Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea
South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3151, Article 3151 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3151 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Kim, Ju-Hee Kim, Sin-Young Yoo, Seung-Hoon |
description | South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article examines the public acceptance of the plan by employing contingent valuation (CV). A nationwide CV survey of 1000 households was performed to collect the data on the willingness to pay (WTP) for implementing the plan using electricity charges as a payment vehicle during October 2018. More specifically, a dichotomous choice question to ask interviewees whether they have an intention of paying an offered bid and a spike model to treat the zero WTP observations were employed. The estimate for monthly WTP was KRW 3646 (USD 3.27) per household. When 10 years of the payment period presented in the survey and forecasted values of residential RE electricity consumption from 2018 to 2030 were used, the WTP was worth KRW 60.4 (USD 0.05) per kWh in 2018 constant price. The WTP amounts to 56.5% of the price for residential electricity (KRW 106.9 or USD 0.10 per kWh). That is, the RE electricity produced through implementing the plan has a premium of 56.5% over the current electricity. Overall, it is concluded that public acceptance of the plan has been secured. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12083151 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2399643172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2399643172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef97099f15e2c24d512ba4376e25bc61f8e0c27efa2ac8d70c154c49cc33f1523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEElXphi-wyg4U8CNOYnZVVB6iEhWvbeQ44zZVahfHoerfk1AELJnN3MW5M9IJglOCLxkT-KppCcUpI5wcBAOKExISzPHhn3wcjJpmhbthjAgSD4LNvC3qSqGJUrDx0ihAViO_BDR-AgNbWdSApgbcYocYphjNa2nG12j6UZXQ09rZNZIos8ZXZgHGozdZt9JX1qBn35Y7VHXBtn6JHqwDeRIcaVk3MPrew-D1ZvqS3YWzx9v7bDILFYuJD0GLBAuhCQeqaFRyQgsZsSQGygsVE50CVjQBLalUaZlgRXikIqEUY12JsmFwtr-7cfa9hcbnK9s6073MKRMijhhJeup8Tylnm8aBzjeuWku3ywnOe6n5r9QOvtjDWyisblTVC_gpdFI541ykSZfSqKPT_9NZ5b-UZbY1nn0CCiGIgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399643172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Kim, Ju-Hee ; Kim, Sin-Young ; Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju-Hee ; Kim, Sin-Young ; Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><description>South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article examines the public acceptance of the plan by employing contingent valuation (CV). A nationwide CV survey of 1000 households was performed to collect the data on the willingness to pay (WTP) for implementing the plan using electricity charges as a payment vehicle during October 2018. More specifically, a dichotomous choice question to ask interviewees whether they have an intention of paying an offered bid and a spike model to treat the zero WTP observations were employed. The estimate for monthly WTP was KRW 3646 (USD 3.27) per household. When 10 years of the payment period presented in the survey and forecasted values of residential RE electricity consumption from 2018 to 2030 were used, the WTP was worth KRW 60.4 (USD 0.05) per kWh in 2018 constant price. The WTP amounts to 56.5% of the price for residential electricity (KRW 106.9 or USD 0.10 per kWh). That is, the RE electricity produced through implementing the plan has a premium of 56.5% over the current electricity. Overall, it is concluded that public acceptance of the plan has been secured.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12083151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Coal-fired power plants ; Electricity ; Electricity consumption ; Electricity pricing ; Energy ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Households ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Methods ; Motivation ; Natural & organic foods ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear power plants ; Polls & surveys ; Preferences ; Questionnaires ; Residential energy ; Science & Technology ; Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Solar energy ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Theory ; Valuation ; Willingness to pay]]></subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3151, Article 3151</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>27</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000535598700084</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef97099f15e2c24d512ba4376e25bc61f8e0c27efa2ac8d70c154c49cc33f1523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef97099f15e2c24d512ba4376e25bc61f8e0c27efa2ac8d70c154c49cc33f1523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5048-219X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><title>Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea</title><title>Sustainability</title><addtitle>SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL</addtitle><description>South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article examines the public acceptance of the plan by employing contingent valuation (CV). A nationwide CV survey of 1000 households was performed to collect the data on the willingness to pay (WTP) for implementing the plan using electricity charges as a payment vehicle during October 2018. More specifically, a dichotomous choice question to ask interviewees whether they have an intention of paying an offered bid and a spike model to treat the zero WTP observations were employed. The estimate for monthly WTP was KRW 3646 (USD 3.27) per household. When 10 years of the payment period presented in the survey and forecasted values of residential RE electricity consumption from 2018 to 2030 were used, the WTP was worth KRW 60.4 (USD 0.05) per kWh in 2018 constant price. The WTP amounts to 56.5% of the price for residential electricity (KRW 106.9 or USD 0.10 per kWh). That is, the RE electricity produced through implementing the plan has a premium of 56.5% over the current electricity. Overall, it is concluded that public acceptance of the plan has been secured.</description><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity consumption</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Studies</subject><subject>Green & Sustainable Science & Technology</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Natural & organic foods</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Science & Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEElXphi-wyg4U8CNOYnZVVB6iEhWvbeQ44zZVahfHoerfk1AELJnN3MW5M9IJglOCLxkT-KppCcUpI5wcBAOKExISzPHhn3wcjJpmhbthjAgSD4LNvC3qSqGJUrDx0ihAViO_BDR-AgNbWdSApgbcYocYphjNa2nG12j6UZXQ09rZNZIos8ZXZgHGozdZt9JX1qBn35Y7VHXBtn6JHqwDeRIcaVk3MPrew-D1ZvqS3YWzx9v7bDILFYuJD0GLBAuhCQeqaFRyQgsZsSQGygsVE50CVjQBLalUaZlgRXikIqEUY12JsmFwtr-7cfa9hcbnK9s6073MKRMijhhJeup8Tylnm8aBzjeuWku3ywnOe6n5r9QOvtjDWyisblTVC_gpdFI541ykSZfSqKPT_9NZ5b-UZbY1nn0CCiGIgQ</recordid><startdate>20200414</startdate><enddate>20200414</enddate><creator>Kim, Ju-Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Sin-Young</creator><creator>Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-219X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200414</creationdate><title>Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea</title><author>Kim, Ju-Hee ; Kim, Sin-Young ; Yoo, Seung-Hoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef97099f15e2c24d512ba4376e25bc61f8e0c27efa2ac8d70c154c49cc33f1523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity consumption</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Studies</topic><topic>Green & Sustainable Science & Technology</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Natural & organic foods</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Science & Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Ju-Hee</au><au>Kim, Sin-Young</au><au>Yoo, Seung-Hoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><stitle>SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL</stitle><date>2020-04-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3151</spage><pages>3151-</pages><artnum>3151</artnum><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article examines the public acceptance of the plan by employing contingent valuation (CV). A nationwide CV survey of 1000 households was performed to collect the data on the willingness to pay (WTP) for implementing the plan using electricity charges as a payment vehicle during October 2018. More specifically, a dichotomous choice question to ask interviewees whether they have an intention of paying an offered bid and a spike model to treat the zero WTP observations were employed. The estimate for monthly WTP was KRW 3646 (USD 3.27) per household. When 10 years of the payment period presented in the survey and forecasted values of residential RE electricity consumption from 2018 to 2030 were used, the WTP was worth KRW 60.4 (USD 0.05) per kWh in 2018 constant price. The WTP amounts to 56.5% of the price for residential electricity (KRW 106.9 or USD 0.10 per kWh). That is, the RE electricity produced through implementing the plan has a premium of 56.5% over the current electricity. Overall, it is concluded that public acceptance of the plan has been secured.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><doi>10.3390/su12083151</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-219X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3151, Article 3151 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2399643172 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Coal-fired power plants Electricity Electricity consumption Electricity pricing Energy Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences & Ecology Environmental Studies Green & Sustainable Science & Technology Households Life Sciences & Biomedicine Methods Motivation Natural & organic foods Nuclear energy Nuclear power plants Polls & surveys Preferences Questionnaires Residential energy Science & Technology Science & Technology - Other Topics Solar energy Studies Sustainability Theory Valuation Willingness to pay |
title | Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A43%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20Acceptance%20of%20the%20%22Renewable%20Energy%203020%20Plan%22:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Contingent%20Valuation%20Study%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Kim,%20Ju-Hee&rft.date=2020-04-14&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3151&rft.pages=3151-&rft.artnum=3151&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12083151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2399643172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399643172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |