PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods
Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polymer engineering and science 2020-06, Vol.60 (6), p.1146-1157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1157 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1146 |
container_title | Polymer engineering and science |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê Piazza, Diego Lansarin, Marla Azário |
description | Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide (ZnO) were prepared by three different techniques: solution mixing (SM) followed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation; and melt blending at both low‐ and high‐shear rates (LS and HS) in a rheometer and mixing chamber, respectively, to compare the resultant morphology in photocatalysis. Photocatalytic efficiency was assessed by methylene blue (MB) discoloration in a batch reactor liquid phase and by resazurin (RZ) reduction. The changes promoted by nanoparticle inclusion, processing conditions and UV effect were demonstrated by FTIR‐ATR, XRD, DSC, and SEM. Results showed that ZnO incorporation was successful under all processing conditions, providing effective photocatalytic composites. However, samples prepared by SM had a twofold increase in discoloration efficiency and fourfold increase in surface photoactivity, when compared with LS or HS‐produced samples, explained by its higher porosity of 88% ± 1.3%. The covering of the photocatalyst surface was also evident on SEM analysis for melt blended samples, further contributing to reduction in their photocatalytic activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pen.25368 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414905388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629055189</galeid><sourcerecordid>A629055189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-500890722bb6375d39b446813c3071af0e9f6d868624069361eafe58703451923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10k1r3DAQBmBTWug27aH_QNBTod7Vh-WVe1vSpAmEJvTr0IuQ7bFXwZZcjdxm_32VbCFd2CKQQDzvSAyTZa8ZXTJK-WoCt-RSlOpJtmCyUDkvRfE0W1AqeC6UUs-zF4i3NFkhq0U23nz_cL764a5J48fJo41AOjuMSDofyLT10TcmmmGHFt-TzYMywUT7CwjGud0R3xH0wxytd2S0d9b1xLiWjDBEUg_g2vubEeLWt_gye9aZAeHV3_Mk-3Z-9vX0Ir-6_nh5urnKG8moyiWlqqJrzuu6FGvZiqouilIx0Qi6ZqajUHVlq0pV8oKWlSgZmA6kWlNRSFZxcZK92dedgv85A0Z96-fg0pOaF6yoqEyteFS9GUBb1_kYTDNabPSm5AlJpqqk8iOqBwfBDN5B6hYc-uURn1YLo22OBt4eBJKJcBd7MyPqyy-fD-27f2w9o3WAaUPbbyPuI8dKN8EjBuj0FOxowk4zqu_nRad50Q_zkuxqb3-n_-3-D_XN2ad94g_gb71r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414905388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê ; Piazza, Diego ; Lansarin, Marla Azário</creator><creatorcontrib>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê ; Piazza, Diego ; Lansarin, Marla Azário</creatorcontrib><description>Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide (ZnO) were prepared by three different techniques: solution mixing (SM) followed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation; and melt blending at both low‐ and high‐shear rates (LS and HS) in a rheometer and mixing chamber, respectively, to compare the resultant morphology in photocatalysis. Photocatalytic efficiency was assessed by methylene blue (MB) discoloration in a batch reactor liquid phase and by resazurin (RZ) reduction. The changes promoted by nanoparticle inclusion, processing conditions and UV effect were demonstrated by FTIR‐ATR, XRD, DSC, and SEM. Results showed that ZnO incorporation was successful under all processing conditions, providing effective photocatalytic composites. However, samples prepared by SM had a twofold increase in discoloration efficiency and fourfold increase in surface photoactivity, when compared with LS or HS‐produced samples, explained by its higher porosity of 88% ± 1.3%. The covering of the photocatalyst surface was also evident on SEM analysis for melt blended samples, further contributing to reduction in their photocatalytic activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-2634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pen.25368</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>blending ; Catalysis ; Catalytic activity ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Composite materials ; composites ; Discoloration ; Liquid phases ; Melt blending ; Methods ; Methylene blue ; mixing ; Morphology ; Nanoparticles ; Phase separation ; Photocatalysis ; Photocatalysts ; Polyvinylidene fluoride ; Polyvinylidene fluorides ; Porosity ; Povidone ; Reduction ; Zinc oxide ; Zinc oxides</subject><ispartof>Polymer engineering and science, 2020-06, Vol.60 (6), p.1146-1157</ispartof><rights>2020 Society of Plastics Engineers</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-500890722bb6375d39b446813c3071af0e9f6d868624069361eafe58703451923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-500890722bb6375d39b446813c3071af0e9f6d868624069361eafe58703451923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2724-5094</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpen.25368$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpen.25368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansarin, Marla Azário</creatorcontrib><title>PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods</title><title>Polymer engineering and science</title><description>Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide (ZnO) were prepared by three different techniques: solution mixing (SM) followed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation; and melt blending at both low‐ and high‐shear rates (LS and HS) in a rheometer and mixing chamber, respectively, to compare the resultant morphology in photocatalysis. Photocatalytic efficiency was assessed by methylene blue (MB) discoloration in a batch reactor liquid phase and by resazurin (RZ) reduction. The changes promoted by nanoparticle inclusion, processing conditions and UV effect were demonstrated by FTIR‐ATR, XRD, DSC, and SEM. Results showed that ZnO incorporation was successful under all processing conditions, providing effective photocatalytic composites. However, samples prepared by SM had a twofold increase in discoloration efficiency and fourfold increase in surface photoactivity, when compared with LS or HS‐produced samples, explained by its higher porosity of 88% ± 1.3%. The covering of the photocatalyst surface was also evident on SEM analysis for melt blended samples, further contributing to reduction in their photocatalytic activity.</description><subject>blending</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Catalytic activity</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>composites</subject><subject>Discoloration</subject><subject>Liquid phases</subject><subject>Melt blending</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Methylene blue</subject><subject>mixing</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Phase separation</subject><subject>Photocatalysis</subject><subject>Photocatalysts</subject><subject>Polyvinylidene fluoride</subject><subject>Polyvinylidene fluorides</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Povidone</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Zinc oxide</subject><subject>Zinc oxides</subject><issn>0032-3888</issn><issn>1548-2634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNp10k1r3DAQBmBTWug27aH_QNBTod7Vh-WVe1vSpAmEJvTr0IuQ7bFXwZZcjdxm_32VbCFd2CKQQDzvSAyTZa8ZXTJK-WoCt-RSlOpJtmCyUDkvRfE0W1AqeC6UUs-zF4i3NFkhq0U23nz_cL764a5J48fJo41AOjuMSDofyLT10TcmmmGHFt-TzYMywUT7CwjGud0R3xH0wxytd2S0d9b1xLiWjDBEUg_g2vubEeLWt_gye9aZAeHV3_Mk-3Z-9vX0Ir-6_nh5urnKG8moyiWlqqJrzuu6FGvZiqouilIx0Qi6ZqajUHVlq0pV8oKWlSgZmA6kWlNRSFZxcZK92dedgv85A0Z96-fg0pOaF6yoqEyteFS9GUBb1_kYTDNabPSm5AlJpqqk8iOqBwfBDN5B6hYc-uURn1YLo22OBt4eBJKJcBd7MyPqyy-fD-27f2w9o3WAaUPbbyPuI8dKN8EjBuj0FOxowk4zqu_nRad50Q_zkuxqb3-n_-3-D_XN2ad94g_gb71r</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê</creator><creator>Piazza, Diego</creator><creator>Lansarin, Marla Azário</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-5094</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods</title><author>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê ; Piazza, Diego ; Lansarin, Marla Azário</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-500890722bb6375d39b446813c3071af0e9f6d868624069361eafe58703451923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>blending</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Catalytic activity</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>composites</topic><topic>Discoloration</topic><topic>Liquid phases</topic><topic>Melt blending</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Methylene blue</topic><topic>mixing</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Phase separation</topic><topic>Photocatalysis</topic><topic>Photocatalysts</topic><topic>Polyvinylidene fluoride</topic><topic>Polyvinylidene fluorides</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Povidone</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Zinc oxide</topic><topic>Zinc oxides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansarin, Marla Azário</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dossin Zanrosso, Crissiê</au><au>Piazza, Diego</au><au>Lansarin, Marla Azário</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods</atitle><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1146</spage><epage>1157</epage><pages>1146-1157</pages><issn>0032-3888</issn><eissn>1548-2634</eissn><abstract>Heterogeneous photocatalysis represents a solution for several environmental problems. However, achieving photocatalyst separation from reaction media on a large scale remains a challenge, one that might be overcome by the immobilization of photocatalysts into supports. To this end, composites of polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide (ZnO) were prepared by three different techniques: solution mixing (SM) followed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation; and melt blending at both low‐ and high‐shear rates (LS and HS) in a rheometer and mixing chamber, respectively, to compare the resultant morphology in photocatalysis. Photocatalytic efficiency was assessed by methylene blue (MB) discoloration in a batch reactor liquid phase and by resazurin (RZ) reduction. The changes promoted by nanoparticle inclusion, processing conditions and UV effect were demonstrated by FTIR‐ATR, XRD, DSC, and SEM. Results showed that ZnO incorporation was successful under all processing conditions, providing effective photocatalytic composites. However, samples prepared by SM had a twofold increase in discoloration efficiency and fourfold increase in surface photoactivity, when compared with LS or HS‐produced samples, explained by its higher porosity of 88% ± 1.3%. The covering of the photocatalyst surface was also evident on SEM analysis for melt blended samples, further contributing to reduction in their photocatalytic activity.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pen.25368</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-5094</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-3888 |
ispartof | Polymer engineering and science, 2020-06, Vol.60 (6), p.1146-1157 |
issn | 0032-3888 1548-2634 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2414905388 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | blending Catalysis Catalytic activity Comparative analysis Comparative studies Composite materials composites Discoloration Liquid phases Melt blending Methods Methylene blue mixing Morphology Nanoparticles Phase separation Photocatalysis Photocatalysts Polyvinylidene fluoride Polyvinylidene fluorides Porosity Povidone Reduction Zinc oxide Zinc oxides |
title | PVDF/ZnO composite films for photocatalysis: A comparative study of solution mixing and melt blending methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A47%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PVDF/ZnO%20composite%20films%20for%20photocatalysis:%20A%20comparative%20study%20of%20solution%20mixing%20and%20melt%20blending%20methods&rft.jtitle=Polymer%20engineering%20and%20science&rft.au=Dossin%20Zanrosso,%20Crissi%C3%AA&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1146&rft.epage=1157&rft.pages=1146-1157&rft.issn=0032-3888&rft.eissn=1548-2634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pen.25368&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA629055189%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414905388&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A629055189&rfr_iscdi=true |