Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics

Each year, global consumers dispose of 20 million–50 million tons of electronic products, including laptops, tablets, and, most commonly, cell phones. Realizing the residual value in used electronics, consumers frequently look for ways to sell their devices, whereas independent parties (IPs) such as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Production and operations management 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.1188-1211
Hauptverfasser: Esenduran, Gökçe, Hill, James A., Noh, In Joon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1211
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1188
container_title Production and operations management
container_volume 29
creator Esenduran, Gökçe
Hill, James A.
Noh, In Joon
description Each year, global consumers dispose of 20 million–50 million tons of electronic products, including laptops, tablets, and, most commonly, cell phones. Realizing the residual value in used electronics, consumers frequently look for ways to sell their devices, whereas independent parties (IPs) such as Gazelle and NextWorth and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) such as Apple compete in acquiring them. These firms also compete with online marketplaces such as eBay, which offer a channel for individuals to sell used devices to others. To succeed in this highly competitive market, buying firms (i.e., OEMs andIPs) must understand factors that influence sellers’ estimated utility and their decisions in a resale process. We conduct laboratory experiments with a two‐stage resale process, where subjects in the first stage choose a resale channel to sell their used cell phone. In the second stage, subjects evaluate a potential counteroffer decision, that is, post‐choice decision. Our results from the resale‐channel choice stage show that individuals have a higher sensitivity to price, time until payment, and online ratings when selling to an IP than when selling to an OEM or through an OM. No significant difference exists, however, in their sensitivity to IP or OEM data security policies. Our results from the post‐choice decision stage show that a seller's share in the counteroffer increases the likelihood of acceptance in all resale channels, whereas higher online ratings might increase or decrease the likelihood of accepting a counteroffer depending on the resale channel. Our laboratory experiment results generally are consistent, with some differences, when replicated on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/poms.13149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2401485456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1111_poms.13149</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2401485456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-aa66fff8546131f5fe9ebd1a9ca32409672a61193637322eaa42226aea5364103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsXf0HAgyBsTTa72eYopVWhUlF7DuPupN2yTWqypfTfm7qKF3EuGcL33jweIZecDXic241bhwEXPFNHpMeVKJJc5fI47ixXCc-K4Sk5C2HFGCtEynpkMrcV-tCCrWq7oO0S6Wjp6hKpM3Rmm9oifcEAzeEfrMWGGufpPGBFxw2WrXe2LsM5OTHQBLz4fvtkPhm_jR6S6ez-cXQ3TUqhlEoApDTGDPNMxpAmN6jwveKgShBpxpQsUpA85pYixksRIEvTVAJCLmTGmeiTq853493HFkOrV27rbTypo55n0TmXkbrpqNK7EDwavfH1Gvxec6YPPelDT_qrpwjzDt7VDe7_IfXz7On1R3PdaQIs8DfCH-6ft3p2DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401485456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Esenduran, Gökçe ; Hill, James A. ; Noh, In Joon</creator><creatorcontrib>Esenduran, Gökçe ; Hill, James A. ; Noh, In Joon</creatorcontrib><description>Each year, global consumers dispose of 20 million–50 million tons of electronic products, including laptops, tablets, and, most commonly, cell phones. Realizing the residual value in used electronics, consumers frequently look for ways to sell their devices, whereas independent parties (IPs) such as Gazelle and NextWorth and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) such as Apple compete in acquiring them. These firms also compete with online marketplaces such as eBay, which offer a channel for individuals to sell used devices to others. To succeed in this highly competitive market, buying firms (i.e., OEMs andIPs) must understand factors that influence sellers’ estimated utility and their decisions in a resale process. We conduct laboratory experiments with a two‐stage resale process, where subjects in the first stage choose a resale channel to sell their used cell phone. In the second stage, subjects evaluate a potential counteroffer decision, that is, post‐choice decision. Our results from the resale‐channel choice stage show that individuals have a higher sensitivity to price, time until payment, and online ratings when selling to an IP than when selling to an OEM or through an OM. No significant difference exists, however, in their sensitivity to IP or OEM data security policies. Our results from the post‐choice decision stage show that a seller's share in the counteroffer increases the likelihood of acceptance in all resale channels, whereas higher online ratings might increase or decrease the likelihood of accepting a counteroffer depending on the resale channel. Our laboratory experiment results generally are consistent, with some differences, when replicated on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-1478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-5956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/poms.13149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>choice models ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer electronics ; lab experiment ; Laboratories ; MTurk ; OEM ; online markets ; product acquisition ; used electronics</subject><ispartof>Production and operations management, 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.1188-1211</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>2020 Production and Operations Management Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-aa66fff8546131f5fe9ebd1a9ca32409672a61193637322eaa42226aea5364103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-aa66fff8546131f5fe9ebd1a9ca32409672a61193637322eaa42226aea5364103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/poms.13149$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/poms.13149$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Esenduran, Gökçe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, In Joon</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics</title><title>Production and operations management</title><description>Each year, global consumers dispose of 20 million–50 million tons of electronic products, including laptops, tablets, and, most commonly, cell phones. Realizing the residual value in used electronics, consumers frequently look for ways to sell their devices, whereas independent parties (IPs) such as Gazelle and NextWorth and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) such as Apple compete in acquiring them. These firms also compete with online marketplaces such as eBay, which offer a channel for individuals to sell used devices to others. To succeed in this highly competitive market, buying firms (i.e., OEMs andIPs) must understand factors that influence sellers’ estimated utility and their decisions in a resale process. We conduct laboratory experiments with a two‐stage resale process, where subjects in the first stage choose a resale channel to sell their used cell phone. In the second stage, subjects evaluate a potential counteroffer decision, that is, post‐choice decision. Our results from the resale‐channel choice stage show that individuals have a higher sensitivity to price, time until payment, and online ratings when selling to an IP than when selling to an OEM or through an OM. No significant difference exists, however, in their sensitivity to IP or OEM data security policies. Our results from the post‐choice decision stage show that a seller's share in the counteroffer increases the likelihood of acceptance in all resale channels, whereas higher online ratings might increase or decrease the likelihood of accepting a counteroffer depending on the resale channel. Our laboratory experiment results generally are consistent, with some differences, when replicated on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk).</description><subject>choice models</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer electronics</subject><subject>lab experiment</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>MTurk</subject><subject>OEM</subject><subject>online markets</subject><subject>product acquisition</subject><subject>used electronics</subject><issn>1059-1478</issn><issn>1937-5956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsXf0HAgyBsTTa72eYopVWhUlF7DuPupN2yTWqypfTfm7qKF3EuGcL33jweIZecDXic241bhwEXPFNHpMeVKJJc5fI47ixXCc-K4Sk5C2HFGCtEynpkMrcV-tCCrWq7oO0S6Wjp6hKpM3Rmm9oifcEAzeEfrMWGGufpPGBFxw2WrXe2LsM5OTHQBLz4fvtkPhm_jR6S6ez-cXQ3TUqhlEoApDTGDPNMxpAmN6jwveKgShBpxpQsUpA85pYixksRIEvTVAJCLmTGmeiTq853493HFkOrV27rbTypo55n0TmXkbrpqNK7EDwavfH1Gvxec6YPPelDT_qrpwjzDt7VDe7_IfXz7On1R3PdaQIs8DfCH-6ft3p2DA</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Esenduran, Gökçe</creator><creator>Hill, James A.</creator><creator>Noh, In Joon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics</title><author>Esenduran, Gökçe ; Hill, James A. ; Noh, In Joon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-aa66fff8546131f5fe9ebd1a9ca32409672a61193637322eaa42226aea5364103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>choice models</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer electronics</topic><topic>lab experiment</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>MTurk</topic><topic>OEM</topic><topic>online markets</topic><topic>product acquisition</topic><topic>used electronics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Esenduran, Gökçe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, In Joon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Esenduran, Gökçe</au><au>Hill, James A.</au><au>Noh, In Joon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics</atitle><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1188</spage><epage>1211</epage><pages>1188-1211</pages><issn>1059-1478</issn><eissn>1937-5956</eissn><abstract>Each year, global consumers dispose of 20 million–50 million tons of electronic products, including laptops, tablets, and, most commonly, cell phones. Realizing the residual value in used electronics, consumers frequently look for ways to sell their devices, whereas independent parties (IPs) such as Gazelle and NextWorth and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) such as Apple compete in acquiring them. These firms also compete with online marketplaces such as eBay, which offer a channel for individuals to sell used devices to others. To succeed in this highly competitive market, buying firms (i.e., OEMs andIPs) must understand factors that influence sellers’ estimated utility and their decisions in a resale process. We conduct laboratory experiments with a two‐stage resale process, where subjects in the first stage choose a resale channel to sell their used cell phone. In the second stage, subjects evaluate a potential counteroffer decision, that is, post‐choice decision. Our results from the resale‐channel choice stage show that individuals have a higher sensitivity to price, time until payment, and online ratings when selling to an IP than when selling to an OEM or through an OM. No significant difference exists, however, in their sensitivity to IP or OEM data security policies. Our results from the post‐choice decision stage show that a seller's share in the counteroffer increases the likelihood of acceptance in all resale channels, whereas higher online ratings might increase or decrease the likelihood of accepting a counteroffer depending on the resale channel. Our laboratory experiment results generally are consistent, with some differences, when replicated on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk).</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1111/poms.13149</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-1478
ispartof Production and operations management, 2020-05, Vol.29 (5), p.1188-1211
issn 1059-1478
1937-5956
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2401485456
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; SAGE Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects choice models
Consumer behavior
Consumer electronics
lab experiment
Laboratories
MTurk
OEM
online markets
product acquisition
used electronics
title Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A52%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20Choice%20of%20Online%20Resale%20Channel%20for%20Used%20Electronics&rft.jtitle=Production%20and%20operations%20management&rft.au=Esenduran,%20G%C3%B6k%C3%A7e&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1188&rft.epage=1211&rft.pages=1188-1211&rft.issn=1059-1478&rft.eissn=1937-5956&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/poms.13149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2401485456%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401485456&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1111_poms.13149&rfr_iscdi=true