Comparison between cystourethrography and sonourethrography in preoperative diagnostic management of patients with anterior urethral strictures
To evaluate the urethral lesions and the degree of spongiofibrosis using cystourethrography (CUG) and sonourethrography (SUG) in order to propose the best imaging method for further surgical treatment. The study involved 66 patients with anterior urethral strictures with indication for urethroplasty...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medical ultrasonography 2018-12, Vol.20 (4), p.436-440 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 440 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 436 |
| container_title | Medical ultrasonography |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Krukowski, Jakub Kałużny, Adam Kłącz, Jakub Matuszewski, Marcin |
| description | To evaluate the urethral lesions and the degree of spongiofibrosis using cystourethrography (CUG) and sonourethrography (SUG) in order to propose the best imaging method for further surgical treatment.
The study involved 66 patients with anterior urethral strictures with indication for urethroplasty. Results of CUG and SUG were compared with each other and data from surgical protocol.
Totally 72 strictures were detected; 47 in the bulbar part of urethra and 25 in the penile urethra. The mean length of the stenosis was 16.43 mm for CUG and 27.41 mm for SUG and 31.05 mm during surgery. The correlation levels between imaging techniques and intraoperative measurements were 0.55 (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.11152/mu-1613 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2401878697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401878697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-79dbe5ceebff2d3ef19d9b29981c3718a8d7130927ec549d721fc608376c583d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9q3DAQh0VpSZY0kCcogl56cauRbP05hiVNCoFekrORpfGuSmw5ktywT5FXjtpNc-hpZqSPb5gfIRfAvgJAx79NawMSxDuy4UzKRstWvCcb0G3btKD4KTnPOQyMC5CqM-yEnArWiVa2ZkOet3FabAo5znTA8oQ4U3fIJa4Jyz7FXbLL_kDt7GlF_nsNM10SxgWTLeE3Uh_sbo65BEcnO9sdTjgXGke61P_aZvoUyr7KCqYQEz3a7APNJQVX6pg_kg-jfch4_lrPyP33q7vtTXP78_rH9vK2cQKgNMr4ATuHOIwj9wJHMN4M3BgNTijQVnsFghmu0HWt8YrD6CTTQknXaeHFGfl89C4pPq6YS_-rHjfXlT1vGWilpVGV-nKkXIo5Jxz7JYXJpkMPrP8bfj-t_Z_wK_rpVbgOE_o38F_U4gVb2IQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401878697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between cystourethrography and sonourethrography in preoperative diagnostic management of patients with anterior urethral strictures</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Krukowski, Jakub ; Kałużny, Adam ; Kłącz, Jakub ; Matuszewski, Marcin</creator><creatorcontrib>Krukowski, Jakub ; Kałużny, Adam ; Kłącz, Jakub ; Matuszewski, Marcin</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the urethral lesions and the degree of spongiofibrosis using cystourethrography (CUG) and sonourethrography (SUG) in order to propose the best imaging method for further surgical treatment.
The study involved 66 patients with anterior urethral strictures with indication for urethroplasty. Results of CUG and SUG were compared with each other and data from surgical protocol.
Totally 72 strictures were detected; 47 in the bulbar part of urethra and 25 in the penile urethra. The mean length of the stenosis was 16.43 mm for CUG and 27.41 mm for SUG and 31.05 mm during surgery. The correlation levels between imaging techniques and intraoperative measurements were 0.55 (p<0.001) for CUG and 0.73 (p<0.001) for SUG. After dividing the strictures according to their location, better correlation for stenoses was obtained in penile urethra: 0.66 (p<0.001) for CUG and 0.86 (p<0.001) for SUG.
SUG seems to be a simple and fast examination to evaluate urethral strictures. It is more accurate in comparison to CUG and gives a possibility to assess the spongiofibrosis. This information suggests that SUG can be a good complement to CUG in diagnosis of anterior urethtral strictures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-4172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2066-8643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11152/mu-1613</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30534649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Romania: Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bladder ; Correlation analysis ; Diagnostic systems ; Etiology ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Methods ; Patients ; Studies ; Surgery ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Urinary tract ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Medical ultrasonography, 2018-12, Vol.20 (4), p.436-440</ispartof><rights>Copyright Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology 2018</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-79dbe5ceebff2d3ef19d9b29981c3718a8d7130927ec549d721fc608376c583d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krukowski, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kałużny, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kłącz, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matuszewski, Marcin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between cystourethrography and sonourethrography in preoperative diagnostic management of patients with anterior urethral strictures</title><title>Medical ultrasonography</title><addtitle>Med Ultrason</addtitle><description>To evaluate the urethral lesions and the degree of spongiofibrosis using cystourethrography (CUG) and sonourethrography (SUG) in order to propose the best imaging method for further surgical treatment.
The study involved 66 patients with anterior urethral strictures with indication for urethroplasty. Results of CUG and SUG were compared with each other and data from surgical protocol.
Totally 72 strictures were detected; 47 in the bulbar part of urethra and 25 in the penile urethra. The mean length of the stenosis was 16.43 mm for CUG and 27.41 mm for SUG and 31.05 mm during surgery. The correlation levels between imaging techniques and intraoperative measurements were 0.55 (p<0.001) for CUG and 0.73 (p<0.001) for SUG. After dividing the strictures according to their location, better correlation for stenoses was obtained in penile urethra: 0.66 (p<0.001) for CUG and 0.86 (p<0.001) for SUG.
SUG seems to be a simple and fast examination to evaluate urethral strictures. It is more accurate in comparison to CUG and gives a possibility to assess the spongiofibrosis. This information suggests that SUG can be a good complement to CUG in diagnosis of anterior urethtral strictures.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1844-4172</issn><issn>2066-8643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9q3DAQh0VpSZY0kCcogl56cauRbP05hiVNCoFekrORpfGuSmw5ktywT5FXjtpNc-hpZqSPb5gfIRfAvgJAx79NawMSxDuy4UzKRstWvCcb0G3btKD4KTnPOQyMC5CqM-yEnArWiVa2ZkOet3FabAo5znTA8oQ4U3fIJa4Jyz7FXbLL_kDt7GlF_nsNM10SxgWTLeE3Uh_sbo65BEcnO9sdTjgXGke61P_aZvoUyr7KCqYQEz3a7APNJQVX6pg_kg-jfch4_lrPyP33q7vtTXP78_rH9vK2cQKgNMr4ATuHOIwj9wJHMN4M3BgNTijQVnsFghmu0HWt8YrD6CTTQknXaeHFGfl89C4pPq6YS_-rHjfXlT1vGWilpVGV-nKkXIo5Jxz7JYXJpkMPrP8bfj-t_Z_wK_rpVbgOE_o38F_U4gVb2IQ8</recordid><startdate>20181208</startdate><enddate>20181208</enddate><creator>Krukowski, Jakub</creator><creator>Kałużny, Adam</creator><creator>Kłącz, Jakub</creator><creator>Matuszewski, Marcin</creator><general>Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181208</creationdate><title>Comparison between cystourethrography and sonourethrography in preoperative diagnostic management of patients with anterior urethral strictures</title><author>Krukowski, Jakub ; Kałużny, Adam ; Kłącz, Jakub ; Matuszewski, Marcin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-79dbe5ceebff2d3ef19d9b29981c3718a8d7130927ec549d721fc608376c583d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krukowski, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kałużny, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kłącz, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matuszewski, Marcin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Medical ultrasonography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krukowski, Jakub</au><au>Kałużny, Adam</au><au>Kłącz, Jakub</au><au>Matuszewski, Marcin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between cystourethrography and sonourethrography in preoperative diagnostic management of patients with anterior urethral strictures</atitle><jtitle>Medical ultrasonography</jtitle><addtitle>Med Ultrason</addtitle><date>2018-12-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>436</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>436-440</pages><issn>1844-4172</issn><eissn>2066-8643</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the urethral lesions and the degree of spongiofibrosis using cystourethrography (CUG) and sonourethrography (SUG) in order to propose the best imaging method for further surgical treatment.
The study involved 66 patients with anterior urethral strictures with indication for urethroplasty. Results of CUG and SUG were compared with each other and data from surgical protocol.
Totally 72 strictures were detected; 47 in the bulbar part of urethra and 25 in the penile urethra. The mean length of the stenosis was 16.43 mm for CUG and 27.41 mm for SUG and 31.05 mm during surgery. The correlation levels between imaging techniques and intraoperative measurements were 0.55 (p<0.001) for CUG and 0.73 (p<0.001) for SUG. After dividing the strictures according to their location, better correlation for stenoses was obtained in penile urethra: 0.66 (p<0.001) for CUG and 0.86 (p<0.001) for SUG.
SUG seems to be a simple and fast examination to evaluate urethral strictures. It is more accurate in comparison to CUG and gives a possibility to assess the spongiofibrosis. This information suggests that SUG can be a good complement to CUG in diagnosis of anterior urethtral strictures.</abstract><cop>Romania</cop><pub>Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</pub><pmid>30534649</pmid><doi>10.11152/mu-1613</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1844-4172 |
| ispartof | Medical ultrasonography, 2018-12, Vol.20 (4), p.436-440 |
| issn | 1844-4172 2066-8643 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2401878697 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Accuracy Bladder Correlation analysis Diagnostic systems Etiology Medical diagnosis Medical imaging Methods Patients Studies Surgery Ultrasonic imaging Urinary tract Urology |
| title | Comparison between cystourethrography and sonourethrography in preoperative diagnostic management of patients with anterior urethral strictures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20cystourethrography%20and%20sonourethrography%20in%20preoperative%20diagnostic%20management%20of%20patients%20with%20anterior%20urethral%20strictures&rft.jtitle=Medical%20ultrasonography&rft.au=Krukowski,%20Jakub&rft.date=2018-12-08&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=436&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=436-440&rft.issn=1844-4172&rft.eissn=2066-8643&rft_id=info:doi/10.11152/mu-1613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2401878697%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401878697&rft_id=info:pmid/30534649&rfr_iscdi=true |