Overabundance of Black-Tailed Deer in Urbanized Coastal California
Abundance of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in western North America is often considered lower than desirable for hunting. Some coastal populations of Columbian black-tailed deer (O. h. columbianus) in California, USA, near urban development, however, are perceived as a nuisance and may be overabun...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2020-07, Vol.84 (5), p.979-988 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 988 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 979 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | FURNAS, BRETT J. LANDERS, RUSS H. PAISTE, RHONDA G. SACKS, BENJAMIN N. |
description | Abundance of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in western North America is often considered lower than desirable for hunting. Some coastal populations of Columbian black-tailed deer (O. h. columbianus) in California, USA, near urban development, however, are perceived as a nuisance and may be overabundant. To determine the density of a potential nuisance population in Marin County, California, we used a combination of fecal DNA surveys, camera stations, and 2 sources of ancillary data on wildlife observations. We estimated an average density of 18.3 deer/km² (90% CI=15.8–20.7) throughout Marin County during late summer and early fall, 2015 and 2016. Within the county, areas with intermediate human density (885 people/km², 90% CI=125–1,646) were associated with the highest deer densities (25–44/km²). Our estimate of average deer density was 1.7–6.1 times higher than published density estimates for deer from elsewhere in California and on the low end of densities reported for mule and white-tailed (O. virginianus) deer in regions where they routinely cause a nuisance to humans. High black-tailed deer densities in Marin County may be partially attributed to a paucity of large predators, but more investigation is warranted to evaluate the effects of a recent increase in coyotes (Canis latrans) on the deer population. Analyses of highway road kill rates and citizen science surveys suggest that the deer population in Marin County has been stable over the past 10 years. Our results demonstrate how robust estimation of deer density can inform human–wildlife conflict issues, not just managed hunting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.21849 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2408990101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26934839</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26934839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-8e0ce6b607b9ac41aa5cdc1b3f0e98fe9de36fcdedabf9206c3ada2216c640f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv3oWANyF1ZzfdZo82alWUXlr0tkz2QxLTpO62lvrrTY169DQw87wzzEPIKdABUMouy83idcAgTeQe6YHko5ilMNonvXbI4mECL4fkKISSUg6Qih4ZTz-sx3xdG6y1jRoXjSvUb_EMi8qa6NpaHxV1NPc51sVn28kaDCusogyrwjW-LvCYHDisgj35qX0yv72ZZXfx43Ryn109xpozLuPUUm1FLugol6gTQBxqoyHnjlqZOiuN5cJpYw3mTjIqNEeDjIHQIqFO8j457_YuffO-tmGlymbt6_akYglNpaRAoaUuOkr7JgRvnVr6YoF-q4CqnSO1c6S-HbUwdPCm_Xb7D6kenp8mv5mzLlOGVeP_MkxInqRc8i-KkXNp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2408990101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overabundance of Black-Tailed Deer in Urbanized Coastal California</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>FURNAS, BRETT J. ; LANDERS, RUSS H. ; PAISTE, RHONDA G. ; SACKS, BENJAMIN N.</creator><creatorcontrib>FURNAS, BRETT J. ; LANDERS, RUSS H. ; PAISTE, RHONDA G. ; SACKS, BENJAMIN N.</creatorcontrib><description>Abundance of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in western North America is often considered lower than desirable for hunting. Some coastal populations of Columbian black-tailed deer (O. h. columbianus) in California, USA, near urban development, however, are perceived as a nuisance and may be overabundant. To determine the density of a potential nuisance population in Marin County, California, we used a combination of fecal DNA surveys, camera stations, and 2 sources of ancillary data on wildlife observations. We estimated an average density of 18.3 deer/km² (90% CI=15.8–20.7) throughout Marin County during late summer and early fall, 2015 and 2016. Within the county, areas with intermediate human density (885 people/km², 90% CI=125–1,646) were associated with the highest deer densities (25–44/km²). Our estimate of average deer density was 1.7–6.1 times higher than published density estimates for deer from elsewhere in California and on the low end of densities reported for mule and white-tailed (O. virginianus) deer in regions where they routinely cause a nuisance to humans. High black-tailed deer densities in Marin County may be partially attributed to a paucity of large predators, but more investigation is warranted to evaluate the effects of a recent increase in coyotes (Canis latrans) on the deer population. Analyses of highway road kill rates and citizen science surveys suggest that the deer population in Marin County has been stable over the past 10 years. Our results demonstrate how robust estimation of deer density can inform human–wildlife conflict issues, not just managed hunting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; cameras ; citizen science ; coyote ; Deer ; Density ; fecal DNA ; Human Dimensions ; human–wildlife conflict ; Hunting ; Nuisance ; N‐mixture modeling ; Polls & surveys ; Predators ; spatial capture–recapture ; suburban development ; Urban development ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2020-07, Vol.84 (5), p.979-988</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. The published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-8e0ce6b607b9ac41aa5cdc1b3f0e98fe9de36fcdedabf9206c3ada2216c640f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-8e0ce6b607b9ac41aa5cdc1b3f0e98fe9de36fcdedabf9206c3ada2216c640f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6377-4148 ; 0000-0003-0143-6589</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26934839$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26934839$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>FURNAS, BRETT J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDERS, RUSS H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAISTE, RHONDA G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SACKS, BENJAMIN N.</creatorcontrib><title>Overabundance of Black-Tailed Deer in Urbanized Coastal California</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Abundance of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in western North America is often considered lower than desirable for hunting. Some coastal populations of Columbian black-tailed deer (O. h. columbianus) in California, USA, near urban development, however, are perceived as a nuisance and may be overabundant. To determine the density of a potential nuisance population in Marin County, California, we used a combination of fecal DNA surveys, camera stations, and 2 sources of ancillary data on wildlife observations. We estimated an average density of 18.3 deer/km² (90% CI=15.8–20.7) throughout Marin County during late summer and early fall, 2015 and 2016. Within the county, areas with intermediate human density (885 people/km², 90% CI=125–1,646) were associated with the highest deer densities (25–44/km²). Our estimate of average deer density was 1.7–6.1 times higher than published density estimates for deer from elsewhere in California and on the low end of densities reported for mule and white-tailed (O. virginianus) deer in regions where they routinely cause a nuisance to humans. High black-tailed deer densities in Marin County may be partially attributed to a paucity of large predators, but more investigation is warranted to evaluate the effects of a recent increase in coyotes (Canis latrans) on the deer population. Analyses of highway road kill rates and citizen science surveys suggest that the deer population in Marin County has been stable over the past 10 years. Our results demonstrate how robust estimation of deer density can inform human–wildlife conflict issues, not just managed hunting.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>cameras</subject><subject>citizen science</subject><subject>coyote</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>fecal DNA</subject><subject>Human Dimensions</subject><subject>human–wildlife conflict</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Nuisance</subject><subject>N‐mixture modeling</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>spatial capture–recapture</subject><subject>suburban development</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv3oWANyF1ZzfdZo82alWUXlr0tkz2QxLTpO62lvrrTY169DQw87wzzEPIKdABUMouy83idcAgTeQe6YHko5ilMNonvXbI4mECL4fkKISSUg6Qih4ZTz-sx3xdG6y1jRoXjSvUb_EMi8qa6NpaHxV1NPc51sVn28kaDCusogyrwjW-LvCYHDisgj35qX0yv72ZZXfx43Ryn109xpozLuPUUm1FLugol6gTQBxqoyHnjlqZOiuN5cJpYw3mTjIqNEeDjIHQIqFO8j457_YuffO-tmGlymbt6_akYglNpaRAoaUuOkr7JgRvnVr6YoF-q4CqnSO1c6S-HbUwdPCm_Xb7D6kenp8mv5mzLlOGVeP_MkxInqRc8i-KkXNp</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>FURNAS, BRETT J.</creator><creator>LANDERS, RUSS H.</creator><creator>PAISTE, RHONDA G.</creator><creator>SACKS, BENJAMIN N.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6377-4148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0143-6589</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Overabundance of Black-Tailed Deer in Urbanized Coastal California</title><author>FURNAS, BRETT J. ; LANDERS, RUSS H. ; PAISTE, RHONDA G. ; SACKS, BENJAMIN N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-8e0ce6b607b9ac41aa5cdc1b3f0e98fe9de36fcdedabf9206c3ada2216c640f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>cameras</topic><topic>citizen science</topic><topic>coyote</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>fecal DNA</topic><topic>Human Dimensions</topic><topic>human–wildlife conflict</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Nuisance</topic><topic>N‐mixture modeling</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>spatial capture–recapture</topic><topic>suburban development</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FURNAS, BRETT J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDERS, RUSS H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAISTE, RHONDA G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SACKS, BENJAMIN N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FURNAS, BRETT J.</au><au>LANDERS, RUSS H.</au><au>PAISTE, RHONDA G.</au><au>SACKS, BENJAMIN N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overabundance of Black-Tailed Deer in Urbanized Coastal California</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>979</spage><epage>988</epage><pages>979-988</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Abundance of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in western North America is often considered lower than desirable for hunting. Some coastal populations of Columbian black-tailed deer (O. h. columbianus) in California, USA, near urban development, however, are perceived as a nuisance and may be overabundant. To determine the density of a potential nuisance population in Marin County, California, we used a combination of fecal DNA surveys, camera stations, and 2 sources of ancillary data on wildlife observations. We estimated an average density of 18.3 deer/km² (90% CI=15.8–20.7) throughout Marin County during late summer and early fall, 2015 and 2016. Within the county, areas with intermediate human density (885 people/km², 90% CI=125–1,646) were associated with the highest deer densities (25–44/km²). Our estimate of average deer density was 1.7–6.1 times higher than published density estimates for deer from elsewhere in California and on the low end of densities reported for mule and white-tailed (O. virginianus) deer in regions where they routinely cause a nuisance to humans. High black-tailed deer densities in Marin County may be partially attributed to a paucity of large predators, but more investigation is warranted to evaluate the effects of a recent increase in coyotes (Canis latrans) on the deer population. Analyses of highway road kill rates and citizen science surveys suggest that the deer population in Marin County has been stable over the past 10 years. Our results demonstrate how robust estimation of deer density can inform human–wildlife conflict issues, not just managed hunting.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21849</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6377-4148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0143-6589</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2020-07, Vol.84 (5), p.979-988 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2408990101 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal populations cameras citizen science coyote Deer Density fecal DNA Human Dimensions human–wildlife conflict Hunting Nuisance N‐mixture modeling Polls & surveys Predators spatial capture–recapture suburban development Urban development Wildlife Wildlife management |
title | Overabundance of Black-Tailed Deer in Urbanized Coastal California |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overabundance%20of%20Black-Tailed%20Deer%20in%20Urbanized%20Coastal%20California&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=FURNAS,%20BRETT%20J.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=979&rft.epage=988&rft.pages=979-988&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21849&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26934839%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2408990101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26934839&rfr_iscdi=true |