Drugs in sport — testing results from the South African Laboratory 1995 - 2002
Objective. To summarise the results of the past 8 years obtained at the South African Doping Control Laboratory and to compare the results with international statistics. Method. Screening procedures were performed on 14 017 urine samples collected from competitors in 54 different sporting codes duri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | South African journal of sports medicine 2004-12, Vol.16 (1), p.29 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | South African journal of sports medicine |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Van der Merwe, PJ |
description | Objective. To summarise the results of the past 8 years obtained at the South African Doping Control Laboratory and to compare the results with international statistics. Method. Screening procedures were performed on 14 017 urine samples collected from competitors in 54 different sporting codes during the period 1995 - 2002. Samples were analysed using gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the presence of prohibited substances, which are listed by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Results. The results obtained were compared with those of the IOC-accredited laboratories. Prohibited substances were detected in 300 samples (2.14%), of which 45.6% contained anabolic agents and 34.6% stimulants. The positive samples from the IOC laboratories contained 58.7% anabolic agents and 20.8% stimulants. Testosterone and nandrolone were the anabolic agents most frequently detected in positive samples, both in South Africa and internationally. The ephedrines as a group accounted for most stimulants detected in positive samples. Conclusion. It is of concern that the percentage of positive samples (2.14%) obtained in our laboratory is higher than the 1.70% in IOC laboratories. It is therefore necessary that doping control to curb the use of prohibited substances should continue and expand. South African Journal of Sports Medicine Vol.16(1) 2004: 29-32 |
doi_str_mv | 10.17159/2078-516X/2004/v16i1a191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2406384425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2406384425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c785-aaf314cee54d20d718cf8b5acafd11da3c4c581bfb0b3d0b25b431575c4e924f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKvvEHE9Njc_nZllqb8woGAX7kKSSdop7aQmGaE7H8In9EmcsdLVOXAO9x4-hK6B3EIOopxQkheZgOl77wiffMK0AQUlnKDRMTpFIyAgBs_O0UWMa0KYKCEfode70C0jblocdz4k_PP1jZONqWmXONjYbVLELvgtTiuL33yXVnjmQmNUiyulfVDJhz2GshQ4w_0CeonOnNpEe_WvY7R4uF_Mn7Lq5fF5PqsykxciU8ox4MZawWtK6hwK4wotlFGuBqgVM9yIArTTRLOaaCo0ZyByYbgtKXdsjG4OZ3fBf3T9YLn2XWj7j5JyMmUF51T0rfLQMsHHGKyTu9BsVdhLIPKPnxwgyQGSHPjJIz_2C003ZCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406384425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drugs in sport — testing results from the South African Laboratory 1995 - 2002</title><source>Open Access: African Journals Online</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Freely accessible e-journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</source><creator>Van der Merwe, PJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Van der Merwe, PJ</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To summarise the results of the past 8 years obtained at the South African Doping Control Laboratory and to compare the results with international statistics. Method. Screening procedures were performed on 14 017 urine samples collected from competitors in 54 different sporting codes during the period 1995 - 2002. Samples were analysed using gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the presence of prohibited substances, which are listed by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Results. The results obtained were compared with those of the IOC-accredited laboratories. Prohibited substances were detected in 300 samples (2.14%), of which 45.6% contained anabolic agents and 34.6% stimulants. The positive samples from the IOC laboratories contained 58.7% anabolic agents and 20.8% stimulants. Testosterone and nandrolone were the anabolic agents most frequently detected in positive samples, both in South Africa and internationally. The ephedrines as a group accounted for most stimulants detected in positive samples. Conclusion. It is of concern that the percentage of positive samples (2.14%) obtained in our laboratory is higher than the 1.70% in IOC laboratories. It is therefore necessary that doping control to curb the use of prohibited substances should continue and expand. South African Journal of Sports Medicine Vol.16(1) 2004: 29-32</description><identifier>ISSN: 1015-5163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2078-516X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17159/2078-516X/2004/v16i1a191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sandton: Health and Medical Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Chromatography ; Laboratories ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>South African journal of sports medicine, 2004-12, Vol.16 (1), p.29</ispartof><rights>2004. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van der Merwe, PJ</creatorcontrib><title>Drugs in sport — testing results from the South African Laboratory 1995 - 2002</title><title>South African journal of sports medicine</title><description>Objective. To summarise the results of the past 8 years obtained at the South African Doping Control Laboratory and to compare the results with international statistics. Method. Screening procedures were performed on 14 017 urine samples collected from competitors in 54 different sporting codes during the period 1995 - 2002. Samples were analysed using gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the presence of prohibited substances, which are listed by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Results. The results obtained were compared with those of the IOC-accredited laboratories. Prohibited substances were detected in 300 samples (2.14%), of which 45.6% contained anabolic agents and 34.6% stimulants. The positive samples from the IOC laboratories contained 58.7% anabolic agents and 20.8% stimulants. Testosterone and nandrolone were the anabolic agents most frequently detected in positive samples, both in South Africa and internationally. The ephedrines as a group accounted for most stimulants detected in positive samples. Conclusion. It is of concern that the percentage of positive samples (2.14%) obtained in our laboratory is higher than the 1.70% in IOC laboratories. It is therefore necessary that doping control to curb the use of prohibited substances should continue and expand. South African Journal of Sports Medicine Vol.16(1) 2004: 29-32</description><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>1015-5163</issn><issn>2078-516X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKvvEHE9Njc_nZllqb8woGAX7kKSSdop7aQmGaE7H8In9EmcsdLVOXAO9x4-hK6B3EIOopxQkheZgOl77wiffMK0AQUlnKDRMTpFIyAgBs_O0UWMa0KYKCEfode70C0jblocdz4k_PP1jZONqWmXONjYbVLELvgtTiuL33yXVnjmQmNUiyulfVDJhz2GshQ4w_0CeonOnNpEe_WvY7R4uF_Mn7Lq5fF5PqsykxciU8ox4MZawWtK6hwK4wotlFGuBqgVM9yIArTTRLOaaCo0ZyByYbgtKXdsjG4OZ3fBf3T9YLn2XWj7j5JyMmUF51T0rfLQMsHHGKyTu9BsVdhLIPKPnxwgyQGSHPjJIz_2C003ZCM</recordid><startdate>20041203</startdate><enddate>20041203</enddate><creator>Van der Merwe, PJ</creator><general>Health and Medical Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041203</creationdate><title>Drugs in sport — testing results from the South African Laboratory 1995 - 2002</title><author>Van der Merwe, PJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c785-aaf314cee54d20d718cf8b5acafd11da3c4c581bfb0b3d0b25b431575c4e924f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van der Merwe, PJ</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>South African journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van der Merwe, PJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drugs in sport — testing results from the South African Laboratory 1995 - 2002</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2004-12-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><pages>29-</pages><issn>1015-5163</issn><eissn>2078-516X</eissn><abstract>Objective. To summarise the results of the past 8 years obtained at the South African Doping Control Laboratory and to compare the results with international statistics. Method. Screening procedures were performed on 14 017 urine samples collected from competitors in 54 different sporting codes during the period 1995 - 2002. Samples were analysed using gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the presence of prohibited substances, which are listed by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Results. The results obtained were compared with those of the IOC-accredited laboratories. Prohibited substances were detected in 300 samples (2.14%), of which 45.6% contained anabolic agents and 34.6% stimulants. The positive samples from the IOC laboratories contained 58.7% anabolic agents and 20.8% stimulants. Testosterone and nandrolone were the anabolic agents most frequently detected in positive samples, both in South Africa and internationally. The ephedrines as a group accounted for most stimulants detected in positive samples. Conclusion. It is of concern that the percentage of positive samples (2.14%) obtained in our laboratory is higher than the 1.70% in IOC laboratories. It is therefore necessary that doping control to curb the use of prohibited substances should continue and expand. South African Journal of Sports Medicine Vol.16(1) 2004: 29-32</abstract><cop>Sandton</cop><pub>Health and Medical Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.17159/2078-516X/2004/v16i1a191</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1015-5163 |
ispartof | South African journal of sports medicine, 2004-12, Vol.16 (1), p.29 |
issn | 1015-5163 2078-516X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2406384425 |
source | Open Access: African Journals Online; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Freely accessible e-journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access) |
subjects | Chromatography Laboratories Sports medicine |
title | Drugs in sport — testing results from the South African Laboratory 1995 - 2002 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A05%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drugs%20in%20sport%20%E2%80%94%20testing%20results%20from%20the%20South%20African%20Laboratory%201995%20-%202002&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Van%20der%20Merwe,%20PJ&rft.date=2004-12-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.pages=29-&rft.issn=1015-5163&rft.eissn=2078-516X&rft_id=info:doi/10.17159/2078-516X/2004/v16i1a191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2406384425%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406384425&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |