The response of resistant kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) to armoured scale insect (Diaspididae) feeding

The responses of five experimental genotypes and one commercial variety of kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis ) to attack by two polyphagous, congeneric armoured scale insect pests ( Hemiberlesia rapax and H. lataniae ) are described. H. lataniae feeding elicits a response in the bark and fruit of all...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthropod-plant interactions 2011-06, Vol.5 (2), p.149-161
Hauptverfasser: Hill, M. G., Mauchline, N. A., Jones, M. K., Sutherland, P. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Arthropod-plant interactions
container_volume 5
creator Hill, M. G.
Mauchline, N. A.
Jones, M. K.
Sutherland, P. W.
description The responses of five experimental genotypes and one commercial variety of kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis ) to attack by two polyphagous, congeneric armoured scale insect pests ( Hemiberlesia rapax and H. lataniae ) are described. H. lataniae feeding elicits a response in the bark and fruit of all but one of the experimental genotypes, leading to the development of wound periderm over a 4–5 week period, and death of the insect. The response, which differs slightly between tissue types and genotypes, consists of wound periderm formation in a bowl shape beneath and around the insect, preventing its stylet from reaching normal unmodified parenchyma tissue. Wound periderm cell walls become suberised and cells beneath the insect become filled with phenolic compounds. In some cases, cells beneath the insect become hypertrophic or undergo lysis, exhibiting characteristics of a hypersensitive-like response. The remaining genotype showed no physical change in tissue structure in response to H. lataniae feeding, and the insects survived but were substantially reduced in size. These results suggest that both physical and chemical plant resistance responses are involved. In contrast, H. rapax elicited no observable histological response from any of the genotypes and the insects developed normally on bark and fruit. Both insect species developed normally on leaf petioles and these exhibit only slight cell wall thickening in response to their feeding. This unusual plant defensive response to a sucking insect has similarities to simple types of gall formation in response to insect and pathogen attack and has characteristics of resistance gene-mediated models of plant defence.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11829-011-9124-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2402246109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2402246109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3c23dfba853e47650caf73b57441da8c87b0989114b464eff0b78f307c44101e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gsscAQ8FdiZ6zKp1SJpcyW45xbl9YpdirEv8dREExMd8Pzvnd6ELqk5JYSIu8SpYrVBaG0qCkTRX2EJlRJVigl5PHvXpan6CylDSEVZ0JO0Hq5Bhwh7buQAHdu2H3qTejxu__0Lh58j69ntvfBt95gu_YBQkZucN9hE3fdIUKLkzVbwD532Izfe5P2GW8N3GAH0PqwOkcnzmwTXPzMKXp7fFjOn4vF69PLfLYoLKdVX3DLeOsao0oOQlYlscZJ3pRSCNoaZZVsSK1qSkUjKgHOkUYqx4m0GSAU-BRdjb372H0cIPV6k18M-aRmgjAmKkrqTNGRsrFLKYLT--h3Jn5pSvQgVI9CdRaqB6F6yLAxkzIbVhD_mv8PfQOKlnio</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2402246109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The response of resistant kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) to armoured scale insect (Diaspididae) feeding</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hill, M. G. ; Mauchline, N. A. ; Jones, M. K. ; Sutherland, P. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, M. G. ; Mauchline, N. A. ; Jones, M. K. ; Sutherland, P. W.</creatorcontrib><description>The responses of five experimental genotypes and one commercial variety of kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis ) to attack by two polyphagous, congeneric armoured scale insect pests ( Hemiberlesia rapax and H. lataniae ) are described. H. lataniae feeding elicits a response in the bark and fruit of all but one of the experimental genotypes, leading to the development of wound periderm over a 4–5 week period, and death of the insect. The response, which differs slightly between tissue types and genotypes, consists of wound periderm formation in a bowl shape beneath and around the insect, preventing its stylet from reaching normal unmodified parenchyma tissue. Wound periderm cell walls become suberised and cells beneath the insect become filled with phenolic compounds. In some cases, cells beneath the insect become hypertrophic or undergo lysis, exhibiting characteristics of a hypersensitive-like response. The remaining genotype showed no physical change in tissue structure in response to H. lataniae feeding, and the insects survived but were substantially reduced in size. These results suggest that both physical and chemical plant resistance responses are involved. In contrast, H. rapax elicited no observable histological response from any of the genotypes and the insects developed normally on bark and fruit. Both insect species developed normally on leaf petioles and these exhibit only slight cell wall thickening in response to their feeding. This unusual plant defensive response to a sucking insect has similarities to simple types of gall formation in response to insect and pathogen attack and has characteristics of resistance gene-mediated models of plant defence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1872-8855</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11829-011-9124-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Actinidia ; Actinidia chinensis ; Bark ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cell walls ; Chemical industry ; Chemical plants ; Defensive behavior ; Ecology ; Entomology ; Eutrophication ; Feeding ; Fruits ; Genotypes ; Hemiberlesia lataniae ; Herbivores ; Insects ; Invertebrates ; Kiwifruit ; Life Sciences ; Lysis ; Original Paper ; Parenchyma ; Pest resistance ; Pests ; Phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Plant Pathology ; Plant resistance ; Plant Sciences ; Thickening ; Wounds</subject><ispartof>Arthropod-plant interactions, 2011-06, Vol.5 (2), p.149-161</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3c23dfba853e47650caf73b57441da8c87b0989114b464eff0b78f307c44101e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3c23dfba853e47650caf73b57441da8c87b0989114b464eff0b78f307c44101e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11829-011-9124-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11829-011-9124-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauchline, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, P. W.</creatorcontrib><title>The response of resistant kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) to armoured scale insect (Diaspididae) feeding</title><title>Arthropod-plant interactions</title><addtitle>Arthropod-Plant Interactions</addtitle><description>The responses of five experimental genotypes and one commercial variety of kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis ) to attack by two polyphagous, congeneric armoured scale insect pests ( Hemiberlesia rapax and H. lataniae ) are described. H. lataniae feeding elicits a response in the bark and fruit of all but one of the experimental genotypes, leading to the development of wound periderm over a 4–5 week period, and death of the insect. The response, which differs slightly between tissue types and genotypes, consists of wound periderm formation in a bowl shape beneath and around the insect, preventing its stylet from reaching normal unmodified parenchyma tissue. Wound periderm cell walls become suberised and cells beneath the insect become filled with phenolic compounds. In some cases, cells beneath the insect become hypertrophic or undergo lysis, exhibiting characteristics of a hypersensitive-like response. The remaining genotype showed no physical change in tissue structure in response to H. lataniae feeding, and the insects survived but were substantially reduced in size. These results suggest that both physical and chemical plant resistance responses are involved. In contrast, H. rapax elicited no observable histological response from any of the genotypes and the insects developed normally on bark and fruit. Both insect species developed normally on leaf petioles and these exhibit only slight cell wall thickening in response to their feeding. This unusual plant defensive response to a sucking insect has similarities to simple types of gall formation in response to insect and pathogen attack and has characteristics of resistance gene-mediated models of plant defence.</description><subject>Actinidia</subject><subject>Actinidia chinensis</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cell walls</subject><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Chemical plants</subject><subject>Defensive behavior</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Hemiberlesia lataniae</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Kiwifruit</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parenchyma</subject><subject>Pest resistance</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Thickening</subject><subject>Wounds</subject><issn>1872-8855</issn><issn>1872-8847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gsscAQ8FdiZ6zKp1SJpcyW45xbl9YpdirEv8dREExMd8Pzvnd6ELqk5JYSIu8SpYrVBaG0qCkTRX2EJlRJVigl5PHvXpan6CylDSEVZ0JO0Hq5Bhwh7buQAHdu2H3qTejxu__0Lh58j69ntvfBt95gu_YBQkZucN9hE3fdIUKLkzVbwD532Izfe5P2GW8N3GAH0PqwOkcnzmwTXPzMKXp7fFjOn4vF69PLfLYoLKdVX3DLeOsao0oOQlYlscZJ3pRSCNoaZZVsSK1qSkUjKgHOkUYqx4m0GSAU-BRdjb372H0cIPV6k18M-aRmgjAmKkrqTNGRsrFLKYLT--h3Jn5pSvQgVI9CdRaqB6F6yLAxkzIbVhD_mv8PfQOKlnio</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Hill, M. G.</creator><creator>Mauchline, N. A.</creator><creator>Jones, M. K.</creator><creator>Sutherland, P. W.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>The response of resistant kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) to armoured scale insect (Diaspididae) feeding</title><author>Hill, M. G. ; Mauchline, N. A. ; Jones, M. K. ; Sutherland, P. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3c23dfba853e47650caf73b57441da8c87b0989114b464eff0b78f307c44101e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Actinidia</topic><topic>Actinidia chinensis</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cell walls</topic><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Chemical plants</topic><topic>Defensive behavior</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Hemiberlesia lataniae</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Kiwifruit</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parenchyma</topic><topic>Pest resistance</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Thickening</topic><topic>Wounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauchline, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, P. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Arthropod-plant interactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, M. G.</au><au>Mauchline, N. A.</au><au>Jones, M. K.</au><au>Sutherland, P. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The response of resistant kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) to armoured scale insect (Diaspididae) feeding</atitle><jtitle>Arthropod-plant interactions</jtitle><stitle>Arthropod-Plant Interactions</stitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>149-161</pages><issn>1872-8855</issn><eissn>1872-8847</eissn><abstract>The responses of five experimental genotypes and one commercial variety of kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis ) to attack by two polyphagous, congeneric armoured scale insect pests ( Hemiberlesia rapax and H. lataniae ) are described. H. lataniae feeding elicits a response in the bark and fruit of all but one of the experimental genotypes, leading to the development of wound periderm over a 4–5 week period, and death of the insect. The response, which differs slightly between tissue types and genotypes, consists of wound periderm formation in a bowl shape beneath and around the insect, preventing its stylet from reaching normal unmodified parenchyma tissue. Wound periderm cell walls become suberised and cells beneath the insect become filled with phenolic compounds. In some cases, cells beneath the insect become hypertrophic or undergo lysis, exhibiting characteristics of a hypersensitive-like response. The remaining genotype showed no physical change in tissue structure in response to H. lataniae feeding, and the insects survived but were substantially reduced in size. These results suggest that both physical and chemical plant resistance responses are involved. In contrast, H. rapax elicited no observable histological response from any of the genotypes and the insects developed normally on bark and fruit. Both insect species developed normally on leaf petioles and these exhibit only slight cell wall thickening in response to their feeding. This unusual plant defensive response to a sucking insect has similarities to simple types of gall formation in response to insect and pathogen attack and has characteristics of resistance gene-mediated models of plant defence.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11829-011-9124-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1872-8855
ispartof Arthropod-plant interactions, 2011-06, Vol.5 (2), p.149-161
issn 1872-8855
1872-8847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2402246109
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Actinidia
Actinidia chinensis
Bark
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cell walls
Chemical industry
Chemical plants
Defensive behavior
Ecology
Entomology
Eutrophication
Feeding
Fruits
Genotypes
Hemiberlesia lataniae
Herbivores
Insects
Invertebrates
Kiwifruit
Life Sciences
Lysis
Original Paper
Parenchyma
Pest resistance
Pests
Phenolic compounds
Phenols
Plant Pathology
Plant resistance
Plant Sciences
Thickening
Wounds
title The response of resistant kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) to armoured scale insect (Diaspididae) feeding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A29%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20response%20of%20resistant%20kiwifruit%20(Actinidia%20chinensis)%20to%20armoured%20scale%20insect%20(Diaspididae)%20feeding&rft.jtitle=Arthropod-plant%20interactions&rft.au=Hill,%20M.%20G.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=149-161&rft.issn=1872-8855&rft.eissn=1872-8847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11829-011-9124-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2402246109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2402246109&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true