Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing
This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of wood and wood products 2014-11, Vol.72 (6), p.815-823 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 823 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 815 |
container_title | European journal of wood and wood products |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Haider, Andreas Reitberger, Michael Leßlhumer, Jürgen Plank, Bernhard Müller, Ulrich |
description | This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temperatures for component testing according to EN 310, the surface temperatures of the decks during a normal hot summer day were measured. A cyclic test according to EN 321 was applied to all decking materials. Afterwards the component testing was repeated. All wooden samples reveal considerable cracks, some were twisted, and few were even broken. In particular regarding the optical appearance, wood decks show advantages against the TMT decks. Some WPC decks show very fine cracks on the face, which were additionally analyzed by means of X-ray computed tomography (CT). Except for the WPC deck with higher wood content, no WPC deck revealed significant changes after the cyclic test. The CT analysis was also suitable to find cracks inside the materials and illustrate them. Thus, the whole damage inside a sample could be characterized by calculating a kind of error pattern. No considerable cracks or failures could be observed on the WPC decks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2410604153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2410604153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p296t-7877edc05f6aac415e815846537baa90e9fc62227ded7a2280e8518fd92ac7b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUE1LAzEQDaJgqf0B3gKeo5NkN8l6k6JWKIig6C2k2Vlt2TZrsqv035ulBecyA-9reIRccrjmAPomAXDQDHjBwAjN5AmZ8EIqpqX6OCWTDBsmtTLnZJbSBvJIXggpJ-TlPYSadqHdbzFSH7ZdSOseE_3BmIZE-y-MW9e2e9pHdD3W9HcUHNHxvqV-79u1p1nVr3efF-SscW3C2XFPydvD_et8wZbPj0_zuyXrRKV6po3WWHsoG-WcL3iJhpemUKXUK-cqwKrxSgiha6y1E8IAmpKbpq6E83pVyim5Ovh2MXwPOdtuwhB3OdKKgoOC7CkzSxxYqYv5OYz_LA52bM8e2rO5PTu2Z6X8A94oYyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2410604153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Haider, Andreas ; Reitberger, Michael ; Leßlhumer, Jürgen ; Plank, Bernhard ; Müller, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Haider, Andreas ; Reitberger, Michael ; Leßlhumer, Jürgen ; Plank, Bernhard ; Müller, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temperatures for component testing according to EN 310, the surface temperatures of the decks during a normal hot summer day were measured. A cyclic test according to EN 321 was applied to all decking materials. Afterwards the component testing was repeated. All wooden samples reveal considerable cracks, some were twisted, and few were even broken. In particular regarding the optical appearance, wood decks show advantages against the TMT decks. Some WPC decks show very fine cracks on the face, which were additionally analyzed by means of X-ray computed tomography (CT). Except for the WPC deck with higher wood content, no WPC deck revealed significant changes after the cyclic test. The CT analysis was also suitable to find cracks inside the materials and illustrate them. Thus, the whole damage inside a sample could be characterized by calculating a kind of error pattern. No considerable cracks or failures could be observed on the WPC decks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-736X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ceramics ; Composites ; Computed tomography ; Cyclic testing ; Decks ; Glass ; Life Sciences ; Machines ; Manufacturing ; Natural Materials ; Original ; Polymer matrix composites ; Polymers ; Processes ; Surface temperature ; Thermal stability ; Wood ; Wood Science & Technology</subject><ispartof>European journal of wood and wood products, 2014-11, Vol.72 (6), p.815-823</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p296t-7877edc05f6aac415e815846537baa90e9fc62227ded7a2280e8518fd92ac7b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haider, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitberger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leßlhumer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plank, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing</title><title>European journal of wood and wood products</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Wood Prod</addtitle><description>This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temperatures for component testing according to EN 310, the surface temperatures of the decks during a normal hot summer day were measured. A cyclic test according to EN 321 was applied to all decking materials. Afterwards the component testing was repeated. All wooden samples reveal considerable cracks, some were twisted, and few were even broken. In particular regarding the optical appearance, wood decks show advantages against the TMT decks. Some WPC decks show very fine cracks on the face, which were additionally analyzed by means of X-ray computed tomography (CT). Except for the WPC deck with higher wood content, no WPC deck revealed significant changes after the cyclic test. The CT analysis was also suitable to find cracks inside the materials and illustrate them. Thus, the whole damage inside a sample could be characterized by calculating a kind of error pattern. No considerable cracks or failures could be observed on the WPC decks.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Composites</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cyclic testing</subject><subject>Decks</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Machines</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Natural Materials</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Polymer matrix composites</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Thermal stability</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood Science & Technology</subject><issn>0018-3768</issn><issn>1436-736X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUE1LAzEQDaJgqf0B3gKeo5NkN8l6k6JWKIig6C2k2Vlt2TZrsqv035ulBecyA-9reIRccrjmAPomAXDQDHjBwAjN5AmZ8EIqpqX6OCWTDBsmtTLnZJbSBvJIXggpJ-TlPYSadqHdbzFSH7ZdSOseE_3BmIZE-y-MW9e2e9pHdD3W9HcUHNHxvqV-79u1p1nVr3efF-SscW3C2XFPydvD_et8wZbPj0_zuyXrRKV6po3WWHsoG-WcL3iJhpemUKXUK-cqwKrxSgiha6y1E8IAmpKbpq6E83pVyim5Ovh2MXwPOdtuwhB3OdKKgoOC7CkzSxxYqYv5OYz_LA52bM8e2rO5PTu2Z6X8A94oYyA</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Haider, Andreas</creator><creator>Reitberger, Michael</creator><creator>Leßlhumer, Jürgen</creator><creator>Plank, Bernhard</creator><creator>Müller, Ulrich</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing</title><author>Haider, Andreas ; Reitberger, Michael ; Leßlhumer, Jürgen ; Plank, Bernhard ; Müller, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p296t-7877edc05f6aac415e815846537baa90e9fc62227ded7a2280e8518fd92ac7b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Composites</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cyclic testing</topic><topic>Decks</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Machines</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Natural Materials</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Polymer matrix composites</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Thermal stability</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood Science & Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haider, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitberger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leßlhumer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plank, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>European journal of wood and wood products</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haider, Andreas</au><au>Reitberger, Michael</au><au>Leßlhumer, Jürgen</au><au>Plank, Bernhard</au><au>Müller, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing</atitle><jtitle>European journal of wood and wood products</jtitle><stitle>Eur. J. Wood Prod</stitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>815</spage><epage>823</epage><pages>815-823</pages><issn>0018-3768</issn><eissn>1436-736X</eissn><abstract>This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temperatures for component testing according to EN 310, the surface temperatures of the decks during a normal hot summer day were measured. A cyclic test according to EN 321 was applied to all decking materials. Afterwards the component testing was repeated. All wooden samples reveal considerable cracks, some were twisted, and few were even broken. In particular regarding the optical appearance, wood decks show advantages against the TMT decks. Some WPC decks show very fine cracks on the face, which were additionally analyzed by means of X-ray computed tomography (CT). Except for the WPC deck with higher wood content, no WPC deck revealed significant changes after the cyclic test. The CT analysis was also suitable to find cracks inside the materials and illustrate them. Thus, the whole damage inside a sample could be characterized by calculating a kind of error pattern. No considerable cracks or failures could be observed on the WPC decks.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-3768 |
ispartof | European journal of wood and wood products, 2014-11, Vol.72 (6), p.815-823 |
issn | 0018-3768 1436-736X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2410604153 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Ceramics Composites Computed tomography Cyclic testing Decks Glass Life Sciences Machines Manufacturing Natural Materials Original Polymer matrix composites Polymers Processes Surface temperature Thermal stability Wood Wood Science & Technology |
title | Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A50%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wood%20polymer%20composites%20versus%20thermally%20treated%20wood%20versus%20wood:%20cyclic%20testing&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20wood%20and%20wood%20products&rft.au=Haider,%20Andreas&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=815&rft.epage=823&rft.pages=815-823&rft.issn=0018-3768&rft.eissn=1436-736X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sprin%3E2410604153%3C/proquest_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2410604153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |