Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and the vaginal microbiome: A case‐control study

Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age. Some evidence suggests that dysbiosis of the gut microbiota could be associated with PCOS clinical parameters, but little is known for the association between vaginal microbiome and PCOS. Obje...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) 2020-07, Vol.93 (1), p.52-60
Hauptverfasser: Hong, Xiang, Qin, Pengfei, Huang, Kaiping, Ding, Xiaoling, Ma, Jun, Xuan, Yan, Zhu, Xiaoyue, Peng, Danhong, Wang, Bei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 52
container_title Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)
container_volume 93
creator Hong, Xiang
Qin, Pengfei
Huang, Kaiping
Ding, Xiaoling
Ma, Jun
Xuan, Yan
Zhu, Xiaoyue
Peng, Danhong
Wang, Bei
description Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age. Some evidence suggests that dysbiosis of the gut microbiota could be associated with PCOS clinical parameters, but little is known for the association between vaginal microbiome and PCOS. Objective To determine differences in the vaginal microbiome between women with PCOS and healthy control women. Research design and methods In this case‐control study, the women with newly diagnosed PCOS (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 40) were included from the hospital and maternal and child health centre, respectively. The vaginal swabs were collected, and microbiome structures were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The screening values for potential bacteria biomarker for PCOS were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method. Results There was significant difference in vaginal bacterial structures between PCOS and healthy control women. The vaginal bacterial species in the PCOS group were more diverse than the control group (Simpson index for PCOS group vs. control group: median 0.49 vs. 0.80, P = .008; Shannon index: median 1.07 vs. 0.44, P = .003; Chao1 index: median 85.12 vs. 66.13, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cen.14198
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2411409992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2411409992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-f21c1ee194f5068dbc7d947a8e1233e56e3397193ead4f36ae1de581d78c7ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EoqWw4ALIEisWaf3Iy-yqqjykCjawNo49gVRJXOKkVXYcgTNyEgwBdsxmFvPNp5kfoVNKptTXTEM9pSEV6R4aUx5HAWNxtI_GhBMSkDgOR-jIuTUhJEpJcohGnHG_x8gYPc2ds7pQbWFrnEG7A6jxxpa97l1baGy3qumx62vT2Aqwqg1uXwBv1XNRqxJXhW5sVvjRJZ5jrRx8vL1rW7eNLbFrO9Mfo4NclQ5OfvoEPV4tHxY3wer--nYxXwWaRzwNckY1BaAizCMSpybTiRFholKgjHOIYuBcJFRwUCbMeayAGohSapJUJyoTfILOB--msa8duFaubdf4G51kIaUhEUIwT10MlD_buQZyuWmKyr8oKZFfWUqfpfzO0rNnP8Yuq8D8kb_heWA2ALuihP5_k1ws7wblJ7AEf18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2411409992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and the vaginal microbiome: A case‐control study</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hong, Xiang ; Qin, Pengfei ; Huang, Kaiping ; Ding, Xiaoling ; Ma, Jun ; Xuan, Yan ; Zhu, Xiaoyue ; Peng, Danhong ; Wang, Bei</creator><creatorcontrib>Hong, Xiang ; Qin, Pengfei ; Huang, Kaiping ; Ding, Xiaoling ; Ma, Jun ; Xuan, Yan ; Zhu, Xiaoyue ; Peng, Danhong ; Wang, Bei</creatorcontrib><description>Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age. Some evidence suggests that dysbiosis of the gut microbiota could be associated with PCOS clinical parameters, but little is known for the association between vaginal microbiome and PCOS. Objective To determine differences in the vaginal microbiome between women with PCOS and healthy control women. Research design and methods In this case‐control study, the women with newly diagnosed PCOS (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 40) were included from the hospital and maternal and child health centre, respectively. The vaginal swabs were collected, and microbiome structures were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The screening values for potential bacteria biomarker for PCOS were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method. Results There was significant difference in vaginal bacterial structures between PCOS and healthy control women. The vaginal bacterial species in the PCOS group were more diverse than the control group (Simpson index for PCOS group vs. control group: median 0.49 vs. 0.80, P = .008; Shannon index: median 1.07 vs. 0.44, P = .003; Chao1 index: median 85.12 vs. 66.13, P &lt; .001). The relative abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus in the PCOS group was significantly lower than controls (P = .001), and the relative abundance of Mycoplasma and Prevotella was higher than controls (P &lt; .001, P = .002, respectively). The Mycoplasma genus could be a potential biomarker for PCOS screening, as ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the relative abundance of Mycoplasma was 0.958 (95% CI: 0.901‐0.999). Subgroup analyses also showed these associations would not change among the women with the same BMI level and vagina cleanliness grading. Conclusions In the vaginal microbiome, the Mycoplasma genus was associated with PCOS. Further research is required to explore causal correlations between PCOS and the vaginal microbiome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-0664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cen.14198</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32311120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biomarkers ; Dysbacteriosis ; Endocrine disorders ; Intestinal microflora ; Lactobacillus ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Mycoplasma ; Ovaries ; Polycystic ovary syndrome ; rRNA 16S ; Vagina ; vaginal microbiome</subject><ispartof>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford), 2020-07, Vol.93 (1), p.52-60</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-f21c1ee194f5068dbc7d947a8e1233e56e3397193ead4f36ae1de581d78c7ab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-f21c1ee194f5068dbc7d947a8e1233e56e3397193ead4f36ae1de581d78c7ab93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5232-0933</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcen.14198$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcen.14198$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hong, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Kaiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xuan, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiaoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Danhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bei</creatorcontrib><title>Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and the vaginal microbiome: A case‐control study</title><title>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</addtitle><description>Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age. Some evidence suggests that dysbiosis of the gut microbiota could be associated with PCOS clinical parameters, but little is known for the association between vaginal microbiome and PCOS. Objective To determine differences in the vaginal microbiome between women with PCOS and healthy control women. Research design and methods In this case‐control study, the women with newly diagnosed PCOS (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 40) were included from the hospital and maternal and child health centre, respectively. The vaginal swabs were collected, and microbiome structures were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The screening values for potential bacteria biomarker for PCOS were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method. Results There was significant difference in vaginal bacterial structures between PCOS and healthy control women. The vaginal bacterial species in the PCOS group were more diverse than the control group (Simpson index for PCOS group vs. control group: median 0.49 vs. 0.80, P = .008; Shannon index: median 1.07 vs. 0.44, P = .003; Chao1 index: median 85.12 vs. 66.13, P &lt; .001). The relative abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus in the PCOS group was significantly lower than controls (P = .001), and the relative abundance of Mycoplasma and Prevotella was higher than controls (P &lt; .001, P = .002, respectively). The Mycoplasma genus could be a potential biomarker for PCOS screening, as ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the relative abundance of Mycoplasma was 0.958 (95% CI: 0.901‐0.999). Subgroup analyses also showed these associations would not change among the women with the same BMI level and vagina cleanliness grading. Conclusions In the vaginal microbiome, the Mycoplasma genus was associated with PCOS. Further research is required to explore causal correlations between PCOS and the vaginal microbiome.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Dysbacteriosis</subject><subject>Endocrine disorders</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Lactobacillus</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Mycoplasma</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Polycystic ovary syndrome</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>vaginal microbiome</subject><issn>0300-0664</issn><issn>1365-2265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EoqWw4ALIEisWaf3Iy-yqqjykCjawNo49gVRJXOKkVXYcgTNyEgwBdsxmFvPNp5kfoVNKptTXTEM9pSEV6R4aUx5HAWNxtI_GhBMSkDgOR-jIuTUhJEpJcohGnHG_x8gYPc2ds7pQbWFrnEG7A6jxxpa97l1baGy3qumx62vT2Aqwqg1uXwBv1XNRqxJXhW5sVvjRJZ5jrRx8vL1rW7eNLbFrO9Mfo4NclQ5OfvoEPV4tHxY3wer--nYxXwWaRzwNckY1BaAizCMSpybTiRFholKgjHOIYuBcJFRwUCbMeayAGohSapJUJyoTfILOB--msa8duFaubdf4G51kIaUhEUIwT10MlD_buQZyuWmKyr8oKZFfWUqfpfzO0rNnP8Yuq8D8kb_heWA2ALuihP5_k1ws7wblJ7AEf18</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Hong, Xiang</creator><creator>Qin, Pengfei</creator><creator>Huang, Kaiping</creator><creator>Ding, Xiaoling</creator><creator>Ma, Jun</creator><creator>Xuan, Yan</creator><creator>Zhu, Xiaoyue</creator><creator>Peng, Danhong</creator><creator>Wang, Bei</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5232-0933</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and the vaginal microbiome: A case‐control study</title><author>Hong, Xiang ; Qin, Pengfei ; Huang, Kaiping ; Ding, Xiaoling ; Ma, Jun ; Xuan, Yan ; Zhu, Xiaoyue ; Peng, Danhong ; Wang, Bei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-f21c1ee194f5068dbc7d947a8e1233e56e3397193ead4f36ae1de581d78c7ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Dysbacteriosis</topic><topic>Endocrine disorders</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Lactobacillus</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Mycoplasma</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Polycystic ovary syndrome</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>vaginal microbiome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hong, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Kaiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xuan, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiaoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Danhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hong, Xiang</au><au>Qin, Pengfei</au><au>Huang, Kaiping</au><au>Ding, Xiaoling</au><au>Ma, Jun</au><au>Xuan, Yan</au><au>Zhu, Xiaoyue</au><au>Peng, Danhong</au><au>Wang, Bei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and the vaginal microbiome: A case‐control study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>52-60</pages><issn>0300-0664</issn><eissn>1365-2265</eissn><abstract>Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age. Some evidence suggests that dysbiosis of the gut microbiota could be associated with PCOS clinical parameters, but little is known for the association between vaginal microbiome and PCOS. Objective To determine differences in the vaginal microbiome between women with PCOS and healthy control women. Research design and methods In this case‐control study, the women with newly diagnosed PCOS (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 40) were included from the hospital and maternal and child health centre, respectively. The vaginal swabs were collected, and microbiome structures were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The screening values for potential bacteria biomarker for PCOS were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method. Results There was significant difference in vaginal bacterial structures between PCOS and healthy control women. The vaginal bacterial species in the PCOS group were more diverse than the control group (Simpson index for PCOS group vs. control group: median 0.49 vs. 0.80, P = .008; Shannon index: median 1.07 vs. 0.44, P = .003; Chao1 index: median 85.12 vs. 66.13, P &lt; .001). The relative abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus in the PCOS group was significantly lower than controls (P = .001), and the relative abundance of Mycoplasma and Prevotella was higher than controls (P &lt; .001, P = .002, respectively). The Mycoplasma genus could be a potential biomarker for PCOS screening, as ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the relative abundance of Mycoplasma was 0.958 (95% CI: 0.901‐0.999). Subgroup analyses also showed these associations would not change among the women with the same BMI level and vagina cleanliness grading. Conclusions In the vaginal microbiome, the Mycoplasma genus was associated with PCOS. Further research is required to explore causal correlations between PCOS and the vaginal microbiome.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32311120</pmid><doi>10.1111/cen.14198</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5232-0933</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-0664
ispartof Clinical endocrinology (Oxford), 2020-07, Vol.93 (1), p.52-60
issn 0300-0664
1365-2265
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2411409992
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Abundance
Biomarkers
Dysbacteriosis
Endocrine disorders
Intestinal microflora
Lactobacillus
Maternal & child health
Microbiomes
Microbiota
Mycoplasma
Ovaries
Polycystic ovary syndrome
rRNA 16S
Vagina
vaginal microbiome
title Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and the vaginal microbiome: A case‐control study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T09%3A05%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20polycystic%20ovary%20syndrome%20and%20the%20vaginal%20microbiome:%20A%20case%E2%80%90control%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20endocrinology%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Hong,%20Xiang&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=52-60&rft.issn=0300-0664&rft.eissn=1365-2265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cen.14198&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2411409992%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2411409992&rft_id=info:pmid/32311120&rfr_iscdi=true