The Failure of Gender Equality Initiatives in Academia: Exploring Defensive Institutional Work in Flemish Universities
Although a large number of studies have explored the main causes of gender inequality in academia, less attention has been given to the processes underlying the failure of gender equality initiatives to enhance gender representation, especially at the professorial level. We offer a critical discours...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gender & society 2020-06, Vol.34 (3), p.467-495 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 495 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 467 |
container_title | Gender & society |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Roos, Hannelore Mampaey, Jelle Huisman, Jeroen Luyckx, Joost |
description | Although a large number of studies have explored the main causes of gender inequality in academia, less attention has been given to the processes underlying the failure of gender equality initiatives to enhance gender representation, especially at the professorial level. We offer a critical discourse analysis of recently promulgated gender policy documents of the five Flemish universities, and demonstrate that defensive institutional work is a fundamental process underlying resistance to gender equality in the academic profession. That is, powerful organizational actors resist gender change by (un)intentionally deploying a combination of discursive strategies that legitimate what we describe as non–time-bound gender equality initiatives: The expected outcomes are undetermined in time, and they delegitimate concrete, time-bound measures that define specific outcomes against well-defined deadlines. By explicitly bringing a temporal dimension into our analysis, we argue that defensive institutional work deflects questions regarding what ought to be achieved when, and contributes to the slow pace of gender change in academia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0891243220914521 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414989959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0891243220914521</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2414989959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-28a41eb5bcb9409a9fd16eb95afbac59e6604cf1e69b0c109316a4d62163449c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd3jwHP1SRN0sXbmNscCF42PJY0_bpldu2WpMP9e1MmCIKn7_A-z8vHi9A9JY-UZtkTGSnKeMoYUZQLRi_QgArBklRl2SUa9HHS59foxvstIURyoQbouNwAnmlbdw5wW-E5NCU4PD10urbhhBeNDVYHewSPbYPHRpews_oZT7_2detss8YvUEHjIxFhH2zogm0bXeOP1n32zqyOht_gVRMZ52Mf-Ft0Venaw93PHaLVbLqcvCZv7_PFZPyWGE6zkLCR5hQKUZhCcaK0qkoqoVBCV4U2QoGUhJuKglQFMZSolErNS8moTDlXJh2ih3Pv3rWHDnzIt23n4nc-Z5xyNVJKqEiRM2Vc672DKt87u9PulFOS9-vmf9eNSnJWvF7Db-m__DcCG3qQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414989959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Failure of Gender Equality Initiatives in Academia: Exploring Defensive Institutional Work in Flemish Universities</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Roos, Hannelore ; Mampaey, Jelle ; Huisman, Jeroen ; Luyckx, Joost</creator><creatorcontrib>Roos, Hannelore ; Mampaey, Jelle ; Huisman, Jeroen ; Luyckx, Joost</creatorcontrib><description>Although a large number of studies have explored the main causes of gender inequality in academia, less attention has been given to the processes underlying the failure of gender equality initiatives to enhance gender representation, especially at the professorial level. We offer a critical discourse analysis of recently promulgated gender policy documents of the five Flemish universities, and demonstrate that defensive institutional work is a fundamental process underlying resistance to gender equality in the academic profession. That is, powerful organizational actors resist gender change by (un)intentionally deploying a combination of discursive strategies that legitimate what we describe as non–time-bound gender equality initiatives: The expected outcomes are undetermined in time, and they delegitimate concrete, time-bound measures that define specific outcomes against well-defined deadlines. By explicitly bringing a temporal dimension into our analysis, we argue that defensive institutional work deflects questions regarding what ought to be achieved when, and contributes to the slow pace of gender change in academia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-2432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0891243220914521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Change agents ; Critical theory ; Discourse analysis ; Equality ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Occupational segregation ; Organizational change ; Resistance</subject><ispartof>Gender & society, 2020-06, Vol.34 (3), p.467-495</ispartof><rights>2020 by The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-28a41eb5bcb9409a9fd16eb95afbac59e6604cf1e69b0c109316a4d62163449c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-28a41eb5bcb9409a9fd16eb95afbac59e6604cf1e69b0c109316a4d62163449c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1486-227X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0891243220914521$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891243220914521$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roos, Hannelore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mampaey, Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisman, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luyckx, Joost</creatorcontrib><title>The Failure of Gender Equality Initiatives in Academia: Exploring Defensive Institutional Work in Flemish Universities</title><title>Gender & society</title><description>Although a large number of studies have explored the main causes of gender inequality in academia, less attention has been given to the processes underlying the failure of gender equality initiatives to enhance gender representation, especially at the professorial level. We offer a critical discourse analysis of recently promulgated gender policy documents of the five Flemish universities, and demonstrate that defensive institutional work is a fundamental process underlying resistance to gender equality in the academic profession. That is, powerful organizational actors resist gender change by (un)intentionally deploying a combination of discursive strategies that legitimate what we describe as non–time-bound gender equality initiatives: The expected outcomes are undetermined in time, and they delegitimate concrete, time-bound measures that define specific outcomes against well-defined deadlines. By explicitly bringing a temporal dimension into our analysis, we argue that defensive institutional work deflects questions regarding what ought to be achieved when, and contributes to the slow pace of gender change in academia.</description><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Occupational segregation</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><issn>0891-2432</issn><issn>1552-3977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd3jwHP1SRN0sXbmNscCF42PJY0_bpldu2WpMP9e1MmCIKn7_A-z8vHi9A9JY-UZtkTGSnKeMoYUZQLRi_QgArBklRl2SUa9HHS59foxvstIURyoQbouNwAnmlbdw5wW-E5NCU4PD10urbhhBeNDVYHewSPbYPHRpews_oZT7_2detss8YvUEHjIxFhH2zogm0bXeOP1n32zqyOht_gVRMZ52Mf-Ft0Venaw93PHaLVbLqcvCZv7_PFZPyWGE6zkLCR5hQKUZhCcaK0qkoqoVBCV4U2QoGUhJuKglQFMZSolErNS8moTDlXJh2ih3Pv3rWHDnzIt23n4nc-Z5xyNVJKqEiRM2Vc672DKt87u9PulFOS9-vmf9eNSnJWvF7Db-m__DcCG3qQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Roos, Hannelore</creator><creator>Mampaey, Jelle</creator><creator>Huisman, Jeroen</creator><creator>Luyckx, Joost</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-227X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>The Failure of Gender Equality Initiatives in Academia: Exploring Defensive Institutional Work in Flemish Universities</title><author>Roos, Hannelore ; Mampaey, Jelle ; Huisman, Jeroen ; Luyckx, Joost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-28a41eb5bcb9409a9fd16eb95afbac59e6604cf1e69b0c109316a4d62163449c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Occupational segregation</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roos, Hannelore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mampaey, Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisman, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luyckx, Joost</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Gender & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roos, Hannelore</au><au>Mampaey, Jelle</au><au>Huisman, Jeroen</au><au>Luyckx, Joost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Failure of Gender Equality Initiatives in Academia: Exploring Defensive Institutional Work in Flemish Universities</atitle><jtitle>Gender & society</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>495</epage><pages>467-495</pages><issn>0891-2432</issn><eissn>1552-3977</eissn><abstract>Although a large number of studies have explored the main causes of gender inequality in academia, less attention has been given to the processes underlying the failure of gender equality initiatives to enhance gender representation, especially at the professorial level. We offer a critical discourse analysis of recently promulgated gender policy documents of the five Flemish universities, and demonstrate that defensive institutional work is a fundamental process underlying resistance to gender equality in the academic profession. That is, powerful organizational actors resist gender change by (un)intentionally deploying a combination of discursive strategies that legitimate what we describe as non–time-bound gender equality initiatives: The expected outcomes are undetermined in time, and they delegitimate concrete, time-bound measures that define specific outcomes against well-defined deadlines. By explicitly bringing a temporal dimension into our analysis, we argue that defensive institutional work deflects questions regarding what ought to be achieved when, and contributes to the slow pace of gender change in academia.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0891243220914521</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-227X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0891-2432 |
ispartof | Gender & society, 2020-06, Vol.34 (3), p.467-495 |
issn | 0891-2432 1552-3977 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2414989959 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Change agents Critical theory Discourse analysis Equality Gender equity Gender inequality Occupational segregation Organizational change Resistance |
title | The Failure of Gender Equality Initiatives in Academia: Exploring Defensive Institutional Work in Flemish Universities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A23%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Failure%20of%20Gender%20Equality%20Initiatives%20in%20Academia:%20Exploring%20Defensive%20Institutional%20Work%20in%20Flemish%20Universities&rft.jtitle=Gender%20&%20society&rft.au=Roos,%20Hannelore&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=495&rft.pages=467-495&rft.issn=0891-2432&rft.eissn=1552-3977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0891243220914521&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2414989959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414989959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0891243220914521&rfr_iscdi=true |