Brucella and non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis: comparison of ultrasound findings
In brucellosis the male genitourinary system can be affected in a small number of patients. In this study we aimed to identify, discuss and compare the radiologic findings of 24 cases with Brucella epididymo-orchitis (BEO) and 285 cases with non-Brucella epididymis orchitis (NBEO). The study had a r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medical ultrasonography 2019-08, Vol.21 (3), p.246-250 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 250 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 246 |
| container_title | Medical ultrasonography |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Baykan, Ali Haydar Sayiner, Hakan Sezgin Inan, Ibrahim |
| description | In brucellosis the male genitourinary system can be affected in a small number of patients. In this study we aimed to identify, discuss and compare the radiologic findings of 24 cases with Brucella epididymo-orchitis (BEO) and 285 cases with non-Brucella epididymis orchitis (NBEO).
The study had a retrospective design. The area of involvement, side of involvement (left, right or bilateral), presence of abscess, hydrocele and testicular involvement pattern were analyzed and compared between the BEO and NBEO cases.
The median age of the included cases was 33 years, with a minimum of 0 and maximum of 89. Epididymo-orchitis and isolated orchitis were more frequent in BEO cases while isolated epididymis involvement was more common in patients with non-BEO (p=0.0117). Bilateral involvement was present in 20.8% and 4.6% cases in the BEO and non-BEO groups, respectively (p=0.008). The frequency of abscess was significantly higher in BEO cases (p=0.003).
Although the radiological indications of BEO are similar to those of other types of epididymo-orchitis, abscess formation, bilateral involvement and testicular involvement contribute significantly to diagnosis. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.11152/mu-1871 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2402558310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2402558310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-44b3fc0c6f6f3f8b0d06b9a8d9ada933d8e2443a4f449caa336e0741d96b62c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMozjAO-Auk4MZNNMlN09adDr5gYDa6LmkeGmmbmjSL-fdTnXFWBy7fPQc-hC4puaWU5uyuS5iWBT1Bc0aEwKXgcIrmtOQcc1qwGVrG6BrCgIoir8g5mgHlhWAE5mjzGJIybSsz2eus9z0-HszgtNPbzmMf1JcbXbzPlO8GGVz0feZtltoxyOjT9Gldr13_GS_QmZVtNMtDLtDH89P76hWvNy9vq4c1VkDpiDlvwCqihBUWbNkQTURTyVJXUssKQJeGcQ6SW84rJSWAMKTgVFeiEUzlsEDX-94h-J9k4lh_-xT6abJmnLA8L4GSibrZUyr4GIOx9RBcJ8O2pqT-k1d3qf6VN6FXh8LUdEYfwX9VsAM1MGni</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2402558310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brucella and non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis: comparison of ultrasound findings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Baykan, Ali Haydar ; Sayiner, Hakan Sezgin ; Inan, Ibrahim</creator><creatorcontrib>Baykan, Ali Haydar ; Sayiner, Hakan Sezgin ; Inan, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><description>In brucellosis the male genitourinary system can be affected in a small number of patients. In this study we aimed to identify, discuss and compare the radiologic findings of 24 cases with Brucella epididymo-orchitis (BEO) and 285 cases with non-Brucella epididymis orchitis (NBEO).
The study had a retrospective design. The area of involvement, side of involvement (left, right or bilateral), presence of abscess, hydrocele and testicular involvement pattern were analyzed and compared between the BEO and NBEO cases.
The median age of the included cases was 33 years, with a minimum of 0 and maximum of 89. Epididymo-orchitis and isolated orchitis were more frequent in BEO cases while isolated epididymis involvement was more common in patients with non-BEO (p=0.0117). Bilateral involvement was present in 20.8% and 4.6% cases in the BEO and non-BEO groups, respectively (p=0.008). The frequency of abscess was significantly higher in BEO cases (p=0.003).
Although the radiological indications of BEO are similar to those of other types of epididymo-orchitis, abscess formation, bilateral involvement and testicular involvement contribute significantly to diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-4172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2066-8643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11152/mu-1871</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31476203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Romania: Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brucella ; Brucellosis ; Brucellosis - diagnostic imaging ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dairy products ; Epididymis - diagnostic imaging ; Epididymis - microbiology ; Epididymitis - diagnostic imaging ; Epididymitis - microbiology ; Humans ; Infant ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Milk ; Orchitis - diagnostic imaging ; Orchitis - microbiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Testis - diagnostic imaging ; Testis - microbiology ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography - methods ; Urogenital system ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medical ultrasonography, 2019-08, Vol.21 (3), p.246-250</ispartof><rights>Copyright Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-44b3fc0c6f6f3f8b0d06b9a8d9ada933d8e2443a4f449caa336e0741d96b62c53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baykan, Ali Haydar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayiner, Hakan Sezgin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inan, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><title>Brucella and non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis: comparison of ultrasound findings</title><title>Medical ultrasonography</title><addtitle>Med Ultrason</addtitle><description>In brucellosis the male genitourinary system can be affected in a small number of patients. In this study we aimed to identify, discuss and compare the radiologic findings of 24 cases with Brucella epididymo-orchitis (BEO) and 285 cases with non-Brucella epididymis orchitis (NBEO).
The study had a retrospective design. The area of involvement, side of involvement (left, right or bilateral), presence of abscess, hydrocele and testicular involvement pattern were analyzed and compared between the BEO and NBEO cases.
The median age of the included cases was 33 years, with a minimum of 0 and maximum of 89. Epididymo-orchitis and isolated orchitis were more frequent in BEO cases while isolated epididymis involvement was more common in patients with non-BEO (p=0.0117). Bilateral involvement was present in 20.8% and 4.6% cases in the BEO and non-BEO groups, respectively (p=0.008). The frequency of abscess was significantly higher in BEO cases (p=0.003).
Although the radiological indications of BEO are similar to those of other types of epididymo-orchitis, abscess formation, bilateral involvement and testicular involvement contribute significantly to diagnosis.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Brucella</subject><subject>Brucellosis</subject><subject>Brucellosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Dairy products</subject><subject>Epididymis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Epididymis - microbiology</subject><subject>Epididymitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Epididymitis - microbiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Orchitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Orchitis - microbiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Testis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Testis - microbiology</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1844-4172</issn><issn>2066-8643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMozjAO-Auk4MZNNMlN09adDr5gYDa6LmkeGmmbmjSL-fdTnXFWBy7fPQc-hC4puaWU5uyuS5iWBT1Bc0aEwKXgcIrmtOQcc1qwGVrG6BrCgIoir8g5mgHlhWAE5mjzGJIybSsz2eus9z0-HszgtNPbzmMf1JcbXbzPlO8GGVz0feZtltoxyOjT9Gldr13_GS_QmZVtNMtDLtDH89P76hWvNy9vq4c1VkDpiDlvwCqihBUWbNkQTURTyVJXUssKQJeGcQ6SW84rJSWAMKTgVFeiEUzlsEDX-94h-J9k4lh_-xT6abJmnLA8L4GSibrZUyr4GIOx9RBcJ8O2pqT-k1d3qf6VN6FXh8LUdEYfwX9VsAM1MGni</recordid><startdate>20190831</startdate><enddate>20190831</enddate><creator>Baykan, Ali Haydar</creator><creator>Sayiner, Hakan Sezgin</creator><creator>Inan, Ibrahim</creator><general>Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190831</creationdate><title>Brucella and non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis: comparison of ultrasound findings</title><author>Baykan, Ali Haydar ; Sayiner, Hakan Sezgin ; Inan, Ibrahim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-44b3fc0c6f6f3f8b0d06b9a8d9ada933d8e2443a4f449caa336e0741d96b62c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Brucella</topic><topic>Brucellosis</topic><topic>Brucellosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Dairy products</topic><topic>Epididymis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Epididymis - microbiology</topic><topic>Epididymitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Epididymitis - microbiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Orchitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Orchitis - microbiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Testis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Testis - microbiology</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baykan, Ali Haydar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayiner, Hakan Sezgin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inan, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Medical ultrasonography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baykan, Ali Haydar</au><au>Sayiner, Hakan Sezgin</au><au>Inan, Ibrahim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brucella and non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis: comparison of ultrasound findings</atitle><jtitle>Medical ultrasonography</jtitle><addtitle>Med Ultrason</addtitle><date>2019-08-31</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>246-250</pages><issn>1844-4172</issn><eissn>2066-8643</eissn><abstract>In brucellosis the male genitourinary system can be affected in a small number of patients. In this study we aimed to identify, discuss and compare the radiologic findings of 24 cases with Brucella epididymo-orchitis (BEO) and 285 cases with non-Brucella epididymis orchitis (NBEO).
The study had a retrospective design. The area of involvement, side of involvement (left, right or bilateral), presence of abscess, hydrocele and testicular involvement pattern were analyzed and compared between the BEO and NBEO cases.
The median age of the included cases was 33 years, with a minimum of 0 and maximum of 89. Epididymo-orchitis and isolated orchitis were more frequent in BEO cases while isolated epididymis involvement was more common in patients with non-BEO (p=0.0117). Bilateral involvement was present in 20.8% and 4.6% cases in the BEO and non-BEO groups, respectively (p=0.008). The frequency of abscess was significantly higher in BEO cases (p=0.003).
Although the radiological indications of BEO are similar to those of other types of epididymo-orchitis, abscess formation, bilateral involvement and testicular involvement contribute significantly to diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Romania</cop><pub>Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</pub><pmid>31476203</pmid><doi>10.11152/mu-1871</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1844-4172 |
| ispartof | Medical ultrasonography, 2019-08, Vol.21 (3), p.246-250 |
| issn | 1844-4172 2066-8643 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2402558310 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Brucella Brucellosis Brucellosis - diagnostic imaging Child Child, Preschool Dairy products Epididymis - diagnostic imaging Epididymis - microbiology Epididymitis - diagnostic imaging Epididymitis - microbiology Humans Infant Magnetic resonance imaging Male Middle Aged Milk Orchitis - diagnostic imaging Orchitis - microbiology Retrospective Studies Statistical analysis Studies Testis - diagnostic imaging Testis - microbiology Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography - methods Urogenital system Young Adult |
| title | Brucella and non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis: comparison of ultrasound findings |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A57%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brucella%20and%20non-Brucella%20epididymo-orchitis:%20comparison%20of%20ultrasound%20findings&rft.jtitle=Medical%20ultrasonography&rft.au=Baykan,%20Ali%20Haydar&rft.date=2019-08-31&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=246-250&rft.issn=1844-4172&rft.eissn=2066-8643&rft_id=info:doi/10.11152/mu-1871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2402558310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2402558310&rft_id=info:pmid/31476203&rfr_iscdi=true |