Toward the Ethnography of Argumentation: A Response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of Argumentation in Educational Discourse’
This paper is a response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of argumentation in educational discourse’, particularly to his suggestion that argument studies should turn to ethnography to understand better how argumentation is taught, learned, and deployed. The response notes that Toulmin's model...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Text & talk 2005-01, Vol.25 (1), p.129-144 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 129 |
container_title | Text & talk |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Prior, Paul |
description | This paper is a response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of argumentation in educational discourse’, particularly to his suggestion that argument studies should turn to ethnography to understand better how argumentation is taught, learned, and deployed. The response notes that Toulmin's model of argument (claim, data, warrant, etc.) and his theory of argumentation have called for such attention since the 1950s; however, the educational reception of the model (whether for instruction, assessment, or research) has largely ignored the sociocultural dimensions of Toulmin's work and treated the model as a generic heuristic. In fact, a great deal of work relevant to a new ethnography of argumentation has already been undertaken in a variety of sociocultural settings. This paper reviews examples of such studies and argues that they point to a pressing need to move beyond analysis of argumentative artifacts (whether texts, films, music, photographs, monuments, or whatever) to analysis of people's embodied, collaborative, and distributed activity in complexly laminated fields of practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2405809737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85621470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-67cb81179b283fcf2e5337521f32830ec11b0607286ed10ecb4be8d011d302083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9uEzEQxi0EElHpC_RkCQlOu_XY67XDiaikBaktooRerf0zmyxs1sH2Ks0F9THg9fokON0KJBDiZI_1-2bm80fIEbAUJMjjgDch5YzJlMsUUuDTR2QCOYgkA1CPyYRBLpNMa_2UHHrfloxxzaZCqQn5trDbwtU0rJDOw6q3S1dsVjtqGzpzy2GNfShCa_tXdEav0G9s75EGS6_aarXXzfra4da_pHe33y9sjZ3_S0rbns7robovio6-aX1lB-fx7vbHM_KkKTqPhw_nAfl0Ol-cvE3O35-9O5mdJ1UmeEhyVZU6epmWXIumajhKIZTk0Ij4wLACKFnOFNc51hDrMitR1wygFowzLQ7Ii7HvxtmvA_pg1nEL7LqiRzt4o2XOIVPsv6DQTMqpyCP4_A_wczQV_XnDMybj_yqhIsVHqnLWe4eN2bh2XbidAWb24Zl9eGYfnuHSgInhRdHrUbQtuoCuxqUbdvHye8K_xVzC2CIZW7Q-Mr-GFu6LyeNe0nxYZOby7PSCZdfX5qP4CQyys8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2405809737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward the Ethnography of Argumentation: A Response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of Argumentation in Educational Discourse’</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Prior, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Prior, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is a response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of argumentation in educational discourse’, particularly to his suggestion that argument studies should turn to ethnography to understand better how argumentation is taught, learned, and deployed. The response notes that Toulmin's model of argument (claim, data, warrant, etc.) and his theory of argumentation have called for such attention since the 1950s; however, the educational reception of the model (whether for instruction, assessment, or research) has largely ignored the sociocultural dimensions of Toulmin's work and treated the model as a generic heuristic. In fact, a great deal of work relevant to a new ethnography of argumentation has already been undertaken in a variety of sociocultural settings. This paper reviews examples of such studies and argues that they point to a pressing need to move beyond analysis of argumentative artifacts (whether texts, films, music, photographs, monuments, or whatever) to analysis of people's embodied, collaborative, and distributed activity in complexly laminated fields of practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-4888</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1860-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-4117</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1860-7349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TXTHDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Hague: Walter de Gruyter</publisher><subject>Andrews, Richard ; Argumentation ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Discourse ; Discourse analysis ; Education ; Ethnography ; ethnography of communication ; Monuments ; Music ; Photography ; Rhetoric ; social practice ; Sociocultural factors ; Sociolinguistics ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Text & talk, 2005-01, Vol.25 (1), p.129-144</ispartof><rights>Walter de Gruyter</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-67cb81179b283fcf2e5337521f32830ec11b0607286ed10ecb4be8d011d302083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66497,68281</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prior, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Toward the Ethnography of Argumentation: A Response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of Argumentation in Educational Discourse’</title><title>Text & talk</title><addtitle>Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse</addtitle><description>This paper is a response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of argumentation in educational discourse’, particularly to his suggestion that argument studies should turn to ethnography to understand better how argumentation is taught, learned, and deployed. The response notes that Toulmin's model of argument (claim, data, warrant, etc.) and his theory of argumentation have called for such attention since the 1950s; however, the educational reception of the model (whether for instruction, assessment, or research) has largely ignored the sociocultural dimensions of Toulmin's work and treated the model as a generic heuristic. In fact, a great deal of work relevant to a new ethnography of argumentation has already been undertaken in a variety of sociocultural settings. This paper reviews examples of such studies and argues that they point to a pressing need to move beyond analysis of argumentative artifacts (whether texts, films, music, photographs, monuments, or whatever) to analysis of people's embodied, collaborative, and distributed activity in complexly laminated fields of practice.</description><subject>Andrews, Richard</subject><subject>Argumentation</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>ethnography of communication</subject><subject>Monuments</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>social practice</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Sociolinguistics</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0165-4888</issn><issn>1860-7330</issn><issn>1613-4117</issn><issn>1860-7349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9uEzEQxi0EElHpC_RkCQlOu_XY67XDiaikBaktooRerf0zmyxs1sH2Ks0F9THg9fokON0KJBDiZI_1-2bm80fIEbAUJMjjgDch5YzJlMsUUuDTR2QCOYgkA1CPyYRBLpNMa_2UHHrfloxxzaZCqQn5trDbwtU0rJDOw6q3S1dsVjtqGzpzy2GNfShCa_tXdEav0G9s75EGS6_aarXXzfra4da_pHe33y9sjZ3_S0rbns7robovio6-aX1lB-fx7vbHM_KkKTqPhw_nAfl0Ol-cvE3O35-9O5mdJ1UmeEhyVZU6epmWXIumajhKIZTk0Ij4wLACKFnOFNc51hDrMitR1wygFowzLQ7Ii7HvxtmvA_pg1nEL7LqiRzt4o2XOIVPsv6DQTMqpyCP4_A_wczQV_XnDMybj_yqhIsVHqnLWe4eN2bh2XbidAWb24Zl9eGYfnuHSgInhRdHrUbQtuoCuxqUbdvHye8K_xVzC2CIZW7Q-Mr-GFu6LyeNe0nxYZOby7PSCZdfX5qP4CQyys8Q</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Prior, Paul</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter</general><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Toward the Ethnography of Argumentation: A Response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of Argumentation in Educational Discourse’</title><author>Prior, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-67cb81179b283fcf2e5337521f32830ec11b0607286ed10ecb4be8d011d302083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Andrews, Richard</topic><topic>Argumentation</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>ethnography of communication</topic><topic>Monuments</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>social practice</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Sociolinguistics</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prior, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Text & talk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prior, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward the Ethnography of Argumentation: A Response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of Argumentation in Educational Discourse’</atitle><jtitle>Text & talk</jtitle><addtitle>Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>129-144</pages><issn>0165-4888</issn><issn>1860-7330</issn><eissn>1613-4117</eissn><eissn>1860-7349</eissn><coden>TXTHDF</coden><abstract>This paper is a response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of argumentation in educational discourse’, particularly to his suggestion that argument studies should turn to ethnography to understand better how argumentation is taught, learned, and deployed. The response notes that Toulmin's model of argument (claim, data, warrant, etc.) and his theory of argumentation have called for such attention since the 1950s; however, the educational reception of the model (whether for instruction, assessment, or research) has largely ignored the sociocultural dimensions of Toulmin's work and treated the model as a generic heuristic. In fact, a great deal of work relevant to a new ethnography of argumentation has already been undertaken in a variety of sociocultural settings. This paper reviews examples of such studies and argues that they point to a pressing need to move beyond analysis of argumentative artifacts (whether texts, films, music, photographs, monuments, or whatever) to analysis of people's embodied, collaborative, and distributed activity in complexly laminated fields of practice.</abstract><cop>The Hague</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-4888 |
ispartof | Text & talk, 2005-01, Vol.25 (1), p.129-144 |
issn | 0165-4888 1860-7330 1613-4117 1860-7349 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2405809737 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Andrews, Richard Argumentation Collaboration Communication Discourse Discourse analysis Education Ethnography ethnography of communication Monuments Music Photography Rhetoric social practice Sociocultural factors Sociolinguistics Writing |
title | Toward the Ethnography of Argumentation: A Response to Richard Andrews' ‘Models of Argumentation in Educational Discourse’ |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A59%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20the%20Ethnography%20of%20Argumentation:%20A%20Response%20to%20Richard%20Andrews'%20%E2%80%98Models%20of%20Argumentation%20in%20Educational%20Discourse%E2%80%99&rft.jtitle=Text%20&%20talk&rft.au=Prior,%20Paul&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=129-144&rft.issn=0165-4888&rft.eissn=1613-4117&rft.coden=TXTHDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85621470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2405809737&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |