Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing

Adversarial examples provide an opportunity as well as impose a challenge for understanding image classification systems. Based on the analysis of the adversarial training solution Adversarial Logits Pairing (ALP), we observed in this work that: (1) The inference of adversarially robust model tends...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2021-04
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Shangxi, Jitao Sang, Xu, Kaiyuan, Zheng, Guanhua, Xu, Changsheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Wu, Shangxi
Jitao Sang
Xu, Kaiyuan
Zheng, Guanhua
Xu, Changsheng
description Adversarial examples provide an opportunity as well as impose a challenge for understanding image classification systems. Based on the analysis of the adversarial training solution Adversarial Logits Pairing (ALP), we observed in this work that: (1) The inference of adversarially robust model tends to rely on fewer high-contribution features compared with vulnerable ones. (2) The training target of ALP doesn't fit well to a noticeable part of samples, where the logits pairing loss is overemphasized and obstructs minimizing the classification loss. Motivated by these observations, we design an Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing (AALP) solution by modifying the training process and training target of ALP. Specifically, AALP consists of an adaptive feature optimization module with Guided Dropout to systematically pursue fewer high-contribution features, and an adaptive sample weighting module by setting sample-specific training weights to balance between logits pairing loss and classification loss. The proposed AALP solution demonstrates superior defense performance on multiple datasets with extensive experiments.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2406734579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2406734579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24067345793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQdkxJLCjJLEtVcEwpSy0qTizKTMxR8MlPzywpVghIzCzKzEvnYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IxMDM3NjE1NzS2PiVAEAkyYuPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406734579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Wu, Shangxi ; Jitao Sang ; Xu, Kaiyuan ; Zheng, Guanhua ; Xu, Changsheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shangxi ; Jitao Sang ; Xu, Kaiyuan ; Zheng, Guanhua ; Xu, Changsheng</creatorcontrib><description>Adversarial examples provide an opportunity as well as impose a challenge for understanding image classification systems. Based on the analysis of the adversarial training solution Adversarial Logits Pairing (ALP), we observed in this work that: (1) The inference of adversarially robust model tends to rely on fewer high-contribution features compared with vulnerable ones. (2) The training target of ALP doesn't fit well to a noticeable part of samples, where the logits pairing loss is overemphasized and obstructs minimizing the classification loss. Motivated by these observations, we design an Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing (AALP) solution by modifying the training process and training target of ALP. Specifically, AALP consists of an adaptive feature optimization module with Guided Dropout to systematically pursue fewer high-contribution features, and an adaptive sample weighting module by setting sample-specific training weights to balance between logits pairing loss and classification loss. The proposed AALP solution demonstrates superior defense performance on multiple datasets with extensive experiments.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Adaptive sampling ; Image classification ; Modules ; Optimization ; Training</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-04</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shangxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitao Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kaiyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Guanhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Changsheng</creatorcontrib><title>Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Adversarial examples provide an opportunity as well as impose a challenge for understanding image classification systems. Based on the analysis of the adversarial training solution Adversarial Logits Pairing (ALP), we observed in this work that: (1) The inference of adversarially robust model tends to rely on fewer high-contribution features compared with vulnerable ones. (2) The training target of ALP doesn't fit well to a noticeable part of samples, where the logits pairing loss is overemphasized and obstructs minimizing the classification loss. Motivated by these observations, we design an Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing (AALP) solution by modifying the training process and training target of ALP. Specifically, AALP consists of an adaptive feature optimization module with Guided Dropout to systematically pursue fewer high-contribution features, and an adaptive sample weighting module by setting sample-specific training weights to balance between logits pairing loss and classification loss. The proposed AALP solution demonstrates superior defense performance on multiple datasets with extensive experiments.</description><subject>Adaptive sampling</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQdkxJLCjJLEtVcEwpSy0qTizKTMxR8MlPzywpVghIzCzKzEvnYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IxMDM3NjE1NzS2PiVAEAkyYuPg</recordid><startdate>20210416</startdate><enddate>20210416</enddate><creator>Wu, Shangxi</creator><creator>Jitao Sang</creator><creator>Xu, Kaiyuan</creator><creator>Zheng, Guanhua</creator><creator>Xu, Changsheng</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210416</creationdate><title>Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing</title><author>Wu, Shangxi ; Jitao Sang ; Xu, Kaiyuan ; Zheng, Guanhua ; Xu, Changsheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24067345793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adaptive sampling</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shangxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitao Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kaiyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Guanhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Changsheng</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Shangxi</au><au>Jitao Sang</au><au>Xu, Kaiyuan</au><au>Zheng, Guanhua</au><au>Xu, Changsheng</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-04-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Adversarial examples provide an opportunity as well as impose a challenge for understanding image classification systems. Based on the analysis of the adversarial training solution Adversarial Logits Pairing (ALP), we observed in this work that: (1) The inference of adversarially robust model tends to rely on fewer high-contribution features compared with vulnerable ones. (2) The training target of ALP doesn't fit well to a noticeable part of samples, where the logits pairing loss is overemphasized and obstructs minimizing the classification loss. Motivated by these observations, we design an Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing (AALP) solution by modifying the training process and training target of ALP. Specifically, AALP consists of an adaptive feature optimization module with Guided Dropout to systematically pursue fewer high-contribution features, and an adaptive sample weighting module by setting sample-specific training weights to balance between logits pairing loss and classification loss. The proposed AALP solution demonstrates superior defense performance on multiple datasets with extensive experiments.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2021-04
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2406734579
source Free E- Journals
subjects Adaptive sampling
Image classification
Modules
Optimization
Training
title Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T05%3A54%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Adaptive%20Adversarial%20Logits%20Pairing&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Wu,%20Shangxi&rft.date=2021-04-16&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2406734579%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406734579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true