A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills
Milling of ferrous metals is usually performed by applying cemented carbide tools due to their high hardness, temperature and wear resistance. Recently, ceramic tool materials have been on the rise and enhanced the efficiency in machining. As ceramics are brittle-hard materials, tool manufacturing r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Production engineering (Berlin, Germany) Germany), 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.355-364 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 364 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 355 |
container_title | Production engineering (Berlin, Germany) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Dröder, Klaus Karpuschewski, Bernhard Uhlmann, Eckart Arrabiyeh, Peter A. Berger, Daniel Busemann, Sarah Hartig, Jörg Madanchi, Nadine Mahlfeld, Georg Sommerfeld, Christian |
description | Milling of ferrous metals is usually performed by applying cemented carbide tools due to their high hardness, temperature and wear resistance. Recently, ceramic tool materials have been on the rise and enhanced the efficiency in machining. As ceramics are brittle-hard materials, tool manufacturing requires a sound knowledge in order to meet the tool requirements such as sharp cutting edges and wear resistance. In this study, milling tools made of the high performance ceramic SiAlON were compared to tools made from cemented carbide. For both tool materials, the influence of a prepared cutting edge was investigated. Both the tool manufacturing process and the cutting edge preparation processes are presented, followed by the application of those tools within milling experiments. In order to evaluate the efficiency of both tool types, the cutting forces and the cumulative process energy demand were analyzed. Additionally, surface roughness of the machined workpieces and tool wear were examined. It was found that the ceramic tools, although process forces were higher than for cemented carbide tools, exhibited by far lower energy consumption, less tool wear and finally generated lower surface roughness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2413579676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2413579676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5393c6bff9f94302cb509c5fa5b3e4a45a1b2395e0a120073f277af99d7185c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgqf0DnhY8R1_y8tHcLMUvKHjRc8imiUR2uzXZCv33Rlfw5uHxhmFmeG8IuWRwzQD0TWFMC6DA64BRipoTMmNLhVSjxFMyAyMEVZKLc7IoJbUA0gBDJWbkdtX4od-77Mb0GRq3c92xpNIMsfEhuz75ym0r7sNuDBW43KZtaEIl-9R15YKcRdeVsPjdc_J6f_eyfqSb54en9WpDPSocqUSDXrUxmmgEAvetBONldLLFIJyQjrUcjQzgGK9PYeRau2jMVrOl9BLn5GrK3efh4xDKaN-HQ67nFssFQ6mN0qqq-KTyeSglh2j3OfUuHy0D-12WncqytSz7U5Y11YSTqVTx7i3kv-h_XF9DY2r9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2413579676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills</title><source>Springer journals</source><creator>Dröder, Klaus ; Karpuschewski, Bernhard ; Uhlmann, Eckart ; Arrabiyeh, Peter A. ; Berger, Daniel ; Busemann, Sarah ; Hartig, Jörg ; Madanchi, Nadine ; Mahlfeld, Georg ; Sommerfeld, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Dröder, Klaus ; Karpuschewski, Bernhard ; Uhlmann, Eckart ; Arrabiyeh, Peter A. ; Berger, Daniel ; Busemann, Sarah ; Hartig, Jörg ; Madanchi, Nadine ; Mahlfeld, Georg ; Sommerfeld, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Milling of ferrous metals is usually performed by applying cemented carbide tools due to their high hardness, temperature and wear resistance. Recently, ceramic tool materials have been on the rise and enhanced the efficiency in machining. As ceramics are brittle-hard materials, tool manufacturing requires a sound knowledge in order to meet the tool requirements such as sharp cutting edges and wear resistance. In this study, milling tools made of the high performance ceramic SiAlON were compared to tools made from cemented carbide. For both tool materials, the influence of a prepared cutting edge was investigated. Both the tool manufacturing process and the cutting edge preparation processes are presented, followed by the application of those tools within milling experiments. In order to evaluate the efficiency of both tool types, the cutting forces and the cumulative process energy demand were analyzed. Additionally, surface roughness of the machined workpieces and tool wear were examined. It was found that the ceramic tools, although process forces were higher than for cemented carbide tools, exhibited by far lower energy consumption, less tool wear and finally generated lower surface roughness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-6524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-7353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Carbide tools ; Cemented carbides ; Ceramic tools ; Ceramics ; Cutting force ; Cutting resistance ; Cutting wear ; End milling ; Energy consumption ; Engineering ; Ferrous metals ; Hard materials ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Milling (machining) ; Production ; Production Process ; Surface roughness ; Tool wear ; Wear resistance ; Workpieces</subject><ispartof>Production engineering (Berlin, Germany), 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.355-364</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5393c6bff9f94302cb509c5fa5b3e4a45a1b2395e0a120073f277af99d7185c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5393c6bff9f94302cb509c5fa5b3e4a45a1b2395e0a120073f277af99d7185c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dröder, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karpuschewski, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhlmann, Eckart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrabiyeh, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busemann, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madanchi, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahlfeld, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerfeld, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills</title><title>Production engineering (Berlin, Germany)</title><addtitle>Prod. Eng. Res. Devel</addtitle><description>Milling of ferrous metals is usually performed by applying cemented carbide tools due to their high hardness, temperature and wear resistance. Recently, ceramic tool materials have been on the rise and enhanced the efficiency in machining. As ceramics are brittle-hard materials, tool manufacturing requires a sound knowledge in order to meet the tool requirements such as sharp cutting edges and wear resistance. In this study, milling tools made of the high performance ceramic SiAlON were compared to tools made from cemented carbide. For both tool materials, the influence of a prepared cutting edge was investigated. Both the tool manufacturing process and the cutting edge preparation processes are presented, followed by the application of those tools within milling experiments. In order to evaluate the efficiency of both tool types, the cutting forces and the cumulative process energy demand were analyzed. Additionally, surface roughness of the machined workpieces and tool wear were examined. It was found that the ceramic tools, although process forces were higher than for cemented carbide tools, exhibited by far lower energy consumption, less tool wear and finally generated lower surface roughness.</description><subject>Carbide tools</subject><subject>Cemented carbides</subject><subject>Ceramic tools</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Cutting force</subject><subject>Cutting resistance</subject><subject>Cutting wear</subject><subject>End milling</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Ferrous metals</subject><subject>Hard materials</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Milling (machining)</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Production Process</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Tool wear</subject><subject>Wear resistance</subject><subject>Workpieces</subject><issn>0944-6524</issn><issn>1863-7353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgqf0DnhY8R1_y8tHcLMUvKHjRc8imiUR2uzXZCv33Rlfw5uHxhmFmeG8IuWRwzQD0TWFMC6DA64BRipoTMmNLhVSjxFMyAyMEVZKLc7IoJbUA0gBDJWbkdtX4od-77Mb0GRq3c92xpNIMsfEhuz75ym0r7sNuDBW43KZtaEIl-9R15YKcRdeVsPjdc_J6f_eyfqSb54en9WpDPSocqUSDXrUxmmgEAvetBONldLLFIJyQjrUcjQzgGK9PYeRau2jMVrOl9BLn5GrK3efh4xDKaN-HQ67nFssFQ6mN0qqq-KTyeSglh2j3OfUuHy0D-12WncqytSz7U5Y11YSTqVTx7i3kv-h_XF9DY2r9</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Dröder, Klaus</creator><creator>Karpuschewski, Bernhard</creator><creator>Uhlmann, Eckart</creator><creator>Arrabiyeh, Peter A.</creator><creator>Berger, Daniel</creator><creator>Busemann, Sarah</creator><creator>Hartig, Jörg</creator><creator>Madanchi, Nadine</creator><creator>Mahlfeld, Georg</creator><creator>Sommerfeld, Christian</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills</title><author>Dröder, Klaus ; Karpuschewski, Bernhard ; Uhlmann, Eckart ; Arrabiyeh, Peter A. ; Berger, Daniel ; Busemann, Sarah ; Hartig, Jörg ; Madanchi, Nadine ; Mahlfeld, Georg ; Sommerfeld, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5393c6bff9f94302cb509c5fa5b3e4a45a1b2395e0a120073f277af99d7185c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carbide tools</topic><topic>Cemented carbides</topic><topic>Ceramic tools</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Cutting force</topic><topic>Cutting resistance</topic><topic>Cutting wear</topic><topic>End milling</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Ferrous metals</topic><topic>Hard materials</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Milling (machining)</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Production Process</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Tool wear</topic><topic>Wear resistance</topic><topic>Workpieces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dröder, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karpuschewski, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhlmann, Eckart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrabiyeh, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busemann, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madanchi, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahlfeld, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerfeld, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Production engineering (Berlin, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dröder, Klaus</au><au>Karpuschewski, Bernhard</au><au>Uhlmann, Eckart</au><au>Arrabiyeh, Peter A.</au><au>Berger, Daniel</au><au>Busemann, Sarah</au><au>Hartig, Jörg</au><au>Madanchi, Nadine</au><au>Mahlfeld, Georg</au><au>Sommerfeld, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills</atitle><jtitle>Production engineering (Berlin, Germany)</jtitle><stitle>Prod. Eng. Res. Devel</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>355-364</pages><issn>0944-6524</issn><eissn>1863-7353</eissn><abstract>Milling of ferrous metals is usually performed by applying cemented carbide tools due to their high hardness, temperature and wear resistance. Recently, ceramic tool materials have been on the rise and enhanced the efficiency in machining. As ceramics are brittle-hard materials, tool manufacturing requires a sound knowledge in order to meet the tool requirements such as sharp cutting edges and wear resistance. In this study, milling tools made of the high performance ceramic SiAlON were compared to tools made from cemented carbide. For both tool materials, the influence of a prepared cutting edge was investigated. Both the tool manufacturing process and the cutting edge preparation processes are presented, followed by the application of those tools within milling experiments. In order to evaluate the efficiency of both tool types, the cutting forces and the cumulative process energy demand were analyzed. Additionally, surface roughness of the machined workpieces and tool wear were examined. It was found that the ceramic tools, although process forces were higher than for cemented carbide tools, exhibited by far lower energy consumption, less tool wear and finally generated lower surface roughness.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0944-6524 |
ispartof | Production engineering (Berlin, Germany), 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.355-364 |
issn | 0944-6524 1863-7353 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2413579676 |
source | Springer journals |
subjects | Carbide tools Cemented carbides Ceramic tools Ceramics Cutting force Cutting resistance Cutting wear End milling Energy consumption Engineering Ferrous metals Hard materials Industrial and Production Engineering Milling (machining) Production Production Process Surface roughness Tool wear Wear resistance Workpieces |
title | A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T17%3A53%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20ceramic%20and%20cemented%20carbide%20end%20mills&rft.jtitle=Production%20engineering%20(Berlin,%20Germany)&rft.au=Dr%C3%B6der,%20Klaus&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=355-364&rft.issn=0944-6524&rft.eissn=1863-7353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2413579676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2413579676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |