PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods

Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymer engineering and science 2020-06, Vol.60 (6), p.1146-1157
Hauptverfasser: Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê, Piazza, Diego, Lansarin, Marla Azário
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1157
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1146
container_title Polymer engineering and science
container_volume 60
creator Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê
Piazza, Diego
Lansarin, Marla Azário
description Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide (ZnO) were prepared by three different techniques: solution mixing (SM) followed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation; and melt blending at both low‐ and high‐shear rates (LS and HS) in a rheometer and mixing chamber, respectively, to compare the resultant morphology in photocatalysis. Photocatalytic efficiency was assessed by methylene blue (MB) discoloration in a batch reactor liquid phase and by resazurin (RZ) reduction. The changes promoted by nanoparticle inclusion, processing conditions and UV effect were demonstrated by FTIR‐ATR, XRD, DSC, and SEM. Results showed that ZnO incorporation was successful under all processing conditions, providing effective photocatalytic composites. However, samples prepared by SM had a twofold increase in discoloration efficiency and fourfold increase in surface photoactivity, when compared with LS or HS‐produced samples, explained by its higher porosity of 88% ± 1.3%. The covering of the photocatalyst surface was also evident on SEM analysis for melt blended samples, further contributing to reduction in their photocatalytic activity.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pen.25368
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414905388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629055189</galeid><sourcerecordid>A629055189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-500890722bb6375d39b446813c3071af0e9f6d868624069361eafe58703451923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10k1r3DAQBmBTWug27aH_QNBTod7Vh-WVe1vSpAmEJvTr0IuQ7bFXwZZcjdxm_32VbCFd2CKQQDzvSAyTZa8ZXTJK-WoCt-RSlOpJtmCyUDkvRfE0W1AqeC6UUs-zF4i3NFkhq0U23nz_cL764a5J48fJo41AOjuMSDofyLT10TcmmmGHFt-TzYMywUT7CwjGud0R3xH0wxytd2S0d9b1xLiWjDBEUg_g2vubEeLWt_gye9aZAeHV3_Mk-3Z-9vX0Ir-6_nh5urnKG8moyiWlqqJrzuu6FGvZiqouilIx0Qi6ZqajUHVlq0pV8oKWlSgZmA6kWlNRSFZxcZK92dedgv85A0Z96-fg0pOaF6yoqEyteFS9GUBb1_kYTDNabPSm5AlJpqqk8iOqBwfBDN5B6hYc-uURn1YLo22OBt4eBJKJcBd7MyPqyy-fD-27f2w9o3WAaUPbbyPuI8dKN8EjBuj0FOxowk4zqu_nRad50Q_zkuxqb3-n_-3-D_XN2ad94g_gb71r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414905388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê ; Piazza, Diego ; Lansarin, Marla Azário</creator><creatorcontrib>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê ; Piazza, Diego ; Lansarin, Marla Azário</creatorcontrib><description>Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide (ZnO) were prepared by three different techniques: solution mixing (SM) followed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation; and melt blending at both low‐ and high‐shear rates (LS and HS) in a rheometer and mixing chamber, respectively, to compare the resultant morphology in photocatalysis. Photocatalytic efficiency was assessed by methylene blue (MB) discoloration in a batch reactor liquid phase and by resazurin (RZ) reduction. The changes promoted by nanoparticle inclusion, processing conditions and UV effect were demonstrated by FTIR‐ATR, XRD, DSC, and SEM. Results showed that ZnO incorporation was successful under all processing conditions, providing effective photocatalytic composites. However, samples prepared by SM had a twofold increase in discoloration efficiency and fourfold increase in surface photoactivity, when compared with LS or HS‐produced samples, explained by its higher porosity of 88% ± 1.3%. The covering of the photocatalyst surface was also evident on SEM analysis for melt blended samples, further contributing to reduction in their photocatalytic activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-2634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pen.25368</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>blending ; Catalysis ; Catalytic activity ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Composite materials ; composites ; Discoloration ; Liquid phases ; Melt blending ; Methods ; Methylene blue ; mixing ; Morphology ; Nanoparticles ; Phase separation ; Photocatalysis ; Photocatalysts ; Polyvinylidene fluoride ; Polyvinylidene fluorides ; Porosity ; Povidone ; Reduction ; Zinc oxide ; Zinc oxides</subject><ispartof>Polymer engineering and science, 2020-06, Vol.60 (6), p.1146-1157</ispartof><rights>2020 Society of Plastics Engineers</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-500890722bb6375d39b446813c3071af0e9f6d868624069361eafe58703451923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-500890722bb6375d39b446813c3071af0e9f6d868624069361eafe58703451923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2724-5094</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpen.25368$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpen.25368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansarin, Marla Azário</creatorcontrib><title>PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods</title><title>Polymer engineering and science</title><description>Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide (ZnO) were prepared by three different techniques: solution mixing (SM) followed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation; and melt blending at both low‐ and high‐shear rates (LS and HS) in a rheometer and mixing chamber, respectively, to compare the resultant morphology in photocatalysis. Photocatalytic efficiency was assessed by methylene blue (MB) discoloration in a batch reactor liquid phase and by resazurin (RZ) reduction. The changes promoted by nanoparticle inclusion, processing conditions and UV effect were demonstrated by FTIR‐ATR, XRD, DSC, and SEM. Results showed that ZnO incorporation was successful under all processing conditions, providing effective photocatalytic composites. However, samples prepared by SM had a twofold increase in discoloration efficiency and fourfold increase in surface photoactivity, when compared with LS or HS‐produced samples, explained by its higher porosity of 88% ± 1.3%. The covering of the photocatalyst surface was also evident on SEM analysis for melt blended samples, further contributing to reduction in their photocatalytic activity.</description><subject>blending</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Catalytic activity</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>composites</subject><subject>Discoloration</subject><subject>Liquid phases</subject><subject>Melt blending</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Methylene blue</subject><subject>mixing</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Phase separation</subject><subject>Photocatalysis</subject><subject>Photocatalysts</subject><subject>Polyvinylidene fluoride</subject><subject>Polyvinylidene fluorides</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Povidone</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Zinc oxide</subject><subject>Zinc oxides</subject><issn>0032-3888</issn><issn>1548-2634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNp10k1r3DAQBmBTWug27aH_QNBTod7Vh-WVe1vSpAmEJvTr0IuQ7bFXwZZcjdxm_32VbCFd2CKQQDzvSAyTZa8ZXTJK-WoCt-RSlOpJtmCyUDkvRfE0W1AqeC6UUs-zF4i3NFkhq0U23nz_cL764a5J48fJo41AOjuMSDofyLT10TcmmmGHFt-TzYMywUT7CwjGud0R3xH0wxytd2S0d9b1xLiWjDBEUg_g2vubEeLWt_gye9aZAeHV3_Mk-3Z-9vX0Ir-6_nh5urnKG8moyiWlqqJrzuu6FGvZiqouilIx0Qi6ZqajUHVlq0pV8oKWlSgZmA6kWlNRSFZxcZK92dedgv85A0Z96-fg0pOaF6yoqEyteFS9GUBb1_kYTDNabPSm5AlJpqqk8iOqBwfBDN5B6hYc-uURn1YLo22OBt4eBJKJcBd7MyPqyy-fD-27f2w9o3WAaUPbbyPuI8dKN8EjBuj0FOxowk4zqu_nRad50Q_zkuxqb3-n_-3-D_XN2ad94g_gb71r</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê</creator><creator>Piazza, Diego</creator><creator>Lansarin, Marla Azário</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-5094</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods</title><author>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê ; Piazza, Diego ; Lansarin, Marla Azário</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-500890722bb6375d39b446813c3071af0e9f6d868624069361eafe58703451923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>blending</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Catalytic activity</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>composites</topic><topic>Discoloration</topic><topic>Liquid phases</topic><topic>Melt blending</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Methylene blue</topic><topic>mixing</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Phase separation</topic><topic>Photocatalysis</topic><topic>Photocatalysts</topic><topic>Polyvinylidene fluoride</topic><topic>Polyvinylidene fluorides</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Povidone</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Zinc oxide</topic><topic>Zinc oxides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansarin, Marla Azário</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê</au><au>Piazza, Diego</au><au>Lansarin, Marla Azário</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods</atitle><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1146</spage><epage>1157</epage><pages>1146-1157</pages><issn>0032-3888</issn><eissn>1548-2634</eissn><abstract>Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide (ZnO) were prepared by three different techniques: solution mixing (SM) followed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation; and melt blending at both low‐ and high‐shear rates (LS and HS) in a rheometer and mixing chamber, respectively, to compare the resultant morphology in photocatalysis. Photocatalytic efficiency was assessed by methylene blue (MB) discoloration in a batch reactor liquid phase and by resazurin (RZ) reduction. The changes promoted by nanoparticle inclusion, processing conditions and UV effect were demonstrated by FTIR‐ATR, XRD, DSC, and SEM. Results showed that ZnO incorporation was successful under all processing conditions, providing effective photocatalytic composites. However, samples prepared by SM had a twofold increase in discoloration efficiency and fourfold increase in surface photoactivity, when compared with LS or HS‐produced samples, explained by its higher porosity of 88% ± 1.3%. The covering of the photocatalyst surface was also evident on SEM analysis for melt blended samples, further contributing to reduction in their photocatalytic activity.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pen.25368</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-5094</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-3888
ispartof Polymer engineering and science, 2020-06, Vol.60 (6), p.1146-1157
issn 0032-3888
1548-2634
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2414905388
source Wiley Journals
subjects blending
Catalysis
Catalytic activity
Comparative analysis
Comparative studies
Composite materials
composites
Discoloration
Liquid phases
Melt blending
Methods
Methylene blue
mixing
Morphology
Nanoparticles
Phase separation
Photocatalysis
Photocatalysts
Polyvinylidene fluoride
Polyvinylidene fluorides
Porosity
Povidone
Reduction
Zinc oxide
Zinc oxides
title PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A47%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PVDF/ZnO%20composite%20films%20for%20photocatalysis:%20A%20comparative%20study%20of%20solution%20mixing%20and%20melt%20blending%20methods&rft.jtitle=Polymer%20engineering%20and%20science&rft.au=Dossin%20Zanrosso,%20Crissi%C3%AA&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1146&rft.epage=1157&rft.pages=1146-1157&rft.issn=0032-3888&rft.eissn=1548-2634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pen.25368&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA629055189%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414905388&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A629055189&rfr_iscdi=true