Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives
Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize mat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE engineering management review 2020-06, Vol.48 (2), p.193-201 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 201 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | IEEE engineering management review |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Nandi, Santosh A. Hervani, Aref Helms, Marilyn M. |
description | Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize material and energy use while maintaining firm profitability. Circular economy business models (CEBM) are recommended for achieving competitiveness for firms and their supply chains while reducing manufacturing waste and natural resource shortages present in the "take-make-waste" production system of traditional manufacturing. Despite the benefits of implementing CEBMs, there is a struggle to visualize the implications of CEBMs in organizational supply chains and beyond. This article presents the benefits of supply chain collaboration and infrastructure components based on practices of CEBM from several case study examples. Organizational, managerial, and technology development implications based on economic, environmental, and social dimensions are discussed from an administrative perspective. The paper ends with actionable steps for further advancement of CEBM in practice, along with areas for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/EMR.2020.2991388 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414534247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9082123</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2414534247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-762be0ba3fdeb0d56ac3acd0d62598c5793052ab9a3c9bbee09aca7f7b51f5513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKf3gjcFrzvfJE2TeKdlfsCG4sd1SNK32NG1NVkH-_d2bHh1bp5zDjyEXFOYUQr6br78mDFgMGNaU67UCZlQzWWaUalOyQR4DqkSip6TixhXADTPuJ6Q-6IOfmhsSOa-a7v1LnkcYt1ijMmyK7GJ6efQ980uKX5s3SbvGGKPflNvMV6Ss8o2Ea-OOSXfT_Ov4iVdvD2_Fg-L1DPBN6nMmUNwllclOihFbj23voQyZ0IrL6TmIJh12nKvnUMEbb2VlXSCVkJQPiW3h90-dL8Dxo1ZdUNox0vDMpoJnrFMjhQcKB-6GANWpg_12oadoWD2hsxoyOwNmaOhsXJzqNSI-I9rUIwyzv8AzN9h7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414534247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Nandi, Santosh ; A. Hervani, Aref ; Helms, Marilyn M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Santosh ; A. Hervani, Aref ; Helms, Marilyn M.</creatorcontrib><description>Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize material and energy use while maintaining firm profitability. Circular economy business models (CEBM) are recommended for achieving competitiveness for firms and their supply chains while reducing manufacturing waste and natural resource shortages present in the "take-make-waste" production system of traditional manufacturing. Despite the benefits of implementing CEBMs, there is a struggle to visualize the implications of CEBMs in organizational supply chains and beyond. This article presents the benefits of supply chain collaboration and infrastructure components based on practices of CEBM from several case study examples. Organizational, managerial, and technology development implications based on economic, environmental, and social dimensions are discussed from an administrative perspective. The paper ends with actionable steps for further advancement of CEBM in practice, along with areas for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-8581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4178</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2020.2991388</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEMRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Biological system modeling ; Business models ; Circular business models ; Circular economy ; Circularity ; Commercial energy ; Economics ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing wastes ; Natural resources ; Organizational aspects ; practitioners ; Production systems ; Profitability ; Recycling ; Shortages ; Social factors ; supply chain management ; supply chain tier ; Supply chains ; sustainability ; sustainable manufacturing</subject><ispartof>IEEE engineering management review, 2020-06, Vol.48 (2), p.193-201</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-762be0ba3fdeb0d56ac3acd0d62598c5793052ab9a3c9bbee09aca7f7b51f5513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-762be0ba3fdeb0d56ac3acd0d62598c5793052ab9a3c9bbee09aca7f7b51f5513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4793-683X ; 0000-0001-8551-6716</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9082123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9082123$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Hervani, Aref</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Marilyn M.</creatorcontrib><title>Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives</title><title>IEEE engineering management review</title><addtitle>EMR</addtitle><description>Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize material and energy use while maintaining firm profitability. Circular economy business models (CEBM) are recommended for achieving competitiveness for firms and their supply chains while reducing manufacturing waste and natural resource shortages present in the "take-make-waste" production system of traditional manufacturing. Despite the benefits of implementing CEBMs, there is a struggle to visualize the implications of CEBMs in organizational supply chains and beyond. This article presents the benefits of supply chain collaboration and infrastructure components based on practices of CEBM from several case study examples. Organizational, managerial, and technology development implications based on economic, environmental, and social dimensions are discussed from an administrative perspective. The paper ends with actionable steps for further advancement of CEBM in practice, along with areas for future research.</description><subject>Biological system modeling</subject><subject>Business models</subject><subject>Circular business models</subject><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Circularity</subject><subject>Commercial energy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing wastes</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>practitioners</subject><subject>Production systems</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>supply chain management</subject><subject>supply chain tier</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>sustainable manufacturing</subject><issn>0360-8581</issn><issn>1937-4178</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKf3gjcFrzvfJE2TeKdlfsCG4sd1SNK32NG1NVkH-_d2bHh1bp5zDjyEXFOYUQr6br78mDFgMGNaU67UCZlQzWWaUalOyQR4DqkSip6TixhXADTPuJ6Q-6IOfmhsSOa-a7v1LnkcYt1ijMmyK7GJ6efQ980uKX5s3SbvGGKPflNvMV6Ss8o2Ea-OOSXfT_Ov4iVdvD2_Fg-L1DPBN6nMmUNwllclOihFbj23voQyZ0IrL6TmIJh12nKvnUMEbb2VlXSCVkJQPiW3h90-dL8Dxo1ZdUNox0vDMpoJnrFMjhQcKB-6GANWpg_12oadoWD2hsxoyOwNmaOhsXJzqNSI-I9rUIwyzv8AzN9h7Q</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Nandi, Santosh</creator><creator>A. Hervani, Aref</creator><creator>Helms, Marilyn M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4793-683X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-6716</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives</title><author>Nandi, Santosh ; A. Hervani, Aref ; Helms, Marilyn M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-762be0ba3fdeb0d56ac3acd0d62598c5793052ab9a3c9bbee09aca7f7b51f5513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biological system modeling</topic><topic>Business models</topic><topic>Circular business models</topic><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Circularity</topic><topic>Commercial energy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing wastes</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>practitioners</topic><topic>Production systems</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>supply chain management</topic><topic>supply chain tier</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>sustainable manufacturing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Hervani, Aref</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Marilyn M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE engineering management review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nandi, Santosh</au><au>A. Hervani, Aref</au><au>Helms, Marilyn M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives</atitle><jtitle>IEEE engineering management review</jtitle><stitle>EMR</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>193-201</pages><issn>0360-8581</issn><eissn>1937-4178</eissn><coden>IEMRAP</coden><abstract>Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize material and energy use while maintaining firm profitability. Circular economy business models (CEBM) are recommended for achieving competitiveness for firms and their supply chains while reducing manufacturing waste and natural resource shortages present in the "take-make-waste" production system of traditional manufacturing. Despite the benefits of implementing CEBMs, there is a struggle to visualize the implications of CEBMs in organizational supply chains and beyond. This article presents the benefits of supply chain collaboration and infrastructure components based on practices of CEBM from several case study examples. Organizational, managerial, and technology development implications based on economic, environmental, and social dimensions are discussed from an administrative perspective. The paper ends with actionable steps for further advancement of CEBM in practice, along with areas for future research.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/EMR.2020.2991388</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4793-683X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-6716</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-8581 |
ispartof | IEEE engineering management review, 2020-06, Vol.48 (2), p.193-201 |
issn | 0360-8581 1937-4178 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2414534247 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Biological system modeling Business models Circular business models Circular economy Circularity Commercial energy Economics Energy conservation Energy consumption Manufacturing Manufacturing wastes Natural resources Organizational aspects practitioners Production systems Profitability Recycling Shortages Social factors supply chain management supply chain tier Supply chains sustainability sustainable manufacturing |
title | Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Circular%20Economy%20Business%20Models-Supply%20Chain%20Perspectives&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20engineering%20management%20review&rft.au=Nandi,%20Santosh&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=193-201&rft.issn=0360-8581&rft.eissn=1937-4178&rft.coden=IEMRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EMR.2020.2991388&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2414534247%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414534247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9082123&rfr_iscdi=true |