MP48: Head computerized tomography overuse in adults with mild traumatic brain injury in a single Quebec emergency department
Introduction: Choosing Wisely Canada has reported rates of unnecessary head computed tomography (CT) scans for low-risk mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients in Ontario and Alberta ranging from 14% to 46%. Local data for Quebec is currently not available. We sought to estimate the overuse of C...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of emergency medicine 2020-05, Vol.22 (S1), p.S60-S60 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S60 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | S60 |
container_title | Canadian journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Thibault, S. Gélinas, V. Turcotte, S. Pépin, A. Renald, R. Le Sage, N. Plante, P. Witteman, H. Légaré, F. Sauvé, L. Gagnon, M. Archambault, P. |
description | Introduction:
Choosing Wisely Canada has reported rates of unnecessary head computed tomography (CT) scans for low-risk mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients in Ontario and Alberta ranging from 14% to 46%. Local data for Quebec is currently not available. We sought to estimate the overuse of CT scans among adults with mTBI in the emergency department (ED) of a single level II trauma center in Quebec.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective chart review of adults who visited the ED of Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis from 04/01/2016 to 03/31/2017. Using an administrative database (Med-GPS, Montreal), we randomly sampled ED patients aged over 18 that had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and had suffered from a mTBI in the last 24 hours. We excluded patients with an unclear history of trauma, a bleeding disorder/anticoagulation, a history of seizure, any acute focal neurological deficit, a return visit for reassessment of the same injury, unstable vital signs, or a pregnancy. Data was extracted by two reviewers who analyzed separate charts. They used the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) to determine relevance of CT scans. Overuse was determined if a patient without any high or medium risk CCHR criteria underwent a scan. A third reviewer verified a 10% random sample of the data extraction for each primary reviewer and inter-rater reliability was assessed using the kappa statistic.
Results:
From the 942 eligible mTBI patients, we randomly selected 418 patient charts to review, of which 217 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria (56% were men and the mean age was 48 years old (SD = 21)). Among included patients, 101 were determined as low risk. The overuse proportion was 26% (26/101), 95% CI [18-35]. Two CT scans were assessed as abnormal, but none revealed life-threatening injuries and only one was considered clinically significant with a subdural hematoma of 9 mm. Inter-rater reliability was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.6 and 1.0) for each primary reviewer.
Conclusion:
We identified head CT scan overuse in this ED. This will support local quality improvement initiatives to reduce unnecessary head CT scans for adults with mTBI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/cem.2020.196 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2401562346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401562346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1036-8b03bdc1105f23fe17a2d780641122358b7bb6408f926e5f80b3170ff55152a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhYMoWKs7f8CAW1PnziOZupOiVqiooOthktxpU_JyJqNE8L-bWnF1z4WPc-CLonOgM6CQXuVYzxhl4zdPDqIJCAWxooIf_mcuj6MT77eUApOgJtH347NQ12SJpiB5W3ehR1d-YUH6tm7XznSbgbQf6IJHUjbEFKHqPfks-w2py2rEnAm16cucZM6MQNlsgxt-UeLLZl0heQmYYU6wRrfGJh9IgZ1xfY1NfxodWVN5PPu70-jt7vZ1sYxXT_cPi5tVnAPlSawyyrMiB6DSMm4RUsOKVNFEADDGpcrSLEsEVXbOEpRW0YxDSq2VEiQzgk-ji31v59r3gL7X2za4ZpzUTFCQCeMiGanLPZW71nuHVneurI0bNFC9E6xHwXonWI-C-Q-8BG5-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401562346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MP48: Head computerized tomography overuse in adults with mild traumatic brain injury in a single Quebec emergency department</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Thibault, S. ; Gélinas, V. ; Turcotte, S. ; Pépin, A. ; Renald, R. ; Le Sage, N. ; Plante, P. ; Witteman, H. ; Légaré, F. ; Sauvé, L. ; Gagnon, M. ; Archambault, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thibault, S. ; Gélinas, V. ; Turcotte, S. ; Pépin, A. ; Renald, R. ; Le Sage, N. ; Plante, P. ; Witteman, H. ; Légaré, F. ; Sauvé, L. ; Gagnon, M. ; Archambault, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:
Choosing Wisely Canada has reported rates of unnecessary head computed tomography (CT) scans for low-risk mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients in Ontario and Alberta ranging from 14% to 46%. Local data for Quebec is currently not available. We sought to estimate the overuse of CT scans among adults with mTBI in the emergency department (ED) of a single level II trauma center in Quebec.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective chart review of adults who visited the ED of Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis from 04/01/2016 to 03/31/2017. Using an administrative database (Med-GPS, Montreal), we randomly sampled ED patients aged over 18 that had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and had suffered from a mTBI in the last 24 hours. We excluded patients with an unclear history of trauma, a bleeding disorder/anticoagulation, a history of seizure, any acute focal neurological deficit, a return visit for reassessment of the same injury, unstable vital signs, or a pregnancy. Data was extracted by two reviewers who analyzed separate charts. They used the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) to determine relevance of CT scans. Overuse was determined if a patient without any high or medium risk CCHR criteria underwent a scan. A third reviewer verified a 10% random sample of the data extraction for each primary reviewer and inter-rater reliability was assessed using the kappa statistic.
Results:
From the 942 eligible mTBI patients, we randomly selected 418 patient charts to review, of which 217 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria (56% were men and the mean age was 48 years old (SD = 21)). Among included patients, 101 were determined as low risk. The overuse proportion was 26% (26/101), 95% CI [18-35]. Two CT scans were assessed as abnormal, but none revealed life-threatening injuries and only one was considered clinically significant with a subdural hematoma of 9 mm. Inter-rater reliability was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.6 and 1.0) for each primary reviewer.
Conclusion:
We identified head CT scan overuse in this ED. This will support local quality improvement initiatives to reduce unnecessary head CT scans for adults with mTBI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-8035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1481-8043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pickering: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Medical imaging ; Patients ; Tomography ; Trauma ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2020-05, Vol.22 (S1), p.S60-S60</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thibault, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gélinas, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turcotte, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pépin, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renald, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Sage, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plante, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witteman, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Légaré, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvé, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagnon, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archambault, P.</creatorcontrib><title>MP48: Head computerized tomography overuse in adults with mild traumatic brain injury in a single Quebec emergency department</title><title>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</title><description>Introduction:
Choosing Wisely Canada has reported rates of unnecessary head computed tomography (CT) scans for low-risk mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients in Ontario and Alberta ranging from 14% to 46%. Local data for Quebec is currently not available. We sought to estimate the overuse of CT scans among adults with mTBI in the emergency department (ED) of a single level II trauma center in Quebec.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective chart review of adults who visited the ED of Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis from 04/01/2016 to 03/31/2017. Using an administrative database (Med-GPS, Montreal), we randomly sampled ED patients aged over 18 that had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and had suffered from a mTBI in the last 24 hours. We excluded patients with an unclear history of trauma, a bleeding disorder/anticoagulation, a history of seizure, any acute focal neurological deficit, a return visit for reassessment of the same injury, unstable vital signs, or a pregnancy. Data was extracted by two reviewers who analyzed separate charts. They used the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) to determine relevance of CT scans. Overuse was determined if a patient without any high or medium risk CCHR criteria underwent a scan. A third reviewer verified a 10% random sample of the data extraction for each primary reviewer and inter-rater reliability was assessed using the kappa statistic.
Results:
From the 942 eligible mTBI patients, we randomly selected 418 patient charts to review, of which 217 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria (56% were men and the mean age was 48 years old (SD = 21)). Among included patients, 101 were determined as low risk. The overuse proportion was 26% (26/101), 95% CI [18-35]. Two CT scans were assessed as abnormal, but none revealed life-threatening injuries and only one was considered clinically significant with a subdural hematoma of 9 mm. Inter-rater reliability was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.6 and 1.0) for each primary reviewer.
Conclusion:
We identified head CT scan overuse in this ED. This will support local quality improvement initiatives to reduce unnecessary head CT scans for adults with mTBI.</description><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>1481-8035</issn><issn>1481-8043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhYMoWKs7f8CAW1PnziOZupOiVqiooOthktxpU_JyJqNE8L-bWnF1z4WPc-CLonOgM6CQXuVYzxhl4zdPDqIJCAWxooIf_mcuj6MT77eUApOgJtH347NQ12SJpiB5W3ehR1d-YUH6tm7XznSbgbQf6IJHUjbEFKHqPfks-w2py2rEnAm16cucZM6MQNlsgxt-UeLLZl0heQmYYU6wRrfGJh9IgZ1xfY1NfxodWVN5PPu70-jt7vZ1sYxXT_cPi5tVnAPlSawyyrMiB6DSMm4RUsOKVNFEADDGpcrSLEsEVXbOEpRW0YxDSq2VEiQzgk-ji31v59r3gL7X2za4ZpzUTFCQCeMiGanLPZW71nuHVneurI0bNFC9E6xHwXonWI-C-Q-8BG5-</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Thibault, S.</creator><creator>Gélinas, V.</creator><creator>Turcotte, S.</creator><creator>Pépin, A.</creator><creator>Renald, R.</creator><creator>Le Sage, N.</creator><creator>Plante, P.</creator><creator>Witteman, H.</creator><creator>Légaré, F.</creator><creator>Sauvé, L.</creator><creator>Gagnon, M.</creator><creator>Archambault, P.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>MP48: Head computerized tomography overuse in adults with mild traumatic brain injury in a single Quebec emergency department</title><author>Thibault, S. ; Gélinas, V. ; Turcotte, S. ; Pépin, A. ; Renald, R. ; Le Sage, N. ; Plante, P. ; Witteman, H. ; Légaré, F. ; Sauvé, L. ; Gagnon, M. ; Archambault, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1036-8b03bdc1105f23fe17a2d780641122358b7bb6408f926e5f80b3170ff55152a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thibault, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gélinas, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turcotte, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pépin, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renald, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Sage, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plante, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witteman, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Légaré, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvé, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagnon, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archambault, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thibault, S.</au><au>Gélinas, V.</au><au>Turcotte, S.</au><au>Pépin, A.</au><au>Renald, R.</au><au>Le Sage, N.</au><au>Plante, P.</au><au>Witteman, H.</au><au>Légaré, F.</au><au>Sauvé, L.</au><au>Gagnon, M.</au><au>Archambault, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MP48: Head computerized tomography overuse in adults with mild traumatic brain injury in a single Quebec emergency department</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S60</spage><epage>S60</epage><pages>S60-S60</pages><issn>1481-8035</issn><eissn>1481-8043</eissn><abstract>Introduction:
Choosing Wisely Canada has reported rates of unnecessary head computed tomography (CT) scans for low-risk mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients in Ontario and Alberta ranging from 14% to 46%. Local data for Quebec is currently not available. We sought to estimate the overuse of CT scans among adults with mTBI in the emergency department (ED) of a single level II trauma center in Quebec.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective chart review of adults who visited the ED of Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis from 04/01/2016 to 03/31/2017. Using an administrative database (Med-GPS, Montreal), we randomly sampled ED patients aged over 18 that had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and had suffered from a mTBI in the last 24 hours. We excluded patients with an unclear history of trauma, a bleeding disorder/anticoagulation, a history of seizure, any acute focal neurological deficit, a return visit for reassessment of the same injury, unstable vital signs, or a pregnancy. Data was extracted by two reviewers who analyzed separate charts. They used the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) to determine relevance of CT scans. Overuse was determined if a patient without any high or medium risk CCHR criteria underwent a scan. A third reviewer verified a 10% random sample of the data extraction for each primary reviewer and inter-rater reliability was assessed using the kappa statistic.
Results:
From the 942 eligible mTBI patients, we randomly selected 418 patient charts to review, of which 217 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria (56% were men and the mean age was 48 years old (SD = 21)). Among included patients, 101 were determined as low risk. The overuse proportion was 26% (26/101), 95% CI [18-35]. Two CT scans were assessed as abnormal, but none revealed life-threatening injuries and only one was considered clinically significant with a subdural hematoma of 9 mm. Inter-rater reliability was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.6 and 1.0) for each primary reviewer.
Conclusion:
We identified head CT scan overuse in this ED. This will support local quality improvement initiatives to reduce unnecessary head CT scans for adults with mTBI.</abstract><cop>Pickering</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1017/cem.2020.196</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1481-8035 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2020-05, Vol.22 (S1), p.S60-S60 |
issn | 1481-8035 1481-8043 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2401562346 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Medical imaging Patients Tomography Trauma Traumatic brain injury |
title | MP48: Head computerized tomography overuse in adults with mild traumatic brain injury in a single Quebec emergency department |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A28%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MP48:%20Head%20computerized%20tomography%20overuse%20in%20adults%20with%20mild%20traumatic%20brain%20injury%20in%20a%20single%20Quebec%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Thibault,%20S.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S60&rft.epage=S60&rft.pages=S60-S60&rft.issn=1481-8035&rft.eissn=1481-8043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/cem.2020.196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2401562346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401562346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |