Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand
The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New Zealand journal of ecology 2020-01, Vol.44 (2), p.1-7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | New Zealand journal of ecology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Dilks, Peter Sjoberg, Tim Murphy, Elaine C. |
description | The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountains, West Otago, trail cameras were used to monitor the impact of the application on mammalian predators. Both stoats and rats were regularly recorded on cameras throughout the study area before the poison operation, but no stoats or rats were recorded the day after the operation, and none had returned by the time monitoring ended 38 days later. Possum, mouse and hedgehog detections were also significantly reduced. The aerial 1080 operation was therefore effective at controlling pests, and there was no evidence of a decline in bird or deer abundance due to non-target poisoning. Before this study it was not known that hedgehogs could be controlled by aerial 1080; this finding reveals an added benefit from its application. The use of trail cameras was effective at monitoring a range of species and although more labour-intensive than traditional monitoring methods, it provided more detailed information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.20417/nzjecol.44.13 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2406985069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26931307</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26931307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-312c6a4474148f06b82fb4642e7ebc29cd240372c93de91868b299164caf6ab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDlPAzEQhS0EEiHQ0iFZomWDr_goIQqHFKCBBgrL69hio40d7F2O_HoMidLMK-ab90YPgFOMRgQxLC7DeuFsbEeMjTDdAwOMhaiEkHIfDBDGqOKMjw_BUc4LhKjElA7A29R7Z7vm0wWXM4weGpca00KMJII-Jmhj6FJs_1ZLs1yW1crlLsMmwO7dweu2d_Ah9qEzTcgX8NF9wVdnWhPmx-DAmza7k60OwcvN9HlyV82ebu8nV7PK0rHoKoqJ5YYxwTCTHvFaEl8zzogTrrZE2TlhiApiFZ07hSWXNVEKc2aN56ZmdAjON76rFD_68pxexD6FEqnLJVdyXEahRhvKpphzcl6vUrM06UdjpP8L1NsCNWO6lLOzDW1Y6ybM3XdRpRQac8UoQURSUaizDbXIXUw7T1ISMUWC_gIbH3fa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406985069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Index New Zealand (Open Access)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dilks, Peter ; Sjoberg, Tim ; Murphy, Elaine C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dilks, Peter ; Sjoberg, Tim ; Murphy, Elaine C. ; Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><description>The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountains, West Otago, trail cameras were used to monitor the impact of the application on mammalian predators. Both stoats and rats were regularly recorded on cameras throughout the study area before the poison operation, but no stoats or rats were recorded the day after the operation, and none had returned by the time monitoring ended 38 days later. Possum, mouse and hedgehog detections were also significantly reduced. The aerial 1080 operation was therefore effective at controlling pests, and there was no evidence of a decline in bird or deer abundance due to non-target poisoning. Before this study it was not known that hedgehogs could be controlled by aerial 1080; this finding reveals an added benefit from its application. The use of trail cameras was effective at monitoring a range of species and although more labour-intensive than traditional monitoring methods, it provided more detailed information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0110-6465</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1177-7788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1177-7788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20417/nzjecol.44.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Christchurch: New Zealand Ecological Society</publisher><subject>Aerial application ; Aerial applications ; Animal behavior ; Baits ; Birds ; Cameras ; Control ; Deer ; Mammal pests ; Mammals ; Monitoring ; Monitoring methods ; Mountains ; Pest control ; Pest control baits ; Pests ; Poisoning ; Poisons ; Predators ; Sodium fluoroacetate</subject><ispartof>New Zealand journal of ecology, 2020-01, Vol.44 (2), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2020 New Zealand Ecological Society</rights><rights>Copyright New Zealand Ecological Society 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-312c6a4474148f06b82fb4642e7ebc29cd240372c93de91868b299164caf6ab43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26931307$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26931307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,25931,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://natlib-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,999056943202837&tab=innz&search_scope=INNZ&vid=NLNZ&offset=0$$DView this record in NLNZ$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dilks, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjoberg, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Elaine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand</title><title>New Zealand journal of ecology</title><description>The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountains, West Otago, trail cameras were used to monitor the impact of the application on mammalian predators. Both stoats and rats were regularly recorded on cameras throughout the study area before the poison operation, but no stoats or rats were recorded the day after the operation, and none had returned by the time monitoring ended 38 days later. Possum, mouse and hedgehog detections were also significantly reduced. The aerial 1080 operation was therefore effective at controlling pests, and there was no evidence of a decline in bird or deer abundance due to non-target poisoning. Before this study it was not known that hedgehogs could be controlled by aerial 1080; this finding reveals an added benefit from its application. The use of trail cameras was effective at monitoring a range of species and although more labour-intensive than traditional monitoring methods, it provided more detailed information.</description><subject>Aerial application</subject><subject>Aerial applications</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Baits</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Mammal pests</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pest control baits</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>Poisons</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Sodium fluoroacetate</subject><issn>0110-6465</issn><issn>1177-7788</issn><issn>1177-7788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>LETOP</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDlPAzEQhS0EEiHQ0iFZomWDr_goIQqHFKCBBgrL69hio40d7F2O_HoMidLMK-ab90YPgFOMRgQxLC7DeuFsbEeMjTDdAwOMhaiEkHIfDBDGqOKMjw_BUc4LhKjElA7A29R7Z7vm0wWXM4weGpca00KMJII-Jmhj6FJs_1ZLs1yW1crlLsMmwO7dweu2d_Ah9qEzTcgX8NF9wVdnWhPmx-DAmza7k60OwcvN9HlyV82ebu8nV7PK0rHoKoqJ5YYxwTCTHvFaEl8zzogTrrZE2TlhiApiFZ07hSWXNVEKc2aN56ZmdAjON76rFD_68pxexD6FEqnLJVdyXEahRhvKpphzcl6vUrM06UdjpP8L1NsCNWO6lLOzDW1Y6ybM3XdRpRQac8UoQURSUaizDbXIXUw7T1ISMUWC_gIbH3fa</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Dilks, Peter</creator><creator>Sjoberg, Tim</creator><creator>Murphy, Elaine C.</creator><general>New Zealand Ecological Society</general><scope>GOM</scope><scope>LETOP</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand</title><author>Dilks, Peter ; Sjoberg, Tim ; Murphy, Elaine C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-312c6a4474148f06b82fb4642e7ebc29cd240372c93de91868b299164caf6ab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerial application</topic><topic>Aerial applications</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Baits</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Mammal pests</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pest control baits</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>Poisons</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Sodium fluoroacetate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dilks, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjoberg, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Elaine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><collection>Index New Zealand</collection><collection>Index New Zealand (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>New Zealand journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dilks, Peter</au><au>Sjoberg, Tim</au><au>Murphy, Elaine C.</au><aucorp>Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0110-6465</issn><issn>1177-7788</issn><eissn>1177-7788</eissn><abstract>The endemic fauna of New Zealand evolved in the absence of mammalian predators and their introduction has been devastating. Large-scale aerial applications of cereal baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are routinely used to control these pests. During one such operation in the Blue Mountains, West Otago, trail cameras were used to monitor the impact of the application on mammalian predators. Both stoats and rats were regularly recorded on cameras throughout the study area before the poison operation, but no stoats or rats were recorded the day after the operation, and none had returned by the time monitoring ended 38 days later. Possum, mouse and hedgehog detections were also significantly reduced. The aerial 1080 operation was therefore effective at controlling pests, and there was no evidence of a decline in bird or deer abundance due to non-target poisoning. Before this study it was not known that hedgehogs could be controlled by aerial 1080; this finding reveals an added benefit from its application. The use of trail cameras was effective at monitoring a range of species and although more labour-intensive than traditional monitoring methods, it provided more detailed information.</abstract><cop>Christchurch</cop><pub>New Zealand Ecological Society</pub><doi>10.20417/nzjecol.44.13</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0110-6465 |
ispartof | New Zealand journal of ecology, 2020-01, Vol.44 (2), p.1-7 |
issn | 0110-6465 1177-7788 1177-7788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2406985069 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Index New Zealand (Open Access); Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerial application Aerial applications Animal behavior Baits Birds Cameras Control Deer Mammal pests Mammals Monitoring Monitoring methods Mountains Pest control Pest control baits Pests Poisoning Poisons Predators Sodium fluoroacetate |
title | Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20aerial%201080%20for%20control%20of%20mammal%20pests%20in%20the%20Blue%20Mountains,%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Dilks,%20Peter&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Conservation,%20Private%20Bag%204715,%20Christchurch,%20New%20Zealand&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0110-6465&rft.eissn=1177-7788&rft_id=info:doi/10.20417/nzjecol.44.13&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26931307%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406985069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26931307&rfr_iscdi=true |