The Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarker Testing Landscape

Cancer immunotherapy provides unprecedented rates of durable clinical benefit to late-stage cancer patients across many tumor types, but there remains a critical need for biomarkers to accurately predict clinical response. Although some cancer immunotherapy tests are associated with approved therapi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2020-06, Vol.144 (6), p.706-724
Hauptverfasser: Walk, Eric E, Yohe, Sophia L, Beckman, Amy, Schade, Andrew, Zutter, Mary M, Pfeifer, John, Berry, Anna B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 724
container_issue 6
container_start_page 706
container_title Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)
container_volume 144
creator Walk, Eric E
Yohe, Sophia L
Beckman, Amy
Schade, Andrew
Zutter, Mary M
Pfeifer, John
Berry, Anna B
description Cancer immunotherapy provides unprecedented rates of durable clinical benefit to late-stage cancer patients across many tumor types, but there remains a critical need for biomarkers to accurately predict clinical response. Although some cancer immunotherapy tests are associated with approved therapies and considered validated, other biomarkers are still emerging and at various states of clinical and translational exploration. To provide pathologists with a current and practical update on the evolving field of cancer immunotherapy testing. The scientific background, clinical data, and testing methodology for the following cancer immunotherapy biomarkers are reviewed: programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), mismatch repair, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, polymerase δ and ε mutations, cancer neoantigens, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, transcriptional signatures of immune responsiveness, cancer immunotherapy resistance biomarkers, and the microbiome. Selected scientific publications and clinical trial data representing the current field of cancer immunotherapy. The cancer immunotherapy field, including the use of biomarker testing to predict patient response, is still in evolution. PD-L1, mismatch repair, and microsatellite instability testing are helping to guide the use of US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, but there remains a need for better predictors of response and resistance. Several categories of tumor and patient characteristics underlying immune responsiveness are emerging and may represent the next generation of cancer immunotherapy predictive biomarkers. Pathologists have important roles and responsibilities as the field of cancer immunotherapy continues to develop, including leadership of translational studies, exploration of novel biomarkers, and the accurate and timely implementation of newly approved and validated companion diagnostics.
doi_str_mv 10.5858/arpa.2018-0584-CP
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2409890624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629317600</galeid><sourcerecordid>A629317600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-faab23447e2fb11fc6ff6bb2243dae1a75c798e7ab95c79199efa040b95baf943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCB-CCVkJCvWSxHduJjyWiUGkleljO1sQ73k1J7GAnh357HLX8KVr5YI_1e6PRm0fIW0a3spb1R4gjbDlldUFlLYrm9hlZMSnKgjMln5MVpbQstK7lBXmV0l0uNefsJbkoWcVETfWKiP0JNw14i3FzMwyzD9MJI4z3m09dGCD-yP97TFPnj5sd-EOyMOJr8sJBn_DN470m368_75uvxe7bl5vmaldYWYmpcAAtL4WokLuWMWeVc6ptORflAZBBJW2la6yg1cuLaY0OqKC5bMFpUa7J5UPfMYafc57CDF2y2PfgMczJ8JIJLpWiKqPv_0Pvwhx9ns5wQXWtqeLiL3WEHk3nXZgi2KWpuVJcZ1tUtmxNijPUEX02pg8eXZe_n_DbM3w-Bxw6e1bw4R_BCaGfTin089QFn56C7AG0MaQU0Zkxdnkr94ZRs0TALBEwSwTMEgHT3GbNu0cn5nbAwx_F752XvwBm0Kln</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2409890624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarker Testing Landscape</title><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Walk, Eric E ; Yohe, Sophia L ; Beckman, Amy ; Schade, Andrew ; Zutter, Mary M ; Pfeifer, John ; Berry, Anna B</creator><creatorcontrib>Walk, Eric E ; Yohe, Sophia L ; Beckman, Amy ; Schade, Andrew ; Zutter, Mary M ; Pfeifer, John ; Berry, Anna B ; College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee ; on behalf of the College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer immunotherapy provides unprecedented rates of durable clinical benefit to late-stage cancer patients across many tumor types, but there remains a critical need for biomarkers to accurately predict clinical response. Although some cancer immunotherapy tests are associated with approved therapies and considered validated, other biomarkers are still emerging and at various states of clinical and translational exploration. To provide pathologists with a current and practical update on the evolving field of cancer immunotherapy testing. The scientific background, clinical data, and testing methodology for the following cancer immunotherapy biomarkers are reviewed: programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), mismatch repair, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, polymerase δ and ε mutations, cancer neoantigens, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, transcriptional signatures of immune responsiveness, cancer immunotherapy resistance biomarkers, and the microbiome. Selected scientific publications and clinical trial data representing the current field of cancer immunotherapy. The cancer immunotherapy field, including the use of biomarker testing to predict patient response, is still in evolution. PD-L1, mismatch repair, and microsatellite instability testing are helping to guide the use of US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, but there remains a need for better predictors of response