Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand

The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New Zealand journal of ecology 2020-01, Vol.44 (2), p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Dilks, Peter, Sjoberg, Tim, Murphy, Elaine C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title New Zealand journal of ecology
container_volume 44
creator Dilks, Peter
Sjoberg, Tim
Murphy, Elaine C.
description The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountains, West Otago, trail cameras were used to monitor the impact of the application on mammalian predators. Both stoats and rats were regularly recorded on cameras throughout the study area before the poison operation, but no stoats or rats were recorded the day after the operation, and none had returned by the time monitoring ended 38 days later. Possum, mouse and hedgehog detections were also significantly reduced. The aerial 1080 operation was therefore effective at controlling pests, and there was no evidence of a decline in bird or deer abundance due to non-target poisoning. Before this study it was not known that hedgehogs could be controlled by aerial 1080; this finding reveals an added benefit from its application. The use of trail cameras was effective at monitoring a range of species and although more labour-intensive than traditional monitoring methods, it provided more detailed information.
doi_str_mv 10.20417/nzjecol.44.13
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2406985069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26931307</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26931307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-312c6a4474148f06b82fb4642e7ebc29cd240372c93de91868b299164caf6ab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDlPAzEQhS0EEiHQ0iFZomWDr_goIQqHFKCBBgrL69hio40d7F2O_HoMidLMK-ab90YPgFOMRgQxLC7DeuFsbEeMjTDdAwOMhaiEkHIfDBDGqOKMjw_BUc4LhKjElA7A29R7Z7vm0wWXM4weGpca00KMJII-Jmhj6FJs_1ZLs1yW1crlLsMmwO7dweu2d_Ah9qEzTcgX8NF9wVdnWhPmx-DAmza7k60OwcvN9HlyV82ebu8nV7PK0rHoKoqJ5YYxwTCTHvFaEl8zzogTrrZE2TlhiApiFZ07hSWXNVEKc2aN56ZmdAjON76rFD_68pxexD6FEqnLJVdyXEahRhvKpphzcl6vUrM06UdjpP8L1NsCNWO6lLOzDW1Y6ybM3XdRpRQac8UoQURSUaizDbXIXUw7T1ISMUWC_gIbH3fa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406985069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Index New Zealand (Open Access)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dilks, Peter ; Sjoberg, Tim ; Murphy, Elaine C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dilks, Peter ; Sjoberg, Tim ; Murphy, Elaine C. ; Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><description>The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountains, West Otago, trail cameras were used to monitor the impact of the application on mammalian predators. Both stoats and rats were regularly recorded on cameras throughout the study area before the poison operation, but no stoats or rats were recorded the day after the operation, and none had returned by the time monitoring ended 38 days later. Possum, mouse and hedgehog detections were also significantly reduced. The aerial 1080 operation was therefore effective at controlling pests, and there was no evidence of a decline in bird or deer abundance due to non-target poisoning. Before this study it was not known that hedgehogs could be controlled by aerial 1080; this finding reveals an added benefit from its application. The use of trail cameras was effective at monitoring a range of species and although more labour-intensive than traditional monitoring methods, it provided more detailed information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0110-6465</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1177-7788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1177-7788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20417/nzjecol.44.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Christchurch: New Zealand Ecological Society</publisher><subject>Aerial application ; Aerial applications ; Animal behavior ; Baits ; Birds ; Cameras ; Control ; Deer ; Mammal pests ; Mammals ; Monitoring ; Monitoring methods ; Mountains ; Pest control ; Pest control baits ; Pests ; Poisoning ; Poisons ; Predators ; Sodium fluoroacetate</subject><ispartof>New Zealand journal of ecology, 2020-01, Vol.44 (2), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2020 New Zealand Ecological Society</rights><rights>Copyright New Zealand Ecological Society 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-312c6a4474148f06b82fb4642e7ebc29cd240372c93de91868b299164caf6ab43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26931307$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26931307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,25931,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://natlib-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,999056943202837&amp;tab=innz&amp;search_scope=INNZ&amp;vid=NLNZ&amp;offset=0$$DView this record in NLNZ$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dilks, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjoberg, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Elaine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand</title><title>New Zealand journal of ecology</title><description>The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountains, West Otago, trail cameras were used to monitor the impact of the application on mammalian predators. Both stoats and rats were regularly recorded on cameras throughout the study area before the poison operation, but no stoats or rats were recorded the day after the operation, and none had returned by the time monitoring ended 38 days later. Possum, mouse and hedgehog detections were also significantly reduced. The aerial 1080 operation was therefore effective at controlling pests, and there was no evidence of a decline in bird or deer abundance due to non-target poisoning. Before this study it was not known that hedgehogs could be controlled by aerial 1080; this finding reveals an added benefit from its application. The use of trail cameras was effective at monitoring a range of species and although more labour-intensive than traditional monitoring methods, it provided more detailed information.</description><subject>Aerial application</subject><subject>Aerial applications</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Baits</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Mammal pests</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pest control baits</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>Poisons</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Sodium fluoroacetate</subject><issn>0110-6465</issn><issn>1177-7788</issn><issn>1177-7788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>LETOP</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDlPAzEQhS0EEiHQ0iFZomWDr_goIQqHFKCBBgrL69hio40d7F2O_HoMidLMK-ab90YPgFOMRgQxLC7DeuFsbEeMjTDdAwOMhaiEkHIfDBDGqOKMjw_BUc4LhKjElA7A29R7Z7vm0wWXM4weGpca00KMJII-Jmhj6FJs_1ZLs1yW1crlLsMmwO7dweu2d_Ah9qEzTcgX8NF9wVdnWhPmx-DAmza7k60OwcvN9HlyV82ebu8nV7PK0rHoKoqJ5YYxwTCTHvFaEl8zzogTrrZE2TlhiApiFZ07hSWXNVEKc2aN56ZmdAjON76rFD_68pxexD6FEqnLJVdyXEahRhvKpphzcl6vUrM06UdjpP8L1NsCNWO6lLOzDW1Y6ybM3XdRpRQac8UoQURSUaizDbXIXUw7T1ISMUWC_gIbH3fa</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Dilks, Peter</creator><creator>Sjoberg, Tim</creator><creator>Murphy, Elaine C.</creator><general>New Zealand Ecological Society</general><scope>GOM</scope><scope>LETOP</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand</title><author>Dilks, Peter ; Sjoberg, Tim ; Murphy, Elaine C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-312c6a4474148f06b82fb4642e7ebc29cd240372c93de91868b299164caf6ab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerial application</topic><topic>Aerial applications</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Baits</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Mammal pests</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pest control baits</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>Poisons</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Sodium fluoroacetate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dilks, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjoberg, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Elaine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><collection>Index New Zealand</collection><collection>Index New Zealand (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>New Zealand journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dilks, Peter</au><au>Sjoberg, Tim</au><au>Murphy, Elaine C.</au><aucorp>Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0110-6465</issn><issn>1177-7788</issn><eissn>1177-7788</eissn><abstract>The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountains, West Otago, trail cameras were used to monitor the impact of the application on mammalian predators. Both stoats and rats were regularly recorded on cameras throughout the study area before the poison operation, but no stoats or rats were recorded the day after the operation, and none had returned by the time monitoring ended 38 days later. Possum, mouse and hedgehog detections were also significantly reduced. The aerial 1080 operation was therefore effective at controlling pests, and there was no evidence of a decline in bird or deer abundance due to non-target poisoning. Before this study it was not known that hedgehogs could be controlled by aerial 1080; this finding reveals an added benefit from its application. The use of trail cameras was effective at monitoring a range of species and although more labour-intensive than traditional monitoring methods, it provided more detailed information.</abstract><cop>Christchurch</cop><pub>New Zealand Ecological Society</pub><doi>10.20417/nzjecol.44.13</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0110-6465
ispartof New Zealand journal of ecology, 2020-01, Vol.44 (2), p.1-7
issn 0110-6465
1177-7788
1177-7788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2406985069
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Index New Zealand (Open Access); Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aerial application
Aerial applications
Animal behavior
Baits
Birds
Cameras
Control
Deer
Mammal pests
Mammals
Monitoring
Monitoring methods
Mountains
Pest control
Pest control baits
Pests
Poisoning
Poisons
Predators
Sodium fluoroacetate
title Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20aerial%201080%20for%20control%20of%20mammal%20pests%20in%20the%20Blue%20Mountains,%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Dilks,%20Peter&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Conservation,%20Private%20Bag%204715,%20Christchurch,%20New%20Zealand&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0110-6465&rft.eissn=1177-7788&rft_id=info:doi/10.20417/nzjecol.44.13&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26931307%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406985069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26931307&rfr_iscdi=true