Correlation of the rate of progression of visual field loss between Guided Progression Analysis (GPA II) and PeriDataTM program in glaucoma patients: Pilot study

Correlation of the rate of progression of visual field loss between Guided Progression Analysis (GPA II) and PeriDataTM program in glaucoma patients: Pilot study

Purpose To assess the correlation of progression rate measured by GPAII using visual field index (VFI%) and PeriDataTM employing functional equivalent score (FES) in glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective, observational study including 54 eyes of 37 medically treated glaucoma patients with at leas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2011-09, Vol.89 (s248), p.0-0
Hauptverfasser: POURJAVAN, S, PEETERS, H, DETRY‐MOREL, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Glaucoma
Surgery
Visual field
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 0
container_issue s248
container_start_page 0
container_title Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)
container_volume 89
creator POURJAVAN, S
PEETERS, H
DETRY‐MOREL, M
description Purpose To assess the correlation of progression rate measured by GPAII using visual field index (VFI%) and PeriDataTM employing functional equivalent score (FES) in glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective, observational study including 54 eyes of 37 medically treated glaucoma patients with at least 5 reliable visual field examinations in minimum 2 years. Only patients with a negative rate of progression with VFI were taken into account to calculate their rate of progression and loss of FES. Patients who underwent filtering surgery or laser trabeculoplasty during the follow‐up period were excluded. Results Mean age was 75.7 ±13.4 yrs. the patients performed their visual field with Humphrey standard automated perimeter (Sita Standard 24‐2). The mean follow‐up was 7.5 ± 2.5 yrs. The mean of progression by GPA (%/year) and PeriData FES index (%/year) were: ‐2.0 ± 2.2 (range= ‐10.6 to ‐0.2 per year) and ‐3.18 ± 2.5 (range: ‐9.3 to 2.8 per year) respectively. There was an excellent correlation between GPAII index VFI% loss per year and PeriData FES loss per year (
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.2254.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2399672765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2399672765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1294-2ae57de9a56713f968a9d0ff63a78559091b578d44de9c36679d0571c297321a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1LxDAQLaLg528w4EUPW5u0STbiZVl1XVBcUMFbGNupZsm2a5Kq-3P8p6asiEdzyWPmvWHmvSQ5pFlK4zudp1RyPsilGKYsozRljBfp50ay81vf_MX8aTvZ9X6eZYIKUewkX-PWObQQTNuQtibhFYmDgD1euvbFofc_rXfjO7CkNmgrYlvvyTOGD8SGTDpTYUVmf_ijBuzKG0-OJ7MRmU5PCDSRgc5cQICH2_VwWBDTkBcLXdkugCzjGtgEf0ZmxraB-NBVq_1kqwbr8eDn30sery4fxteDm7vJdDy6GZSUqWLAALmsUAEXkua1EkNQVVbXIgc55Fxlij5zOayKIpLKXAgZ21zSkimZMwr5XnK0nhs3e-vQBz1vOxfP8JrlSgnJpOCRJdes0kUHHNZ66cwC3ErTTPd56Lnuvda977rPQ_d56M-oPF8rP4zF1X9lenR336P8GwNOkes</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399672765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of the rate of progression of visual field loss between Guided Progression Analysis (GPA II) and PeriDataTM program in glaucoma patients: Pilot study</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>POURJAVAN, S ; PEETERS, H ; DETRY‐MOREL, M</creator><creatorcontrib>POURJAVAN, S ; PEETERS, H ; DETRY‐MOREL, M</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To assess the correlation of progression rate measured by GPAII using visual field index (VFI%) and PeriDataTM employing functional equivalent score (FES) in glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective, observational study including 54 eyes of 37 medically treated glaucoma patients with at least 5 reliable visual field examinations in minimum 2 years. Only patients with a negative rate of progression with VFI were taken into account to calculate their rate of progression and loss of FES. Patients who underwent filtering surgery or laser trabeculoplasty during the follow‐up period were excluded. Results Mean age was 75.7 ±13.4 yrs. the patients performed their visual field with Humphrey standard automated perimeter (Sita Standard 24‐2). The mean follow‐up was 7.5 ± 2.5 yrs. The mean of progression by GPA (%/year) and PeriData FES index (%/year) were: ‐2.0 ± 2.2 (range= ‐10.6 to ‐0.2 per year) and ‐3.18 ± 2.5 (range: ‐9.3 to 2.8 per year) respectively. There was an excellent correlation between GPAII index VFI% loss per year and PeriData FES loss per year (&lt;0.001) for the total group. In contrary when the group was limited to low‐ moderate progressors (VFI% loss per year ≥ ‐2), there was no correlation between the two different indexes. Conclusion In this study we couldn't find any correlation between VFI% and FES% in the clinically low to moderate visual field progression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.2254.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Glaucoma ; Surgery ; Visual field</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2011-09, Vol.89 (s248), p.0-0</ispartof><rights>2011 Acta Ophthalmologica</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Sep 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1755-3768.2011.2254.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,27929,27930,45580,46838</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>POURJAVAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEETERS, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DETRY‐MOREL, M</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of the rate of progression of visual field loss between Guided Progression Analysis (GPA II) and PeriDataTM program in glaucoma patients: Pilot study</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><description>Purpose To assess the correlation of progression rate measured by GPAII using visual field index (VFI%) and PeriDataTM employing functional equivalent score (FES) in glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective, observational study including 54 eyes of 37 medically treated glaucoma patients with at least 5 reliable visual field examinations in minimum 2 years. Only patients with a negative rate of progression with VFI were taken into account to calculate their rate of progression and loss of FES. Patients who underwent filtering surgery or laser trabeculoplasty during the follow‐up period were excluded. Results Mean age was 75.7 ±13.4 yrs. the patients performed their visual field with Humphrey standard automated perimeter (Sita Standard 24‐2). The mean follow‐up was 7.5 ± 2.5 yrs. The mean of progression by GPA (%/year) and PeriData FES index (%/year) were: ‐2.0 ± 2.2 (range= ‐10.6 to ‐0.2 per year) and ‐3.18 ± 2.5 (range: ‐9.3 to 2.8 per year) respectively. There was an excellent correlation between GPAII index VFI% loss per year and PeriData FES loss per year (&lt;0.001) for the total group. In contrary when the group was limited to low‐ moderate progressors (VFI% loss per year ≥ ‐2), there was no correlation between the two different indexes. Conclusion In this study we couldn't find any correlation between VFI% and FES% in the clinically low to moderate visual field progression.</description><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Visual field</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1LxDAQLaLg528w4EUPW5u0STbiZVl1XVBcUMFbGNupZsm2a5Kq-3P8p6asiEdzyWPmvWHmvSQ5pFlK4zudp1RyPsilGKYsozRljBfp50ay81vf_MX8aTvZ9X6eZYIKUewkX-PWObQQTNuQtibhFYmDgD1euvbFofc_rXfjO7CkNmgrYlvvyTOGD8SGTDpTYUVmf_ijBuzKG0-OJ7MRmU5PCDSRgc5cQICH2_VwWBDTkBcLXdkugCzjGtgEf0ZmxraB-NBVq_1kqwbr8eDn30sery4fxteDm7vJdDy6GZSUqWLAALmsUAEXkua1EkNQVVbXIgc55Fxlij5zOayKIpLKXAgZ21zSkimZMwr5XnK0nhs3e-vQBz1vOxfP8JrlSgnJpOCRJdes0kUHHNZ66cwC3ErTTPd56Lnuvda977rPQ_d56M-oPF8rP4zF1X9lenR336P8GwNOkes</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>POURJAVAN, S</creator><creator>PEETERS, H</creator><creator>DETRY‐MOREL, M</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Correlation of the rate of progression of visual field loss between Guided Progression Analysis (GPA II) and PeriDataTM program in glaucoma patients: Pilot study</title><author>POURJAVAN, S ; PEETERS, H ; DETRY‐MOREL, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1294-2ae57de9a56713f968a9d0ff63a78559091b578d44de9c36679d0571c297321a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Visual field</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>POURJAVAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEETERS, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DETRY‐MOREL, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>POURJAVAN, S</au><au>PEETERS, H</au><au>DETRY‐MOREL, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of the rate of progression of visual field loss between Guided Progression Analysis (GPA II) and PeriDataTM program in glaucoma patients: Pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>s248</issue><spage>0</spage><epage>0</epage><pages>0-0</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>Purpose To assess the correlation of progression rate measured by GPAII using visual field index (VFI%) and PeriDataTM employing functional equivalent score (FES) in glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective, observational study including 54 eyes of 37 medically treated glaucoma patients with at least 5 reliable visual field examinations in minimum 2 years. Only patients with a negative rate of progression with VFI were taken into account to calculate their rate of progression and loss of FES. Patients who underwent filtering surgery or laser trabeculoplasty during the follow‐up period were excluded. Results Mean age was 75.7 ±13.4 yrs. the patients performed their visual field with Humphrey standard automated perimeter (Sita Standard 24‐2). The mean follow‐up was 7.5 ± 2.5 yrs. The mean of progression by GPA (%/year) and PeriData FES index (%/year) were: ‐2.0 ± 2.2 (range= ‐10.6 to ‐0.2 per year) and ‐3.18 ± 2.5 (range: ‐9.3 to 2.8 per year) respectively. There was an excellent correlation between GPAII index VFI% loss per year and PeriData FES loss per year (&lt;0.001) for the total group. In contrary when the group was limited to low‐ moderate progressors (VFI% loss per year ≥ ‐2), there was no correlation between the two different indexes. Conclusion In this study we couldn't find any correlation between VFI% and FES% in the clinically low to moderate visual field progression.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.2254.x</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-375X
ispartof Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2011-09, Vol.89 (s248), p.0-0
issn 1755-375X
1755-3768
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2399672765
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Glaucoma
Surgery
Visual field
title Correlation of the rate of progression of visual field loss between Guided Progression Analysis (GPA II) and PeriDataTM program in glaucoma patients: Pilot study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T01%3A58%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20the%20rate%20of%20progression%20of%20visual%20field%20loss%20between%20Guided%20Progression%20Analysis%20(GPA%20II)%20and%20PeriDataTM%20program%20in%20glaucoma%20patients:%20Pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=POURJAVAN,%20S&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=s248&rft.spage=0&rft.epage=0&rft.pages=0-0&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.2254.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2399672765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399672765&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true