and resistance. Several categories of tumor and patient characteristics underlying immune responsiveness are emerging and may represent the next generation of cancer immunotherapy predictive biomarkers. Pathologists have important roles and responsibilities as the field of cancer immunotherapy continues to develop, including leadership of translational studies, exploration of novel biomarkers, and the accurate and timely implementation of newly approved and validated companion diagnostics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0584-CP</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31714809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Antitumor activity ; Apoptosis ; Atezolizumab ; Avelumab ; Biomarkers ; Cancer ; Cancer immunotherapy ; Cancer treatment ; Cell proliferation ; Clinical trials ; CTLA-4 protein ; Cytotoxicity ; Durvalumab ; FDA approval ; Genomics ; Immune checkpoint ; Immunoregulation ; Immunotherapy ; Interferon ; Ipilimumab ; Lymphocytes ; Lymphocytes T ; Medical research ; Medical tests ; Melanoma ; Metastases ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Nivolumab ; PD-1 protein ; PD-L1 protein ; Pembrolizumab ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Tumor cells</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976), 2020-06, Vol.144 (6), p.706-724</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Jun 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-faab23447e2fb11fc6ff6bb2243dae1a75c798e7ab95c79199efa040b95baf943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-faab23447e2fb11fc6ff6bb2243dae1a75c798e7ab95c79199efa040b95baf943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31714809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walk, Eric E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yohe, Sophia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckman, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schade, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zutter, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Anna B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee</creatorcontrib><title>The Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarker Testing Landscape</title><title>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>Cancer immunotherapy provides unprecedented rates of durable clinical benefit to late-stage cancer patients across many tumor types, but there remains a critical need for biomarkers to accurately predict clinical response. Although some cancer immunotherapy tests are associated with approved therapies and considered validated, other biomarkers are still emerging and at various states of clinical and translational exploration. To provide pathologists with a current and practical update on the evolving field of cancer immunotherapy testing. The scientific background, clinical data, and testing methodology for the following cancer immunotherapy biomarkers are reviewed: programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), mismatch repair, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, polymerase δ and ε mutations, cancer neoantigens, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, transcriptional signatures of immune responsiveness, cancer immunotherapy resistance biomarkers, and the microbiome. Selected scientific publications and clinical trial data representing the current field of cancer immunotherapy. The cancer immunotherapy field, including the use of biomarker testing to predict patient response, is still in evolution. PD-L1, mismatch repair, and microsatellite instability testing are helping to guide the use of US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, but there remains a need for better predictors of response and resistance. Several categories of tumor and patient characteristics underlying immune responsiveness are emerging and may represent the next generation of cancer immunotherapy predictive biomarkers. Pathologists have important roles and responsibilities as the field of cancer immunotherapy continues to develop, including leadership of translational studies, exploration of novel biomarkers, and the accurate and timely implementation of newly approved and validated companion diagnostics.</description><subject>Antitumor activity</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Atezolizumab</subject><subject>Avelumab</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer immunotherapy</subject><subject>Cancer treatment</subject><subject>Cell proliferation</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>CTLA-4 protein</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Durvalumab</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint</subject><subject>Immunoregulation</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>Ipilimumab</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Lymphocytes T</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Nivolumab</subject><subject>PD-1 protein</subject><subject>PD-L1 protein</subject><subject>Pembrolizumab</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Tumor cells</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCB-CCVkJCvWSxHduJjyWiUGkleljO1sQ73k1J7GAnh357HLX8KVr5YI_1e6PRm0fIW0a3spb1R4gjbDlldUFlLYrm9hlZMSnKgjMln5MVpbQstK7lBXmV0l0uNefsJbkoWcVETfWKiP0JNw14i3FzMwyzD9MJI4z3m09dGCD-yP97TFPnj5sd-EOyMOJr8sJBn_DN470m368_75uvxe7bl5vmaldYWYmpcAAtL4WokLuWMWeVc6ptORflAZBBJW2la6yg1cuLaY0OqKC5bMFpUa7J5UPfMYafc57CDF2y2PfgMczJ8JIJLpWiKqPv_0Pvwhx9ns5wQXWtqeLiL3WEHk3nXZgi2KWpuVJcZ1tUtmxNijPUEX02pg8eXZe_n_DbM3w-Bxw6e1bw4R_BCaGfTin089QFn56C7AG0MaQU0Zkxdnkr94ZRs0TALBEwSwTMEgHT3GbNu0cn5nbAwx_F752XvwBm0Kln</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Walk, Eric E</creator><creator>Yohe, Sophia L</creator><creator>Beckman, Amy</creator><creator>Schade, Andrew</creator><creator>Zutter, Mary M</creator><creator>Pfeifer, John</creator><creator>Berry, Anna B</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>The Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarker Testing Landscape</title><author>Walk, Eric E ; Yohe, Sophia L ; Beckman, Amy ; Schade, Andrew ; Zutter, Mary M ; Pfeifer, John ; Berry, Anna B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-faab23447e2fb11fc6ff6bb2243dae1a75c798e7ab95c79199efa040b95baf943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antitumor activity</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Atezolizumab</topic><topic>Avelumab</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer immunotherapy</topic><topic>Cancer treatment</topic><topic>Cell proliferation</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>CTLA-4 protein</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Durvalumab</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint</topic><topic>Immunoregulation</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>Ipilimumab</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Lymphocytes T</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Nivolumab</topic><topic>PD-1 protein</topic><topic>PD-L1 protein</topic><topic>Pembrolizumab</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Tumor cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walk, Eric E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yohe, Sophia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckman, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schade, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zutter, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Anna B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walk, Eric E</au><au>Yohe, Sophia L</au><au>Beckman, Amy</au><au>Schade, Andrew</au><au>Zutter, Mary M</au><au>Pfeifer, John</au><au>Berry, Anna B</au><aucorp>College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarker Testing Landscape</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>724</epage><pages>706-724</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><abstract>Cancer immunotherapy provides unprecedented rates of durable clinical benefit to late-stage cancer patients across many tumor types, but there remains a critical need for biomarkers to accurately predict clinical response. Although some cancer immunotherapy tests are associated with approved therapies and considered validated, other biomarkers are still emerging and at various states of clinical and translational exploration. To provide pathologists with a current and practical update on the evolving field of cancer immunotherapy testing. The scientific background, clinical data, and testing methodology for the following cancer immunotherapy biomarkers are reviewed: programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), mismatch repair, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, polymerase δ and ε mutations, cancer neoantigens, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, transcriptional signatures of immune responsiveness, cancer immunotherapy resistance biomarkers, and the microbiome. Selected scientific publications and clinical trial data representing the current field of cancer immunotherapy. The cancer immunotherapy field, including the use of biomarker testing to predict patient response, is still in evolution. PD-L1, mismatch repair, and microsatellite instability testing are helping to guide the use of US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, but there remains a need for better predictors of response and resistance. Several categories of tumor and patient characteristics underlying immune responsiveness are emerging and may represent the next generation of cancer immunotherapy predictive biomarkers. Pathologists have important roles and responsibilities as the field of cancer immunotherapy continues to develop, including leadership of translational studies, exploration of novel biomarkers, and the accurate and timely implementation of newly approved and validated companion diagnostics.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><pmid>31714809</pmid><doi>10.5858/arpa.2018-0584-CP</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9985
ispartof Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2020-06, Vol.144 (6), p.706-724
issn 0003-9985
1543-2165
1543-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2409890624
source Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Antitumor activity
Apoptosis
Atezolizumab
Avelumab
Biomarkers
Cancer
Cancer immunotherapy
Cancer treatment
Cell proliferation
Clinical trials
CTLA-4 protein
Cytotoxicity
Durvalumab
FDA approval
Genomics
Immune checkpoint
Immunoregulation
Immunotherapy
Interferon
Ipilimumab
Lymphocytes
Lymphocytes T
Medical research
Medical tests
Melanoma
Metastases
Monoclonal antibodies
Nivolumab
PD-1 protein
PD-L1 protein
Pembrolizumab
Targeted cancer therapy
Tumor cells
title The Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarker Testing Landscape
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A51%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Cancer%20Immunotherapy%20Biomarker%20Testing%20Landscape&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Walk,%20Eric%20E&rft.aucorp=College%20of%20American%20Pathologists%20Personalized%20Health%20Care%20Committee&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=724&rft.pages=706-724&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/arpa.2018-0584-CP&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA629317600%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2409890624&rft_id=info:pmid/31714809&rft_galeid=A629317600&rfr_iscdi=true