Martian Ionopause Boundary: Coincidence With Photoelectron Boundary and Response to Internal and External Drivers

The Martian ionopause boundary detected as steep gradients in the local electron density profiles from the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionospheric Sounder on Mars Express is studied individually and statistically and compared to the photoelectron boundary identified by the drop of photoel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2020-05, Vol.125 (5), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Duru, F., Baker, N., De Boer, M., Chamberlain, A., Verchimak, R., Morgan, D. D., Chu, F., Girazian, Z., Gurnett, D. A., Halekas, J., Kopf, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 125
creator Duru, F.
Baker, N.
De Boer, M.
Chamberlain, A.
Verchimak, R.
Morgan, D. D.
Chu, F.
Girazian, Z.
Gurnett, D. A.
Halekas, J.
Kopf, A.
description The Martian ionopause boundary detected as steep gradients in the local electron density profiles from the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionospheric Sounder on Mars Express is studied individually and statistically and compared to the photoelectron boundary identified by the drop of photoelectron signature due to CO2 and O molecules. In ~90% of the cases where we have electron energy flux data, the ionopause coincides with the photoelectron boundary. The steep density gradients form at the border of the photoelectron region and above. The ionopause is observed in a wide range of latitude, longitude, and altitude. According to remote sounding investigations, the average thickness of the ionopause is ~30 km. The average altitude is between 500 and 700 km on the dayside. The altitude of the ionopause is inversely related to the solar wind dynamic pressure. Strong crustal magnetic fields increase the altitude of the boundary and they have a slight, negative effect on the occurrence only for high values. The ionopause occurs more frequently, and its altitude is higher during southern summer. The average altitude of the ionopause and solar irradiance are correlated with each other. The effect of the extreme ultraviolet flux on the occurrence rate is less noticeable. Key Points An ionopause boundary, defined as an altitudinal steep density gradient, has been detected in 13% of the cases in 12 years of MARSIS data In 89% of the cases, the ionopause coincides with the PEB The ionopause altitude is affected by solar wind dynamic pressure and crustal magnetic fields
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JA027409
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2406908803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2406908803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3502-57810caf67558fa3901d41a809ebe2ad9ba35289a0555fcacd886ed2fc25cfd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhhujiQS9-QOaeBWdttul9YaICMFoiMbjprTdsGRtl3ZX5d-7CBpPzmW-npnMvAidEbgkQOUVBSKnA6D9BOQB6lCSyp5MgB7-xEzAMTqNcQWtibZEeAetH1SoC-XwxDtfqSZafOMbZ1TYXOOhL5wujHXa4teiXuKnpa-9La2ug3e_IFbO4LmNlXfteO3xxNU2OFV-N0af--Q2FO82xBN0lKsy2tO976KXu9Hz8L43exxPhoNZTzMOtMf7goBWedrnXOSKSSAmIUqAtAtLlZELxTgVUgHnPNdKGyFSa2iuKde5SVkXne_2VsGvGxvrbOWb7SExowmkEoQA1lIXO0oHH2OweVaF4q19KiOQbXXN_ura4myHfxSl3fzLZtPxfMB5CpR9AV9iejM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406908803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Martian Ionopause Boundary: Coincidence With Photoelectron Boundary and Response to Internal and External Drivers</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Duru, F. ; Baker, N. ; De Boer, M. ; Chamberlain, A. ; Verchimak, R. ; Morgan, D. D. ; Chu, F. ; Girazian, Z. ; Gurnett, D. A. ; Halekas, J. ; Kopf, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Duru, F. ; Baker, N. ; De Boer, M. ; Chamberlain, A. ; Verchimak, R. ; Morgan, D. D. ; Chu, F. ; Girazian, Z. ; Gurnett, D. A. ; Halekas, J. ; Kopf, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The Martian ionopause boundary detected as steep gradients in the local electron density profiles from the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionospheric Sounder on Mars Express is studied individually and statistically and compared to the photoelectron boundary identified by the drop of photoelectron signature due to CO2 and O molecules. In ~90% of the cases where we have electron energy flux data, the ionopause coincides with the photoelectron boundary. The steep density gradients form at the border of the photoelectron region and above. The ionopause is observed in a wide range of latitude, longitude, and altitude. According to remote sounding investigations, the average thickness of the ionopause is ~30 km. The average altitude is between 500 and 700 km on the dayside. The altitude of the ionopause is inversely related to the solar wind dynamic pressure. Strong crustal magnetic fields increase the altitude of the boundary and they have a slight, negative effect on the occurrence only for high values. The ionopause occurs more frequently, and its altitude is higher during southern summer. The average altitude of the ionopause and solar irradiance are correlated with each other. The effect of the extreme ultraviolet flux on the occurrence rate is less noticeable. Key Points An ionopause boundary, defined as an altitudinal steep density gradient, has been detected in 13% of the cases in 12 years of MARSIS data In 89% of the cases, the ionopause coincides with the PEB The ionopause altitude is affected by solar wind dynamic pressure and crustal magnetic fields</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JA027409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Altitude ; Carbon dioxide ; Density gradients ; Dynamic pressure ; Electron density ; Electron density profiles ; Electron energy ; Energy flux ; Ionopause ; ionosphere ; Ionospheric sounding ; Irradiance ; Magnetic fields ; Mars ; Mars Express (ESA) ; photoelectron boundary ; Photoelectrons ; Radar ; Solar irradiance ; Solar magnetic field ; Solar wind ; Solar wind dynamics</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2020-05, Vol.125 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3502-57810caf67558fa3901d41a809ebe2ad9ba35289a0555fcacd886ed2fc25cfd63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3502-57810caf67558fa3901d41a809ebe2ad9ba35289a0555fcacd886ed2fc25cfd63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5258-6128 ; 0000-0002-3186-0551 ; 0000-0003-1529-5991 ; 0000-0001-9761-5172 ; 0000-0002-3343-9234 ; 0000-0002-0035-7988 ; 0000-0003-2403-0282</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JA027409$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JA027409$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duru, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Boer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verchimak, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, D. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girazian, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurnett, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halekas, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopf, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Martian Ionopause Boundary: Coincidence With Photoelectron Boundary and Response to Internal and External Drivers</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>The Martian ionopause boundary detected as steep gradients in the local electron density profiles from the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionospheric Sounder on Mars Express is studied individually and statistically and compared to the photoelectron boundary identified by the drop of photoelectron signature due to CO2 and O molecules. In ~90% of the cases where we have electron energy flux data, the ionopause coincides with the photoelectron boundary. The steep density gradients form at the border of the photoelectron region and above. The ionopause is observed in a wide range of latitude, longitude, and altitude. According to remote sounding investigations, the average thickness of the ionopause is ~30 km. The average altitude is between 500 and 700 km on the dayside. The altitude of the ionopause is inversely related to the solar wind dynamic pressure. Strong crustal magnetic fields increase the altitude of the boundary and they have a slight, negative effect on the occurrence only for high values. The ionopause occurs more frequently, and its altitude is higher during southern summer. The average altitude of the ionopause and solar irradiance are correlated with each other. The effect of the extreme ultraviolet flux on the occurrence rate is less noticeable. Key Points An ionopause boundary, defined as an altitudinal steep density gradient, has been detected in 13% of the cases in 12 years of MARSIS data In 89% of the cases, the ionopause coincides with the PEB The ionopause altitude is affected by solar wind dynamic pressure and crustal magnetic fields</description><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Density gradients</subject><subject>Dynamic pressure</subject><subject>Electron density</subject><subject>Electron density profiles</subject><subject>Electron energy</subject><subject>Energy flux</subject><subject>Ionopause</subject><subject>ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric sounding</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Mars</subject><subject>Mars Express (ESA)</subject><subject>photoelectron boundary</subject><subject>Photoelectrons</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Solar irradiance</subject><subject>Solar magnetic field</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><subject>Solar wind dynamics</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhhujiQS9-QOaeBWdttul9YaICMFoiMbjprTdsGRtl3ZX5d-7CBpPzmW-npnMvAidEbgkQOUVBSKnA6D9BOQB6lCSyp5MgB7-xEzAMTqNcQWtibZEeAetH1SoC-XwxDtfqSZafOMbZ1TYXOOhL5wujHXa4teiXuKnpa-9La2ug3e_IFbO4LmNlXfteO3xxNU2OFV-N0af--Q2FO82xBN0lKsy2tO976KXu9Hz8L43exxPhoNZTzMOtMf7goBWedrnXOSKSSAmIUqAtAtLlZELxTgVUgHnPNdKGyFSa2iuKde5SVkXne_2VsGvGxvrbOWb7SExowmkEoQA1lIXO0oHH2OweVaF4q19KiOQbXXN_ura4myHfxSl3fzLZtPxfMB5CpR9AV9iejM</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Duru, F.</creator><creator>Baker, N.</creator><creator>De Boer, M.</creator><creator>Chamberlain, A.</creator><creator>Verchimak, R.</creator><creator>Morgan, D. D.</creator><creator>Chu, F.</creator><creator>Girazian, Z.</creator><creator>Gurnett, D. A.</creator><creator>Halekas, J.</creator><creator>Kopf, A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-6128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-0551</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-5991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9761-5172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-9234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-7988</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2403-0282</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Martian Ionopause Boundary: Coincidence With Photoelectron Boundary and Response to Internal and External Drivers</title><author>Duru, F. ; Baker, N. ; De Boer, M. ; Chamberlain, A. ; Verchimak, R. ; Morgan, D. D. ; Chu, F. ; Girazian, Z. ; Gurnett, D. A. ; Halekas, J. ; Kopf, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3502-57810caf67558fa3901d41a809ebe2ad9ba35289a0555fcacd886ed2fc25cfd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Density gradients</topic><topic>Dynamic pressure</topic><topic>Electron density</topic><topic>Electron density profiles</topic><topic>Electron energy</topic><topic>Energy flux</topic><topic>Ionopause</topic><topic>ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric sounding</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Mars</topic><topic>Mars Express (ESA)</topic><topic>photoelectron boundary</topic><topic>Photoelectrons</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Solar irradiance</topic><topic>Solar magnetic field</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><topic>Solar wind dynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duru, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Boer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verchimak, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, D. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girazian, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurnett, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halekas, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopf, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duru, F.</au><au>Baker, N.</au><au>De Boer, M.</au><au>Chamberlain, A.</au><au>Verchimak, R.</au><au>Morgan, D. D.</au><au>Chu, F.</au><au>Girazian, Z.</au><au>Gurnett, D. A.</au><au>Halekas, J.</au><au>Kopf, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Martian Ionopause Boundary: Coincidence With Photoelectron Boundary and Response to Internal and External Drivers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>The Martian ionopause boundary detected as steep gradients in the local electron density profiles from the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionospheric Sounder on Mars Express is studied individually and statistically and compared to the photoelectron boundary identified by the drop of photoelectron signature due to CO2 and O molecules. In ~90% of the cases where we have electron energy flux data, the ionopause coincides with the photoelectron boundary. The steep density gradients form at the border of the photoelectron region and above. The ionopause is observed in a wide range of latitude, longitude, and altitude. According to remote sounding investigations, the average thickness of the ionopause is ~30 km. The average altitude is between 500 and 700 km on the dayside. The altitude of the ionopause is inversely related to the solar wind dynamic pressure. Strong crustal magnetic fields increase the altitude of the boundary and they have a slight, negative effect on the occurrence only for high values. The ionopause occurs more frequently, and its altitude is higher during southern summer. The average altitude of the ionopause and solar irradiance are correlated with each other. The effect of the extreme ultraviolet flux on the occurrence rate is less noticeable. Key Points An ionopause boundary, defined as an altitudinal steep density gradient, has been detected in 13% of the cases in 12 years of MARSIS data In 89% of the cases, the ionopause coincides with the PEB The ionopause altitude is affected by solar wind dynamic pressure and crustal magnetic fields</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JA027409</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-6128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-0551</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-5991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9761-5172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-9234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-7988</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2403-0282</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2020-05, Vol.125 (5), p.n/a
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2406908803
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content
subjects Altitude
Carbon dioxide
Density gradients
Dynamic pressure
Electron density
Electron density profiles
Electron energy
Energy flux
Ionopause
ionosphere
Ionospheric sounding
Irradiance
Magnetic fields
Mars
Mars Express (ESA)
photoelectron boundary
Photoelectrons
Radar
Solar irradiance
Solar magnetic field
Solar wind
Solar wind dynamics
title Martian Ionopause Boundary: Coincidence With Photoelectron Boundary and Response to Internal and External Drivers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T12%3A57%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Martian%20Ionopause%20Boundary:%20Coincidence%20With%20Photoelectron%20Boundary%20and%20Response%20to%20Internal%20and%20External%20Drivers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Duru,%20F.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JA027409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2406908803%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406908803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true