Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron
Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron is a cold-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of insect conservation 2020-06, Vol.24 (3), p.445-457 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 457 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 445 |
container_title | Journal of insect conservation |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Ewing, S. R. Menéndez, R. Schofield, L. Bradbury, R. B. |
description | Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet
Erebia epiphron
is a cold-adapted butterfly found in alpine grasslands in mountainous regions of Europe. Efforts to devise conservation strategies for this climate change-threatened species are hampered due to its basic ecology being poorly understood. Here, we describe a study on the autecology of Mountain Ringlets at sites across its British distribution, focusing on the habitat preferences of egg-laying females as a proxy for larval preferences. Female Mountain Ringlets placed their eggs predominantly on
Nardus stricta
and
Festuca ovina
, but also on several other host plant species, suggesting larvae may be more broadly polyphagous than previously realised. Sites chosen for eggs had higher abundance of larval host plants, intermediate leaf litter cover, and lower cover of grass tussocks than random locations, as well as a shorter and sparser grass sward. Although the main host plant is ubiquitous in upland areas of Britain, our findings suggest that this butterfly’s egg and larval stages have specialised ecological requirements, requiring specific microhabitat features characterised by a narrow range of vegetation composition and structural characteristics. Many habitat associations are liable to be explicable as adaptations to ensure placement of eggs and larvae in sites within optimal (warm or buffered) microclimates. We tentatively suggest that the distribution of Mountain Ringlets in the landscape is thermally-constrained. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2400058167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2400058167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-20eba97f7b78c1efe6411ebed9583c1c7ab7edb589cc33b7b55cce8aa0b0a73f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQXUTBWv0DngJeXU023U32KKV-QEUQFW8hSWfblG2yJlmh_SX-XNNW9OZheDPMe29gXpadE3xFMGbXgWA-IjkucI5xUdT55iAbkJIVec1Keph6WlV5Rfn7cXYSwhJjXPOSD7KvN5hDlNE4i7RbdS6YXS_tDIXoex17D0imMmnpo7QRdR5mRkfnA3INcp_mV5UAUIAW9G40Wx8k285YQKqPEXzTri9RXAB6dL2NMjGejZ23ENHEgzISQWe6hXf2NDtqZBvg7AeH2evt5GV8n0-f7h7GN9Nc04rGvMCgZM0aphjXBBqoRoSAglldcqqJZlIxmKmS11pTqpgqS62BS4kVlow2dJhd7H077z56CFEsXe9tOimKUXpTyUnFEqvYs7R3IXhoROfNSvq1IFhsExD7BERKQOwSEJskontRSGQ7B_9n_Y_qG7r_j4U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400058167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ewing, S. R. ; Menéndez, R. ; Schofield, L. ; Bradbury, R. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ewing, S. R. ; Menéndez, R. ; Schofield, L. ; Bradbury, R. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet
Erebia epiphron
is a cold-adapted butterfly found in alpine grasslands in mountainous regions of Europe. Efforts to devise conservation strategies for this climate change-threatened species are hampered due to its basic ecology being poorly understood. Here, we describe a study on the autecology of Mountain Ringlets at sites across its British distribution, focusing on the habitat preferences of egg-laying females as a proxy for larval preferences. Female Mountain Ringlets placed their eggs predominantly on
Nardus stricta
and
Festuca ovina
, but also on several other host plant species, suggesting larvae may be more broadly polyphagous than previously realised. Sites chosen for eggs had higher abundance of larval host plants, intermediate leaf litter cover, and lower cover of grass tussocks than random locations, as well as a shorter and sparser grass sward. Although the main host plant is ubiquitous in upland areas of Britain, our findings suggest that this butterfly’s egg and larval stages have specialised ecological requirements, requiring specific microhabitat features characterised by a narrow range of vegetation composition and structural characteristics. Many habitat associations are liable to be explicable as adaptations to ensure placement of eggs and larvae in sites within optimal (warm or buffered) microclimates. We tentatively suggest that the distribution of Mountain Ringlets in the landscape is thermally-constrained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-638X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Animal Ecology ; Autecology ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies & moths ; Climate change ; Composition ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Ecological effects ; Egg laying ; Eggs ; Endangered & extinct species ; Entomology ; Erebia ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Habitat preferences ; Herbivores ; Host plants ; Larvae ; Leaf litter ; Life Sciences ; Microclimate ; Microenvironments ; Microhabitats ; Mountain regions ; Mountains ; Original Paper ; Oviposition ; Plant species ; Reproductive strategy ; Site selection ; Threatened species ; Vegetation ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect conservation, 2020-06, Vol.24 (3), p.445-457</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-20eba97f7b78c1efe6411ebed9583c1c7ab7edb589cc33b7b55cce8aa0b0a73f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-20eba97f7b78c1efe6411ebed9583c1c7ab7edb589cc33b7b55cce8aa0b0a73f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ewing, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, R. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron</title><title>Journal of insect conservation</title><addtitle>J Insect Conserv</addtitle><description>Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet
Erebia epiphron
is a cold-adapted butterfly found in alpine grasslands in mountainous regions of Europe. Efforts to devise conservation strategies for this climate change-threatened species are hampered due to its basic ecology being poorly understood. Here, we describe a study on the autecology of Mountain Ringlets at sites across its British distribution, focusing on the habitat preferences of egg-laying females as a proxy for larval preferences. Female Mountain Ringlets placed their eggs predominantly on
Nardus stricta
and
Festuca ovina
, but also on several other host plant species, suggesting larvae may be more broadly polyphagous than previously realised. Sites chosen for eggs had higher abundance of larval host plants, intermediate leaf litter cover, and lower cover of grass tussocks than random locations, as well as a shorter and sparser grass sward. Although the main host plant is ubiquitous in upland areas of Britain, our findings suggest that this butterfly’s egg and larval stages have specialised ecological requirements, requiring specific microhabitat features characterised by a narrow range of vegetation composition and structural characteristics. Many habitat associations are liable to be explicable as adaptations to ensure placement of eggs and larvae in sites within optimal (warm or buffered) microclimates. We tentatively suggest that the distribution of Mountain Ringlets in the landscape is thermally-constrained.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Autecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Egg laying</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Erebia</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Microenvironments</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Reproductive strategy</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1366-638X</issn><issn>1572-9753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQXUTBWv0DngJeXU023U32KKV-QEUQFW8hSWfblG2yJlmh_SX-XNNW9OZheDPMe29gXpadE3xFMGbXgWA-IjkucI5xUdT55iAbkJIVec1Keph6WlV5Rfn7cXYSwhJjXPOSD7KvN5hDlNE4i7RbdS6YXS_tDIXoex17D0imMmnpo7QRdR5mRkfnA3INcp_mV5UAUIAW9G40Wx8k285YQKqPEXzTri9RXAB6dL2NMjGejZ23ENHEgzISQWe6hXf2NDtqZBvg7AeH2evt5GV8n0-f7h7GN9Nc04rGvMCgZM0aphjXBBqoRoSAglldcqqJZlIxmKmS11pTqpgqS62BS4kVlow2dJhd7H077z56CFEsXe9tOimKUXpTyUnFEqvYs7R3IXhoROfNSvq1IFhsExD7BERKQOwSEJskontRSGQ7B_9n_Y_qG7r_j4U</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Ewing, S. R.</creator><creator>Menéndez, R.</creator><creator>Schofield, L.</creator><creator>Bradbury, R. B.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron</title><author>Ewing, S. R. ; Menéndez, R. ; Schofield, L. ; Bradbury, R. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-20eba97f7b78c1efe6411ebed9583c1c7ab7edb589cc33b7b55cce8aa0b0a73f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Autecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Egg laying</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Erebia</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Microenvironments</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Reproductive strategy</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ewing, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, R. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ewing, S. R.</au><au>Menéndez, R.</au><au>Schofield, L.</au><au>Bradbury, R. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Insect Conserv</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>457</epage><pages>445-457</pages><issn>1366-638X</issn><eissn>1572-9753</eissn><abstract>Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet
Erebia epiphron
is a cold-adapted butterfly found in alpine grasslands in mountainous regions of Europe. Efforts to devise conservation strategies for this climate change-threatened species are hampered due to its basic ecology being poorly understood. Here, we describe a study on the autecology of Mountain Ringlets at sites across its British distribution, focusing on the habitat preferences of egg-laying females as a proxy for larval preferences. Female Mountain Ringlets placed their eggs predominantly on
Nardus stricta
and
Festuca ovina
, but also on several other host plant species, suggesting larvae may be more broadly polyphagous than previously realised. Sites chosen for eggs had higher abundance of larval host plants, intermediate leaf litter cover, and lower cover of grass tussocks than random locations, as well as a shorter and sparser grass sward. Although the main host plant is ubiquitous in upland areas of Britain, our findings suggest that this butterfly’s egg and larval stages have specialised ecological requirements, requiring specific microhabitat features characterised by a narrow range of vegetation composition and structural characteristics. Many habitat associations are liable to be explicable as adaptations to ensure placement of eggs and larvae in sites within optimal (warm or buffered) microclimates. We tentatively suggest that the distribution of Mountain Ringlets in the landscape is thermally-constrained.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-638X |
ispartof | Journal of insect conservation, 2020-06, Vol.24 (3), p.445-457 |
issn | 1366-638X 1572-9753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2400058167 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adaptation Animal Ecology Autecology Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Butterflies & moths Climate change Composition Conservation Conservation Biology/Ecology Ecological effects Egg laying Eggs Endangered & extinct species Entomology Erebia Grasses Grasslands Habitat preferences Herbivores Host plants Larvae Leaf litter Life Sciences Microclimate Microenvironments Microhabitats Mountain regions Mountains Original Paper Oviposition Plant species Reproductive strategy Site selection Threatened species Vegetation Wildlife conservation |
title | Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vegetation%20composition%20and%20structure%20are%20important%20predictors%20of%20oviposition%20site%20selection%20in%20an%20alpine%20butterfly,%20the%20Mountain%20Ringlet%20Erebia%20epiphron&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20conservation&rft.au=Ewing,%20S.%20R.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=457&rft.pages=445-457&rft.issn=1366-638X&rft.eissn=1572-9753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2400058167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400058167&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |