Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives

Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize mat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE engineering management review 2020-06, Vol.48 (2), p.193-201
Hauptverfasser: Nandi, Santosh, A. Hervani, Aref, Helms, Marilyn M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 201
container_issue 2
container_start_page 193
container_title IEEE engineering management review
container_volume 48
creator Nandi, Santosh
A. Hervani, Aref
Helms, Marilyn M.
description Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize material and energy use while maintaining firm profitability. Circular economy business models (CEBM) are recommended for achieving competitiveness for firms and their supply chains while reducing manufacturing waste and natural resource shortages present in the "take-make-waste" production system of traditional manufacturing. Despite the benefits of implementing CEBMs, there is a struggle to visualize the implications of CEBMs in organizational supply chains and beyond. This article presents the benefits of supply chain collaboration and infrastructure components based on practices of CEBM from several case study examples. Organizational, managerial, and technology development implications based on economic, environmental, and social dimensions are discussed from an administrative perspective. The paper ends with actionable steps for further advancement of CEBM in practice, along with areas for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/EMR.2020.2991388
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414534247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9082123</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2414534247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-762be0ba3fdeb0d56ac3acd0d62598c5793052ab9a3c9bbee09aca7f7b51f5513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKf3gjcFrzvfJE2TeKdlfsCG4sd1SNK32NG1NVkH-_d2bHh1bp5zDjyEXFOYUQr6br78mDFgMGNaU67UCZlQzWWaUalOyQR4DqkSip6TixhXADTPuJ6Q-6IOfmhsSOa-a7v1LnkcYt1ijMmyK7GJ6efQ980uKX5s3SbvGGKPflNvMV6Ss8o2Ea-OOSXfT_Ov4iVdvD2_Fg-L1DPBN6nMmUNwllclOihFbj23voQyZ0IrL6TmIJh12nKvnUMEbb2VlXSCVkJQPiW3h90-dL8Dxo1ZdUNox0vDMpoJnrFMjhQcKB-6GANWpg_12oadoWD2hsxoyOwNmaOhsXJzqNSI-I9rUIwyzv8AzN9h7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414534247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Nandi, Santosh ; A. Hervani, Aref ; Helms, Marilyn M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Santosh ; A. Hervani, Aref ; Helms, Marilyn M.</creatorcontrib><description>Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize material and energy use while maintaining firm profitability. Circular economy business models (CEBM) are recommended for achieving competitiveness for firms and their supply chains while reducing manufacturing waste and natural resource shortages present in the "take-make-waste" production system of traditional manufacturing. Despite the benefits of implementing CEBMs, there is a struggle to visualize the implications of CEBMs in organizational supply chains and beyond. This article presents the benefits of supply chain collaboration and infrastructure components based on practices of CEBM from several case study examples. Organizational, managerial, and technology development implications based on economic, environmental, and social dimensions are discussed from an administrative perspective. The paper ends with actionable steps for further advancement of CEBM in practice, along with areas for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-8581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4178</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2020.2991388</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEMRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Biological system modeling ; Business models ; Circular business models ; Circular economy ; Circularity ; Commercial energy ; Economics ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing wastes ; Natural resources ; Organizational aspects ; practitioners ; Production systems ; Profitability ; Recycling ; Shortages ; Social factors ; supply chain management ; supply chain tier ; Supply chains ; sustainability ; sustainable manufacturing</subject><ispartof>IEEE engineering management review, 2020-06, Vol.48 (2), p.193-201</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-762be0ba3fdeb0d56ac3acd0d62598c5793052ab9a3c9bbee09aca7f7b51f5513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-762be0ba3fdeb0d56ac3acd0d62598c5793052ab9a3c9bbee09aca7f7b51f5513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4793-683X ; 0000-0001-8551-6716</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9082123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9082123$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Hervani, Aref</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Marilyn M.</creatorcontrib><title>Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives</title><title>IEEE engineering management review</title><addtitle>EMR</addtitle><description>Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize material and energy use while maintaining firm profitability. Circular economy business models (CEBM) are recommended for achieving competitiveness for firms and their supply chains while reducing manufacturing waste and natural resource shortages present in the "take-make-waste" production system of traditional manufacturing. Despite the benefits of implementing CEBMs, there is a struggle to visualize the implications of CEBMs in organizational supply chains and beyond. This article presents the benefits of supply chain collaboration and infrastructure components based on practices of CEBM from several case study examples. Organizational, managerial, and technology development implications based on economic, environmental, and social dimensions are discussed from an administrative perspective. The paper ends with actionable steps for further advancement of CEBM in practice, along with areas for future research.</description><subject>Biological system modeling</subject><subject>Business models</subject><subject>Circular business models</subject><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Circularity</subject><subject>Commercial energy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing wastes</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>practitioners</subject><subject>Production systems</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>supply chain management</subject><subject>supply chain tier</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>sustainable manufacturing</subject><issn>0360-8581</issn><issn>1937-4178</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKf3gjcFrzvfJE2TeKdlfsCG4sd1SNK32NG1NVkH-_d2bHh1bp5zDjyEXFOYUQr6br78mDFgMGNaU67UCZlQzWWaUalOyQR4DqkSip6TixhXADTPuJ6Q-6IOfmhsSOa-a7v1LnkcYt1ijMmyK7GJ6efQ980uKX5s3SbvGGKPflNvMV6Ss8o2Ea-OOSXfT_Ov4iVdvD2_Fg-L1DPBN6nMmUNwllclOihFbj23voQyZ0IrL6TmIJh12nKvnUMEbb2VlXSCVkJQPiW3h90-dL8Dxo1ZdUNox0vDMpoJnrFMjhQcKB-6GANWpg_12oadoWD2hsxoyOwNmaOhsXJzqNSI-I9rUIwyzv8AzN9h7Q</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Nandi, Santosh</creator><creator>A. Hervani, Aref</creator><creator>Helms, Marilyn M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4793-683X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-6716</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives</title><author>Nandi, Santosh ; A. Hervani, Aref ; Helms, Marilyn M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-762be0ba3fdeb0d56ac3acd0d62598c5793052ab9a3c9bbee09aca7f7b51f5513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biological system modeling</topic><topic>Business models</topic><topic>Circular business models</topic><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Circularity</topic><topic>Commercial energy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing wastes</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>practitioners</topic><topic>Production systems</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>supply chain management</topic><topic>supply chain tier</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>sustainable manufacturing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Hervani, Aref</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Marilyn M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE engineering management review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nandi, Santosh</au><au>A. Hervani, Aref</au><au>Helms, Marilyn M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives</atitle><jtitle>IEEE engineering management review</jtitle><stitle>EMR</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>193-201</pages><issn>0360-8581</issn><eissn>1937-4178</eissn><coden>IEMRAP</coden><abstract>Modern manufacturing generates waste and causes shortages in natural resources due to a "take-make-waste" production system. The circular economy (CE) has been a policy initiative for supply chain looping strategies to reuse, refurbish, recycle, minimize, eliminate, share, and optimize material and energy use while maintaining firm profitability. Circular economy business models (CEBM) are recommended for achieving competitiveness for firms and their supply chains while reducing manufacturing waste and natural resource shortages present in the "take-make-waste" production system of traditional manufacturing. Despite the benefits of implementing CEBMs, there is a struggle to visualize the implications of CEBMs in organizational supply chains and beyond. This article presents the benefits of supply chain collaboration and infrastructure components based on practices of CEBM from several case study examples. Organizational, managerial, and technology development implications based on economic, environmental, and social dimensions are discussed from an administrative perspective. The paper ends with actionable steps for further advancement of CEBM in practice, along with areas for future research.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/EMR.2020.2991388</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4793-683X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-6716</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0360-8581
ispartof IEEE engineering management review, 2020-06, Vol.48 (2), p.193-201
issn 0360-8581
1937-4178
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2414534247
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Biological system modeling
Business models
Circular business models
Circular economy
Circularity
Commercial energy
Economics
Energy conservation
Energy consumption
Manufacturing
Manufacturing wastes
Natural resources
Organizational aspects
practitioners
Production systems
Profitability
Recycling
Shortages
Social factors
supply chain management
supply chain tier
Supply chains
sustainability
sustainable manufacturing
title Circular Economy Business Models-Supply Chain Perspectives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Circular%20Economy%20Business%20Models-Supply%20Chain%20Perspectives&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20engineering%20management%20review&rft.au=Nandi,%20Santosh&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=193-201&rft.issn=0360-8581&rft.eissn=1937-4178&rft.coden=IEMRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EMR.2020.2991388&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2414534247%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414534247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9082123&rfr_iscdi=true