Meiofauna as a model to test paradigms of ecological metacommunity theory

The metacommunity concept incorporates spatial dynamics into community ecology, shedding light on how local and regional processes interact in structuring ecological communities, and to which measure they are deterministic or stochastic. We reviewed metacommunity studies on freshwater meiobenthos pu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2020-07, Vol.847 (12), p.2645-2663
Hauptverfasser: Gansfort, Birgit, Fontaneto, Diego, Zhai, Marie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2663
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2645
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 847
creator Gansfort, Birgit
Fontaneto, Diego
Zhai, Marie
description The metacommunity concept incorporates spatial dynamics into community ecology, shedding light on how local and regional processes interact in structuring ecological communities, and to which measure they are deterministic or stochastic. We reviewed metacommunity studies on freshwater meiobenthos published since 2004, when the main principles of metacommunity theory were conceptualized. The studies (together 19) were observational, focused mainly on ostracods, and rarely on rotifers and nematodes. In accordance with general expectations, the prevalent structuring force was species sorting. Ostracods showed more dispersal limitations than nematodes and rotifers, and there was very little support for dispersal surplus. We discussed the role of body size, dispersal mode, and attachment to sediment for the meiofauna dispersal. Effects of metacommunity context (habitat connectivity, spatial extent, and environmental heterogeneity), study design (e.g., sample size), and statistical approach could not be sufficiently disentangled due to the low number of studies. Local stochasticity, consistent with neutral theory and patch dynamics, was indicated for taxa with weak specialization and metacommunities in small habitats. Our understanding of meiofaunal metacommunities is only fragmentary and it would highly benefit from direct comparisons of taxa with different species traits and between different spatial scales, and studies incorporating temporal dynamics and hypothesis-driven experiments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-020-04185-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2408734210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A625619265</galeid><sourcerecordid>A625619265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-e779aa43fcd213177de61c67ea113b06eb90a22b0a48f7d0273e6e7dcbbf75973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQRkVpoLdJX6ArQVdZOB1JtmUvQ2jTCymB_KzFWB65DrZ1I8nQ-_ZR6kLJpgxiQJwjffAx9lnAhQDQX6MAXUEBMp9SNFUh37GdqLQqKiH0e7YDEE3RiKr5wD7G-ARZaiXs2P4njd7huiDHyJHPvqeJJ88TxcQPGLAfhzly7zhZP_lhtDjxmRJaP8_rMqYjT7_Ih-MZO3E4Rfr0d5-yx-_fHq5-FDe31_ury5vClqpOBWndIpbK2V4KJbTuqRa21oRCqA5q6lpAKTvAsnG6B6kV1aR723VOV61Wp-zL9u4h-Oc1pzRPfg1L_tLIEhqtSikgUxcbNeBEZlycTwFtnp7m0fqF3JjvL2tZ1aKVdZWF8zdCZhL9TgOuMZr9_d1bVm6sDT7GQM4cwjhjOBoB5rUPs_Vhch_mTx9GZkltUszwMlD4l_s_1gs9EYwq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2408734210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meiofauna as a model to test paradigms of ecological metacommunity theory</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gansfort, Birgit ; Fontaneto, Diego ; Zhai, Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Gansfort, Birgit ; Fontaneto, Diego ; Zhai, Marie</creatorcontrib><description>The metacommunity concept incorporates spatial dynamics into community ecology, shedding light on how local and regional processes interact in structuring ecological communities, and to which measure they are deterministic or stochastic. We reviewed metacommunity studies on freshwater meiobenthos published since 2004, when the main principles of metacommunity theory were conceptualized. The studies (together 19) were observational, focused mainly on ostracods, and rarely on rotifers and nematodes. In accordance with general expectations, the prevalent structuring force was species sorting. Ostracods showed more dispersal limitations than nematodes and rotifers, and there was very little support for dispersal surplus. We discussed the role of body size, dispersal mode, and attachment to sediment for the meiofauna dispersal. Effects of metacommunity context (habitat connectivity, spatial extent, and environmental heterogeneity), study design (e.g., sample size), and statistical approach could not be sufficiently disentangled due to the low number of studies. Local stochasticity, consistent with neutral theory and patch dynamics, was indicated for taxa with weak specialization and metacommunities in small habitats. Our understanding of meiofaunal metacommunities is only fragmentary and it would highly benefit from direct comparisons of taxa with different species traits and between different spatial scales, and studies incorporating temporal dynamics and hypothesis-driven experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-020-04185-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body size ; Community ecology ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Dynamics ; Ecology ; Freshwater ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Habitat connectivity ; Heterogeneity ; Inland water environment ; Life Sciences ; Marine biology ; Meiobenthos ; Meiofauna ; Meiofauna in Freshwater Ecosystems ; Model testing ; Nematodes ; Rotifera ; Specialization ; Stochasticity ; Taxa ; Theories ; Zoobenthos ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2020-07, Vol.847 (12), p.2645-2663</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-e779aa43fcd213177de61c67ea113b06eb90a22b0a48f7d0273e6e7dcbbf75973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-e779aa43fcd213177de61c67ea113b06eb90a22b0a48f7d0273e6e7dcbbf75973</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0384-0710</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-020-04185-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-020-04185-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gansfort, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaneto, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Meiofauna as a model to test paradigms of ecological metacommunity theory</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>The metacommunity concept incorporates spatial dynamics into community ecology, shedding light on how local and regional processes interact in structuring ecological communities, and to which measure they are deterministic or stochastic. We reviewed metacommunity studies on freshwater meiobenthos published since 2004, when the main principles of metacommunity theory were conceptualized. The studies (together 19) were observational, focused mainly on ostracods, and rarely on rotifers and nematodes. In accordance with general expectations, the prevalent structuring force was species sorting. Ostracods showed more dispersal limitations than nematodes and rotifers, and there was very little support for dispersal surplus. We discussed the role of body size, dispersal mode, and attachment to sediment for the meiofauna dispersal. Effects of metacommunity context (habitat connectivity, spatial extent, and environmental heterogeneity), study design (e.g., sample size), and statistical approach could not be sufficiently disentangled due to the low number of studies. Local stochasticity, consistent with neutral theory and patch dynamics, was indicated for taxa with weak specialization and metacommunities in small habitats. Our understanding of meiofaunal metacommunities is only fragmentary and it would highly benefit from direct comparisons of taxa with different species traits and between different spatial scales, and studies incorporating temporal dynamics and hypothesis-driven experiments.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Habitat connectivity</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Meiobenthos</subject><subject>Meiofauna</subject><subject>Meiofauna in Freshwater Ecosystems</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>Rotifera</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQRkVpoLdJX6ArQVdZOB1JtmUvQ2jTCymB_KzFWB65DrZ1I8nQ-_ZR6kLJpgxiQJwjffAx9lnAhQDQX6MAXUEBMp9SNFUh37GdqLQqKiH0e7YDEE3RiKr5wD7G-ARZaiXs2P4njd7huiDHyJHPvqeJJ88TxcQPGLAfhzly7zhZP_lhtDjxmRJaP8_rMqYjT7_Ih-MZO3E4Rfr0d5-yx-_fHq5-FDe31_ury5vClqpOBWndIpbK2V4KJbTuqRa21oRCqA5q6lpAKTvAsnG6B6kV1aR723VOV61Wp-zL9u4h-Oc1pzRPfg1L_tLIEhqtSikgUxcbNeBEZlycTwFtnp7m0fqF3JjvL2tZ1aKVdZWF8zdCZhL9TgOuMZr9_d1bVm6sDT7GQM4cwjhjOBoB5rUPs_Vhch_mTx9GZkltUszwMlD4l_s_1gs9EYwq</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Gansfort, Birgit</creator><creator>Fontaneto, Diego</creator><creator>Zhai, Marie</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0384-0710</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Meiofauna as a model to test paradigms of ecological metacommunity theory</title><author>Gansfort, Birgit ; Fontaneto, Diego ; Zhai, Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-e779aa43fcd213177de61c67ea113b06eb90a22b0a48f7d0273e6e7dcbbf75973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Habitat connectivity</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Meiobenthos</topic><topic>Meiofauna</topic><topic>Meiofauna in Freshwater Ecosystems</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>Rotifera</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gansfort, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaneto, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science In Context</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gansfort, Birgit</au><au>Fontaneto, Diego</au><au>Zhai, Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meiofauna as a model to test paradigms of ecological metacommunity theory</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>847</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2645</spage><epage>2663</epage><pages>2645-2663</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>The metacommunity concept incorporates spatial dynamics into community ecology, shedding light on how local and regional processes interact in structuring ecological communities, and to which measure they are deterministic or stochastic. We reviewed metacommunity studies on freshwater meiobenthos published since 2004, when the main principles of metacommunity theory were conceptualized. The studies (together 19) were observational, focused mainly on ostracods, and rarely on rotifers and nematodes. In accordance with general expectations, the prevalent structuring force was species sorting. Ostracods showed more dispersal limitations than nematodes and rotifers, and there was very little support for dispersal surplus. We discussed the role of body size, dispersal mode, and attachment to sediment for the meiofauna dispersal. Effects of metacommunity context (habitat connectivity, spatial extent, and environmental heterogeneity), study design (e.g., sample size), and statistical approach could not be sufficiently disentangled due to the low number of studies. Local stochasticity, consistent with neutral theory and patch dynamics, was indicated for taxa with weak specialization and metacommunities in small habitats. Our understanding of meiofaunal metacommunities is only fragmentary and it would highly benefit from direct comparisons of taxa with different species traits and between different spatial scales, and studies incorporating temporal dynamics and hypothesis-driven experiments.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-020-04185-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0384-0710</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2020-07, Vol.847 (12), p.2645-2663
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2408734210
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Body size
Community ecology
Dispersal
Dispersion
Dynamics
Ecology
Freshwater
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Habitat connectivity
Heterogeneity
Inland water environment
Life Sciences
Marine biology
Meiobenthos
Meiofauna
Meiofauna in Freshwater Ecosystems
Model testing
Nematodes
Rotifera
Specialization
Stochasticity
Taxa
Theories
Zoobenthos
Zoology
title Meiofauna as a model to test paradigms of ecological metacommunity theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A27%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meiofauna%20as%20a%20model%20to%20test%20paradigms%20of%20ecological%20metacommunity%20theory&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Gansfort,%20Birgit&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=847&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2645&rft.epage=2663&rft.pages=2645-2663&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-020-04185-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA625619265%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2408734210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A625619265&rfr_iscdi=true