P090: Validation of a palliative or end of life care case-finding measure in emergency medical services
Introduction: The novel Paramedics Providing Palliative Care at Home program has been developed to address the mismatch between traditional paramedic practice and patient's goals of care. Case-finding is key to estimate potential impact for systems looking to establish such programs, continuous...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of emergency medicine 2020-05, Vol.22 (S1), p.S97-S97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S97 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | S97 |
container_title | Canadian journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Goldstein, J. Carter, A. Harrison, M. Arab, M. Stewart, B. Jensen, J. Muise, A. |
description | Introduction:
The novel Paramedics Providing Palliative Care at Home program has been developed to address the mismatch between traditional paramedic practice and patient's goals of care. Case-finding is key to estimate potential impact for systems looking to establish such programs, continuous quality improvement once operational, and for prospective identification of patients who might benefit from referral to palliative care. Typical paramedic charting templates do not provide direct identification of these cases. Our objective was to test the validity of a previously derived Palliative Support Composite Measure (PSCM) and two modifications.
Methods:
A priori Gold Standard criteria for determining whether a response was appropriate for a paramedic palliative care approach were identified by expert consensus. Excluding chief complaints and clinical conditions that were universally identified as not appropriate for paramedic palliative support, these criteria were applied by two trained chart abstractors to 500 consecutive charts to classify calls as appropriate for paramedic palliative support, or not. The PSCM and modifications (added criteria call location type and registration in a palliative care program, text mining terms) were applied to the same cohort, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicative (PPV/NPV) values calculated.
Results:
Of the 500 cases, 21 (4.2%) were classified as appropriate for paramedic palliative support by the Gold Standard (kappa 0.734). 9 cases with initial disagreement were reviewed with 8 ultimately being deemed to fit the palliative support criteria. The PSCM performed poorly (using the “potential palliative” cut point): sensitivity 71.4% (95%CI: 47.8-88.7), specificity 71.4% (95%CI: 67.1-75.4) and PPV of 9.9% (95%CI: 7.5-12.9) and NPV of 98.3% (95%CI: 96.7-99). The modified PSCM: sensitivity 61.9% (95% CI: 38.4-81.9), specificity 99% (95%CI: 97.6-99.7), PPV 72.2% (95%CI: 50.5-86.9) and NPV 98.3% (95%CI: 97.2-99). A Modified PSCM plus pall* text term performed similarly: sensitivity100% (83.9-100), specificity 97.3% (95% CI: 95.4-98.5), PPV 61.8% (95%CI: 48.6-73.4) and NPV100%.
Conclusion:
A modified PSCM provides moderate sensitivity, specificity and PPV, improved by the text term Pall* if feasible. This query will be helpful to systems considering a paramedic palliative care program or when one is already operational. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/cem.2020.296 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2401565438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401565438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1036-e93934fad4b0d1e70ce177d54f98f5e2c2bd5bd1f0381e0e06f2bdbd7b6e21ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKQzEQhoMoWKs7HyDg1lNnknN1J8UbFHShbkNOMikp51KTtuDbm0PFzVw-fmbgY-waYYGA1Z2hfiFAwEI05QmbYV5jVkMuT_9nWZyzixg3ACgKrGds_Q4N3PMv3Xmrd34c-Oi45lvddT7tB-Jj4DTYCXfeETc6TCVS5vxg_bDmPem4T9APnHoKaxrMT4LWG93xSOHgDcVLduZ0F-nqr8_Z59Pjx_IlW709vy4fVplBkGVGjWxk7rTNW7BIFRjCqrJF7praFSSMaG3RWnQgayQgKF0ira3akgQaknN2c7y7DeP3nuJObcZ9GNJLJXLAoixyWafU7TFlwhhjIKe2wfc6_CgENalUSaWaVKqkUv4CfwVnBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401565438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P090: Validation of a palliative or end of life care case-finding measure in emergency medical services</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Goldstein, J. ; Carter, A. ; Harrison, M. ; Arab, M. ; Stewart, B. ; Jensen, J. ; Muise, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, J. ; Carter, A. ; Harrison, M. ; Arab, M. ; Stewart, B. ; Jensen, J. ; Muise, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:
The novel Paramedics Providing Palliative Care at Home program has been developed to address the mismatch between traditional paramedic practice and patient's goals of care. Case-finding is key to estimate potential impact for systems looking to establish such programs, continuous quality improvement once operational, and for prospective identification of patients who might benefit from referral to palliative care. Typical paramedic charting templates do not provide direct identification of these cases. Our objective was to test the validity of a previously derived Palliative Support Composite Measure (PSCM) and two modifications.
Methods:
A priori Gold Standard criteria for determining whether a response was appropriate for a paramedic palliative care approach were identified by expert consensus. Excluding chief complaints and clinical conditions that were universally identified as not appropriate for paramedic palliative support, these criteria were applied by two trained chart abstractors to 500 consecutive charts to classify calls as appropriate for paramedic palliative support, or not. The PSCM and modifications (added criteria call location type and registration in a palliative care program, text mining terms) were applied to the same cohort, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicative (PPV/NPV) values calculated.
Results:
Of the 500 cases, 21 (4.2%) were classified as appropriate for paramedic palliative support by the Gold Standard (kappa 0.734). 9 cases with initial disagreement were reviewed with 8 ultimately being deemed to fit the palliative support criteria. The PSCM performed poorly (using the “potential palliative” cut point): sensitivity 71.4% (95%CI: 47.8-88.7), specificity 71.4% (95%CI: 67.1-75.4) and PPV of 9.9% (95%CI: 7.5-12.9) and NPV of 98.3% (95%CI: 96.7-99). The modified PSCM: sensitivity 61.9% (95% CI: 38.4-81.9), specificity 99% (95%CI: 97.6-99.7), PPV 72.2% (95%CI: 50.5-86.9) and NPV 98.3% (95%CI: 97.2-99). A Modified PSCM plus pall* text term performed similarly: sensitivity100% (83.9-100), specificity 97.3% (95% CI: 95.4-98.5), PPV 61.8% (95%CI: 48.6-73.4) and NPV100%.
Conclusion:
A modified PSCM provides moderate sensitivity, specificity and PPV, improved by the text term Pall* if feasible. This query will be helpful to systems considering a paramedic palliative care program or when one is already operational.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-8035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1481-8043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.296</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pickering: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Hospice care ; Palliative care</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2020-05, Vol.22 (S1), p.S97-S97</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arab, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muise, A.</creatorcontrib><title>P090: Validation of a palliative or end of life care case-finding measure in emergency medical services</title><title>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</title><description>Introduction:
The novel Paramedics Providing Palliative Care at Home program has been developed to address the mismatch between traditional paramedic practice and patient's goals of care. Case-finding is key to estimate potential impact for systems looking to establish such programs, continuous quality improvement once operational, and for prospective identification of patients who might benefit from referral to palliative care. Typical paramedic charting templates do not provide direct identification of these cases. Our objective was to test the validity of a previously derived Palliative Support Composite Measure (PSCM) and two modifications.
Methods:
A priori Gold Standard criteria for determining whether a response was appropriate for a paramedic palliative care approach were identified by expert consensus. Excluding chief complaints and clinical conditions that were universally identified as not appropriate for paramedic palliative support, these criteria were applied by two trained chart abstractors to 500 consecutive charts to classify calls as appropriate for paramedic palliative support, or not. The PSCM and modifications (added criteria call location type and registration in a palliative care program, text mining terms) were applied to the same cohort, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicative (PPV/NPV) values calculated.
Results:
Of the 500 cases, 21 (4.2%) were classified as appropriate for paramedic palliative support by the Gold Standard (kappa 0.734). 9 cases with initial disagreement were reviewed with 8 ultimately being deemed to fit the palliative support criteria. The PSCM performed poorly (using the “potential palliative” cut point): sensitivity 71.4% (95%CI: 47.8-88.7), specificity 71.4% (95%CI: 67.1-75.4) and PPV of 9.9% (95%CI: 7.5-12.9) and NPV of 98.3% (95%CI: 96.7-99). The modified PSCM: sensitivity 61.9% (95% CI: 38.4-81.9), specificity 99% (95%CI: 97.6-99.7), PPV 72.2% (95%CI: 50.5-86.9) and NPV 98.3% (95%CI: 97.2-99). A Modified PSCM plus pall* text term performed similarly: sensitivity100% (83.9-100), specificity 97.3% (95% CI: 95.4-98.5), PPV 61.8% (95%CI: 48.6-73.4) and NPV100%.
Conclusion:
A modified PSCM provides moderate sensitivity, specificity and PPV, improved by the text term Pall* if feasible. This query will be helpful to systems considering a paramedic palliative care program or when one is already operational.</description><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><issn>1481-8035</issn><issn>1481-8043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtKQzEQhoMoWKs7HyDg1lNnknN1J8UbFHShbkNOMikp51KTtuDbm0PFzVw-fmbgY-waYYGA1Z2hfiFAwEI05QmbYV5jVkMuT_9nWZyzixg3ACgKrGds_Q4N3PMv3Xmrd34c-Oi45lvddT7tB-Jj4DTYCXfeETc6TCVS5vxg_bDmPem4T9APnHoKaxrMT4LWG93xSOHgDcVLduZ0F-nqr8_Z59Pjx_IlW709vy4fVplBkGVGjWxk7rTNW7BIFRjCqrJF7praFSSMaG3RWnQgayQgKF0ira3akgQaknN2c7y7DeP3nuJObcZ9GNJLJXLAoixyWafU7TFlwhhjIKe2wfc6_CgENalUSaWaVKqkUv4CfwVnBA</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Goldstein, J.</creator><creator>Carter, A.</creator><creator>Harrison, M.</creator><creator>Arab, M.</creator><creator>Stewart, B.</creator><creator>Jensen, J.</creator><creator>Muise, A.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>P090: Validation of a palliative or end of life care case-finding measure in emergency medical services</title><author>Goldstein, J. ; Carter, A. ; Harrison, M. ; Arab, M. ; Stewart, B. ; Jensen, J. ; Muise, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1036-e93934fad4b0d1e70ce177d54f98f5e2c2bd5bd1f0381e0e06f2bdbd7b6e21ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arab, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muise, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldstein, J.</au><au>Carter, A.</au><au>Harrison, M.</au><au>Arab, M.</au><au>Stewart, B.</au><au>Jensen, J.</au><au>Muise, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P090: Validation of a palliative or end of life care case-finding measure in emergency medical services</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S97</spage><epage>S97</epage><pages>S97-S97</pages><issn>1481-8035</issn><eissn>1481-8043</eissn><abstract>Introduction:
The novel Paramedics Providing Palliative Care at Home program has been developed to address the mismatch between traditional paramedic practice and patient's goals of care. Case-finding is key to estimate potential impact for systems looking to establish such programs, continuous quality improvement once operational, and for prospective identification of patients who might benefit from referral to palliative care. Typical paramedic charting templates do not provide direct identification of these cases. Our objective was to test the validity of a previously derived Palliative Support Composite Measure (PSCM) and two modifications.
Methods:
A priori Gold Standard criteria for determining whether a response was appropriate for a paramedic palliative care approach were identified by expert consensus. Excluding chief complaints and clinical conditions that were universally identified as not appropriate for paramedic palliative support, these criteria were applied by two trained chart abstractors to 500 consecutive charts to classify calls as appropriate for paramedic palliative support, or not. The PSCM and modifications (added criteria call location type and registration in a palliative care program, text mining terms) were applied to the same cohort, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicative (PPV/NPV) values calculated.
Results:
Of the 500 cases, 21 (4.2%) were classified as appropriate for paramedic palliative support by the Gold Standard (kappa 0.734). 9 cases with initial disagreement were reviewed with 8 ultimately being deemed to fit the palliative support criteria. The PSCM performed poorly (using the “potential palliative” cut point): sensitivity 71.4% (95%CI: 47.8-88.7), specificity 71.4% (95%CI: 67.1-75.4) and PPV of 9.9% (95%CI: 7.5-12.9) and NPV of 98.3% (95%CI: 96.7-99). The modified PSCM: sensitivity 61.9% (95% CI: 38.4-81.9), specificity 99% (95%CI: 97.6-99.7), PPV 72.2% (95%CI: 50.5-86.9) and NPV 98.3% (95%CI: 97.2-99). A Modified PSCM plus pall* text term performed similarly: sensitivity100% (83.9-100), specificity 97.3% (95% CI: 95.4-98.5), PPV 61.8% (95%CI: 48.6-73.4) and NPV100%.
Conclusion:
A modified PSCM provides moderate sensitivity, specificity and PPV, improved by the text term Pall* if feasible. This query will be helpful to systems considering a paramedic palliative care program or when one is already operational.</abstract><cop>Pickering</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1017/cem.2020.296</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1481-8035 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2020-05, Vol.22 (S1), p.S97-S97 |
issn | 1481-8035 1481-8043 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2401565438 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Hospice care Palliative care |
title | P090: Validation of a palliative or end of life care case-finding measure in emergency medical services |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P090:%20Validation%20of%20a%20palliative%20or%20end%20of%20life%20care%20case-finding%20measure%20in%20emergency%20medical%20services&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Goldstein,%20J.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S97&rft.epage=S97&rft.pages=S97-S97&rft.issn=1481-8035&rft.eissn=1481-8043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/cem.2020.296&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2401565438%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401565438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |