The Impact of No-Till, Conservation, and Conventional Tillage Systems on Erosion and Soil Properties in Lower Austria

The effect of long-term (about 25 years) use of different farming practices on a set of soil properties and development of erosion in Lower Austria has been studied. Three tillage systems—zero, or no-till (NT); minimum, or conservation (CS); and conventional (CV)—are compared. The comparison demonst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eurasian soil science 2020-04, Vol.53 (4), p.503-511
Hauptverfasser: Komissarov, M. A., Klik, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 511
container_issue 4
container_start_page 503
container_title Eurasian soil science
container_volume 53
creator Komissarov, M. A.
Klik, A.
description The effect of long-term (about 25 years) use of different farming practices on a set of soil properties and development of erosion in Lower Austria has been studied. Three tillage systems—zero, or no-till (NT); minimum, or conservation (CS); and conventional (CV)—are compared. The comparison demonstrates that the properties of Typic Argiudols (Luvic Phaeozems), formed on steep (13.2%) slopes, change depending on both the tillage type and the position on the slope. Unlike the CV tillage, the soil-saving technologies provide higher contents of nutrients, silt, and clay, as well as better water permeability and water stability of soil aggregates. Despite an almost doubled amount of lumpy fractions (>10 mm), the soil aggregate states after NT and CS tillage are estimated as “excellent”. Independently of the tillage system, all agrochemical, electrophysical, and hydrophysical parameters (except for pH and bulk density) increase downward the slope, which is associated with erosion, namely, the washout of suspended sediments by water flows. The C org content in the soil tightly correlates with the water stability of soil aggregates ( r = 0.91), the concentration of soluble humic substances and fine solids (SAK; r = 0.76), and electroconductivity ( r = 0.75). An anti-erosion efficiency of tillage practice increases in the series CV–CS–NT. The NT or CS systems are recommended for the erosion-prone slopes of Alpine foothills.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S1064229320040079
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2399896977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A718449915</galeid><sourcerecordid>A718449915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-3a56306e4f5c79dc577ab7af189884c1afcdac35d83dd99abbc5d38c4696815f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhhdR8PMHeAt4dWuy2WySYyl-FIoKreBtmWaTmrJNarKt-O_NuoIHkTlkMu_7DDNMll0SPCKEljdzgquyKCQtMC4x5vIgOyGMVTmR7PUw5UnOe_04O41xjTEVohQn2W7xptF0swXVIW_Qo88Xtm2v0cS7qMMeOuvdNQLX9JW9dv0fWtSbYKXR_DN2ehORd-g2-JjEb-_c2xY9B7_VobM6IuvQzH_ogMa72AUL59mRgTbqi5_3LHu5u11MHvLZ0_10Mp7lQLnocgqsorjSpWGKy0YxzmHJwRAh0_SKgFENKMoaQZtGSlguFWuoUGUlK0GYoWfZ1dB3G_z7TseuXvtdSAvEuqBSCllJzpNrNLhW0OraOuO7ACpFozdWeaeNTfUxJ6IspSQsAWQAVNo5Bm3qbbAbCJ81wXV_jvrPORJTDExMXrfS4XeU_6EvePGMZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399896977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of No-Till, Conservation, and Conventional Tillage Systems on Erosion and Soil Properties in Lower Austria</title><source>Springer journals</source><creator>Komissarov, M. A. ; Klik, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Komissarov, M. A. ; Klik, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of long-term (about 25 years) use of different farming practices on a set of soil properties and development of erosion in Lower Austria has been studied. Three tillage systems—zero, or no-till (NT); minimum, or conservation (CS); and conventional (CV)—are compared. The comparison demonstrates that the properties of Typic Argiudols (Luvic Phaeozems), formed on steep (13.2%) slopes, change depending on both the tillage type and the position on the slope. Unlike the CV tillage, the soil-saving technologies provide higher contents of nutrients, silt, and clay, as well as better water permeability and water stability of soil aggregates. Despite an almost doubled amount of lumpy fractions (&gt;10 mm), the soil aggregate states after NT and CS tillage are estimated as “excellent”. Independently of the tillage system, all agrochemical, electrophysical, and hydrophysical parameters (except for pH and bulk density) increase downward the slope, which is associated with erosion, namely, the washout of suspended sediments by water flows. The C org content in the soil tightly correlates with the water stability of soil aggregates ( r = 0.91), the concentration of soluble humic substances and fine solids (SAK; r = 0.76), and electroconductivity ( r = 0.75). An anti-erosion efficiency of tillage practice increases in the series CV–CS–NT. The NT or CS systems are recommended for the erosion-prone slopes of Alpine foothills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-2293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-195X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S1064229320040079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Aggregates ; Agricultural practices ; Agrochemicals ; Analysis ; Bulk density ; Clay ; Conservation ; Conservation of Soils ; Conservation tillage ; Degradation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Foothills ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Humic acids ; No-tillage ; Nutrients ; Permeability ; Rehabilitation ; Sediments ; Sediments (Geology) ; Soil aggregates ; Soil erosion ; Soil permeability ; Soil properties ; Soil stability ; Soil structure ; Soil water ; Soils ; Suspended sediments ; Tillage ; Washout ; Water flow ; Water stability</subject><ispartof>Eurasian soil science, 2020-04, Vol.53 (4), p.503-511</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-3a56306e4f5c79dc577ab7af189884c1afcdac35d83dd99abbc5d38c4696815f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-3a56306e4f5c79dc577ab7af189884c1afcdac35d83dd99abbc5d38c4696815f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S1064229320040079$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1064229320040079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Komissarov, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klik, A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of No-Till, Conservation, and Conventional Tillage Systems on Erosion and Soil Properties in Lower Austria</title><title>Eurasian soil science</title><addtitle>Eurasian Soil Sc</addtitle><description>The effect of long-term (about 25 years) use of different farming practices on a set of soil properties and development of erosion in Lower Austria has been studied. Three tillage systems—zero, or no-till (NT); minimum, or conservation (CS); and conventional (CV)—are compared. The comparison demonstrates that the properties of Typic Argiudols (Luvic Phaeozems), formed on steep (13.2%) slopes, change depending on both the tillage type and the position on the slope. Unlike the CV tillage, the soil-saving technologies provide higher contents of nutrients, silt, and clay, as well as better water permeability and water stability of soil aggregates. Despite an almost doubled amount of lumpy fractions (&gt;10 mm), the soil aggregate states after NT and CS tillage are estimated as “excellent”. Independently of the tillage system, all agrochemical, electrophysical, and hydrophysical parameters (except for pH and bulk density) increase downward the slope, which is associated with erosion, namely, the washout of suspended sediments by water flows. The C org content in the soil tightly correlates with the water stability of soil aggregates ( r = 0.91), the concentration of soluble humic substances and fine solids (SAK; r = 0.76), and electroconductivity ( r = 0.75). An anti-erosion efficiency of tillage practice increases in the series CV–CS–NT. The NT or CS systems are recommended for the erosion-prone slopes of Alpine foothills.</description><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Soils</subject><subject>Conservation tillage</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Foothills</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Humic acids</subject><subject>No-tillage</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sediments (Geology)</subject><subject>Soil aggregates</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil permeability</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Suspended sediments</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Washout</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><subject>Water stability</subject><issn>1064-2293</issn><issn>1556-195X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhhdR8PMHeAt4dWuy2WySYyl-FIoKreBtmWaTmrJNarKt-O_NuoIHkTlkMu_7DDNMll0SPCKEljdzgquyKCQtMC4x5vIgOyGMVTmR7PUw5UnOe_04O41xjTEVohQn2W7xptF0swXVIW_Qo88Xtm2v0cS7qMMeOuvdNQLX9JW9dv0fWtSbYKXR_DN2ehORd-g2-JjEb-_c2xY9B7_VobM6IuvQzH_ogMa72AUL59mRgTbqi5_3LHu5u11MHvLZ0_10Mp7lQLnocgqsorjSpWGKy0YxzmHJwRAh0_SKgFENKMoaQZtGSlguFWuoUGUlK0GYoWfZ1dB3G_z7TseuXvtdSAvEuqBSCllJzpNrNLhW0OraOuO7ACpFozdWeaeNTfUxJ6IspSQsAWQAVNo5Bm3qbbAbCJ81wXV_jvrPORJTDExMXrfS4XeU_6EvePGMZA</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Komissarov, M. A.</creator><creator>Klik, A.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>The Impact of No-Till, Conservation, and Conventional Tillage Systems on Erosion and Soil Properties in Lower Austria</title><author>Komissarov, M. A. ; Klik, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-3a56306e4f5c79dc577ab7af189884c1afcdac35d83dd99abbc5d38c4696815f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Soils</topic><topic>Conservation tillage</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Foothills</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Humic acids</topic><topic>No-tillage</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sediments (Geology)</topic><topic>Soil aggregates</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil permeability</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Suspended sediments</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Washout</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><topic>Water stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Komissarov, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klik, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Eurasian soil science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Komissarov, M. A.</au><au>Klik, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of No-Till, Conservation, and Conventional Tillage Systems on Erosion and Soil Properties in Lower Austria</atitle><jtitle>Eurasian soil science</jtitle><stitle>Eurasian Soil Sc</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>511</epage><pages>503-511</pages><issn>1064-2293</issn><eissn>1556-195X</eissn><abstract>The effect of long-term (about 25 years) use of different farming practices on a set of soil properties and development of erosion in Lower Austria has been studied. Three tillage systems—zero, or no-till (NT); minimum, or conservation (CS); and conventional (CV)—are compared. The comparison demonstrates that the properties of Typic Argiudols (Luvic Phaeozems), formed on steep (13.2%) slopes, change depending on both the tillage type and the position on the slope. Unlike the CV tillage, the soil-saving technologies provide higher contents of nutrients, silt, and clay, as well as better water permeability and water stability of soil aggregates. Despite an almost doubled amount of lumpy fractions (&gt;10 mm), the soil aggregate states after NT and CS tillage are estimated as “excellent”. Independently of the tillage system, all agrochemical, electrophysical, and hydrophysical parameters (except for pH and bulk density) increase downward the slope, which is associated with erosion, namely, the washout of suspended sediments by water flows. The C org content in the soil tightly correlates with the water stability of soil aggregates ( r = 0.91), the concentration of soluble humic substances and fine solids (SAK; r = 0.76), and electroconductivity ( r = 0.75). An anti-erosion efficiency of tillage practice increases in the series CV–CS–NT. The NT or CS systems are recommended for the erosion-prone slopes of Alpine foothills.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S1064229320040079</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-2293
ispartof Eurasian soil science, 2020-04, Vol.53 (4), p.503-511
issn 1064-2293
1556-195X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2399896977
source Springer journals
subjects Aggregates
Agricultural practices
Agrochemicals
Analysis
Bulk density
Clay
Conservation
Conservation of Soils
Conservation tillage
Degradation
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Foothills
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Humic acids
No-tillage
Nutrients
Permeability
Rehabilitation
Sediments
Sediments (Geology)
Soil aggregates
Soil erosion
Soil permeability
Soil properties
Soil stability
Soil structure
Soil water
Soils
Suspended sediments
Tillage
Washout
Water flow
Water stability
title The Impact of No-Till, Conservation, and Conventional Tillage Systems on Erosion and Soil Properties in Lower Austria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A49%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20No-Till,%20Conservation,%20and%20Conventional%20Tillage%20Systems%20on%20Erosion%20and%20Soil%20Properties%20in%20Lower%20Austria&rft.jtitle=Eurasian%20soil%20science&rft.au=Komissarov,%20M.%20A.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=511&rft.pages=503-511&rft.issn=1064-2293&rft.eissn=1556-195X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S1064229320040079&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA718449915%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399896977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A718449915&rfr_iscdi=true