Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions
Purpose Loneliness is increasingly recognised as the next critical public health issue. A plausible reason for this concern may be related to emerging societal trends affecting the way we relate, communicate, and function in our social environment. In 2006, a prominent review of the clinical signifi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2020-07, Vol.55 (7), p.793-810 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 810 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 793 |
container_title | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Lim, Michelle H. Eres, Robert Vasan, Shradha |
description | Purpose
Loneliness is increasingly recognised as the next critical public health issue. A plausible reason for this concern may be related to emerging societal trends affecting the way we relate, communicate, and function in our social environment. In 2006, a prominent review of the clinical significance of loneliness was published. However, there has not been a comprehensive update on known and emerging risk factors and correlates of loneliness since then. Furthermore, there is no conceptual model that has been developed to better account for the complexity of loneliness and to inform the development of evidence-based solutions as we challenge the issues of the twenty-first century.
Methods
We reviewed the current literature to identify either known or emerging risk factors and correlates of loneliness since 2006. This includes new or known evidence on: (1) demography; (2) health, including physical health; mental health; cognitive health; brain, biology, and genetics; and (3) socio-environmental factors including digital communication and the workplace.
Results
We synthesized the literature according to a new proposed conceptual model of loneliness which showed the interplay between known and emerging correlates and risk factors from demography, health, to socio-environmental factors. In the conceptual model of loneliness, we illustrated how solutions can be delivered and tailored to an individual based on their life circumstances and preferences.
Conclusion
We concluded by making specific recommendations in advancing our scientific understanding of loneliness. Our knowledge can only be deepened if we increase scientific rigour via accounting for confounding variables and using longitudinal, multi-disciplinary, and multiple methodologies in research. We also call for the rigorous evaluation of programs targeting loneliness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414567652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A716438968</galeid><sourcerecordid>A716438968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-8d5db9f829625feaa213e687ecc36e2db9713c42c3848dba5ab106f7934c06c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIwKu95qPz5W1Z_IIFL-45ZNLVY9aeZEzSyPx7S2d1EURySFXqeSupvIQ85-yCM2ZeN8a4MAMTbGDcWjeYB2TDRykHJ6x6SDbMYWycGs_Ik9ZuGWPSGfmYnEmhxMi125B-kyeorYc8pbyjS8mwpAyt0ZRp_wK0f4fcj8OcEKIR47Ue39CQ6XqYQgdaMo2lVlgwaa9oTe0rnUPspWKGXemhdFSlsNBWlrWnkttT8mgOS4Nnd_s5uXn39vPVh-H60_uPV5fXQ1TM9sFOatq62QqnhZohBMElaGsgRqlBYM1wGUcRpR3ttA0qbDnTs3FyjExHLc_Jy1PfQy3fVmjd35a1ZrzS4_ij0kYrcU_twgI-5bn0GuI-tegvDdejtE5bpC7-QeGaYJ8iftuc8PwvgTgJYi2tVZj9oaZ9qEfPmf_pnz_559E__8s_b1D04u7F63YP0x_Jb8MQkCegYSnvoN6P9J-2PwBVV6Y5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414567652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lim, Michelle H. ; Eres, Robert ; Vasan, Shradha</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Michelle H. ; Eres, Robert ; Vasan, Shradha</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Loneliness is increasingly recognised as the next critical public health issue. A plausible reason for this concern may be related to emerging societal trends affecting the way we relate, communicate, and function in our social environment. In 2006, a prominent review of the clinical significance of loneliness was published. However, there has not been a comprehensive update on known and emerging risk factors and correlates of loneliness since then. Furthermore, there is no conceptual model that has been developed to better account for the complexity of loneliness and to inform the development of evidence-based solutions as we challenge the issues of the twenty-first century.
Methods
We reviewed the current literature to identify either known or emerging risk factors and correlates of loneliness since 2006. This includes new or known evidence on: (1) demography; (2) health, including physical health; mental health; cognitive health; brain, biology, and genetics; and (3) socio-environmental factors including digital communication and the workplace.
Results
We synthesized the literature according to a new proposed conceptual model of loneliness which showed the interplay between known and emerging correlates and risk factors from demography, health, to socio-environmental factors. In the conceptual model of loneliness, we illustrated how solutions can be delivered and tailored to an individual based on their life circumstances and preferences.
Conclusion
We concluded by making specific recommendations in advancing our scientific understanding of loneliness. Our knowledge can only be deepened if we increase scientific rigour via accounting for confounding variables and using longitudinal, multi-disciplinary, and multiple methodologies in research. We also call for the rigorous evaluation of programs targeting loneliness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0933-7954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-9285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32524169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>21st century ; Communication ; Correlation ; Demography ; Epidemiology ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Invited Reviews ; Loneliness ; Loneliness - psychology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mental health ; Mental Health - trends ; Psychiatry ; Public Health ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Social aspects ; Social Environment ; Social networks</subject><ispartof>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2020-07, Vol.55 (7), p.793-810</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-8d5db9f829625feaa213e687ecc36e2db9713c42c3848dba5ab106f7934c06c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-8d5db9f829625feaa213e687ecc36e2db9713c42c3848dba5ab106f7934c06c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524169$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Michelle H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eres, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasan, Shradha</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions</title><title>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</title><addtitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</addtitle><addtitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Loneliness is increasingly recognised as the next critical public health issue. A plausible reason for this concern may be related to emerging societal trends affecting the way we relate, communicate, and function in our social environment. In 2006, a prominent review of the clinical significance of loneliness was published. However, there has not been a comprehensive update on known and emerging risk factors and correlates of loneliness since then. Furthermore, there is no conceptual model that has been developed to better account for the complexity of loneliness and to inform the development of evidence-based solutions as we challenge the issues of the twenty-first century.
Methods
We reviewed the current literature to identify either known or emerging risk factors and correlates of loneliness since 2006. This includes new or known evidence on: (1) demography; (2) health, including physical health; mental health; cognitive health; brain, biology, and genetics; and (3) socio-environmental factors including digital communication and the workplace.
Results
We synthesized the literature according to a new proposed conceptual model of loneliness which showed the interplay between known and emerging correlates and risk factors from demography, health, to socio-environmental factors. In the conceptual model of loneliness, we illustrated how solutions can be delivered and tailored to an individual based on their life circumstances and preferences.
Conclusion
We concluded by making specific recommendations in advancing our scientific understanding of loneliness. Our knowledge can only be deepened if we increase scientific rigour via accounting for confounding variables and using longitudinal, multi-disciplinary, and multiple methodologies in research. We also call for the rigorous evaluation of programs targeting loneliness.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Invited Reviews</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>Loneliness - psychology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Health - trends</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><issn>0933-7954</issn><issn>1433-9285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIwKu95qPz5W1Z_IIFL-45ZNLVY9aeZEzSyPx7S2d1EURySFXqeSupvIQ85-yCM2ZeN8a4MAMTbGDcWjeYB2TDRykHJ6x6SDbMYWycGs_Ik9ZuGWPSGfmYnEmhxMi125B-kyeorYc8pbyjS8mwpAyt0ZRp_wK0f4fcj8OcEKIR47Ue39CQ6XqYQgdaMo2lVlgwaa9oTe0rnUPspWKGXemhdFSlsNBWlrWnkttT8mgOS4Nnd_s5uXn39vPVh-H60_uPV5fXQ1TM9sFOatq62QqnhZohBMElaGsgRqlBYM1wGUcRpR3ttA0qbDnTs3FyjExHLc_Jy1PfQy3fVmjd35a1ZrzS4_ij0kYrcU_twgI-5bn0GuI-tegvDdejtE5bpC7-QeGaYJ8iftuc8PwvgTgJYi2tVZj9oaZ9qEfPmf_pnz_559E__8s_b1D04u7F63YP0x_Jb8MQkCegYSnvoN6P9J-2PwBVV6Y5</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Lim, Michelle H.</creator><creator>Eres, Robert</creator><creator>Vasan, Shradha</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions</title><author>Lim, Michelle H. ; Eres, Robert ; Vasan, Shradha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-8d5db9f829625feaa213e687ecc36e2db9713c42c3848dba5ab106f7934c06c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Invited Reviews</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>Loneliness - psychology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Health - trends</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Michelle H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eres, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasan, Shradha</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Michelle H.</au><au>Eres, Robert</au><au>Vasan, Shradha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions</atitle><jtitle>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</jtitle><stitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</stitle><addtitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>793</spage><epage>810</epage><pages>793-810</pages><issn>0933-7954</issn><eissn>1433-9285</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Loneliness is increasingly recognised as the next critical public health issue. A plausible reason for this concern may be related to emerging societal trends affecting the way we relate, communicate, and function in our social environment. In 2006, a prominent review of the clinical significance of loneliness was published. However, there has not been a comprehensive update on known and emerging risk factors and correlates of loneliness since then. Furthermore, there is no conceptual model that has been developed to better account for the complexity of loneliness and to inform the development of evidence-based solutions as we challenge the issues of the twenty-first century.
Methods
We reviewed the current literature to identify either known or emerging risk factors and correlates of loneliness since 2006. This includes new or known evidence on: (1) demography; (2) health, including physical health; mental health; cognitive health; brain, biology, and genetics; and (3) socio-environmental factors including digital communication and the workplace.
Results
We synthesized the literature according to a new proposed conceptual model of loneliness which showed the interplay between known and emerging correlates and risk factors from demography, health, to socio-environmental factors. In the conceptual model of loneliness, we illustrated how solutions can be delivered and tailored to an individual based on their life circumstances and preferences.
Conclusion
We concluded by making specific recommendations in advancing our scientific understanding of loneliness. Our knowledge can only be deepened if we increase scientific rigour via accounting for confounding variables and using longitudinal, multi-disciplinary, and multiple methodologies in research. We also call for the rigorous evaluation of programs targeting loneliness.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32524169</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0933-7954 |
ispartof | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2020-07, Vol.55 (7), p.793-810 |
issn | 0933-7954 1433-9285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2414567652 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | 21st century Communication Correlation Demography Epidemiology Health aspects Humans Identification methods Invited Reviews Loneliness Loneliness - psychology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental health Mental Health - trends Psychiatry Public Health Risk analysis Risk Factors Social aspects Social Environment Social networks |
title | Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20loneliness%20in%20the%20twenty-first%20century:%20an%20update%20on%20correlates,%20risk%20factors,%20and%20potential%20solutions&rft.jtitle=Social%20Psychiatry%20and%20Psychiatric%20Epidemiology&rft.au=Lim,%20Michelle%20H.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=793&rft.epage=810&rft.pages=793-810&rft.issn=0933-7954&rft.eissn=1433-9285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA716438968%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414567652&rft_id=info:pmid/32524169&rft_galeid=A716438968&rfr_iscdi=true |