Disentangling the effects of external perturbations on coexistence and priority effects

A major challenge in ecological research is to identify the tolerance of ecological communities to external perturbations. Modern coexistence theory (MCT) has been widely adopted as a framework to investigate the tolerance to perturbations in relative reductions of per capita growth rates, often usi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of ecology 2020-07, Vol.108 (4), p.1677-1689
Hauptverfasser: Song, Chuliang, Rohr, Rudolf P., Vasseur, David, Saavedra, Serguei, Satake, Akiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1689
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1677
container_title The Journal of ecology
container_volume 108
creator Song, Chuliang
Rohr, Rudolf P.
Vasseur, David
Saavedra, Serguei
Satake, Akiko
description A major challenge in ecological research is to identify the tolerance of ecological communities to external perturbations. Modern coexistence theory (MCT) has been widely adopted as a framework to investigate the tolerance to perturbations in relative reductions of per capita growth rates, often using metrics that explicitly eliminate the independent role of intrinsic growth rates. More recently, the structural approach (SA) was introduced to investigate the tolerance of communities to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates as a function of the strength of intraspecific and interspecific competition. Because the external perturbations are likely to happen in both intrinsic growth rates and competition strengths, no framework alone can fully disentangle the effects of external perturbations. Here we combine MCT and SA to disentangle the tolerance in coexistence and priority effects of a pair of competing species when subject to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates and competition strengths. Through this combination, we reveal the emergence of a key trade‐off: increasing the tolerance to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates typically decreases the tolerance in competition strengths, and vice versa. Furthermore, this trade‐off is stronger under coexistence than under priority effects. We test this combined framework on competing pairs of 18 California annual plant species. For both coexistence and priority effects, we find that the tolerance to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates is maximized instead of that to perturbations in competition strengths in the studied annual plant communities. Synthesis. Our combined framework of modern coexistence theory and structural approach illustrates that it is possible to disentangle the impact of different external perturbations on the persistence of species. Importantly, our findings show that species interactions may reveal whether communities are dominated either by changes in intrinsic growth rates or by competition strengths. Overall, this combined framework can open a new perspective to understand and predict the response of populations to changing environmental conditions. Our combined framework of modern coexistence theory and structural approach illustrates that it is possible to disentangle the impact of different external perturbations on the persistence of species. Importantly, our findings show that species interactions may reveal whether communities are dominated either by changes in intrinsic gr
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2745.13349
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414347508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2414347508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-5867160421f6f44574d22ed9a6b1dba0d676fa2706febdc5ca94972243baa9023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUws1piTms7jt2MqJQvVWIBMVqOcy6pgl1sR7T_PQkBVm456e79Tu8eQpeUzGhfc5qLImOSFzOa57w8QpO_yTGaEMJYRriUp-gsxi0hRMiCTNDrTRPBJe02beM2OL0BBmvBpIi9xbBPEJxu8Q5C6kKlU-Ndv3HYeNg3MYEzgLWr8S40PjTp8EufoxOr2wgXP32KXm5Xz8v7bP1097C8XmeGM1ZmxUJIKghn1ArLeSF5zRjUpRYVrStNaiGF1UwSYaGqTWF0yUvJGM8rrUvC8im6Gu_ugv_oICa19d1gOSrGKc95_-WiV81HlQk-xgBW9X7fdTgoStSQnhqyUkNW6ju9nihG4rNp4fCfXD2uliP3BYDUcbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414347508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disentangling the effects of external perturbations on coexistence and priority effects</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Song, Chuliang ; Rohr, Rudolf P. ; Vasseur, David ; Saavedra, Serguei ; Satake, Akiko</creator><contributor>Satake, Akiko</contributor><creatorcontrib>Song, Chuliang ; Rohr, Rudolf P. ; Vasseur, David ; Saavedra, Serguei ; Satake, Akiko ; Satake, Akiko</creatorcontrib><description>A major challenge in ecological research is to identify the tolerance of ecological communities to external perturbations. Modern coexistence theory (MCT) has been widely adopted as a framework to investigate the tolerance to perturbations in relative reductions of per capita growth rates, often using metrics that explicitly eliminate the independent role of intrinsic growth rates. More recently, the structural approach (SA) was introduced to investigate the tolerance of communities to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates as a function of the strength of intraspecific and interspecific competition. Because the external perturbations are likely to happen in both intrinsic growth rates and competition strengths, no framework alone can fully disentangle the effects of external perturbations. Here we combine MCT and SA to disentangle the tolerance in coexistence and priority effects of a pair of competing species when subject to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates and competition strengths. Through this combination, we reveal the emergence of a key trade‐off: increasing the tolerance to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates typically decreases the tolerance in competition strengths, and vice versa. Furthermore, this trade‐off is stronger under coexistence than under priority effects. We test this combined framework on competing pairs of 18 California annual plant species. For both coexistence and priority effects, we find that the tolerance to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates is maximized instead of that to perturbations in competition strengths in the studied annual plant communities. Synthesis. Our combined framework of modern coexistence theory and structural approach illustrates that it is possible to disentangle the impact of different external perturbations on the persistence of species. Importantly, our findings show that species interactions may reveal whether communities are dominated either by changes in intrinsic growth rates or by competition strengths. Overall, this combined framework can open a new perspective to understand and predict the response of populations to changing environmental conditions. Our combined framework of modern coexistence theory and structural approach illustrates that it is possible to disentangle the impact of different external perturbations on the persistence of species. Importantly, our findings show that species interactions may reveal whether communities are dominated either by changes in intrinsic growth rates or by competition strengths. Overall, this combined framework can open a new perspective to understand and predict the response of populations to changing environmental conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological competition ; Coexistence ; Competition ; competition strengths ; Ecological effects ; Ecological research ; Environmental changes ; Environmental conditions ; Frameworks ; Growth rate ; Interspecific ; intrinsic growth rates ; modern coexistence theory ; Perturbations ; Plant communities ; Plant populations ; priority effects ; Species ; structural approach ; tolerance to perturbations</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2020-07, Vol.108 (4), p.1677-1689</ispartof><rights>2020 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Ecology © 2020 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-5867160421f6f44574d22ed9a6b1dba0d676fa2706febdc5ca94972243baa9023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-5867160421f6f44574d22ed9a6b1dba0d676fa2706febdc5ca94972243baa9023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7490-8626 ; 0000-0002-6440-2696 ; 0000-0003-1768-363X ; 0000-0003-1706-9613</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2745.13349$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2745.13349$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Satake, Akiko</contributor><creatorcontrib>Song, Chuliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohr, Rudolf P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasseur, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Serguei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satake, Akiko</creatorcontrib><title>Disentangling the effects of external perturbations on coexistence and priority effects</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>A major challenge in ecological research is to identify the tolerance of ecological communities to external perturbations. Modern coexistence theory (MCT) has been widely adopted as a framework to investigate the tolerance to perturbations in relative reductions of per capita growth rates, often using metrics that explicitly eliminate the independent role of intrinsic growth rates. More recently, the structural approach (SA) was introduced to investigate the tolerance of communities to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates as a function of the strength of intraspecific and interspecific competition. Because the external perturbations are likely to happen in both intrinsic growth rates and competition strengths, no framework alone can fully disentangle the effects of external perturbations. Here we combine MCT and SA to disentangle the tolerance in coexistence and priority effects of a pair of competing species when subject to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates and competition strengths. Through this combination, we reveal the emergence of a key trade‐off: increasing the tolerance to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates typically decreases the tolerance in competition strengths, and vice versa. Furthermore, this trade‐off is stronger under coexistence than under priority effects. We test this combined framework on competing pairs of 18 California annual plant species. For both coexistence and priority effects, we find that the tolerance to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates is maximized instead of that to perturbations in competition strengths in the studied annual plant communities. Synthesis. Our combined framework of modern coexistence theory and structural approach illustrates that it is possible to disentangle the impact of different external perturbations on the persistence of species. Importantly, our findings show that species interactions may reveal whether communities are dominated either by changes in intrinsic growth rates or by competition strengths. Overall, this combined framework can open a new perspective to understand and predict the response of populations to changing environmental conditions. Our combined framework of modern coexistence theory and structural approach illustrates that it is possible to disentangle the impact of different external perturbations on the persistence of species. Importantly, our findings show that species interactions may reveal whether communities are dominated either by changes in intrinsic growth rates or by competition strengths. Overall, this combined framework can open a new perspective to understand and predict the response of populations to changing environmental conditions.</description><subject>Biological competition</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>competition strengths</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological research</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>intrinsic growth rates</subject><subject>modern coexistence theory</subject><subject>Perturbations</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>priority effects</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>structural approach</subject><subject>tolerance to perturbations</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUws1piTms7jt2MqJQvVWIBMVqOcy6pgl1sR7T_PQkBVm456e79Tu8eQpeUzGhfc5qLImOSFzOa57w8QpO_yTGaEMJYRriUp-gsxi0hRMiCTNDrTRPBJe02beM2OL0BBmvBpIi9xbBPEJxu8Q5C6kKlU-Ndv3HYeNg3MYEzgLWr8S40PjTp8EufoxOr2wgXP32KXm5Xz8v7bP1097C8XmeGM1ZmxUJIKghn1ArLeSF5zRjUpRYVrStNaiGF1UwSYaGqTWF0yUvJGM8rrUvC8im6Gu_ugv_oICa19d1gOSrGKc95_-WiV81HlQk-xgBW9X7fdTgoStSQnhqyUkNW6ju9nihG4rNp4fCfXD2uliP3BYDUcbA</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Song, Chuliang</creator><creator>Rohr, Rudolf P.</creator><creator>Vasseur, David</creator><creator>Saavedra, Serguei</creator><creator>Satake, Akiko</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7490-8626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-2696</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1768-363X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-9613</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Disentangling the effects of external perturbations on coexistence and priority effects</title><author>Song, Chuliang ; Rohr, Rudolf P. ; Vasseur, David ; Saavedra, Serguei ; Satake, Akiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-5867160421f6f44574d22ed9a6b1dba0d676fa2706febdc5ca94972243baa9023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biological competition</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>competition strengths</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological research</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>intrinsic growth rates</topic><topic>modern coexistence theory</topic><topic>Perturbations</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>priority effects</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>structural approach</topic><topic>tolerance to perturbations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Chuliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohr, Rudolf P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasseur, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Serguei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satake, Akiko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Chuliang</au><au>Rohr, Rudolf P.</au><au>Vasseur, David</au><au>Saavedra, Serguei</au><au>Satake, Akiko</au><au>Satake, Akiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disentangling the effects of external perturbations on coexistence and priority effects</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1677</spage><epage>1689</epage><pages>1677-1689</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><abstract>A major challenge in ecological research is to identify the tolerance of ecological communities to external perturbations. Modern coexistence theory (MCT) has been widely adopted as a framework to investigate the tolerance to perturbations in relative reductions of per capita growth rates, often using metrics that explicitly eliminate the independent role of intrinsic growth rates. More recently, the structural approach (SA) was introduced to investigate the tolerance of communities to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates as a function of the strength of intraspecific and interspecific competition. Because the external perturbations are likely to happen in both intrinsic growth rates and competition strengths, no framework alone can fully disentangle the effects of external perturbations. Here we combine MCT and SA to disentangle the tolerance in coexistence and priority effects of a pair of competing species when subject to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates and competition strengths. Through this combination, we reveal the emergence of a key trade‐off: increasing the tolerance to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates typically decreases the tolerance in competition strengths, and vice versa. Furthermore, this trade‐off is stronger under coexistence than under priority effects. We test this combined framework on competing pairs of 18 California annual plant species. For both coexistence and priority effects, we find that the tolerance to perturbations in intrinsic growth rates is maximized instead of that to perturbations in competition strengths in the studied annual plant communities. Synthesis. Our combined framework of modern coexistence theory and structural approach illustrates that it is possible to disentangle the impact of different external perturbations on the persistence of species. Importantly, our findings show that species interactions may reveal whether communities are dominated either by changes in intrinsic growth rates or by competition strengths. Overall, this combined framework can open a new perspective to understand and predict the response of populations to changing environmental conditions. Our combined framework of modern coexistence theory and structural approach illustrates that it is possible to disentangle the impact of different external perturbations on the persistence of species. Importantly, our findings show that species interactions may reveal whether communities are dominated either by changes in intrinsic growth rates or by competition strengths. Overall, this combined framework can open a new perspective to understand and predict the response of populations to changing environmental conditions.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.13349</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7490-8626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-2696</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1768-363X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-9613</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0477
ispartof The Journal of ecology, 2020-07, Vol.108 (4), p.1677-1689
issn 0022-0477
1365-2745
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2414347508
source Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Biological competition
Coexistence
Competition
competition strengths
Ecological effects
Ecological research
Environmental changes
Environmental conditions
Frameworks
Growth rate
Interspecific
intrinsic growth rates
modern coexistence theory
Perturbations
Plant communities
Plant populations
priority effects
Species
structural approach
tolerance to perturbations
title Disentangling the effects of external perturbations on coexistence and priority effects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disentangling%20the%20effects%20of%20external%20perturbations%20on%20coexistence%20and%20priority%20effects&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Song,%20Chuliang&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1677&rft.epage=1689&rft.pages=1677-1689&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.13349&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2414347508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414347508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true