COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL REPAIR VS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR IN INCOMPLETE INGUINAL HERNIA

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare and analyze the outcome of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein repair inIncomplete inguinal hernia. Study Design: Controlled prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Department of Surgery Combined Military Hospital La...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal 2020-04 (2), p.357
Hauptverfasser: Mannan Masud, Majeed, Farhan, Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer, Bilal, Muhammad, Nafasat, Rasool, Naima
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 357
container_title Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal
container_volume
creator Mannan Masud
Majeed, Farhan
Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer
Bilal, Muhammad
Nafasat
Rasool, Naima
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare and analyze the outcome of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein repair inIncomplete inguinal hernia. Study Design: Controlled prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Department of Surgery Combined Military Hospital Lahore, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2018. Methodology: Incomplete Inguinal hernia patients were admitted electively. They were randomly assigned into groups A and B. The group A patients were treated with laparoscopic transabdominal pre peritoneal repair(lap tap) and group B patients underwent Lichtenstein's open repair. Postoperative follow up of early complication of pain, testicular swelling and wound in duration was done. Follow up was at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1month and then 3 month. Results: A total of 80 patients of incomplete inguinal hernia were included with 40 patients in each group. Group A patients had short hospital stay(discharged within 24 hours 68.08%) as compared to group B(31.91% p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2405129222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A623895097</galeid><sourcerecordid>A623895097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g165t-3a1e7d56264a36927f9bdd23dcfe9a72a12b29d633a807e92de568db5cb5d9563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptT8tugzAQRFUrNUrzD0g9U8EaG3x0qZNYIjYC0isy2EREebQh-f86fag9dPewM6PZWe2NN4E4ioI0jeHWm4QhCgNK4vTem43jNnSFEcQhnnhjplYFK0WlpK_mfs4cUVWmCpH5dclkxZ5f1EpIlvtFyQteilpJ7pgjTJT-a-XnIlvWXFY1F_JHdkjIa3TOa-7gYv0ZseSlFOzBu-v1brSz7zn11nNeZ8sgVwuRsTzYRASfA6QjmxhMgMQaEQpJT1tjAJmut1QnoCNogRqCkE7DxFIwFpPUtLhrsaGYoKn3-JX7djq-X-x4brbHy-ngTjbX5yOgAPDr2uidbYZDfzyfdLcfxq5hBFBKcUgT53r6x-Xa2P3QHQ-2H5z-Z-EDFF1qMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2405129222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL REPAIR VS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR IN INCOMPLETE INGUINAL HERNIA</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mannan Masud ; Majeed, Farhan ; Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer ; Bilal, Muhammad ; Nafasat ; Rasool, Naima</creator><creatorcontrib>Mannan Masud ; Majeed, Farhan ; Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer ; Bilal, Muhammad ; Nafasat ; Rasool, Naima</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare and analyze the outcome of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein repair inIncomplete inguinal hernia. Study Design: Controlled prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Department of Surgery Combined Military Hospital Lahore, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2018. Methodology: Incomplete Inguinal hernia patients were admitted electively. They were randomly assigned into groups A and B. The group A patients were treated with laparoscopic transabdominal pre peritoneal repair(lap tap) and group B patients underwent Lichtenstein's open repair. Postoperative follow up of early complication of pain, testicular swelling and wound in duration was done. Follow up was at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1month and then 3 month. Results: A total of 80 patients of incomplete inguinal hernia were included with 40 patients in each group. Group A patients had short hospital stay(discharged within 24 hours 68.08%) as compared to group B(31.91% p&lt;0.001). From 2nd to 6th postoperative week group A patients had significantly less postoperative pain as compared to group B(p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic TAP repair was safe with early hospital discharge and less postoperative pain and post-operative complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-9648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2411-8842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rawalpindi: Knowledge Bylanes</publisher><subject>Abdominal hernia ; Analysis ; Anesthesia ; Bupivacaine ; Hernia ; Hernias ; Hospitals ; Infections ; Inguinal hernia ; Laparoscopy ; Pain ; Patients ; Physicians ; Surgeons ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal, 2020-04 (2), p.357</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Knowledge Bylanes</rights><rights>(c)2020 Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mannan Masud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majeed, Farhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilal, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nafasat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasool, Naima</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL REPAIR VS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR IN INCOMPLETE INGUINAL HERNIA</title><title>Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal</title><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare and analyze the outcome of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein repair inIncomplete inguinal hernia. Study Design: Controlled prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Department of Surgery Combined Military Hospital Lahore, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2018. Methodology: Incomplete Inguinal hernia patients were admitted electively. They were randomly assigned into groups A and B. The group A patients were treated with laparoscopic transabdominal pre peritoneal repair(lap tap) and group B patients underwent Lichtenstein's open repair. Postoperative follow up of early complication of pain, testicular swelling and wound in duration was done. Follow up was at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1month and then 3 month. Results: A total of 80 patients of incomplete inguinal hernia were included with 40 patients in each group. Group A patients had short hospital stay(discharged within 24 hours 68.08%) as compared to group B(31.91% p&lt;0.001). From 2nd to 6th postoperative week group A patients had significantly less postoperative pain as compared to group B(p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic TAP repair was safe with early hospital discharge and less postoperative pain and post-operative complications.</description><subject>Abdominal hernia</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inguinal hernia</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0030-9648</issn><issn>2411-8842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptT8tugzAQRFUrNUrzD0g9U8EaG3x0qZNYIjYC0isy2EREebQh-f86fag9dPewM6PZWe2NN4E4ioI0jeHWm4QhCgNK4vTem43jNnSFEcQhnnhjplYFK0WlpK_mfs4cUVWmCpH5dclkxZ5f1EpIlvtFyQteilpJ7pgjTJT-a-XnIlvWXFY1F_JHdkjIa3TOa-7gYv0ZseSlFOzBu-v1brSz7zn11nNeZ8sgVwuRsTzYRASfA6QjmxhMgMQaEQpJT1tjAJmut1QnoCNogRqCkE7DxFIwFpPUtLhrsaGYoKn3-JX7djq-X-x4brbHy-ngTjbX5yOgAPDr2uidbYZDfzyfdLcfxq5hBFBKcUgT53r6x-Xa2P3QHQ-2H5z-Z-EDFF1qMA</recordid><startdate>20200430</startdate><enddate>20200430</enddate><creator>Mannan Masud</creator><creator>Majeed, Farhan</creator><creator>Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer</creator><creator>Bilal, Muhammad</creator><creator>Nafasat</creator><creator>Rasool, Naima</creator><general>Knowledge Bylanes</general><general>AsiaNet Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200430</creationdate><title>COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL REPAIR VS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR IN INCOMPLETE INGUINAL HERNIA</title><author>Mannan Masud ; Majeed, Farhan ; Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer ; Bilal, Muhammad ; Nafasat ; Rasool, Naima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g165t-3a1e7d56264a36927f9bdd23dcfe9a72a12b29d633a807e92de568db5cb5d9563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdominal hernia</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inguinal hernia</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mannan Masud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majeed, Farhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilal, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nafasat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasool, Naima</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mannan Masud</au><au>Majeed, Farhan</au><au>Mannan, Muhamad Shaheer</au><au>Bilal, Muhammad</au><au>Nafasat</au><au>Rasool, Naima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL REPAIR VS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR IN INCOMPLETE INGUINAL HERNIA</atitle><jtitle>Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal</jtitle><date>2020-04-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issue>2</issue><spage>357</spage><pages>357-</pages><issn>0030-9648</issn><eissn>2411-8842</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare and analyze the outcome of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein repair inIncomplete inguinal hernia. Study Design: Controlled prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Department of Surgery Combined Military Hospital Lahore, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2018. Methodology: Incomplete Inguinal hernia patients were admitted electively. They were randomly assigned into groups A and B. The group A patients were treated with laparoscopic transabdominal pre peritoneal repair(lap tap) and group B patients underwent Lichtenstein's open repair. Postoperative follow up of early complication of pain, testicular swelling and wound in duration was done. Follow up was at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1month and then 3 month. Results: A total of 80 patients of incomplete inguinal hernia were included with 40 patients in each group. Group A patients had short hospital stay(discharged within 24 hours 68.08%) as compared to group B(31.91% p&lt;0.001). From 2nd to 6th postoperative week group A patients had significantly less postoperative pain as compared to group B(p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic TAP repair was safe with early hospital discharge and less postoperative pain and post-operative complications.</abstract><cop>Rawalpindi</cop><pub>Knowledge Bylanes</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-9648
ispartof Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal, 2020-04 (2), p.357
issn 0030-9648
2411-8842
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2405129222
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Abdominal hernia
Analysis
Anesthesia
Bupivacaine
Hernia
Hernias
Hospitals
Infections
Inguinal hernia
Laparoscopy
Pain
Patients
Physicians
Surgeons
Surgery
title COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL REPAIR VS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR IN INCOMPLETE INGUINAL HERNIA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A01%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARISON%20OF%20LAPAROSCOPIC%20TRANSABDOMINAL%20PREPERITONEAL%20REPAIR%20VS%20LICHTENSTEIN%20REPAIR%20IN%20INCOMPLETE%20INGUINAL%20HERNIA&rft.jtitle=Pakistan%20Armed%20Forces%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Mannan%20Masud&rft.date=2020-04-30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=357&rft.pages=357-&rft.issn=0030-9648&rft.eissn=2411-8842&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA623895097%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2405129222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A623895097&rfr_iscdi=true