Validation of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides
Objective: Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides. Methods: This is a meth odological cross-sectional study with 91 randomly selected nursing professionals. The following variables were evaluated: nursing p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta paulista de enfermagem 2020-05, Vol.33 (3), p.1-6 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 6 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Acta paulista de enfermagem |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Gasparino, Renata Cristina Martins, Maria Carolina Pinto dos Santos Alves, Daniela Fernanda Ferreira, Thelen Daiana Mendona |
| description | Objective: Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides. Methods: This is a meth odological cross-sectional study with 91 randomly selected nursing professionals. The following variables were evaluated: nursing practice environment (using the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale), emotional exhaustion (using the Maslach Burnout Inventory subscale), job satisfaction, and safety climate (using two subscales of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire - Short Form), perception of care quality, and intention to leave employment. To assess the reliability and validity of subscales of the Practice Environment Scale, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Spearman's correlation coefficient were calculated, respectively, between the subscales of the Practice Environment Scale and the other study variables. Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.70 to 0.88 among the subscales of the Practice Environment Scale, and all subscales presented a significant correlation with the variables of emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, safety climate, perception of care quality, and intention to leave employment. Conclusion: The instrument showed evidence of satisfactory reliability and validity in the assessment of the nursing practice environment. A validated instrument that measures the practice environment of a larger number of nursing professionals can help administrators implement and evaluate strategies to improve the results of patients, nursing professionals, and institutions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.37689/actaape/2020AO0243 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2415474393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2415474393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24154743933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMtOwzAQAC1UJFLgC7is1HOa9aOkOVaoiBuVQFyrlbOlrtJ1sR2-nxz4gJ7mMKNR6knj0rbP664hX4gu3Bg0uHlH4-yNqnS3NjXqzs1UhRptbTTinZrnfEJctS1ipXZfNISeSogC8QDlyLBL0y14hq38hhTlzFLgw9PAQOco3yBjymFiYX-U4ANJBpIeKPScH9TtgYbMj_-8V4vX7efLW31J8WfkXPanOCaZ1N44vXKts52111V_lJpHPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2415474393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gasparino, Renata Cristina ; Martins, Maria Carolina Pinto ; dos Santos Alves, Daniela Fernanda ; Ferreira, Thelen Daiana Mendona</creator><creatorcontrib>Gasparino, Renata Cristina ; Martins, Maria Carolina Pinto ; dos Santos Alves, Daniela Fernanda ; Ferreira, Thelen Daiana Mendona</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides. Methods: This is a meth odological cross-sectional study with 91 randomly selected nursing professionals. The following variables were evaluated: nursing practice environment (using the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale), emotional exhaustion (using the Maslach Burnout Inventory subscale), job satisfaction, and safety climate (using two subscales of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire - Short Form), perception of care quality, and intention to leave employment. To assess the reliability and validity of subscales of the Practice Environment Scale, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Spearman's correlation coefficient were calculated, respectively, between the subscales of the Practice Environment Scale and the other study variables. Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.70 to 0.88 among the subscales of the Practice Environment Scale, and all subscales presented a significant correlation with the variables of emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, safety climate, perception of care quality, and intention to leave employment. Conclusion: The instrument showed evidence of satisfactory reliability and validity in the assessment of the nursing practice environment. A validated instrument that measures the practice environment of a larger number of nursing professionals can help administrators implement and evaluate strategies to improve the results of patients, nursing professionals, and institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-2100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1982-0194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37689/actaape/2020AO0243</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sao Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Burnout ; Emotions ; Employment ; Hospitals ; Job satisfaction ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Patients ; Perception ; Quality ; Safety ; Validity ; Workforce planning</subject><ispartof>Acta paulista de enfermagem, 2020-05, Vol.33 (3), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gasparino, Renata Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Maria Carolina Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos Alves, Daniela Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Thelen Daiana Mendona</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides</title><title>Acta paulista de enfermagem</title><description>Objective: Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides. Methods: This is a meth odological cross-sectional study with 91 randomly selected nursing professionals. The following variables were evaluated: nursing practice environment (using the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale), emotional exhaustion (using the Maslach Burnout Inventory subscale), job satisfaction, and safety climate (using two subscales of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire - Short Form), perception of care quality, and intention to leave employment. To assess the reliability and validity of subscales of the Practice Environment Scale, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Spearman's correlation coefficient were calculated, respectively, between the subscales of the Practice Environment Scale and the other study variables. Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.70 to 0.88 among the subscales of the Practice Environment Scale, and all subscales presented a significant correlation with the variables of emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, safety climate, perception of care quality, and intention to leave employment. Conclusion: The instrument showed evidence of satisfactory reliability and validity in the assessment of the nursing practice environment. A validated instrument that measures the practice environment of a larger number of nursing professionals can help administrators implement and evaluate strategies to improve the results of patients, nursing professionals, and institutions.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><issn>0103-2100</issn><issn>1982-0194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjMtOwzAQAC1UJFLgC7is1HOa9aOkOVaoiBuVQFyrlbOlrtJ1sR2-nxz4gJ7mMKNR6knj0rbP664hX4gu3Bg0uHlH4-yNqnS3NjXqzs1UhRptbTTinZrnfEJctS1ipXZfNISeSogC8QDlyLBL0y14hq38hhTlzFLgw9PAQOco3yBjymFiYX-U4ANJBpIeKPScH9TtgYbMj_-8V4vX7efLW31J8WfkXPanOCaZ1N44vXKts52111V_lJpHPQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Gasparino, Renata Cristina</creator><creator>Martins, Maria Carolina Pinto</creator><creator>dos Santos Alves, Daniela Fernanda</creator><creator>Ferreira, Thelen Daiana Mendona</creator><general>Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Validation of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides</title><author>Gasparino, Renata Cristina ; Martins, Maria Carolina Pinto ; dos Santos Alves, Daniela Fernanda ; Ferreira, Thelen Daiana Mendona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24154743933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gasparino, Renata Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Maria Carolina Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos Alves, Daniela Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Thelen Daiana Mendona</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Acta paulista de enfermagem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gasparino, Renata Cristina</au><au>Martins, Maria Carolina Pinto</au><au>dos Santos Alves, Daniela Fernanda</au><au>Ferreira, Thelen Daiana Mendona</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides</atitle><jtitle>Acta paulista de enfermagem</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0103-2100</issn><eissn>1982-0194</eissn><abstract>Objective: Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides. Methods: This is a meth odological cross-sectional study with 91 randomly selected nursing professionals. The following variables were evaluated: nursing practice environment (using the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale), emotional exhaustion (using the Maslach Burnout Inventory subscale), job satisfaction, and safety climate (using two subscales of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire - Short Form), perception of care quality, and intention to leave employment. To assess the reliability and validity of subscales of the Practice Environment Scale, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Spearman's correlation coefficient were calculated, respectively, between the subscales of the Practice Environment Scale and the other study variables. Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.70 to 0.88 among the subscales of the Practice Environment Scale, and all subscales presented a significant correlation with the variables of emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, safety climate, perception of care quality, and intention to leave employment. Conclusion: The instrument showed evidence of satisfactory reliability and validity in the assessment of the nursing practice environment. A validated instrument that measures the practice environment of a larger number of nursing professionals can help administrators implement and evaluate strategies to improve the results of patients, nursing professionals, and institutions.</abstract><cop>Sao Paulo</cop><pub>Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem</pub><doi>10.37689/actaape/2020AO0243</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0103-2100 |
| ispartof | Acta paulista de enfermagem, 2020-05, Vol.33 (3), p.1-6 |
| issn | 0103-2100 1982-0194 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2415474393 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Attitudes Burnout Emotions Employment Hospitals Job satisfaction Nurses Nursing Nursing care Patients Perception Quality Safety Validity Workforce planning |
| title | Validation of the Practice Environment Scale among nursing technicians and aides |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Practice%20Environment%20Scale%20among%20nursing%20technicians%20and%20aides&rft.jtitle=Acta%20paulista%20de%20enfermagem&rft.au=Gasparino,%20Renata%20Cristina&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0103-2100&rft.eissn=1982-0194&rft_id=info:doi/10.37689/actaape/2020AO0243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2415474393%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2415474393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |