Comparative analysis of the eye anatomy in fossorial and surface‐living skink species (Reptilia: Scincidae), with special reference to the structure of the retina
We compared the eye anatomy of the scotopic fossorial Acontias orientalis, Acontias rieppeli and Typhlosaurus vermis with that of the photopic surface‐living Trachylepis punctatissima, with particular reference to the retina. The findings were compared with published data on gecko species (Röll, 200...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta zoologica (Stockholm) 2020-07, Vol.101 (3), p.311-323 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 323 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 311 |
| container_title | Acta zoologica (Stockholm) |
| container_volume | 101 |
| creator | Zhao, Zhongning Goedhals, Jacqueline Verdú‐Ricoy, Joaquín Jordaan, Adriaan Heideman, Neil |
| description | We compared the eye anatomy of the scotopic fossorial Acontias orientalis, Acontias rieppeli and Typhlosaurus vermis with that of the photopic surface‐living Trachylepis punctatissima, with particular reference to the retina. The findings were compared with published data on gecko species (Röll, 2001), to determine whether similar trends existed. The vestigial eye of T. vermis was not comparable with that of the other three skink species. The findings in A. orientalis, A. rieppeli and T. punctatissima were as follows: (a) A. rieppeli lacked a conus papillaris, (b) A. orientalis, A. rieppeli and T. punctatissima were pure‐cone species but lacked a fovea, (c) estimated cone density in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli was lower than that in T. punctatissima, (d) the ellipsoid cone segment was smaller and the paraboloid segment larger in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli with the reverse in T. punctatissima, (e) VCL%, ONL%, OPL% and GCL% in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli were significantly greater than that of T. punctatissima, (f) INL% and IPL% in T. punctatissima was significantly greater, and (g) T. punctatissima had abundant Müller cells and fibres. Findings in the gecko species were congruent with those of the three skink species of the present study. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/azo.12297 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2407558507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407558507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-f9ca30c00a80b023fbda86dbb0c9b85a71195dd20172ed4c39da5d8cf6ee0bc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhoMoeLwsfIOAGwWrSXp6cycHbyAIXjZuyjSZarSnqUmq1JWP4EP4ZD6J8VSXzmaY4ZvrT8gWZ_s82AG8mX0uRJEtkQmfpnGUxkWyTCaMMR5lIhOrZM25xxDmLBYT8jkz8w4seP2CFFpoBqcdNTX1D0hxWOS8mQ9Ut7Q2zhmroQlJRV1va5D49f7R6Bfd3lP3pNsn6jqUGh3ducLO60bDIb2WupVaAe7u0VftH0YmtLFYo8VWIvVmMdB520vfW_zbwKLXLWyQlRoah5u_fp3cnhzfzM6ii8vT89nRRSTDwVlUFxJiJhmDnFVMxHWlIE9VVTFZVHkCGedFopRgPBOopjIuFCQql3WKyCqZxutke-zbWfPco_Plo-lteIorxZRlSZInLAvU7khJGx4Sbig7q-dgh5Kz8keEMohQLkQI7MHIvuoGh__B8ujucqz4BoThjYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407558507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of the eye anatomy in fossorial and surface‐living skink species (Reptilia: Scincidae), with special reference to the structure of the retina</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zhao, Zhongning ; Goedhals, Jacqueline ; Verdú‐Ricoy, Joaquín ; Jordaan, Adriaan ; Heideman, Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zhongning ; Goedhals, Jacqueline ; Verdú‐Ricoy, Joaquín ; Jordaan, Adriaan ; Heideman, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the eye anatomy of the scotopic fossorial Acontias orientalis, Acontias rieppeli and Typhlosaurus vermis with that of the photopic surface‐living Trachylepis punctatissima, with particular reference to the retina. The findings were compared with published data on gecko species (Röll, 2001), to determine whether similar trends existed. The vestigial eye of T. vermis was not comparable with that of the other three skink species. The findings in A. orientalis, A. rieppeli and T. punctatissima were as follows: (a) A. rieppeli lacked a conus papillaris, (b) A. orientalis, A. rieppeli and T. punctatissima were pure‐cone species but lacked a fovea, (c) estimated cone density in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli was lower than that in T. punctatissima, (d) the ellipsoid cone segment was smaller and the paraboloid segment larger in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli with the reverse in T. punctatissima, (e) VCL%, ONL%, OPL% and GCL% in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli were significantly greater than that of T. punctatissima, (f) INL% and IPL% in T. punctatissima was significantly greater, and (g) T. punctatissima had abundant Müller cells and fibres. Findings in the gecko species were congruent with those of the three skink species of the present study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-7272</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-6395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/azo.12297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Comparative analysis ; Eye ; Fibers ; fossorial ; Fovea ; Geckos ; Gekkonidae ; Parabolic bodies ; photopic ; Retina ; Scincidae ; scotopic ; Species ; surface‐living ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2020-07, Vol.101 (3), p.311-323</ispartof><rights>2019 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-f9ca30c00a80b023fbda86dbb0c9b85a71195dd20172ed4c39da5d8cf6ee0bc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-f9ca30c00a80b023fbda86dbb0c9b85a71195dd20172ed4c39da5d8cf6ee0bc63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6400-4743</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fazo.12297$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fazo.12297$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zhongning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goedhals, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdú‐Ricoy, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordaan, Adriaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heideman, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of the eye anatomy in fossorial and surface‐living skink species (Reptilia: Scincidae), with special reference to the structure of the retina</title><title>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</title><description>We compared the eye anatomy of the scotopic fossorial Acontias orientalis, Acontias rieppeli and Typhlosaurus vermis with that of the photopic surface‐living Trachylepis punctatissima, with particular reference to the retina. The findings were compared with published data on gecko species (Röll, 2001), to determine whether similar trends existed. The vestigial eye of T. vermis was not comparable with that of the other three skink species. The findings in A. orientalis, A. rieppeli and T. punctatissima were as follows: (a) A. rieppeli lacked a conus papillaris, (b) A. orientalis, A. rieppeli and T. punctatissima were pure‐cone species but lacked a fovea, (c) estimated cone density in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli was lower than that in T. punctatissima, (d) the ellipsoid cone segment was smaller and the paraboloid segment larger in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli with the reverse in T. punctatissima, (e) VCL%, ONL%, OPL% and GCL% in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli were significantly greater than that of T. punctatissima, (f) INL% and IPL% in T. punctatissima was significantly greater, and (g) T. punctatissima had abundant Müller cells and fibres. Findings in the gecko species were congruent with those of the three skink species of the present study.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>fossorial</subject><subject>Fovea</subject><subject>Geckos</subject><subject>Gekkonidae</subject><subject>Parabolic bodies</subject><subject>photopic</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Scincidae</subject><subject>scotopic</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>surface‐living</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0001-7272</issn><issn>1463-6395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhoMoeLwsfIOAGwWrSXp6cycHbyAIXjZuyjSZarSnqUmq1JWP4EP4ZD6J8VSXzmaY4ZvrT8gWZ_s82AG8mX0uRJEtkQmfpnGUxkWyTCaMMR5lIhOrZM25xxDmLBYT8jkz8w4seP2CFFpoBqcdNTX1D0hxWOS8mQ9Ut7Q2zhmroQlJRV1va5D49f7R6Bfd3lP3pNsn6jqUGh3ducLO60bDIb2WupVaAe7u0VftH0YmtLFYo8VWIvVmMdB520vfW_zbwKLXLWyQlRoah5u_fp3cnhzfzM6ii8vT89nRRSTDwVlUFxJiJhmDnFVMxHWlIE9VVTFZVHkCGedFopRgPBOopjIuFCQql3WKyCqZxutke-zbWfPco_Plo-lteIorxZRlSZInLAvU7khJGx4Sbig7q-dgh5Kz8keEMohQLkQI7MHIvuoGh__B8ujucqz4BoThjYg</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Zhao, Zhongning</creator><creator>Goedhals, Jacqueline</creator><creator>Verdú‐Ricoy, Joaquín</creator><creator>Jordaan, Adriaan</creator><creator>Heideman, Neil</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6400-4743</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of the eye anatomy in fossorial and surface‐living skink species (Reptilia: Scincidae), with special reference to the structure of the retina</title><author>Zhao, Zhongning ; Goedhals, Jacqueline ; Verdú‐Ricoy, Joaquín ; Jordaan, Adriaan ; Heideman, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-f9ca30c00a80b023fbda86dbb0c9b85a71195dd20172ed4c39da5d8cf6ee0bc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>fossorial</topic><topic>Fovea</topic><topic>Geckos</topic><topic>Gekkonidae</topic><topic>Parabolic bodies</topic><topic>photopic</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Scincidae</topic><topic>scotopic</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>surface‐living</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zhongning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goedhals, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdú‐Ricoy, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordaan, Adriaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heideman, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Zhongning</au><au>Goedhals, Jacqueline</au><au>Verdú‐Ricoy, Joaquín</au><au>Jordaan, Adriaan</au><au>Heideman, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of the eye anatomy in fossorial and surface‐living skink species (Reptilia: Scincidae), with special reference to the structure of the retina</atitle><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>311-323</pages><issn>0001-7272</issn><eissn>1463-6395</eissn><abstract>We compared the eye anatomy of the scotopic fossorial Acontias orientalis, Acontias rieppeli and Typhlosaurus vermis with that of the photopic surface‐living Trachylepis punctatissima, with particular reference to the retina. The findings were compared with published data on gecko species (Röll, 2001), to determine whether similar trends existed. The vestigial eye of T. vermis was not comparable with that of the other three skink species. The findings in A. orientalis, A. rieppeli and T. punctatissima were as follows: (a) A. rieppeli lacked a conus papillaris, (b) A. orientalis, A. rieppeli and T. punctatissima were pure‐cone species but lacked a fovea, (c) estimated cone density in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli was lower than that in T. punctatissima, (d) the ellipsoid cone segment was smaller and the paraboloid segment larger in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli with the reverse in T. punctatissima, (e) VCL%, ONL%, OPL% and GCL% in A. orientalis and A. rieppeli were significantly greater than that of T. punctatissima, (f) INL% and IPL% in T. punctatissima was significantly greater, and (g) T. punctatissima had abundant Müller cells and fibres. Findings in the gecko species were congruent with those of the three skink species of the present study.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/azo.12297</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6400-4743</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0001-7272 |
| ispartof | Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2020-07, Vol.101 (3), p.311-323 |
| issn | 0001-7272 1463-6395 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2407558507 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Anatomy Comparative analysis Eye Fibers fossorial Fovea Geckos Gekkonidae Parabolic bodies photopic Retina Scincidae scotopic Species surface‐living Vision |
| title | Comparative analysis of the eye anatomy in fossorial and surface‐living skink species (Reptilia: Scincidae), with special reference to the structure of the retina |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A04%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20the%20eye%20anatomy%20in%20fossorial%20and%20surface%E2%80%90living%20skink%20species%20(Reptilia:%20Scincidae),%20with%20special%20reference%20to%20the%20structure%20of%20the%20retina&rft.jtitle=Acta%20zoologica%20(Stockholm)&rft.au=Zhao,%20Zhongning&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=311-323&rft.issn=0001-7272&rft.eissn=1463-6395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/azo.12297&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2407558507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407558507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |