Using nudges to promote healthy food choices at Greater Boston food pantries
Nudging is a strategy used in behavioral economics to influence consumer decision-making through subtle changes in the choice environment. Recently, behavioral economists have been testing the use of nudge techniques to encourage healthier foods for high risk individuals. Food insecure individuals h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2020, Vol.79 (OCE2), Article E709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | OCE2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Proceedings of the Nutrition Society |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Brown, Lisa Townsend, Alice Bates, Sydney Worthington, Adriene |
description | Nudging is a strategy used in behavioral economics to influence consumer decision-making through subtle changes in the choice environment. Recently, behavioral economists have been testing the use of nudge techniques to encourage healthier foods for high risk individuals. Food insecure individuals have an elevated risk of obesity and non-communicable diseases and would benefit from eating more nutrients dense foods for prevention and treatment. To promote more nutrient dense foods for food insecure individuals, Feeding America created a list of Foods to Encourage (F2E). This study evaluated the efficacy of nudge interventions in promoting two selected F2E at client-choice food pantries in Massachusetts. The objective of this study was to determine if the nudge interventions increased the take-rate of the targeted F2E: carrots and brown rice. Nudge interventions were implemented at three client-choice food pantries. Carrots were subjected to a “recipe nudge” in which recipe cards were placed next to the product. Brown rice underwent a placement nudge, which entailed moving the product to the proximal end of the display at waist height within easy reach and line of sight. Data was collected three times pre-intervention and three times post-intervention at each site to determine if the nudge had an impact on take rate. This study took place at three suburban food pantries in the Greater Boston area. The total number of shoppers observed before intervention was 402 and after intervention was 417. The main outcome was the take-rate of the products determined by the number of shoppers who selected the foods before and after intervention. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 24 (Armonk, NY). Odds ratios were calculated to determine the effect of the intervention with a logistic regression controlling for the site. The take-rate of brown rice increased significantly post-placement intervention. The odds ratio for brown rice was 1.940 (95% CI = 1.318 to 2.857). The take rate of other types of rice did not change post-intervention. The take rate for fresh carrots also increased significantly post recipe card intervention. The odds ratio for carrots was 1.519 (95% CI = 1.129 to 2.044). The results of this study indicate a favorable effect of nudges on the take rate of nutrient dense products and could support the use of nudges as a strategy to promote the distribution of healthy food in client-choice food pantries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0029665120006588 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2410992430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0029665120006588</cupid><sourcerecordid>2410992430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1578-c44d5feafb7c9adbfcb9b907129aaa817174d62cefd19005d42420459b0f16d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4C7gevScNJfJUotWoeBCux4yubRT2klN0kXf3ikVXIirs_j-y-En5BbhHgHVwwcA01IKZAAgRV2fkRFyJSqmUJ-T0RFXR35JrnJeA6DktRyR-SJ3_ZL2e7f0mZZIdyluY_F05c2mrA40xOioXcXODtwUOkveFJ_oU8wl9ie8M31Jnc_X5CKYTfY3P3dMFi_Pn9PXav4-e5s-ziuLQtWV5dyJ4E1oldXGtcG2utWgkGljTI0KFXeSWR8cagDhOOMMuNAtBJROTMbk7pQ7PPu197k067hP_VDZMI6gNeMTGFR4UtkUc04-NLvUbU06NAjNcbTmz2iDZ_LjMds2dcMov9H_u74BOiRt-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2410992430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using nudges to promote healthy food choices at Greater Boston food pantries</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Brown, Lisa ; Townsend, Alice ; Bates, Sydney ; Worthington, Adriene</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Lisa ; Townsend, Alice ; Bates, Sydney ; Worthington, Adriene</creatorcontrib><description>Nudging is a strategy used in behavioral economics to influence consumer decision-making through subtle changes in the choice environment. Recently, behavioral economists have been testing the use of nudge techniques to encourage healthier foods for high risk individuals. Food insecure individuals have an elevated risk of obesity and non-communicable diseases and would benefit from eating more nutrients dense foods for prevention and treatment. To promote more nutrient dense foods for food insecure individuals, Feeding America created a list of Foods to Encourage (F2E). This study evaluated the efficacy of nudge interventions in promoting two selected F2E at client-choice food pantries in Massachusetts. The objective of this study was to determine if the nudge interventions increased the take-rate of the targeted F2E: carrots and brown rice. Nudge interventions were implemented at three client-choice food pantries. Carrots were subjected to a “recipe nudge” in which recipe cards were placed next to the product. Brown rice underwent a placement nudge, which entailed moving the product to the proximal end of the display at waist height within easy reach and line of sight. Data was collected three times pre-intervention and three times post-intervention at each site to determine if the nudge had an impact on take rate. This study took place at three suburban food pantries in the Greater Boston area. The total number of shoppers observed before intervention was 402 and after intervention was 417. The main outcome was the take-rate of the products determined by the number of shoppers who selected the foods before and after intervention. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 24 (Armonk, NY). Odds ratios were calculated to determine the effect of the intervention with a logistic regression controlling for the site. The take-rate of brown rice increased significantly post-placement intervention. The odds ratio for brown rice was 1.940 (95% CI = 1.318 to 2.857). The take rate of other types of rice did not change post-intervention. The take rate for fresh carrots also increased significantly post recipe card intervention. The odds ratio for carrots was 1.519 (95% CI = 1.129 to 2.044). The results of this study indicate a favorable effect of nudges on the take rate of nutrient dense products and could support the use of nudges as a strategy to promote the distribution of healthy food in client-choice food pantries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-6651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0029665120006588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Carrots ; Decision making ; Food ; Food selection ; Health promotion ; Intervention ; Nutrients ; Placement ; Recipes ; Regression analysis ; Rice ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2020, Vol.79 (OCE2), Article E709</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0029665120006588/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Sydney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Adriene</creatorcontrib><title>Using nudges to promote healthy food choices at Greater Boston food pantries</title><title>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society</title><addtitle>Proc. Nutr. Soc</addtitle><description>Nudging is a strategy used in behavioral economics to influence consumer decision-making through subtle changes in the choice environment. Recently, behavioral economists have been testing the use of nudge techniques to encourage healthier foods for high risk individuals. Food insecure individuals have an elevated risk of obesity and non-communicable diseases and would benefit from eating more nutrients dense foods for prevention and treatment. To promote more nutrient dense foods for food insecure individuals, Feeding America created a list of Foods to Encourage (F2E). This study evaluated the efficacy of nudge interventions in promoting two selected F2E at client-choice food pantries in Massachusetts. The objective of this study was to determine if the nudge interventions increased the take-rate of the targeted F2E: carrots and brown rice. Nudge interventions were implemented at three client-choice food pantries. Carrots were subjected to a “recipe nudge” in which recipe cards were placed next to the product. Brown rice underwent a placement nudge, which entailed moving the product to the proximal end of the display at waist height within easy reach and line of sight. Data was collected three times pre-intervention and three times post-intervention at each site to determine if the nudge had an impact on take rate. This study took place at three suburban food pantries in the Greater Boston area. The total number of shoppers observed before intervention was 402 and after intervention was 417. The main outcome was the take-rate of the products determined by the number of shoppers who selected the foods before and after intervention. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 24 (Armonk, NY). Odds ratios were calculated to determine the effect of the intervention with a logistic regression controlling for the site. The take-rate of brown rice increased significantly post-placement intervention. The odds ratio for brown rice was 1.940 (95% CI = 1.318 to 2.857). The take rate of other types of rice did not change post-intervention. The take rate for fresh carrots also increased significantly post recipe card intervention. The odds ratio for carrots was 1.519 (95% CI = 1.129 to 2.044). The results of this study indicate a favorable effect of nudges on the take rate of nutrient dense products and could support the use of nudges as a strategy to promote the distribution of healthy food in client-choice food pantries.</description><subject>Carrots</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food selection</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Placement</subject><subject>Recipes</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0029-6651</issn><issn>1475-2719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4C7gevScNJfJUotWoeBCux4yubRT2klN0kXf3ikVXIirs_j-y-En5BbhHgHVwwcA01IKZAAgRV2fkRFyJSqmUJ-T0RFXR35JrnJeA6DktRyR-SJ3_ZL2e7f0mZZIdyluY_F05c2mrA40xOioXcXODtwUOkveFJ_oU8wl9ie8M31Jnc_X5CKYTfY3P3dMFi_Pn9PXav4-e5s-ziuLQtWV5dyJ4E1oldXGtcG2utWgkGljTI0KFXeSWR8cagDhOOMMuNAtBJROTMbk7pQ7PPu197k067hP_VDZMI6gNeMTGFR4UtkUc04-NLvUbU06NAjNcbTmz2iDZ_LjMds2dcMov9H_u74BOiRt-w</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Brown, Lisa</creator><creator>Townsend, Alice</creator><creator>Bates, Sydney</creator><creator>Worthington, Adriene</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Using nudges to promote healthy food choices at Greater Boston food pantries</title><author>Brown, Lisa ; Townsend, Alice ; Bates, Sydney ; Worthington, Adriene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1578-c44d5feafb7c9adbfcb9b907129aaa817174d62cefd19005d42420459b0f16d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carrots</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food selection</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Placement</topic><topic>Recipes</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Sydney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Adriene</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Lisa</au><au>Townsend, Alice</au><au>Bates, Sydney</au><au>Worthington, Adriene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using nudges to promote healthy food choices at Greater Boston food pantries</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society</jtitle><addtitle>Proc. Nutr. Soc</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>OCE2</issue><artnum>E709</artnum><issn>0029-6651</issn><eissn>1475-2719</eissn><abstract>Nudging is a strategy used in behavioral economics to influence consumer decision-making through subtle changes in the choice environment. Recently, behavioral economists have been testing the use of nudge techniques to encourage healthier foods for high risk individuals. Food insecure individuals have an elevated risk of obesity and non-communicable diseases and would benefit from eating more nutrients dense foods for prevention and treatment. To promote more nutrient dense foods for food insecure individuals, Feeding America created a list of Foods to Encourage (F2E). This study evaluated the efficacy of nudge interventions in promoting two selected F2E at client-choice food pantries in Massachusetts. The objective of this study was to determine if the nudge interventions increased the take-rate of the targeted F2E: carrots and brown rice. Nudge interventions were implemented at three client-choice food pantries. Carrots were subjected to a “recipe nudge” in which recipe cards were placed next to the product. Brown rice underwent a placement nudge, which entailed moving the product to the proximal end of the display at waist height within easy reach and line of sight. Data was collected three times pre-intervention and three times post-intervention at each site to determine if the nudge had an impact on take rate. This study took place at three suburban food pantries in the Greater Boston area. The total number of shoppers observed before intervention was 402 and after intervention was 417. The main outcome was the take-rate of the products determined by the number of shoppers who selected the foods before and after intervention. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 24 (Armonk, NY). Odds ratios were calculated to determine the effect of the intervention with a logistic regression controlling for the site. The take-rate of brown rice increased significantly post-placement intervention. The odds ratio for brown rice was 1.940 (95% CI = 1.318 to 2.857). The take rate of other types of rice did not change post-intervention. The take rate for fresh carrots also increased significantly post recipe card intervention. The odds ratio for carrots was 1.519 (95% CI = 1.129 to 2.044). The results of this study indicate a favorable effect of nudges on the take rate of nutrient dense products and could support the use of nudges as a strategy to promote the distribution of healthy food in client-choice food pantries.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0029665120006588</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-6651 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2020, Vol.79 (OCE2), Article E709 |
issn | 0029-6651 1475-2719 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2410992430 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Carrots Decision making Food Food selection Health promotion Intervention Nutrients Placement Recipes Regression analysis Rice Vegetables |
title | Using nudges to promote healthy food choices at Greater Boston food pantries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A19%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20nudges%20to%20promote%20healthy%20food%20choices%20at%20Greater%20Boston%20food%20pantries&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Nutrition%20Society&rft.au=Brown,%20Lisa&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=OCE2&rft.artnum=E709&rft.issn=0029-6651&rft.eissn=1475-2719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0029665120006588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2410992430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2410992430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0029665120006588&rfr_iscdi=true |