Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron

Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron is a cold-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of insect conservation 2020-06, Vol.24 (3), p.445-457
Hauptverfasser: Ewing, S. R., Menéndez, R., Schofield, L., Bradbury, R. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 457
container_issue 3
container_start_page 445
container_title Journal of insect conservation
container_volume 24
creator Ewing, S. R.
Menéndez, R.
Schofield, L.
Bradbury, R. B.
description Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron is a cold-adapted butterfly found in alpine grasslands in mountainous regions of Europe. Efforts to devise conservation strategies for this climate change-threatened species are hampered due to its basic ecology being poorly understood. Here, we describe a study on the autecology of Mountain Ringlets at sites across its British distribution, focusing on the habitat preferences of egg-laying females as a proxy for larval preferences. Female Mountain Ringlets placed their eggs predominantly on Nardus stricta and Festuca ovina , but also on several other host plant species, suggesting larvae may be more broadly polyphagous than previously realised. Sites chosen for eggs had higher abundance of larval host plants, intermediate leaf litter cover, and lower cover of grass tussocks than random locations, as well as a shorter and sparser grass sward. Although the main host plant is ubiquitous in upland areas of Britain, our findings suggest that this butterfly’s egg and larval stages have specialised ecological requirements, requiring specific microhabitat features characterised by a narrow range of vegetation composition and structural characteristics. Many habitat associations are liable to be explicable as adaptations to ensure placement of eggs and larvae in sites within optimal (warm or buffered) microclimates. We tentatively suggest that the distribution of Mountain Ringlets in the landscape is thermally-constrained.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2400058167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2400058167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-20eba97f7b78c1efe6411ebed9583c1c7ab7edb589cc33b7b55cce8aa0b0a73f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQXUTBWv0DngJeXU023U32KKV-QEUQFW8hSWfblG2yJlmh_SX-XNNW9OZheDPMe29gXpadE3xFMGbXgWA-IjkucI5xUdT55iAbkJIVec1Keph6WlV5Rfn7cXYSwhJjXPOSD7KvN5hDlNE4i7RbdS6YXS_tDIXoex17D0imMmnpo7QRdR5mRkfnA3INcp_mV5UAUIAW9G40Wx8k285YQKqPEXzTri9RXAB6dL2NMjGejZ23ENHEgzISQWe6hXf2NDtqZBvg7AeH2evt5GV8n0-f7h7GN9Nc04rGvMCgZM0aphjXBBqoRoSAglldcqqJZlIxmKmS11pTqpgqS62BS4kVlow2dJhd7H077z56CFEsXe9tOimKUXpTyUnFEqvYs7R3IXhoROfNSvq1IFhsExD7BERKQOwSEJskontRSGQ7B_9n_Y_qG7r_j4U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400058167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ewing, S. R. ; Menéndez, R. ; Schofield, L. ; Bradbury, R. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ewing, S. R. ; Menéndez, R. ; Schofield, L. ; Bradbury, R. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron is a cold-adapted butterfly found in alpine grasslands in mountainous regions of Europe. Efforts to devise conservation strategies for this climate change-threatened species are hampered due to its basic ecology being poorly understood. Here, we describe a study on the autecology of Mountain Ringlets at sites across its British distribution, focusing on the habitat preferences of egg-laying females as a proxy for larval preferences. Female Mountain Ringlets placed their eggs predominantly on Nardus stricta and Festuca ovina , but also on several other host plant species, suggesting larvae may be more broadly polyphagous than previously realised. Sites chosen for eggs had higher abundance of larval host plants, intermediate leaf litter cover, and lower cover of grass tussocks than random locations, as well as a shorter and sparser grass sward. Although the main host plant is ubiquitous in upland areas of Britain, our findings suggest that this butterfly’s egg and larval stages have specialised ecological requirements, requiring specific microhabitat features characterised by a narrow range of vegetation composition and structural characteristics. Many habitat associations are liable to be explicable as adaptations to ensure placement of eggs and larvae in sites within optimal (warm or buffered) microclimates. We tentatively suggest that the distribution of Mountain Ringlets in the landscape is thermally-constrained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-638X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Animal Ecology ; Autecology ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Climate change ; Composition ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Ecological effects ; Egg laying ; Eggs ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Entomology ; Erebia ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Habitat preferences ; Herbivores ; Host plants ; Larvae ; Leaf litter ; Life Sciences ; Microclimate ; Microenvironments ; Microhabitats ; Mountain regions ; Mountains ; Original Paper ; Oviposition ; Plant species ; Reproductive strategy ; Site selection ; Threatened species ; Vegetation ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect conservation, 2020-06, Vol.24 (3), p.445-457</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-20eba97f7b78c1efe6411ebed9583c1c7ab7edb589cc33b7b55cce8aa0b0a73f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-20eba97f7b78c1efe6411ebed9583c1c7ab7edb589cc33b7b55cce8aa0b0a73f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ewing, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, R. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron</title><title>Journal of insect conservation</title><addtitle>J Insect Conserv</addtitle><description>Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron is a cold-adapted butterfly found in alpine grasslands in mountainous regions of Europe. Efforts to devise conservation strategies for this climate change-threatened species are hampered due to its basic ecology being poorly understood. Here, we describe a study on the autecology of Mountain Ringlets at sites across its British distribution, focusing on the habitat preferences of egg-laying females as a proxy for larval preferences. Female Mountain Ringlets placed their eggs predominantly on Nardus stricta and Festuca ovina , but also on several other host plant species, suggesting larvae may be more broadly polyphagous than previously realised. Sites chosen for eggs had higher abundance of larval host plants, intermediate leaf litter cover, and lower cover of grass tussocks than random locations, as well as a shorter and sparser grass sward. Although the main host plant is ubiquitous in upland areas of Britain, our findings suggest that this butterfly’s egg and larval stages have specialised ecological requirements, requiring specific microhabitat features characterised by a narrow range of vegetation composition and structural characteristics. Many habitat associations are liable to be explicable as adaptations to ensure placement of eggs and larvae in sites within optimal (warm or buffered) microclimates. We tentatively suggest that the distribution of Mountain Ringlets in the landscape is thermally-constrained.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Autecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Egg laying</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Erebia</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Microenvironments</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Reproductive strategy</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1366-638X</issn><issn>1572-9753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQXUTBWv0DngJeXU023U32KKV-QEUQFW8hSWfblG2yJlmh_SX-XNNW9OZheDPMe29gXpadE3xFMGbXgWA-IjkucI5xUdT55iAbkJIVec1Keph6WlV5Rfn7cXYSwhJjXPOSD7KvN5hDlNE4i7RbdS6YXS_tDIXoex17D0imMmnpo7QRdR5mRkfnA3INcp_mV5UAUIAW9G40Wx8k285YQKqPEXzTri9RXAB6dL2NMjGejZ23ENHEgzISQWe6hXf2NDtqZBvg7AeH2evt5GV8n0-f7h7GN9Nc04rGvMCgZM0aphjXBBqoRoSAglldcqqJZlIxmKmS11pTqpgqS62BS4kVlow2dJhd7H077z56CFEsXe9tOimKUXpTyUnFEqvYs7R3IXhoROfNSvq1IFhsExD7BERKQOwSEJskontRSGQ7B_9n_Y_qG7r_j4U</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Ewing, S. R.</creator><creator>Menéndez, R.</creator><creator>Schofield, L.</creator><creator>Bradbury, R. B.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron</title><author>Ewing, S. R. ; Menéndez, R. ; Schofield, L. ; Bradbury, R. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-20eba97f7b78c1efe6411ebed9583c1c7ab7edb589cc33b7b55cce8aa0b0a73f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Autecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Egg laying</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Erebia</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Microenvironments</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Reproductive strategy</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ewing, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, R. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ewing, S. R.</au><au>Menéndez, R.</au><au>Schofield, L.</au><au>Bradbury, R. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Insect Conserv</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>457</epage><pages>445-457</pages><issn>1366-638X</issn><eissn>1572-9753</eissn><abstract>Knowledge of species’ ecological requirements is key for designing effective conservation management. In butterflies, the needs of larval stages are often the most specialised part of the life-cycle, but for many species information on this is lacking. The Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron is a cold-adapted butterfly found in alpine grasslands in mountainous regions of Europe. Efforts to devise conservation strategies for this climate change-threatened species are hampered due to its basic ecology being poorly understood. Here, we describe a study on the autecology of Mountain Ringlets at sites across its British distribution, focusing on the habitat preferences of egg-laying females as a proxy for larval preferences. Female Mountain Ringlets placed their eggs predominantly on Nardus stricta and Festuca ovina , but also on several other host plant species, suggesting larvae may be more broadly polyphagous than previously realised. Sites chosen for eggs had higher abundance of larval host plants, intermediate leaf litter cover, and lower cover of grass tussocks than random locations, as well as a shorter and sparser grass sward. Although the main host plant is ubiquitous in upland areas of Britain, our findings suggest that this butterfly’s egg and larval stages have specialised ecological requirements, requiring specific microhabitat features characterised by a narrow range of vegetation composition and structural characteristics. Many habitat associations are liable to be explicable as adaptations to ensure placement of eggs and larvae in sites within optimal (warm or buffered) microclimates. We tentatively suggest that the distribution of Mountain Ringlets in the landscape is thermally-constrained.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1366-638X
ispartof Journal of insect conservation, 2020-06, Vol.24 (3), p.445-457
issn 1366-638X
1572-9753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2400058167
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adaptation
Animal Ecology
Autecology
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Butterflies & moths
Climate change
Composition
Conservation
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Ecological effects
Egg laying
Eggs
Endangered & extinct species
Entomology
Erebia
Grasses
Grasslands
Habitat preferences
Herbivores
Host plants
Larvae
Leaf litter
Life Sciences
Microclimate
Microenvironments
Microhabitats
Mountain regions
Mountains
Original Paper
Oviposition
Plant species
Reproductive strategy
Site selection
Threatened species
Vegetation
Wildlife conservation
title Vegetation composition and structure are important predictors of oviposition site selection in an alpine butterfly, the Mountain Ringlet Erebia epiphron
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vegetation%20composition%20and%20structure%20are%20important%20predictors%20of%20oviposition%20site%20selection%20in%20an%20alpine%20butterfly,%20the%20Mountain%20Ringlet%20Erebia%20epiphron&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20conservation&rft.au=Ewing,%20S.%20R.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=457&rft.pages=445-457&rft.issn=1366-638X&rft.eissn=1572-9753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10841-020-00229-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2400058167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400058167&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true