Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing

This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of wood and wood products 2014-11, Vol.72 (6), p.815-823
Hauptverfasser: Haider, Andreas, Reitberger, Michael, Leßlhumer, Jürgen, Plank, Bernhard, Müller, Ulrich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 823
container_issue 6
container_start_page 815
container_title European journal of wood and wood products
container_volume 72
creator Haider, Andreas
Reitberger, Michael
Leßlhumer, Jürgen
Plank, Bernhard
Müller, Ulrich
description This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temperatures for component testing according to EN 310, the surface temperatures of the decks during a normal hot summer day were measured. A cyclic test according to EN 321 was applied to all decking materials. Afterwards the component testing was repeated. All wooden samples reveal considerable cracks, some were twisted, and few were even broken. In particular regarding the optical appearance, wood decks show advantages against the TMT decks. Some WPC decks show very fine cracks on the face, which were additionally analyzed by means of X-ray computed tomography (CT). Except for the WPC deck with higher wood content, no WPC deck revealed significant changes after the cyclic test. The CT analysis was also suitable to find cracks inside the materials and illustrate them. Thus, the whole damage inside a sample could be characterized by calculating a kind of error pattern. No considerable cracks or failures could be observed on the WPC decks.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2410604153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2410604153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p296t-7877edc05f6aac415e815846537baa90e9fc62227ded7a2280e8518fd92ac7b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUE1LAzEQDaJgqf0B3gKeo5NkN8l6k6JWKIig6C2k2Vlt2TZrsqv035ulBecyA-9reIRccrjmAPomAXDQDHjBwAjN5AmZ8EIqpqX6OCWTDBsmtTLnZJbSBvJIXggpJ-TlPYSadqHdbzFSH7ZdSOseE_3BmIZE-y-MW9e2e9pHdD3W9HcUHNHxvqV-79u1p1nVr3efF-SscW3C2XFPydvD_et8wZbPj0_zuyXrRKV6po3WWHsoG-WcL3iJhpemUKXUK-cqwKrxSgiha6y1E8IAmpKbpq6E83pVyim5Ovh2MXwPOdtuwhB3OdKKgoOC7CkzSxxYqYv5OYz_LA52bM8e2rO5PTu2Z6X8A94oYyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2410604153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Haider, Andreas ; Reitberger, Michael ; Leßlhumer, Jürgen ; Plank, Bernhard ; Müller, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Haider, Andreas ; Reitberger, Michael ; Leßlhumer, Jürgen ; Plank, Bernhard ; Müller, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temperatures for component testing according to EN 310, the surface temperatures of the decks during a normal hot summer day were measured. A cyclic test according to EN 321 was applied to all decking materials. Afterwards the component testing was repeated. All wooden samples reveal considerable cracks, some were twisted, and few were even broken. In particular regarding the optical appearance, wood decks show advantages against the TMT decks. Some WPC decks show very fine cracks on the face, which were additionally analyzed by means of X-ray computed tomography (CT). Except for the WPC deck with higher wood content, no WPC deck revealed significant changes after the cyclic test. The CT analysis was also suitable to find cracks inside the materials and illustrate them. Thus, the whole damage inside a sample could be characterized by calculating a kind of error pattern. No considerable cracks or failures could be observed on the WPC decks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-736X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ceramics ; Composites ; Computed tomography ; Cyclic testing ; Decks ; Glass ; Life Sciences ; Machines ; Manufacturing ; Natural Materials ; Original ; Polymer matrix composites ; Polymers ; Processes ; Surface temperature ; Thermal stability ; Wood ; Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>European journal of wood and wood products, 2014-11, Vol.72 (6), p.815-823</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p296t-7877edc05f6aac415e815846537baa90e9fc62227ded7a2280e8518fd92ac7b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haider, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitberger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leßlhumer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plank, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing</title><title>European journal of wood and wood products</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Wood Prod</addtitle><description>This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temperatures for component testing according to EN 310, the surface temperatures of the decks during a normal hot summer day were measured. A cyclic test according to EN 321 was applied to all decking materials. Afterwards the component testing was repeated. All wooden samples reveal considerable cracks, some were twisted, and few were even broken. In particular regarding the optical appearance, wood decks show advantages against the TMT decks. Some WPC decks show very fine cracks on the face, which were additionally analyzed by means of X-ray computed tomography (CT). Except for the WPC deck with higher wood content, no WPC deck revealed significant changes after the cyclic test. The CT analysis was also suitable to find cracks inside the materials and illustrate them. Thus, the whole damage inside a sample could be characterized by calculating a kind of error pattern. No considerable cracks or failures could be observed on the WPC decks.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Composites</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cyclic testing</subject><subject>Decks</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Machines</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Natural Materials</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Polymer matrix composites</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Thermal stability</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>0018-3768</issn><issn>1436-736X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUE1LAzEQDaJgqf0B3gKeo5NkN8l6k6JWKIig6C2k2Vlt2TZrsqv035ulBecyA-9reIRccrjmAPomAXDQDHjBwAjN5AmZ8EIqpqX6OCWTDBsmtTLnZJbSBvJIXggpJ-TlPYSadqHdbzFSH7ZdSOseE_3BmIZE-y-MW9e2e9pHdD3W9HcUHNHxvqV-79u1p1nVr3efF-SscW3C2XFPydvD_et8wZbPj0_zuyXrRKV6po3WWHsoG-WcL3iJhpemUKXUK-cqwKrxSgiha6y1E8IAmpKbpq6E83pVyim5Ovh2MXwPOdtuwhB3OdKKgoOC7CkzSxxYqYv5OYz_LA52bM8e2rO5PTu2Z6X8A94oYyA</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Haider, Andreas</creator><creator>Reitberger, Michael</creator><creator>Leßlhumer, Jürgen</creator><creator>Plank, Bernhard</creator><creator>Müller, Ulrich</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing</title><author>Haider, Andreas ; Reitberger, Michael ; Leßlhumer, Jürgen ; Plank, Bernhard ; Müller, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p296t-7877edc05f6aac415e815846537baa90e9fc62227ded7a2280e8518fd92ac7b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Composites</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cyclic testing</topic><topic>Decks</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Machines</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Natural Materials</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Polymer matrix composites</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Thermal stability</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haider, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitberger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leßlhumer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plank, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>European journal of wood and wood products</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haider, Andreas</au><au>Reitberger, Michael</au><au>Leßlhumer, Jürgen</au><au>Plank, Bernhard</au><au>Müller, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing</atitle><jtitle>European journal of wood and wood products</jtitle><stitle>Eur. J. Wood Prod</stitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>815</spage><epage>823</epage><pages>815-823</pages><issn>0018-3768</issn><eissn>1436-736X</eissn><abstract>This article deals with the differences in the long-term durability and thermal stability under load of terrace deckings from various materials. The tested materials were deckings made of wood, thermally modified timber (TMT), and wood–polymer–composites (WPC). For the determination of the test temperatures for component testing according to EN 310, the surface temperatures of the decks during a normal hot summer day were measured. A cyclic test according to EN 321 was applied to all decking materials. Afterwards the component testing was repeated. All wooden samples reveal considerable cracks, some were twisted, and few were even broken. In particular regarding the optical appearance, wood decks show advantages against the TMT decks. Some WPC decks show very fine cracks on the face, which were additionally analyzed by means of X-ray computed tomography (CT). Except for the WPC deck with higher wood content, no WPC deck revealed significant changes after the cyclic test. The CT analysis was also suitable to find cracks inside the materials and illustrate them. Thus, the whole damage inside a sample could be characterized by calculating a kind of error pattern. No considerable cracks or failures could be observed on the WPC decks.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-3768
ispartof European journal of wood and wood products, 2014-11, Vol.72 (6), p.815-823
issn 0018-3768
1436-736X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2410604153
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ceramics
Composites
Computed tomography
Cyclic testing
Decks
Glass
Life Sciences
Machines
Manufacturing
Natural Materials
Original
Polymer matrix composites
Polymers
Processes
Surface temperature
Thermal stability
Wood
Wood Science & Technology
title Wood polymer composites versus thermally treated wood versus wood: cyclic testing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A50%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wood%20polymer%20composites%20versus%20thermally%20treated%20wood%20versus%20wood:%20cyclic%20testing&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20wood%20and%20wood%20products&rft.au=Haider,%20Andreas&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=815&rft.epage=823&rft.pages=815-823&rft.issn=0018-3768&rft.eissn=1436-736X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00107-014-0827-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sprin%3E2410604153%3C/proquest_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2410604153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true