar, Deepika Hahs, Amy |
description | Many studies on disparities in the distribution of urban green space (UGS) focus on the quantity and accessibility of designated open spaces. However, when all types of UGS, including unmanaged green areas, are accounted for, claims of green space distributive injustice become more complicated. We conducted a preliminary investigation questioning the common Global North assumption that the poor have less access to the benefits of green space, using the cities of Mumbai and Jakarta as case studies as, in their respective countries, wealth inequality has grown at a higher rate than in other Asian countries. We employed four sets of geospatial data to analyze green space distribution patterns and probe the relationship with UGS inequity in different land value districts. We found that the lower land value districts had more vegetation coverage with a higher vegetation density, mainly due to a large quantity of unmanaged greenery. The relationship between the status of urban development and the land values in a district is not necessarily reflective of the UGS distribution once unmanaged vegetation is considered. We conclude by discussing ways to optimize the use of unmanaged UGS as a socioecological asset for poorer districts, and we point to the practical consequences of incorporating the study’s findings into policy and planning towards the creation of ecologically inclusive cities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12124982 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2415722991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2415722991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d3caba0842da6727bafd5b954437269ef77840a59788ce0f0e86a8d448196f9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUtKA0EQhgdRUDQbT9DgThztx7x6GdREJUFR43ao6anRjrF77O5Bs_MOXsNTeRLzELQ2VRQff_3FH0X7jB4LIemJ7xhnPJEF34h2OM1ZzGhKN__N21HP-yldlBBMsmwn-pq4CgwZOkRD7lpQSM60D05XXdDWkFucQcCaBEtGYGryALMOPdGGDMCHeOjsmzaPZIyPoHTQ6I_IuHupQJMlfQXP4AJ8f3xODL63M6uXWtdta13ozIpfKl8a5RA8kr5S6FerlSF0c9JYR8ITkhtr3V601cDMY--370aTwfn96UU8uh5envZHsRIZC3EtFFRAi4TXkOU8r6Cp00qmSSJynkls8rxIKKQyLwqFtKFYZFDUSVIwmTWyEbvRwVq3dfZ18W4op7ZzZnGy5AlLc86lZAvqcE0pZ7132JSt0y_g5iWj5TKQ8i8Q8QOsk4B3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2415722991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban Green Space Distribution Related to Land Values in Fast-Growing Megacities, Mumbai and Jakarta–Unexploited Opportunities to Increase Access to Greenery for the Poor</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hwang, Yun Hye ; Nasution, Ivan Kurniawan ; Amonkar, Deepika ; Hahs, Amy</creator><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Yun Hye ; Nasution, Ivan Kurniawan ; Amonkar, Deepika ; Hahs, Amy</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies on disparities in the distribution of urban green space (UGS) focus on the quantity and accessibility of designated open spaces. However, when all types of UGS, including unmanaged green areas, are accounted for, claims of green space distributive injustice become more complicated. We conducted a preliminary investigation questioning the common Global North assumption that the poor have less access to the benefits of green space, using the cities of Mumbai and Jakarta as case studies as, in their respective countries, wealth inequality has grown at a higher rate than in other Asian countries. We employed four sets of geospatial data to analyze green space distribution patterns and probe the relationship with UGS inequity in different land value districts. We found that the lower land value districts had more vegetation coverage with a higher vegetation density, mainly due to a large quantity of unmanaged greenery. The relationship between the status of urban development and the land values in a district is not necessarily reflective of the UGS distribution once unmanaged vegetation is considered. We conclude by discussing ways to optimize the use of unmanaged UGS as a socioecological asset for poorer districts, and we point to the practical consequences of incorporating the study’s findings into policy and planning towards the creation of ecologically inclusive cities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12124982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Cities ; Cultural heritage ; Distribution patterns ; Endangered & extinct species ; Equity ; Flood damage ; Income distribution ; Land appraisals ; Land use planning ; Low income groups ; Megacities ; Open spaces ; Policy and planning ; Population growth ; Socioeconomic factors ; Spatial data ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Urban areas ; Urban development ; Urban planning ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.4982</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d3caba0842da6727bafd5b954437269ef77840a59788ce0f0e86a8d448196f9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d3caba0842da6727bafd5b954437269ef77840a59788ce0f0e86a8d448196f9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Yun Hye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasution, Ivan Kurniawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amonkar, Deepika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahs, Amy</creatorcontrib><title>Urban Green Space Distribution Related to Land Values in Fast-Growing Megacities, Mumbai and Jakarta–Unexploited Opportunities to Increase Access to Greenery for the Poor</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Many studies on disparities in the distribution of urban green space (UGS) focus on the quantity and accessibility of designated open spaces. However, when all types of UGS, including unmanaged green areas, are accounted for, claims of green space distributive injustice become more complicated. We conducted a preliminary investigation questioning the common Global North assumption that the poor have less access to the benefits of green space, using the cities of Mumbai and Jakarta as case studies as, in their respective countries, wealth inequality has grown at a higher rate than in other Asian countries. We employed four sets of geospatial data to analyze green space distribution patterns and probe the relationship with UGS inequity in different land value districts. We found that the lower land value districts had more vegetation coverage with a higher vegetation density, mainly due to a large quantity of unmanaged greenery. The relationship between the status of urban development and the land values in a district is not necessarily reflective of the UGS distribution once unmanaged vegetation is considered. We conclude by discussing ways to optimize the use of unmanaged UGS as a socioecological asset for poorer districts, and we point to the practical consequences of incorporating the study’s findings into policy and planning towards the creation of ecologically inclusive cities.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Distribution patterns</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Flood damage</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Land appraisals</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Megacities</subject><subject>Open spaces</subject><subject>Policy and planning</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUtKA0EQhgdRUDQbT9DgThztx7x6GdREJUFR43ao6anRjrF77O5Bs_MOXsNTeRLzELQ2VRQff_3FH0X7jB4LIemJ7xhnPJEF34h2OM1ZzGhKN__N21HP-yldlBBMsmwn-pq4CgwZOkRD7lpQSM60D05XXdDWkFucQcCaBEtGYGryALMOPdGGDMCHeOjsmzaPZIyPoHTQ6I_IuHupQJMlfQXP4AJ8f3xODL63M6uXWtdta13ozIpfKl8a5RA8kr5S6FerlSF0c9JYR8ITkhtr3V601cDMY--370aTwfn96UU8uh5envZHsRIZC3EtFFRAi4TXkOU8r6Cp00qmSSJynkls8rxIKKQyLwqFtKFYZFDUSVIwmTWyEbvRwVq3dfZ18W4op7ZzZnGy5AlLc86lZAvqcE0pZ7132JSt0y_g5iWj5TKQ8i8Q8QOsk4B3</recordid><startdate>20200618</startdate><enddate>20200618</enddate><creator>Hwang, Yun Hye</creator><creator>Nasution, Ivan Kurniawan</creator><creator>Amonkar, Deepika</creator><creator>Hahs, Amy</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200618</creationdate><title>Urban Green Space Distribution Related to Land Values in Fast-Growing Megacities, Mumbai and Jakarta–Unexploited Opportunities to Increase Access to Greenery for the Poor</title><author>Hwang, Yun Hye ; Nasution, Ivan Kurniawan ; Amonkar, Deepika ; Hahs, Amy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d3caba0842da6727bafd5b954437269ef77840a59788ce0f0e86a8d448196f9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Distribution patterns</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Flood damage</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Land appraisals</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Megacities</topic><topic>Open spaces</topic><topic>Policy and planning</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Yun Hye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasution, Ivan Kurniawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amonkar, Deepika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahs, Amy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hwang, Yun Hye</au><au>Nasution, Ivan Kurniawan</au><au>Amonkar, Deepika</au><au>Hahs, Amy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urban Green Space Distribution Related to Land Values in Fast-Growing Megacities, Mumbai and Jakarta–Unexploited Opportunities to Increase Access to Greenery for the Poor</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-06-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4982</spage><pages>4982-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Many studies on disparities in the distribution of urban green space (UGS) focus on the quantity and accessibility of designated open spaces. However, when all types of UGS, including unmanaged green areas, are accounted for, claims of green space distributive injustice become more complicated. We conducted a preliminary investigation questioning the common Global North assumption that the poor have less access to the benefits of green space, using the cities of Mumbai and Jakarta as case studies as, in their respective countries, wealth inequality has grown at a higher rate than in other Asian countries. We employed four sets of geospatial data to analyze green space distribution patterns and probe the relationship with UGS inequity in different land value districts. We found that the lower land value districts had more vegetation coverage with a higher vegetation density, mainly due to a large quantity of unmanaged greenery. The relationship between the status of urban development and the land values in a district is not necessarily reflective of the UGS distribution once unmanaged vegetation is considered. We conclude by discussing ways to optimize the use of unmanaged UGS as a socioecological asset for poorer districts, and we point to the practical consequences of incorporating the study’s findings into policy and planning towards the creation of ecologically inclusive cities.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12124982</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.4982 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2415722991 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Cities Cultural heritage Distribution patterns Endangered & extinct species Equity Flood damage Income distribution Land appraisals Land use planning Low income groups Megacities Open spaces Policy and planning Population growth Socioeconomic factors Spatial data Studies Sustainability Urban areas Urban development Urban planning Vegetation |
title | Urban Green Space Distribution Related to Land Values in Fast-Growing Megacities, Mumbai and Jakarta–Unexploited Opportunities to Increase Access to Greenery for the Poor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A26%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban%20Green%20Space%20Distribution%20Related%20to%20Land%20Values%20in%20Fast-Growing%20Megacities,%20Mumbai%20and%20Jakarta%E2%80%93Unexploited%20Opportunities%20to%20Increase%20Access%20to%20Greenery%20for%20the%20Poor&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Hwang,%20Yun%20Hye&rft.date=2020-06-18&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4982&rft.pages=4982-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12124982&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2415722991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2415722991&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |