Relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives This study aims to compare the efficacy and the safety of the iguratimod with placebo and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Two authors independently searched and selected randomized controlled trials from Cochrane library, M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rheumatology 2020-07, Vol.39 (7), p.2139-2150
Hauptverfasser: Shrestha, Sajan, Zhao, Jing, Yang, Changqing, Zhang, Jinping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2150
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2139
container_title Clinical rheumatology
container_volume 39
creator Shrestha, Sajan
Zhao, Jing
Yang, Changqing
Zhang, Jinping
description Objectives This study aims to compare the efficacy and the safety of the iguratimod with placebo and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Two authors independently searched and selected randomized controlled trials from Cochrane library, Medline (through Pubmed), and Chinese databases, and then assessed the risk of bias (using ROB 2 tool), and graded the certainty of evidence (using the GRADEpro GDT software). We applied the RevMan 5 software for performing meta-analyses of the final consensus data. Results We identified 12 trials involving 1938 participants. Ten trials had an overall high risk of bias. Although iguratimod had superior efficacy than placebo, the incidence of adverse events was also higher. Inferring to non-inferiority analysis with other DMARD therapy (primarily comprising methotrexate), iguratimod is likely to result in similar treatment response (20% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36), 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria) and functional ability at 24 weeks. Although the disease state was slightly better with iguratimod (MD − 0.55, 95% CI − 0.85 to − 0.25), a clinically important improvement was not achieved. Iguratimod may have lower C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values. Swollen joint count, tender joint count, pain intensity, and patient’s and physician’s global assessment of disease state may be comparable between the therapies. Both the therapies are likely to have similar odds (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26) of adverse events. Conclusion Our evidence suggests that iguratimod may be considered a potential alternative to methotrexate to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Key Points • The Asia Pacific League of Association for Rheumatology (APLAR) has recommended that iguratimod may be used a first-line drug for rheumatoid arthritis in specific cases. • Patients on iguratimod may have similar treatment response, functional ability, disease state, and adverse event profile at 24 weeks compared with those on methotrexate. • Iguratimod may be considered a better alternative to methotrexate in RA patients having high CRP and ESR values. • Future clinical trials in diverse population comparing the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in monotherapy or combination therapy with DMARDs (other than methotrexate) are warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10067-020-04986-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2413234253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2413234253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43ee48c9ecef8914bb294cafb72db6e4e68892f591eb8c75a1d1265a4897a7d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhi0EoofCC7BAllgbfEscs0MVN6kSEoK1NXHGPa5O4oPttMqD8L64PQV2bOyR5pt_Lj8hLwV_Izg3b0t7e8O45IxrO_TMPiI7oZVm1mr7mOy4MZwpYYcz8qyUa865HKx4Ss6U5Ka3ot-RX9_wADXeIMUQoge_UVgmWiBg3WgKNF6tuQFzmuicllT3mOG40ZAybTGtGaHOuNQ79tjAFhZ6G-ue5j2uM9QUJwq57nOssbyjQMtWKrZE9DTjTcTb-44zVmCwwGErsTwnTwIcCr54-M_Jj48fvl98ZpdfP325eH_JvDJdZVoh6sFb9BjaYnocpdUewmjkNPaosR8GK0NnBY6DNx2ISci-Az1YA2bi6py8Pukec_q5YqnuOq25DVGc1EJJpWWnGiVPlM-plIzBHXOcIW9OcHfnhDs54ZoT7t4JZ1vRqwfpdZxx-lvy5_QNUCegtNRyhflf7__I_gYqe5fn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2413234253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Shrestha, Sajan ; Zhao, Jing ; Yang, Changqing ; Zhang, Jinping</creator><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Sajan ; Zhao, Jing ; Yang, Changqing ; Zhang, Jinping</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This study aims to compare the efficacy and the safety of the iguratimod with placebo and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Two authors independently searched and selected randomized controlled trials from Cochrane library, Medline (through Pubmed), and Chinese databases, and then assessed the risk of bias (using ROB 2 tool), and graded the certainty of evidence (using the GRADEpro GDT software). We applied the RevMan 5 software for performing meta-analyses of the final consensus data. Results We identified 12 trials involving 1938 participants. Ten trials had an overall high risk of bias. Although iguratimod had superior efficacy than placebo, the incidence of adverse events was also higher. Inferring to non-inferiority analysis with other DMARD therapy (primarily comprising methotrexate), iguratimod is likely to result in similar treatment response (20% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36), 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria) and functional ability at 24 weeks. Although the disease state was slightly better with iguratimod (MD − 0.55, 95% CI − 0.85 to − 0.25), a clinically important improvement was not achieved. Iguratimod may have lower C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values. Swollen joint count, tender joint count, pain intensity, and patient’s and physician’s global assessment of disease state may be comparable between the therapies. Both the therapies are likely to have similar odds (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26) of adverse events. Conclusion Our evidence suggests that iguratimod may be considered a potential alternative to methotrexate to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Key Points • The Asia Pacific League of Association for Rheumatology (APLAR) has recommended that iguratimod may be used a first-line drug for rheumatoid arthritis in specific cases. • Patients on iguratimod may have similar treatment response, functional ability, disease state, and adverse event profile at 24 weeks compared with those on methotrexate. • Iguratimod may be considered a better alternative to methotrexate in RA patients having high CRP and ESR values. • Future clinical trials in diverse population comparing the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in monotherapy or combination therapy with DMARDs (other than methotrexate) are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0770-3198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-9949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-04986-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32076916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects ; Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy ; Blood Sedimentation - drug effects ; C-reactive protein ; C-Reactive Protein - drug effects ; Chromones - adverse effects ; Chromones - therapeutic use ; Clinical trials ; Computer programs ; Erythrocyte sedimentation rate ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Methotrexate ; Methotrexate - adverse effects ; Original Article ; Patients ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatology ; Safety ; Sulfonamides - adverse effects ; Sulfonamides - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical rheumatology, 2020-07, Vol.39 (7), p.2139-2150</ispartof><rights>International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2020</rights><rights>International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43ee48c9ecef8914bb294cafb72db6e4e68892f591eb8c75a1d1265a4897a7d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43ee48c9ecef8914bb294cafb72db6e4e68892f591eb8c75a1d1265a4897a7d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10067-020-04986-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10067-020-04986-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Sajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Changqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jinping</creatorcontrib><title>Relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Clinical rheumatology</title><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Objectives This study aims to compare the efficacy and the safety of the iguratimod with placebo and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Two authors independently searched and selected randomized controlled trials from Cochrane library, Medline (through Pubmed), and Chinese databases, and then assessed the risk of bias (using ROB 2 tool), and graded the certainty of evidence (using the GRADEpro GDT software). We applied the RevMan 5 software for performing meta-analyses of the final consensus data. Results We identified 12 trials involving 1938 participants. Ten trials had an overall high risk of bias. Although iguratimod had superior efficacy than placebo, the incidence of adverse events was also higher. Inferring to non-inferiority analysis with other DMARD therapy (primarily comprising methotrexate), iguratimod is likely to result in similar treatment response (20% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36), 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria) and functional ability at 24 weeks. Although the disease state was slightly better with iguratimod (MD − 0.55, 95% CI − 0.85 to − 0.25), a clinically important improvement was not achieved. Iguratimod may have lower C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values. Swollen joint count, tender joint count, pain intensity, and patient’s and physician’s global assessment of disease state may be comparable between the therapies. Both the therapies are likely to have similar odds (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26) of adverse events. Conclusion Our evidence suggests that iguratimod may be considered a potential alternative to methotrexate to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Key Points • The Asia Pacific League of Association for Rheumatology (APLAR) has recommended that iguratimod may be used a first-line drug for rheumatoid arthritis in specific cases. • Patients on iguratimod may have similar treatment response, functional ability, disease state, and adverse event profile at 24 weeks compared with those on methotrexate. • Iguratimod may be considered a better alternative to methotrexate in RA patients having high CRP and ESR values. • Future clinical trials in diverse population comparing the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in monotherapy or combination therapy with DMARDs (other than methotrexate) are warranted.</description><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</subject><subject>Blood Sedimentation - drug effects</subject><subject>C-reactive protein</subject><subject>C-Reactive Protein - drug effects</subject><subject>Chromones - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chromones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Methotrexate</subject><subject>Methotrexate - adverse effects</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0770-3198</issn><issn>1434-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhi0EoofCC7BAllgbfEscs0MVN6kSEoK1NXHGPa5O4oPttMqD8L64PQV2bOyR5pt_Lj8hLwV_Izg3b0t7e8O45IxrO_TMPiI7oZVm1mr7mOy4MZwpYYcz8qyUa865HKx4Ss6U5Ka3ot-RX9_wADXeIMUQoge_UVgmWiBg3WgKNF6tuQFzmuicllT3mOG40ZAybTGtGaHOuNQ79tjAFhZ6G-ue5j2uM9QUJwq57nOssbyjQMtWKrZE9DTjTcTb-44zVmCwwGErsTwnTwIcCr54-M_Jj48fvl98ZpdfP325eH_JvDJdZVoh6sFb9BjaYnocpdUewmjkNPaosR8GK0NnBY6DNx2ISci-Az1YA2bi6py8Pukec_q5YqnuOq25DVGc1EJJpWWnGiVPlM-plIzBHXOcIW9OcHfnhDs54ZoT7t4JZ1vRqwfpdZxx-lvy5_QNUCegtNRyhflf7__I_gYqe5fn</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Shrestha, Sajan</creator><creator>Zhao, Jing</creator><creator>Yang, Changqing</creator><creator>Zhang, Jinping</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Shrestha, Sajan ; Zhao, Jing ; Yang, Changqing ; Zhang, Jinping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43ee48c9ecef8914bb294cafb72db6e4e68892f591eb8c75a1d1265a4897a7d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</topic><topic>Blood Sedimentation - drug effects</topic><topic>C-reactive protein</topic><topic>C-Reactive Protein - drug effects</topic><topic>Chromones - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chromones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Methotrexate</topic><topic>Methotrexate - adverse effects</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Sajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Changqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jinping</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shrestha, Sajan</au><au>Zhao, Jing</au><au>Yang, Changqing</au><au>Zhang, Jinping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle><stitle>Clin Rheumatol</stitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2139</spage><epage>2150</epage><pages>2139-2150</pages><issn>0770-3198</issn><eissn>1434-9949</eissn><abstract>Objectives This study aims to compare the efficacy and the safety of the iguratimod with placebo and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Two authors independently searched and selected randomized controlled trials from Cochrane library, Medline (through Pubmed), and Chinese databases, and then assessed the risk of bias (using ROB 2 tool), and graded the certainty of evidence (using the GRADEpro GDT software). We applied the RevMan 5 software for performing meta-analyses of the final consensus data. Results We identified 12 trials involving 1938 participants. Ten trials had an overall high risk of bias. Although iguratimod had superior efficacy than placebo, the incidence of adverse events was also higher. Inferring to non-inferiority analysis with other DMARD therapy (primarily comprising methotrexate), iguratimod is likely to result in similar treatment response (20% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36), 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria) and functional ability at 24 weeks. Although the disease state was slightly better with iguratimod (MD − 0.55, 95% CI − 0.85 to − 0.25), a clinically important improvement was not achieved. Iguratimod may have lower C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values. Swollen joint count, tender joint count, pain intensity, and patient’s and physician’s global assessment of disease state may be comparable between the therapies. Both the therapies are likely to have similar odds (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26) of adverse events. Conclusion Our evidence suggests that iguratimod may be considered a potential alternative to methotrexate to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Key Points • The Asia Pacific League of Association for Rheumatology (APLAR) has recommended that iguratimod may be used a first-line drug for rheumatoid arthritis in specific cases. • Patients on iguratimod may have similar treatment response, functional ability, disease state, and adverse event profile at 24 weeks compared with those on methotrexate. • Iguratimod may be considered a better alternative to methotrexate in RA patients having high CRP and ESR values. • Future clinical trials in diverse population comparing the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in monotherapy or combination therapy with DMARDs (other than methotrexate) are warranted.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>32076916</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10067-020-04986-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0770-3198
ispartof Clinical rheumatology, 2020-07, Vol.39 (7), p.2139-2150
issn 0770-3198
1434-9949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2413234253
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects
Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy
Blood Sedimentation - drug effects
C-reactive protein
C-Reactive Protein - drug effects
Chromones - adverse effects
Chromones - therapeutic use
Clinical trials
Computer programs
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Methotrexate
Methotrexate - adverse effects
Original Article
Patients
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology
Safety
Sulfonamides - adverse effects
Sulfonamides - therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
title Relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A51%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20iguratimod%20monotherapy%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20patients%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rheumatology&rft.au=Shrestha,%20Sajan&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2139&rft.epage=2150&rft.pages=2139-2150&rft.issn=0770-3198&rft.eissn=1434-9949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10067-020-04986-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2413234253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2413234253&rft_id=info:pmid/32076916&rfr_iscdi=true