Male care status influences the risk-taking decisions in a glassfrog
Parental care increases offspring survival, but may impose costs by decreasing adult survival or mating opportunities. Because individuals have limited resources, time allocation and risk decisions are expected to vary according to the care status and threat faced by parents. Herein, we evaluated th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2020-07, Vol.74 (7), p.1-11, Article 84 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Valencia-Aguilar, Anyelet de Jesus Rodrigues, Domingos Prado, Cynthia P.A. |
description | Parental care increases offspring survival, but may impose costs by decreasing adult survival or mating opportunities. Because individuals have limited resources, time allocation and risk decisions are expected to vary according to the care status and threat faced by parents. Herein, we evaluated the sources of mortality of clutches of the glassfrog Hyalinobatrachium cappellei and the importance of paternal care for offspring survival. We also compared time allocation patterns and antipredator behavior between attending and non-attending males. Using naturalistic observations and field experiments with different dummy predators, we hypothesized that (1) offspring survival would be positively correlated with paternal care; (2) attending males would spend most of the time caring for the embryos, while non-attending males would spend more time foraging and calling; (3) attending males would prioritize their own survival when facing a high risk of predation, even with negative impacts on offspring survival. Main sources of embryo mortality included predation and dehydration, and offspring survivorship was almost totally dependent on paternal care. Although non-attending males spent more time calling and foraging, attending males also called and were able to attract females and increase their mating success. However, contrary to our prediction, we found that attending males were more risk-tolerant, increasing not only offspring survival but also their mortality risk. Our findings highlight the importance of the predation risk level on parents’decisions and that the reproductive status may play a significant role in determining antipredator behavior and mating success in glassfrog males. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-020-02869-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2413789383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48727774</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48727774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-937ffbb881d395fcbcec08649c13b2c82d918c2c0325a367df16f79904d817b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AUEIuI7ePNqkSxmfoLjRdUjTpHamtmNuu_Df27GiOxeXu_m-c-AQcsrhggPoSwQQecZAwHQmL5jYIwuupGCgc7FPFiAVsEwpeUiOENcAkHNjFuT6ybWBepcCxcENI9Kmi-0YOh-QDm-BpgY3bHCbpqtpFXyDTd_tIOpo3TrEmPr6mBxE12I4-flL8np787K6Z4_Pdw-rq0fmpeIDK6SOsSyN4ZUssuhLHzyYXBWey1J4I6qCGy88SJE5mesq8jzqogBVGa5LKZfkfM7dpv5jDDjYdT-mbqq0QnGpTSHNjhIz5VOPmEK029S8u_RpOdjdWnZey05r2e-1rJgkOUs4wV0d0l_0v9bZbK1x6NNvjzJaaK2V_AK0CHW3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2413789383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Male care status influences the risk-taking decisions in a glassfrog</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Valencia-Aguilar, Anyelet ; de Jesus Rodrigues, Domingos ; Prado, Cynthia P.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Valencia-Aguilar, Anyelet ; de Jesus Rodrigues, Domingos ; Prado, Cynthia P.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Parental care increases offspring survival, but may impose costs by decreasing adult survival or mating opportunities. Because individuals have limited resources, time allocation and risk decisions are expected to vary according to the care status and threat faced by parents. Herein, we evaluated the sources of mortality of clutches of the glassfrog Hyalinobatrachium cappellei and the importance of paternal care for offspring survival. We also compared time allocation patterns and antipredator behavior between attending and non-attending males. Using naturalistic observations and field experiments with different dummy predators, we hypothesized that (1) offspring survival would be positively correlated with paternal care; (2) attending males would spend most of the time caring for the embryos, while non-attending males would spend more time foraging and calling; (3) attending males would prioritize their own survival when facing a high risk of predation, even with negative impacts on offspring survival. Main sources of embryo mortality included predation and dehydration, and offspring survivorship was almost totally dependent on paternal care. Although non-attending males spent more time calling and foraging, attending males also called and were able to attract females and increase their mating success. However, contrary to our prediction, we found that attending males were more risk-tolerant, increasing not only offspring survival but also their mortality risk. Our findings highlight the importance of the predation risk level on parents’decisions and that the reproductive status may play a significant role in determining antipredator behavior and mating success in glassfrog males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-020-02869-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal Ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Anti-predator behavior ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Clutches ; Decision making ; Decisions ; Dehydration ; Embryos ; Field tests ; Foraging behavior ; Hatching ; Health risks ; Hyalinobatrachium ; Larvae ; Life Sciences ; Males ; Mating ; Mating behavior ; Mortality ; Mortality risk ; Natural selection ; Offspring ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Parental behavior ; Predation ; Predators ; Reproductive status ; Risk allocation ; Risk levels ; Risk taking ; Sexual selection ; Success ; Survival ; Time allocation ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2020-07, Vol.74 (7), p.1-11, Article 84</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-937ffbb881d395fcbcec08649c13b2c82d918c2c0325a367df16f79904d817b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-937ffbb881d395fcbcec08649c13b2c82d918c2c0325a367df16f79904d817b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6105-4921 ; 0000-0003-3854-4380</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48727774$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48727774$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valencia-Aguilar, Anyelet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus Rodrigues, Domingos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prado, Cynthia P.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Male care status influences the risk-taking decisions in a glassfrog</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Parental care increases offspring survival, but may impose costs by decreasing adult survival or mating opportunities. Because individuals have limited resources, time allocation and risk decisions are expected to vary according to the care status and threat faced by parents. Herein, we evaluated the sources of mortality of clutches of the glassfrog Hyalinobatrachium cappellei and the importance of paternal care for offspring survival. We also compared time allocation patterns and antipredator behavior between attending and non-attending males. Using naturalistic observations and field experiments with different dummy predators, we hypothesized that (1) offspring survival would be positively correlated with paternal care; (2) attending males would spend most of the time caring for the embryos, while non-attending males would spend more time foraging and calling; (3) attending males would prioritize their own survival when facing a high risk of predation, even with negative impacts on offspring survival. Main sources of embryo mortality included predation and dehydration, and offspring survivorship was almost totally dependent on paternal care. Although non-attending males spent more time calling and foraging, attending males also called and were able to attract females and increase their mating success. However, contrary to our prediction, we found that attending males were more risk-tolerant, increasing not only offspring survival but also their mortality risk. Our findings highlight the importance of the predation risk level on parents’decisions and that the reproductive status may play a significant role in determining antipredator behavior and mating success in glassfrog males.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Anti-predator behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Clutches</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Dehydration</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hyalinobatrachium</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mating</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mortality risk</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Parental behavior</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Reproductive status</subject><subject>Risk allocation</subject><subject>Risk levels</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Time allocation</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AUEIuI7ePNqkSxmfoLjRdUjTpHamtmNuu_Df27GiOxeXu_m-c-AQcsrhggPoSwQQecZAwHQmL5jYIwuupGCgc7FPFiAVsEwpeUiOENcAkHNjFuT6ybWBepcCxcENI9Kmi-0YOh-QDm-BpgY3bHCbpqtpFXyDTd_tIOpo3TrEmPr6mBxE12I4-flL8np787K6Z4_Pdw-rq0fmpeIDK6SOsSyN4ZUssuhLHzyYXBWey1J4I6qCGy88SJE5mesq8jzqogBVGa5LKZfkfM7dpv5jDDjYdT-mbqq0QnGpTSHNjhIz5VOPmEK029S8u_RpOdjdWnZey05r2e-1rJgkOUs4wV0d0l_0v9bZbK1x6NNvjzJaaK2V_AK0CHW3</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Valencia-Aguilar, Anyelet</creator><creator>de Jesus Rodrigues, Domingos</creator><creator>Prado, Cynthia P.A.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6105-4921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-4380</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Male care status influences the risk-taking decisions in a glassfrog</title><author>Valencia-Aguilar, Anyelet ; de Jesus Rodrigues, Domingos ; Prado, Cynthia P.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-937ffbb881d395fcbcec08649c13b2c82d918c2c0325a367df16f79904d817b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Anti-predator behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Clutches</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Dehydration</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hyalinobatrachium</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mating</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mortality risk</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Parental behavior</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Reproductive status</topic><topic>Risk allocation</topic><topic>Risk levels</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Time allocation</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valencia-Aguilar, Anyelet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus Rodrigues, Domingos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prado, Cynthia P.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valencia-Aguilar, Anyelet</au><au>de Jesus Rodrigues, Domingos</au><au>Prado, Cynthia P.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Male care status influences the risk-taking decisions in a glassfrog</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><artnum>84</artnum><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Parental care increases offspring survival, but may impose costs by decreasing adult survival or mating opportunities. Because individuals have limited resources, time allocation and risk decisions are expected to vary according to the care status and threat faced by parents. Herein, we evaluated the sources of mortality of clutches of the glassfrog Hyalinobatrachium cappellei and the importance of paternal care for offspring survival. We also compared time allocation patterns and antipredator behavior between attending and non-attending males. Using naturalistic observations and field experiments with different dummy predators, we hypothesized that (1) offspring survival would be positively correlated with paternal care; (2) attending males would spend most of the time caring for the embryos, while non-attending males would spend more time foraging and calling; (3) attending males would prioritize their own survival when facing a high risk of predation, even with negative impacts on offspring survival. Main sources of embryo mortality included predation and dehydration, and offspring survivorship was almost totally dependent on paternal care. Although non-attending males spent more time calling and foraging, attending males also called and were able to attract females and increase their mating success. However, contrary to our prediction, we found that attending males were more risk-tolerant, increasing not only offspring survival but also their mortality risk. Our findings highlight the importance of the predation risk level on parents’decisions and that the reproductive status may play a significant role in determining antipredator behavior and mating success in glassfrog males.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-020-02869-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6105-4921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-4380</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2020-07, Vol.74 (7), p.1-11, Article 84 |
issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2413789383 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal Ecology Animal reproduction Anti-predator behavior Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Clutches Decision making Decisions Dehydration Embryos Field tests Foraging behavior Hatching Health risks Hyalinobatrachium Larvae Life Sciences Males Mating Mating behavior Mortality Mortality risk Natural selection Offspring ORIGINAL ARTICLE Parental behavior Predation Predators Reproductive status Risk allocation Risk levels Risk taking Sexual selection Success Survival Time allocation Zoology |
title | Male care status influences the risk-taking decisions in a glassfrog |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A51%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Male%20care%20status%20influences%20the%20risk-taking%20decisions%20in%20a%20glassfrog&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Valencia-Aguilar,%20Anyelet&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.artnum=84&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-020-02869-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48727774%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2413789383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48727774&rfr_iscdi=true |