Evaluation of Nexus-Sustainability and Conventional Approaches for Optimal Water-Energy-Land-Crop Planning in an Irrigated Canal Command
With the increasing threat to water, energy, and food resources world-wide, it is highly imperative to manage these resources sustainably. This study develops an optimal crop area allocation model based on a novel nexus-sustainability index (NSI), integrating the water use, energy use (environmental...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources management 2020-06, Vol.34 (8), p.2329-2351 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2351 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 2329 |
| container_title | Water resources management |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Das, Aurobrata Sahoo, Bhabagrahi Panda, Sudhindra N. |
| description | With the increasing threat to water, energy, and food resources world-wide, it is highly imperative to manage these resources sustainably. This study develops an optimal crop area allocation model based on a novel nexus-sustainability index (NSI), integrating the water use, energy use (environmental dimension); land use, labour use (social dimension); yield return, and per capita food production (economic dimension) indicators in agricultural food production. This NSI-based model is evaluated in a reservoir-canal command for optimal water and energy uses and, subsequently, compared with the conventional models of Net-Economic Return (NER), Water-Food (W-F) nexus, and Energy-Food (E-F) nexus based approaches using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) analysis. The comparative results revealed that the NSI-based model is the best that could save water, energy and labour resources by 36.82(±1.91)%, 23.72(±2.47)%, and 2.29(±0.16)% during the
Kharif
season; and 17.5(±0.59)%, 19.82(±1.52)%, and 2.02(±0.42)% during the
Rabi
season as compared to the existing condition, respectively, enhancing the net economic return by 56.53(±3.28)% and 79.96(±2.97)% during the corresponding seasons, respectively. Finally, it is advocated that the NSI-based approach could manage the water and energy resources sustainably ensuring security in the local water-energy-land-food (WELF) nexus. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11269-020-02547-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2414141134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2414141134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1722940f40a1812f21aa6ace87fd00112715af67e4c79bc70820ffcda013cbb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKdfwKeAz9HctFvWRynzDwwVVHwMd10yK11Sk1bsN_Bje-cE3yRcArm_c8g5jJ2CPAcp9UUCUNNCSCVpJrkWwx4bwURnAqYTuc9GsqBVrnM4ZEcpvUlJskKO2Nf8A5seuzp4Hhy_s599Eo996rD2uKybuhs4-hUvg_-wfothwy_bNgasXm3iLkR-33b1hp5fsLNRzL2N60EsSCXKGFr-0KD3tV_z2pMVv42xXhNJnrg1K8NmQ-wxO3DYJHvye4_Z89X8qbwRi_vr2_JyIaoMik6AVqrIpcslwgyUU4A4xcrOtFtRKFAaJuim2uaVLpaVljMlnatWKCGrlkuVjdnZzpcivPc2deYt9JE-kozKYXsgy4lSO6qKIaVonWkjZYyDAWm2jZtd44YaNz-Nm4FE2U6UCPZrG_-s_1F9A7b3hck</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414141134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Nexus-Sustainability and Conventional Approaches for Optimal Water-Energy-Land-Crop Planning in an Irrigated Canal Command</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Das, Aurobrata ; Sahoo, Bhabagrahi ; Panda, Sudhindra N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Aurobrata ; Sahoo, Bhabagrahi ; Panda, Sudhindra N.</creatorcontrib><description>With the increasing threat to water, energy, and food resources world-wide, it is highly imperative to manage these resources sustainably. This study develops an optimal crop area allocation model based on a novel nexus-sustainability index (NSI), integrating the water use, energy use (environmental dimension); land use, labour use (social dimension); yield return, and per capita food production (economic dimension) indicators in agricultural food production. This NSI-based model is evaluated in a reservoir-canal command for optimal water and energy uses and, subsequently, compared with the conventional models of Net-Economic Return (NER), Water-Food (W-F) nexus, and Energy-Food (E-F) nexus based approaches using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) analysis. The comparative results revealed that the NSI-based model is the best that could save water, energy and labour resources by 36.82(±1.91)%, 23.72(±2.47)%, and 2.29(±0.16)% during the
Kharif
season; and 17.5(±0.59)%, 19.82(±1.52)%, and 2.02(±0.42)% during the
Rabi
season as compared to the existing condition, respectively, enhancing the net economic return by 56.53(±3.28)% and 79.96(±2.97)% during the corresponding seasons, respectively. Finally, it is advocated that the NSI-based approach could manage the water and energy resources sustainably ensuring security in the local water-energy-land-food (WELF) nexus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-4741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02547-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agronomy ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Canals ; Civil Engineering ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Dimensions ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Economic models ; Economics ; Energy ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy resources ; Energy sources ; Environment ; Food ; Food production ; Food resources ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Labour ; Land use ; Multiple criterion ; Seasons ; Security ; Social factors ; Sustainability ; Water use</subject><ispartof>Water resources management, 2020-06, Vol.34 (8), p.2329-2351</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1722940f40a1812f21aa6ace87fd00112715af67e4c79bc70820ffcda013cbb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1722940f40a1812f21aa6ace87fd00112715af67e4c79bc70820ffcda013cbb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11269-020-02547-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-020-02547-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Aurobrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panda, Sudhindra N.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Nexus-Sustainability and Conventional Approaches for Optimal Water-Energy-Land-Crop Planning in an Irrigated Canal Command</title><title>Water resources management</title><addtitle>Water Resour Manage</addtitle><description>With the increasing threat to water, energy, and food resources world-wide, it is highly imperative to manage these resources sustainably. This study develops an optimal crop area allocation model based on a novel nexus-sustainability index (NSI), integrating the water use, energy use (environmental dimension); land use, labour use (social dimension); yield return, and per capita food production (economic dimension) indicators in agricultural food production. This NSI-based model is evaluated in a reservoir-canal command for optimal water and energy uses and, subsequently, compared with the conventional models of Net-Economic Return (NER), Water-Food (W-F) nexus, and Energy-Food (E-F) nexus based approaches using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) analysis. The comparative results revealed that the NSI-based model is the best that could save water, energy and labour resources by 36.82(±1.91)%, 23.72(±2.47)%, and 2.29(±0.16)% during the
Kharif
season; and 17.5(±0.59)%, 19.82(±1.52)%, and 2.02(±0.42)% during the
Rabi
season as compared to the existing condition, respectively, enhancing the net economic return by 56.53(±3.28)% and 79.96(±2.97)% during the corresponding seasons, respectively. Finally, it is advocated that the NSI-based approach could manage the water and energy resources sustainably ensuring security in the local water-energy-land-food (WELF) nexus.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Labour</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Water use</subject><issn>0920-4741</issn><issn>1573-1650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKdfwKeAz9HctFvWRynzDwwVVHwMd10yK11Sk1bsN_Bje-cE3yRcArm_c8g5jJ2CPAcp9UUCUNNCSCVpJrkWwx4bwURnAqYTuc9GsqBVrnM4ZEcpvUlJskKO2Nf8A5seuzp4Hhy_s599Eo996rD2uKybuhs4-hUvg_-wfothwy_bNgasXm3iLkR-33b1hp5fsLNRzL2N60EsSCXKGFr-0KD3tV_z2pMVv42xXhNJnrg1K8NmQ-wxO3DYJHvye4_Z89X8qbwRi_vr2_JyIaoMik6AVqrIpcslwgyUU4A4xcrOtFtRKFAaJuim2uaVLpaVljMlnatWKCGrlkuVjdnZzpcivPc2deYt9JE-kozKYXsgy4lSO6qKIaVonWkjZYyDAWm2jZtd44YaNz-Nm4FE2U6UCPZrG_-s_1F9A7b3hck</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Das, Aurobrata</creator><creator>Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</creator><creator>Panda, Sudhindra N.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Nexus-Sustainability and Conventional Approaches for Optimal Water-Energy-Land-Crop Planning in an Irrigated Canal Command</title><author>Das, Aurobrata ; Sahoo, Bhabagrahi ; Panda, Sudhindra N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1722940f40a1812f21aa6ace87fd00112715af67e4c79bc70820ffcda013cbb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Labour</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Aurobrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panda, Sudhindra N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Aurobrata</au><au>Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</au><au>Panda, Sudhindra N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Nexus-Sustainability and Conventional Approaches for Optimal Water-Energy-Land-Crop Planning in an Irrigated Canal Command</atitle><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle><stitle>Water Resour Manage</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2329</spage><epage>2351</epage><pages>2329-2351</pages><issn>0920-4741</issn><eissn>1573-1650</eissn><abstract>With the increasing threat to water, energy, and food resources world-wide, it is highly imperative to manage these resources sustainably. This study develops an optimal crop area allocation model based on a novel nexus-sustainability index (NSI), integrating the water use, energy use (environmental dimension); land use, labour use (social dimension); yield return, and per capita food production (economic dimension) indicators in agricultural food production. This NSI-based model is evaluated in a reservoir-canal command for optimal water and energy uses and, subsequently, compared with the conventional models of Net-Economic Return (NER), Water-Food (W-F) nexus, and Energy-Food (E-F) nexus based approaches using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) analysis. The comparative results revealed that the NSI-based model is the best that could save water, energy and labour resources by 36.82(±1.91)%, 23.72(±2.47)%, and 2.29(±0.16)% during the
Kharif
season; and 17.5(±0.59)%, 19.82(±1.52)%, and 2.02(±0.42)% during the
Rabi
season as compared to the existing condition, respectively, enhancing the net economic return by 56.53(±3.28)% and 79.96(±2.97)% during the corresponding seasons, respectively. Finally, it is advocated that the NSI-based approach could manage the water and energy resources sustainably ensuring security in the local water-energy-land-food (WELF) nexus.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11269-020-02547-y</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0920-4741 |
| ispartof | Water resources management, 2020-06, Vol.34 (8), p.2329-2351 |
| issn | 0920-4741 1573-1650 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2414141134 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Agricultural management Agronomy Atmospheric Sciences Canals Civil Engineering Decision analysis Decision making Dimensions Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Economic models Economics Energy Energy conservation Energy consumption Energy resources Energy sources Environment Food Food production Food resources Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Hydrology/Water Resources Labour Land use Multiple criterion Seasons Security Social factors Sustainability Water use |
| title | Evaluation of Nexus-Sustainability and Conventional Approaches for Optimal Water-Energy-Land-Crop Planning in an Irrigated Canal Command |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A51%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Nexus-Sustainability%20and%20Conventional%20Approaches%20for%20Optimal%20Water-Energy-Land-Crop%20Planning%20in%20an%20Irrigated%20Canal%20Command&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20management&rft.au=Das,%20Aurobrata&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2329&rft.epage=2351&rft.pages=2329-2351&rft.issn=0920-4741&rft.eissn=1573-1650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11269-020-02547-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2414141134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414141134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |