From a Spouse to a Citizen: The Gendered and Sexualized Path to Citizenship for Marriage Migrants in South Korea
Morality has been a key factor in naturalization. However, defining what constitutes good moral character has never been specified, leaving interpretation of the good moral character requirement to the discretion of immigration officials and judges. Based on an analysis of court cases filed by marri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Law & society review 2020-06, Vol.54 (2), p.423-452 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 452 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 423 |
container_title | Law & society review |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Kim, Nora Hui-Jung Kim, Hyemee |
description | Morality has been a key factor in naturalization. However, defining what constitutes good moral character has never been specified, leaving interpretation of the good moral character requirement to the discretion of immigration officials and judges. Based on an analysis of court cases filed by marriage migrants, this article expands our understanding of the legal interpretation of the “good morality” requirement in two significant ways. First, by examining the nature of the morality requirements applied to marriage migrants applying for citizenship, we identify that controlling sexual morality is one of the key mechanisms of gendering the path to legal citizenship. Second, our analysis questions the fairness of the judicial rulings and shows that judges are not reliable allies for immigrant spouses. South Korean judges tend to show great deference to the administrative branch and rarely rule against the decisions of the immigration officials. Further, the rulings tend to follow cultural and gendered, rather than legal, understanding of “good” wives and husbands. Ultimately, in the case of South Korea we show that that marriage migrant moral jurisprudence deviates from the developing jurisprudence that decriminalizes intimate choices and challenges the traditional gender roles within a family. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/lasr.12468 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2413993468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48584863</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48584863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3898-18866931a9ed75ae214aa9154b301b48e34e7fe5f6fda7540258f8bacfe96e823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81LAzEQxYMouFYvHgVhwZuwNd87OZZiVSgIVs8hbSewZdvUZIvUv97UVY_OZWbg9-bNI-SS0SHLdde6FIeMSw1HpGBK0kqBEcekoJSLynCmT8lZSiuadyVUQa4mMaxLV862YZew7EKex03XfOLmnJx41ya8-OkD8ja5fx0_VtPnh6fxaFotBBioGIDWRjBncFkrh5xJ50z2ngvK5hJQSKw9Kq_90tX5Ja7Aw9wtPBqNwMWA3PR3tzG87zB1dhV2cZMtLZdMGCNynEzd9tQihpQieruNzdrFvWXUHrLbQ3b7nT3DrIc_mhb3_5B2Opq9_Gque80qdSH-aSQokKCF-AK1SWK3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2413993468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From a Spouse to a Citizen: The Gendered and Sexualized Path to Citizenship for Marriage Migrants in South Korea</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Kim, Nora Hui-Jung ; Kim, Hyemee</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nora Hui-Jung ; Kim, Hyemee</creatorcontrib><description>Morality has been a key factor in naturalization. However, defining what constitutes good moral character has never been specified, leaving interpretation of the good moral character requirement to the discretion of immigration officials and judges. Based on an analysis of court cases filed by marriage migrants, this article expands our understanding of the legal interpretation of the “good morality” requirement in two significant ways. First, by examining the nature of the morality requirements applied to marriage migrants applying for citizenship, we identify that controlling sexual morality is one of the key mechanisms of gendering the path to legal citizenship. Second, our analysis questions the fairness of the judicial rulings and shows that judges are not reliable allies for immigrant spouses. South Korean judges tend to show great deference to the administrative branch and rarely rule against the decisions of the immigration officials. Further, the rulings tend to follow cultural and gendered, rather than legal, understanding of “good” wives and husbands. Ultimately, in the case of South Korea we show that that marriage migrant moral jurisprudence deviates from the developing jurisprudence that decriminalizes intimate choices and challenges the traditional gender roles within a family.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley</publisher><subject>Asian cultural groups ; Citizenship ; Courts ; Culture ; Deference ; Fairness ; Family roles ; Foreign born citizens ; Gender ; Gender roles ; Husbands ; Immigrants ; Immigration ; Judges & magistrates ; Jurisprudence ; Marriage ; Married couples ; Migrants ; Morality ; Naturalization ; Noncitizens ; Personality ; Sexualization ; Spouses ; Wives</subject><ispartof>Law & society review, 2020-06, Vol.54 (2), p.423-452</ispartof><rights>2020 Law and Society Association</rights><rights>Copyright Law and Society Association 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3898-18866931a9ed75ae214aa9154b301b48e34e7fe5f6fda7540258f8bacfe96e823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3898-18866931a9ed75ae214aa9154b301b48e34e7fe5f6fda7540258f8bacfe96e823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48584863$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48584863$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,12825,27323,27903,27904,33753,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nora Hui-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyemee</creatorcontrib><title>From a Spouse to a Citizen: The Gendered and Sexualized Path to Citizenship for Marriage Migrants in South Korea</title><title>Law & society review</title><description>Morality has been a key factor in naturalization. However, defining what constitutes good moral character has never been specified, leaving interpretation of the good moral character requirement to the discretion of immigration officials and judges. Based on an analysis of court cases filed by marriage migrants, this article expands our understanding of the legal interpretation of the “good morality” requirement in two significant ways. First, by examining the nature of the morality requirements applied to marriage migrants applying for citizenship, we identify that controlling sexual morality is one of the key mechanisms of gendering the path to legal citizenship. Second, our analysis questions the fairness of the judicial rulings and shows that judges are not reliable allies for immigrant spouses. South Korean judges tend to show great deference to the administrative branch and rarely rule against the decisions of the immigration officials. Further, the rulings tend to follow cultural and gendered, rather than legal, understanding of “good” wives and husbands. Ultimately, in the case of South Korea we show that that marriage migrant moral jurisprudence deviates from the developing jurisprudence that decriminalizes intimate choices and challenges the traditional gender roles within a family.</description><subject>Asian cultural groups</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Deference</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Family roles</subject><subject>Foreign born citizens</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Married couples</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Naturalization</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Sexualization</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Wives</subject><issn>0023-9216</issn><issn>1540-5893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j81LAzEQxYMouFYvHgVhwZuwNd87OZZiVSgIVs8hbSewZdvUZIvUv97UVY_OZWbg9-bNI-SS0SHLdde6FIeMSw1HpGBK0kqBEcekoJSLynCmT8lZSiuadyVUQa4mMaxLV862YZew7EKex03XfOLmnJx41ya8-OkD8ja5fx0_VtPnh6fxaFotBBioGIDWRjBncFkrh5xJ50z2ngvK5hJQSKw9Kq_90tX5Ja7Aw9wtPBqNwMWA3PR3tzG87zB1dhV2cZMtLZdMGCNynEzd9tQihpQieruNzdrFvWXUHrLbQ3b7nT3DrIc_mhb3_5B2Opq9_Gque80qdSH-aSQokKCF-AK1SWK3</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Kim, Nora Hui-Jung</creator><creator>Kim, Hyemee</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>From a Spouse to a Citizen</title><author>Kim, Nora Hui-Jung ; Kim, Hyemee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3898-18866931a9ed75ae214aa9154b301b48e34e7fe5f6fda7540258f8bacfe96e823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Asian cultural groups</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Deference</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Family roles</topic><topic>Foreign born citizens</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Married couples</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Naturalization</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Sexualization</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Wives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nora Hui-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyemee</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Law & society review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Nora Hui-Jung</au><au>Kim, Hyemee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From a Spouse to a Citizen: The Gendered and Sexualized Path to Citizenship for Marriage Migrants in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Law & society review</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>423-452</pages><issn>0023-9216</issn><eissn>1540-5893</eissn><abstract>Morality has been a key factor in naturalization. However, defining what constitutes good moral character has never been specified, leaving interpretation of the good moral character requirement to the discretion of immigration officials and judges. Based on an analysis of court cases filed by marriage migrants, this article expands our understanding of the legal interpretation of the “good morality” requirement in two significant ways. First, by examining the nature of the morality requirements applied to marriage migrants applying for citizenship, we identify that controlling sexual morality is one of the key mechanisms of gendering the path to legal citizenship. Second, our analysis questions the fairness of the judicial rulings and shows that judges are not reliable allies for immigrant spouses. South Korean judges tend to show great deference to the administrative branch and rarely rule against the decisions of the immigration officials. Further, the rulings tend to follow cultural and gendered, rather than legal, understanding of “good” wives and husbands. Ultimately, in the case of South Korea we show that that marriage migrant moral jurisprudence deviates from the developing jurisprudence that decriminalizes intimate choices and challenges the traditional gender roles within a family.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/lasr.12468</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-9216 |
ispartof | Law & society review, 2020-06, Vol.54 (2), p.423-452 |
issn | 0023-9216 1540-5893 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2413993468 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Asian cultural groups Citizenship Courts Culture Deference Fairness Family roles Foreign born citizens Gender Gender roles Husbands Immigrants Immigration Judges & magistrates Jurisprudence Marriage Married couples Migrants Morality Naturalization Noncitizens Personality Sexualization Spouses Wives |
title | From a Spouse to a Citizen: The Gendered and Sexualized Path to Citizenship for Marriage Migrants in South Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A15%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20a%20Spouse%20to%20a%20Citizen:%20The%20Gendered%20and%20Sexualized%20Path%20to%20Citizenship%20for%20Marriage%20Migrants%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Law%20&%20society%20review&rft.au=Kim,%20Nora%20Hui-Jung&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=423-452&rft.issn=0023-9216&rft.eissn=1540-5893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/lasr.12468&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48584863%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2413993468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48584863&rfr_iscdi=true |