On quantifying expert opinion about multinomial models that contain covariates
Summary The paper addresses the task of forming a prior distribution to represent expert opinion about a multinomial model that contains covariates. The task has not previously been addressed. We suppose that the sampling model is a multinomial logistic regression and represent expert opinion about...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society Statistics in society, 2020-06, Vol.183 (3), p.959-981 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 981 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 959 |
container_title | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society |
container_volume | 183 |
creator | Elfadaly, Fadlalla G. Garthwaite, Paul H. |
description | Summary
The paper addresses the task of forming a prior distribution to represent expert opinion about a multinomial model that contains covariates. The task has not previously been addressed. We suppose that the sampling model is a multinomial logistic regression and represent expert opinion about the regression coefficients by a multivariate normal distribution. This logistic–normal model gives a flexible prior distribution that can capture a broad variety of expert opinion. The challenge is to find meaningful assessment tasks that an expert can perform and which should yield appropriate information to determine the values of parameters in the prior distribution, and to develop theory for determining the parameter values from the assessments. A method is proposed that meets this challenge. The method is implemented in interactive easy‐to‐use software that is freely available. It provides a graphical interface that the expert uses to assess quartiles of sets of proportions and the method determines a mean vector and a positive definite covariance matrix to represent the expert's opinions. The assessment tasks chosen yield parameter values that satisfy the usual laws of probability without the expert being aware of the constraints that this imposes. Special attention is given to feedback that encourages the expert to consider his or her opinions from a different perspective. The method is illustrated in an example that shows its viability and usefulness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rssa.12546 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414643389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2414643389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3706-12ab75180d4ad829964c20dd4e55df8247f987226d0e71cb34ecea995684bfea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAcxoMoOKcXP0HAm9CZpGmTHMfwDYYDp-AtpG2qGW3SJanab29nPftcnsvv__I8AFxitMCjbnwIaoFJRvMjMMM0Z4ng2dsxmCGR0wQLwU_BWQg7dBBjM_C0sXDfKxtNPRj7DvV3p32ErjPWOAtV4foI276JxrrWqAa2rtJNgPFDRVg6G5Wxo38qb1TU4Ryc1KoJ-uLP5-D17vZl9ZCsN_ePq-U6KVOG8gQTVbAMc1RRVXEixudKgqqK6iyrak4oqwVnhOQV0gyXRUp1qZUQWc5pUWuVzsHVtLfzbt_rEOXO9d6OJyWhY26aplyM1PVEld6F4HUtO29a5QeJkTz0JQ99yd--RhhP8Jdp9PAPKZ-32-U08wObK26g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414643389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On quantifying expert opinion about multinomial models that contain covariates</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Elfadaly, Fadlalla G. ; Garthwaite, Paul H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elfadaly, Fadlalla G. ; Garthwaite, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The paper addresses the task of forming a prior distribution to represent expert opinion about a multinomial model that contains covariates. The task has not previously been addressed. We suppose that the sampling model is a multinomial logistic regression and represent expert opinion about the regression coefficients by a multivariate normal distribution. This logistic–normal model gives a flexible prior distribution that can capture a broad variety of expert opinion. The challenge is to find meaningful assessment tasks that an expert can perform and which should yield appropriate information to determine the values of parameters in the prior distribution, and to develop theory for determining the parameter values from the assessments. A method is proposed that meets this challenge. The method is implemented in interactive easy‐to‐use software that is freely available. It provides a graphical interface that the expert uses to assess quartiles of sets of proportions and the method determines a mean vector and a positive definite covariance matrix to represent the expert's opinions. The assessment tasks chosen yield parameter values that satisfy the usual laws of probability without the expert being aware of the constraints that this imposes. Special attention is given to feedback that encourages the expert to consider his or her opinions from a different perspective. The method is illustrated in an example that shows its viability and usefulness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-1998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-985X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12546</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Covariance matrix ; Elicitation method ; Interactive graphical software ; Logistic normal prior ; Mathematical models ; Matrix algebra ; Matrix methods ; Multinomial logistic model ; Multinomial logit model ; Normal distribution ; Parameters ; Prior distribution ; Quartiles ; Regression coefficients ; Sampling ; Statistical analysis ; Usefulness ; Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society, 2020-06, Vol.183 (3), p.959-981</ispartof><rights>2020 Royal Statistical Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Royal Statistical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3706-12ab75180d4ad829964c20dd4e55df8247f987226d0e71cb34ecea995684bfea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3706-12ab75180d4ad829964c20dd4e55df8247f987226d0e71cb34ecea995684bfea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frssa.12546$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frssa.12546$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elfadaly, Fadlalla G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garthwaite, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><title>On quantifying expert opinion about multinomial models that contain covariates</title><title>Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society</title><description>Summary
The paper addresses the task of forming a prior distribution to represent expert opinion about a multinomial model that contains covariates. The task has not previously been addressed. We suppose that the sampling model is a multinomial logistic regression and represent expert opinion about the regression coefficients by a multivariate normal distribution. This logistic–normal model gives a flexible prior distribution that can capture a broad variety of expert opinion. The challenge is to find meaningful assessment tasks that an expert can perform and which should yield appropriate information to determine the values of parameters in the prior distribution, and to develop theory for determining the parameter values from the assessments. A method is proposed that meets this challenge. The method is implemented in interactive easy‐to‐use software that is freely available. It provides a graphical interface that the expert uses to assess quartiles of sets of proportions and the method determines a mean vector and a positive definite covariance matrix to represent the expert's opinions. The assessment tasks chosen yield parameter values that satisfy the usual laws of probability without the expert being aware of the constraints that this imposes. Special attention is given to feedback that encourages the expert to consider his or her opinions from a different perspective. The method is illustrated in an example that shows its viability and usefulness.</description><subject>Covariance matrix</subject><subject>Elicitation method</subject><subject>Interactive graphical software</subject><subject>Logistic normal prior</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Matrix algebra</subject><subject>Matrix methods</subject><subject>Multinomial logistic model</subject><subject>Multinomial logit model</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Prior distribution</subject><subject>Quartiles</subject><subject>Regression coefficients</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Usefulness</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0964-1998</issn><issn>1467-985X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAcxoMoOKcXP0HAm9CZpGmTHMfwDYYDp-AtpG2qGW3SJanab29nPftcnsvv__I8AFxitMCjbnwIaoFJRvMjMMM0Z4ng2dsxmCGR0wQLwU_BWQg7dBBjM_C0sXDfKxtNPRj7DvV3p32ErjPWOAtV4foI276JxrrWqAa2rtJNgPFDRVg6G5Wxo38qb1TU4Ryc1KoJ-uLP5-D17vZl9ZCsN_ePq-U6KVOG8gQTVbAMc1RRVXEixudKgqqK6iyrak4oqwVnhOQV0gyXRUp1qZUQWc5pUWuVzsHVtLfzbt_rEOXO9d6OJyWhY26aplyM1PVEld6F4HUtO29a5QeJkTz0JQ99yd--RhhP8Jdp9PAPKZ-32-U08wObK26g</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Elfadaly, Fadlalla G.</creator><creator>Garthwaite, Paul H.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>On quantifying expert opinion about multinomial models that contain covariates</title><author>Elfadaly, Fadlalla G. ; Garthwaite, Paul H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3706-12ab75180d4ad829964c20dd4e55df8247f987226d0e71cb34ecea995684bfea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Covariance matrix</topic><topic>Elicitation method</topic><topic>Interactive graphical software</topic><topic>Logistic normal prior</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Matrix algebra</topic><topic>Matrix methods</topic><topic>Multinomial logistic model</topic><topic>Multinomial logit model</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Prior distribution</topic><topic>Quartiles</topic><topic>Regression coefficients</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Usefulness</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elfadaly, Fadlalla G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garthwaite, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elfadaly, Fadlalla G.</au><au>Garthwaite, Paul H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On quantifying expert opinion about multinomial models that contain covariates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>981</epage><pages>959-981</pages><issn>0964-1998</issn><eissn>1467-985X</eissn><abstract>Summary
The paper addresses the task of forming a prior distribution to represent expert opinion about a multinomial model that contains covariates. The task has not previously been addressed. We suppose that the sampling model is a multinomial logistic regression and represent expert opinion about the regression coefficients by a multivariate normal distribution. This logistic–normal model gives a flexible prior distribution that can capture a broad variety of expert opinion. The challenge is to find meaningful assessment tasks that an expert can perform and which should yield appropriate information to determine the values of parameters in the prior distribution, and to develop theory for determining the parameter values from the assessments. A method is proposed that meets this challenge. The method is implemented in interactive easy‐to‐use software that is freely available. It provides a graphical interface that the expert uses to assess quartiles of sets of proportions and the method determines a mean vector and a positive definite covariance matrix to represent the expert's opinions. The assessment tasks chosen yield parameter values that satisfy the usual laws of probability without the expert being aware of the constraints that this imposes. Special attention is given to feedback that encourages the expert to consider his or her opinions from a different perspective. The method is illustrated in an example that shows its viability and usefulness.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/rssa.12546</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-1998 |
ispartof | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in society, 2020-06, Vol.183 (3), p.959-981 |
issn | 0964-1998 1467-985X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2414643389 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Covariance matrix Elicitation method Interactive graphical software Logistic normal prior Mathematical models Matrix algebra Matrix methods Multinomial logistic model Multinomial logit model Normal distribution Parameters Prior distribution Quartiles Regression coefficients Sampling Statistical analysis Usefulness Values |
title | On quantifying expert opinion about multinomial models that contain covariates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A04%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20quantifying%20expert%20opinion%20about%20multinomial%20models%20that%20contain%20covariates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Statistical%20Society.%20Series%20A,%20Statistics%20in%20society&rft.au=Elfadaly,%20Fadlalla%20G.&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=981&rft.pages=959-981&rft.issn=0964-1998&rft.eissn=1467-985X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rssa.12546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2414643389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414643389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |