Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current physical guidelines ‒ how do they relate?

Background. The association between self-perceived and actual physical activity, with particular reference to physical activity guidelines, may be an important factor in determining the extent of uptake of and compliance with physical activity.Objectives. To examine the association between self-perc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African journal of sports medicine 2014-10, Vol.26 (3), p.77
Hauptverfasser: Pillay, Julian David, Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L, Proper, Karin I, Tomaz, Simone A, Van Mechelen, Willem, Lambert, Estelle V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 77
container_title South African journal of sports medicine
container_volume 26
creator Pillay, Julian David
Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L
Proper, Karin I
Tomaz, Simone A
Van Mechelen, Willem
Lambert, Estelle V
description Background. The association between self-perceived and actual physical activity, with particular reference to physical activity guidelines, may be an important factor in determining the extent of uptake of and compliance with physical activity.Objectives. To examine the association between self-perceived and actual physical activity in relation to physical activity guidelines, with reference to volume, intensity and duration of steps/day, and to establish the level of agreement between pedometer-measured and selfreported ambulatory physical activity, in relation to current guidelines.Methods. A convenience sample of adults (N=312; mean (standard deviation) age 37 (9) years), wore a pedometer (minimum 3 consecutive days) and completed a questionnaire that included information on physical activity patterns. Analyses of covariance, adjusted for age and gender, compared volume- and intensity-based steps according to meeting/not meeting guidelines (self-reported). The extent of agreement between self-reported and pedometer-measured physical activity was also determined.Results. Average (SD) steps/day were 6 574 (3 541). Of a total of 312 participants’ self-reported data, those meeting guidelines (n=63) accumulated significantly more steps/day than those not meeting guidelines (8 753 (4 251) v. 6 022 (3 114) total steps/day and 1 772 (2 020) v. 421 (1 140) aerobic steps/day, respectively; p
doi_str_mv 10.17159/2413-3108/2014/v26i3a102
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2406336972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A385999183</galeid><sourcerecordid>A385999183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1602-e4cf0780e8cc01e9ba61fd6ecb9863ab95992c6317575db09a8839545f2303143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd9K5DAUh8OisLPjvkNE8Mru5CRN2ngjIvsPBAUV9i5k0tNppdN0k1SZO99A2Ef0SezsLO6NV-fA-fj9OHyEHAL7AgVIveA5iEwAKxecQb544KoVFhj_QGacFWUmQf3aIzNgILe7-Eg-xXjPmJAaihl5vkk4RJoam6jzY59O6TVWfo0JQ7ZGG8eAFR2aTWyd7ah1qX1o0-aERuzqLODgQ3oPoLavqBtDwD79v67GtsKu7THSl6c_tPGPtPJTOW5owM4mPDsg-7XtIn7-N-fk7tvX24sf2eXV958X55eZA8V4hrmrp-8Yls4xQL20CupKoVvqUgm71FJr7pSAQhayWjJty1JomcuaCyYgF3NytMsdgv89Ykzm3o-hnyoNz5kSQumCT9TxjlrZDk2DtktN9N2YWt9Hcy7KqUZDKSZQ70AXfIwBazOEdm3DxgAzf0WZrSizFWW2osybKPEKAZGJ3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406336972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current physical guidelines ‒ how do they relate?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pillay, Julian David ; Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L ; Proper, Karin I ; Tomaz, Simone A ; Van Mechelen, Willem ; Lambert, Estelle V</creator><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Julian David ; Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L ; Proper, Karin I ; Tomaz, Simone A ; Van Mechelen, Willem ; Lambert, Estelle V</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The association between self-perceived and actual physical activity, with particular reference to physical activity guidelines, may be an important factor in determining the extent of uptake of and compliance with physical activity.Objectives. To examine the association between self-perceived and actual physical activity in relation to physical activity guidelines, with reference to volume, intensity and duration of steps/day, and to establish the level of agreement between pedometer-measured and selfreported ambulatory physical activity, in relation to current guidelines.Methods. A convenience sample of adults (N=312; mean (standard deviation) age 37 (9) years), wore a pedometer (minimum 3 consecutive days) and completed a questionnaire that included information on physical activity patterns. Analyses of covariance, adjusted for age and gender, compared volume- and intensity-based steps according to meeting/not meeting guidelines (self-reported). The extent of agreement between self-reported and pedometer-measured physical activity was also determined.Results. Average (SD) steps/day were 6 574 (3 541). Of a total of 312 participants’ self-reported data, those meeting guidelines (n=63) accumulated significantly more steps/day than those not meeting guidelines (8 753 (4 251) v. 6 022 (3 114) total steps/day and 1 772 (2 020) v. 421 (1 140) aerobic steps/day, respectively; p&lt;0.0001). More than half of the group who self-reported meeting the guidelines did not meet guidelines as per pedometer data.Conclusion. The use of pedometers as an alternative and/or adjunct to self-reported measures is an area for consideration. Steps/day recommendations that consider intensity-based steps may provide significant effects in improving fitness and health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1015-5163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2078-516X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17159/2413-3108/2014/v26i3a102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sandton: South African Sports Medicine Association</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Exercise ; Health aspects ; Measurement ; Pedometers ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>South African journal of sports medicine, 2014-10, Vol.26 (3), p.77</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 South African Sports Medicine Association</rights><rights>2014. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Julian David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proper, Karin I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaz, Simone A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Mechelen, Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Estelle V</creatorcontrib><title>Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current physical guidelines ‒ how do they relate?</title><title>South African journal of sports medicine</title><description>Background. The association between self-perceived and actual physical activity, with particular reference to physical activity guidelines, may be an important factor in determining the extent of uptake of and compliance with physical activity.Objectives. To examine the association between self-perceived and actual physical activity in relation to physical activity guidelines, with reference to volume, intensity and duration of steps/day, and to establish the level of agreement between pedometer-measured and selfreported ambulatory physical activity, in relation to current guidelines.Methods. A convenience sample of adults (N=312; mean (standard deviation) age 37 (9) years), wore a pedometer (minimum 3 consecutive days) and completed a questionnaire that included information on physical activity patterns. Analyses of covariance, adjusted for age and gender, compared volume- and intensity-based steps according to meeting/not meeting guidelines (self-reported). The extent of agreement between self-reported and pedometer-measured physical activity was also determined.Results. Average (SD) steps/day were 6 574 (3 541). Of a total of 312 participants’ self-reported data, those meeting guidelines (n=63) accumulated significantly more steps/day than those not meeting guidelines (8 753 (4 251) v. 6 022 (3 114) total steps/day and 1 772 (2 020) v. 421 (1 140) aerobic steps/day, respectively; p&lt;0.0001). More than half of the group who self-reported meeting the guidelines did not meet guidelines as per pedometer data.Conclusion. The use of pedometers as an alternative and/or adjunct to self-reported measures is an area for consideration. Steps/day recommendations that consider intensity-based steps may provide significant effects in improving fitness and health.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Pedometers</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>1015-5163</issn><issn>2078-516X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkd9K5DAUh8OisLPjvkNE8Mru5CRN2ngjIvsPBAUV9i5k0tNppdN0k1SZO99A2Ef0SezsLO6NV-fA-fj9OHyEHAL7AgVIveA5iEwAKxecQb544KoVFhj_QGacFWUmQf3aIzNgILe7-Eg-xXjPmJAaihl5vkk4RJoam6jzY59O6TVWfo0JQ7ZGG8eAFR2aTWyd7ah1qX1o0-aERuzqLODgQ3oPoLavqBtDwD79v67GtsKu7THSl6c_tPGPtPJTOW5owM4mPDsg-7XtIn7-N-fk7tvX24sf2eXV958X55eZA8V4hrmrp-8Yls4xQL20CupKoVvqUgm71FJr7pSAQhayWjJty1JomcuaCyYgF3NytMsdgv89Ykzm3o-hnyoNz5kSQumCT9TxjlrZDk2DtktN9N2YWt9Hcy7KqUZDKSZQ70AXfIwBazOEdm3DxgAzf0WZrSizFWW2osybKPEKAZGJ3Q</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Pillay, Julian David</creator><creator>Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L</creator><creator>Proper, Karin I</creator><creator>Tomaz, Simone A</creator><creator>Van Mechelen, Willem</creator><creator>Lambert, Estelle V</creator><general>South African Sports Medicine Association</general><general>Health and Medical Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current physical guidelines ‒ how do they relate?</title><author>Pillay, Julian David ; Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L ; Proper, Karin I ; Tomaz, Simone A ; Van Mechelen, Willem ; Lambert, Estelle V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1602-e4cf0780e8cc01e9ba61fd6ecb9863ab95992c6317575db09a8839545f2303143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Pedometers</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Julian David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proper, Karin I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaz, Simone A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Mechelen, Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Estelle V</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>South African journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pillay, Julian David</au><au>Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L</au><au>Proper, Karin I</au><au>Tomaz, Simone A</au><au>Van Mechelen, Willem</au><au>Lambert, Estelle V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current physical guidelines ‒ how do they relate?</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>77</spage><pages>77-</pages><issn>1015-5163</issn><eissn>2078-516X</eissn><abstract>Background. The association between self-perceived and actual physical activity, with particular reference to physical activity guidelines, may be an important factor in determining the extent of uptake of and compliance with physical activity.Objectives. To examine the association between self-perceived and actual physical activity in relation to physical activity guidelines, with reference to volume, intensity and duration of steps/day, and to establish the level of agreement between pedometer-measured and selfreported ambulatory physical activity, in relation to current guidelines.Methods. A convenience sample of adults (N=312; mean (standard deviation) age 37 (9) years), wore a pedometer (minimum 3 consecutive days) and completed a questionnaire that included information on physical activity patterns. Analyses of covariance, adjusted for age and gender, compared volume- and intensity-based steps according to meeting/not meeting guidelines (self-reported). The extent of agreement between self-reported and pedometer-measured physical activity was also determined.Results. Average (SD) steps/day were 6 574 (3 541). Of a total of 312 participants’ self-reported data, those meeting guidelines (n=63) accumulated significantly more steps/day than those not meeting guidelines (8 753 (4 251) v. 6 022 (3 114) total steps/day and 1 772 (2 020) v. 421 (1 140) aerobic steps/day, respectively; p&lt;0.0001). More than half of the group who self-reported meeting the guidelines did not meet guidelines as per pedometer data.Conclusion. The use of pedometers as an alternative and/or adjunct to self-reported measures is an area for consideration. Steps/day recommendations that consider intensity-based steps may provide significant effects in improving fitness and health.</abstract><cop>Sandton</cop><pub>South African Sports Medicine Association</pub><doi>10.17159/2413-3108/2014/v26i3a102</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1015-5163
ispartof South African journal of sports medicine, 2014-10, Vol.26 (3), p.77
issn 1015-5163
2078-516X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2406336972
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; African Journals Online (Open Access); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Exercise
Health aspects
Measurement
Pedometers
Sports medicine
title Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current physical guidelines ‒ how do they relate?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A05%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Steps%20that%20count:%20Pedometer-measured%20physical%20activity,%20self-reported%20physical%20activity%20and%20current%20physical%20guidelines%20%E2%80%92%20how%20do%20they%20relate?&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Pillay,%20Julian%20David&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=77&rft.pages=77-&rft.issn=1015-5163&rft.eissn=2078-516X&rft_id=info:doi/10.17159/2413-3108/2014/v26i3a102&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA385999183%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406336972&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A385999183&rfr_iscdi=true