Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of caries removal using various minimally invasive techniques with conventional rotary instruments using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study
Aim: The aim of this in vitro investigation was to assess the most efficient minimally invasive technique (MIT) by comparing the change in volume after caries removal using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the time taken for each technique. Materials and Methods: Forty human extracted molars...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of international oral health 2020-05, Vol.12 (3), p.253-259 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 259 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 253 |
| container_title | Journal of international oral health |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Thomas, Anchu Nagraj, Sumanth Mani, Rekha Haribabu, Ramaswamy |
| description | Aim: The aim of this in vitro investigation was to assess the most efficient minimally invasive technique (MIT) by comparing the change in volume after caries removal using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the time taken for each technique. Materials and Methods: Forty human extracted molars, stored in 0.1% thymol solution, with carious lesions extending into the dentin were used in the study. The caries status of dentin was judged initially by visual inspection and probing and confirmed by caries detector dye. A pre-scan CBCT was performed before assessing the volume of the carious lesion. Teeth were assigned into four groups (n = 10): Group 1 = Carisolv gel, Group 2 = Carie Care, Group 3 = ultrasonic tips, and Group 4 = slow-speed rotary instruments. The caries removal was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Time taken was recorded for each method. A postoperative scan was conducted, and volumetric analysis was carried out. The amount of removal of sound tooth structure was assessed to determine the most MIT. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The intergroup volume change of caries was carried out using the Kruskal-Wallis test, whereas comparison within the group was carried out using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The assessment of time taken during each procedure was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey honest significant difference test. The results were tabulated accordingly. Significance was set at P value ≤ 0.05. Results: The chemomechanical agents (Carisolv and Carie Care) showed minimal change in volume when compared to conventional diamond points. The time taken with conventional diamond point was minimum, and it was maximum for ultrasonic tips. Conclusion: Chemomechanical caries removal is the most minimalistic approach when compared to the other techniques. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4103/JIOH.JIOH_256_19 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2409185371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A632314558</galeid><sourcerecordid>A632314558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-3280aa4e932f8396c3057a48e2445cc71b24d124a5af813b6f4253db826978033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ul1rFDEUHUTBUvvuY0Dwbdd8zZdv62JtpdAXfQ7ZTLKTdpKs-Zhl_p6_zMRdsQVNIPdyOOfAvTlV9RbBNUWQfPh6e3-zLg_DdcNQ_6K6gH3brFDb9y_PfUtx97q6CuEB5tNATGl9Uf3cOnPgnkc9SyBnPqXcOgucAnHMiFJaaGnFUhDBvZYBeGlcZoIUtN2DOYMuBWC01YZP0wK0nXkoflGK0eofKWuOOo5AODtLW_yz2rvIfSGH6JPJcDgbZpYEO8lN7swhRTmA6Izbe34Yl49gY7MGzDp6B0JMw_KmeqX4FOTVuV5W368_f9verO7uv9xuN3crkSePK4I7yDmVPcGqI30jCKxbTjtZFiFEi3aYDghTXnPVIbJrFMU1GXYdbvq2g4RcVu9OvgfvykyRPbjk8yiBYQp71NWkRX9Zez5Jpq1y0XNhdBBs0xBMEK3rLrPW_2DlO0ijywKUzvgzwfsnglHyKY7BTaksMzwnwhNReBeCl4odfP4XvzAEWQkL-52TJ2HJkk8nydFNUfrwOKWj9MzI4dG64391uRD2Jz7kF_sPzFE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2409185371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of caries removal using various minimally invasive techniques with conventional rotary instruments using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Thomas, Anchu ; Nagraj, Sumanth ; Mani, Rekha ; Haribabu, Ramaswamy</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Anchu ; Nagraj, Sumanth ; Mani, Rekha ; Haribabu, Ramaswamy</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: The aim of this in vitro investigation was to assess the most efficient minimally invasive technique (MIT) by comparing the change in volume after caries removal using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the time taken for each technique. Materials and Methods: Forty human extracted molars, stored in 0.1% thymol solution, with carious lesions extending into the dentin were used in the study. The caries status of dentin was judged initially by visual inspection and probing and confirmed by caries detector dye. A pre-scan CBCT was performed before assessing the volume of the carious lesion. Teeth were assigned into four groups (n = 10): Group 1 = Carisolv gel, Group 2 = Carie Care, Group 3 = ultrasonic tips, and Group 4 = slow-speed rotary instruments. The caries removal was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Time taken was recorded for each method. A postoperative scan was conducted, and volumetric analysis was carried out. The amount of removal of sound tooth structure was assessed to determine the most MIT. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The intergroup volume change of caries was carried out using the Kruskal-Wallis test, whereas comparison within the group was carried out using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The assessment of time taken during each procedure was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey honest significant difference test. The results were tabulated accordingly. Significance was set at P value ≤ 0.05. Results: The chemomechanical agents (Carisolv and Carie Care) showed minimal change in volume when compared to conventional diamond points. The time taken with conventional diamond point was minimum, and it was maximum for ultrasonic tips. Conclusion: Chemomechanical caries removal is the most minimalistic approach when compared to the other techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0976-7428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0976-1799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/JIOH.JIOH_256_19</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; CAT scans ; Collagen ; Computed tomography ; Dental caries ; Dental equipment ; Dentin ; Dentistry ; Enamel ; Enzymes ; Equipment and supplies ; Methods ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Molars ; Patient outcomes ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Teeth ; Thymol ; Tomography ; Volumetric analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of international oral health, 2020-05, Vol.12 (3), p.253-259</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-3280aa4e932f8396c3057a48e2445cc71b24d124a5af813b6f4253db826978033</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27457,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Anchu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagraj, Sumanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mani, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haribabu, Ramaswamy</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of caries removal using various minimally invasive techniques with conventional rotary instruments using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study</title><title>Journal of international oral health</title><description>Aim: The aim of this in vitro investigation was to assess the most efficient minimally invasive technique (MIT) by comparing the change in volume after caries removal using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the time taken for each technique. Materials and Methods: Forty human extracted molars, stored in 0.1% thymol solution, with carious lesions extending into the dentin were used in the study. The caries status of dentin was judged initially by visual inspection and probing and confirmed by caries detector dye. A pre-scan CBCT was performed before assessing the volume of the carious lesion. Teeth were assigned into four groups (n = 10): Group 1 = Carisolv gel, Group 2 = Carie Care, Group 3 = ultrasonic tips, and Group 4 = slow-speed rotary instruments. The caries removal was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Time taken was recorded for each method. A postoperative scan was conducted, and volumetric analysis was carried out. The amount of removal of sound tooth structure was assessed to determine the most MIT. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The intergroup volume change of caries was carried out using the Kruskal-Wallis test, whereas comparison within the group was carried out using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The assessment of time taken during each procedure was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey honest significant difference test. The results were tabulated accordingly. Significance was set at P value ≤ 0.05. Results: The chemomechanical agents (Carisolv and Carie Care) showed minimal change in volume when compared to conventional diamond points. The time taken with conventional diamond point was minimum, and it was maximum for ultrasonic tips. Conclusion: Chemomechanical caries removal is the most minimalistic approach when compared to the other techniques.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>CAT scans</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental equipment</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Molars</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Thymol</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Volumetric analysis</subject><issn>0976-7428</issn><issn>0976-1799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ul1rFDEUHUTBUvvuY0Dwbdd8zZdv62JtpdAXfQ7ZTLKTdpKs-Zhl_p6_zMRdsQVNIPdyOOfAvTlV9RbBNUWQfPh6e3-zLg_DdcNQ_6K6gH3brFDb9y_PfUtx97q6CuEB5tNATGl9Uf3cOnPgnkc9SyBnPqXcOgucAnHMiFJaaGnFUhDBvZYBeGlcZoIUtN2DOYMuBWC01YZP0wK0nXkoflGK0eofKWuOOo5AODtLW_yz2rvIfSGH6JPJcDgbZpYEO8lN7swhRTmA6Izbe34Yl49gY7MGzDp6B0JMw_KmeqX4FOTVuV5W368_f9verO7uv9xuN3crkSePK4I7yDmVPcGqI30jCKxbTjtZFiFEi3aYDghTXnPVIbJrFMU1GXYdbvq2g4RcVu9OvgfvykyRPbjk8yiBYQp71NWkRX9Zez5Jpq1y0XNhdBBs0xBMEK3rLrPW_2DlO0ijywKUzvgzwfsnglHyKY7BTaksMzwnwhNReBeCl4odfP4XvzAEWQkL-52TJ2HJkk8nydFNUfrwOKWj9MzI4dG64391uRD2Jz7kF_sPzFE</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Thomas, Anchu</creator><creator>Nagraj, Sumanth</creator><creator>Mani, Rekha</creator><creator>Haribabu, Ramaswamy</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04T</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of caries removal using various minimally invasive techniques with conventional rotary instruments using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study</title><author>Thomas, Anchu ; Nagraj, Sumanth ; Mani, Rekha ; Haribabu, Ramaswamy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-3280aa4e932f8396c3057a48e2445cc71b24d124a5af813b6f4253db826978033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>CAT scans</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental equipment</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Molars</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Thymol</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Volumetric analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Anchu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagraj, Sumanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mani, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haribabu, Ramaswamy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Health & Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of international oral health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Anchu</au><au>Nagraj, Sumanth</au><au>Mani, Rekha</au><au>Haribabu, Ramaswamy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of caries removal using various minimally invasive techniques with conventional rotary instruments using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international oral health</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>253-259</pages><issn>0976-7428</issn><eissn>0976-1799</eissn><abstract>Aim: The aim of this in vitro investigation was to assess the most efficient minimally invasive technique (MIT) by comparing the change in volume after caries removal using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the time taken for each technique. Materials and Methods: Forty human extracted molars, stored in 0.1% thymol solution, with carious lesions extending into the dentin were used in the study. The caries status of dentin was judged initially by visual inspection and probing and confirmed by caries detector dye. A pre-scan CBCT was performed before assessing the volume of the carious lesion. Teeth were assigned into four groups (n = 10): Group 1 = Carisolv gel, Group 2 = Carie Care, Group 3 = ultrasonic tips, and Group 4 = slow-speed rotary instruments. The caries removal was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Time taken was recorded for each method. A postoperative scan was conducted, and volumetric analysis was carried out. The amount of removal of sound tooth structure was assessed to determine the most MIT. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The intergroup volume change of caries was carried out using the Kruskal-Wallis test, whereas comparison within the group was carried out using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The assessment of time taken during each procedure was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey honest significant difference test. The results were tabulated accordingly. Significance was set at P value ≤ 0.05. Results: The chemomechanical agents (Carisolv and Carie Care) showed minimal change in volume when compared to conventional diamond points. The time taken with conventional diamond point was minimum, and it was maximum for ultrasonic tips. Conclusion: Chemomechanical caries removal is the most minimalistic approach when compared to the other techniques.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications</pub><doi>10.4103/JIOH.JIOH_256_19</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0976-7428 |
| ispartof | Journal of international oral health, 2020-05, Vol.12 (3), p.253-259 |
| issn | 0976-7428 0976-1799 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2409185371 |
| source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Care and treatment CAT scans Collagen Computed tomography Dental caries Dental equipment Dentin Dentistry Enamel Enzymes Equipment and supplies Methods Minimally invasive surgery Molars Patient outcomes Software Statistical analysis Teeth Thymol Tomography Volumetric analysis |
| title | Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of caries removal using various minimally invasive techniques with conventional rotary instruments using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T10%3A42%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20efficiency%20of%20caries%20removal%20using%20various%20minimally%20invasive%20techniques%20with%20conventional%20rotary%20instruments%20using%20cone%20beam%20computed%20tomography:%20An%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20oral%20health&rft.au=Thomas,%20Anchu&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=253-259&rft.issn=0976-7428&rft.eissn=0976-1799&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/JIOH.JIOH_256_19&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA632314558%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2409185371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A632314558&rfr_iscdi=true |