Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea

South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3151, Article 3151
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Ju-Hee, Kim, Sin-Young, Yoo, Seung-Hoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3151
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 12
creator Kim, Ju-Hee
Kim, Sin-Young
Yoo, Seung-Hoon
description South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article examines the public acceptance of the plan by employing contingent valuation (CV). A nationwide CV survey of 1000 households was performed to collect the data on the willingness to pay (WTP) for implementing the plan using electricity charges as a payment vehicle during October 2018. More specifically, a dichotomous choice question to ask interviewees whether they have an intention of paying an offered bid and a spike model to treat the zero WTP observations were employed. The estimate for monthly WTP was KRW 3646 (USD 3.27) per household. When 10 years of the payment period presented in the survey and forecasted values of residential RE electricity consumption from 2018 to 2030 were used, the WTP was worth KRW 60.4 (USD 0.05) per kWh in 2018 constant price. The WTP amounts to 56.5% of the price for residential electricity (KRW 106.9 or USD 0.10 per kWh). That is, the RE electricity produced through implementing the plan has a premium of 56.5% over the current electricity. Overall, it is concluded that public acceptance of the plan has been secured.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su12083151
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2399643172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2399643172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef97099f15e2c24d512ba4376e25bc61f8e0c27efa2ac8d70c154c49cc33f1523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEElXphi-wyg4U8CNOYnZVVB6iEhWvbeQ44zZVahfHoerfk1AELJnN3MW5M9IJglOCLxkT-KppCcUpI5wcBAOKExISzPHhn3wcjJpmhbthjAgSD4LNvC3qSqGJUrDx0ihAViO_BDR-AgNbWdSApgbcYocYphjNa2nG12j6UZXQ09rZNZIos8ZXZgHGozdZt9JX1qBn35Y7VHXBtn6JHqwDeRIcaVk3MPrew-D1ZvqS3YWzx9v7bDILFYuJD0GLBAuhCQeqaFRyQgsZsSQGygsVE50CVjQBLalUaZlgRXikIqEUY12JsmFwtr-7cfa9hcbnK9s6073MKRMijhhJeup8Tylnm8aBzjeuWku3ywnOe6n5r9QOvtjDWyisblTVC_gpdFI541ykSZfSqKPT_9NZ5b-UZbY1nn0CCiGIgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399643172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Kim, Ju-Hee ; Kim, Sin-Young ; Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju-Hee ; Kim, Sin-Young ; Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><description>South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article examines the public acceptance of the plan by employing contingent valuation (CV). A nationwide CV survey of 1000 households was performed to collect the data on the willingness to pay (WTP) for implementing the plan using electricity charges as a payment vehicle during October 2018. More specifically, a dichotomous choice question to ask interviewees whether they have an intention of paying an offered bid and a spike model to treat the zero WTP observations were employed. The estimate for monthly WTP was KRW 3646 (USD 3.27) per household. When 10 years of the payment period presented in the survey and forecasted values of residential RE electricity consumption from 2018 to 2030 were used, the WTP was worth KRW 60.4 (USD 0.05) per kWh in 2018 constant price. The WTP amounts to 56.5% of the price for residential electricity (KRW 106.9 or USD 0.10 per kWh). That is, the RE electricity produced through implementing the plan has a premium of 56.5% over the current electricity. Overall, it is concluded that public acceptance of the plan has been secured.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12083151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Coal-fired power plants ; Electricity ; Electricity consumption ; Electricity pricing ; Energy ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Households ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Methods ; Motivation ; Natural & organic foods ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear power plants ; Polls & surveys ; Preferences ; Questionnaires ; Residential energy ; Science & Technology ; Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Solar energy ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Theory ; Valuation ; Willingness to pay]]></subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3151, Article 3151</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>27</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000535598700084</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef97099f15e2c24d512ba4376e25bc61f8e0c27efa2ac8d70c154c49cc33f1523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef97099f15e2c24d512ba4376e25bc61f8e0c27efa2ac8d70c154c49cc33f1523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5048-219X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><title>Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea</title><title>Sustainability</title><addtitle>SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL</addtitle><description>South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article examines the public acceptance of the plan by employing contingent valuation (CV). A nationwide CV survey of 1000 households was performed to collect the data on the willingness to pay (WTP) for implementing the plan using electricity charges as a payment vehicle during October 2018. More specifically, a dichotomous choice question to ask interviewees whether they have an intention of paying an offered bid and a spike model to treat the zero WTP observations were employed. The estimate for monthly WTP was KRW 3646 (USD 3.27) per household. When 10 years of the payment period presented in the survey and forecasted values of residential RE electricity consumption from 2018 to 2030 were used, the WTP was worth KRW 60.4 (USD 0.05) per kWh in 2018 constant price. The WTP amounts to 56.5% of the price for residential electricity (KRW 106.9 or USD 0.10 per kWh). That is, the RE electricity produced through implementing the plan has a premium of 56.5% over the current electricity. Overall, it is concluded that public acceptance of the plan has been secured.</description><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity consumption</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Studies</subject><subject>Green &amp; Sustainable Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Natural &amp; organic foods</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEElXphi-wyg4U8CNOYnZVVB6iEhWvbeQ44zZVahfHoerfk1AELJnN3MW5M9IJglOCLxkT-KppCcUpI5wcBAOKExISzPHhn3wcjJpmhbthjAgSD4LNvC3qSqGJUrDx0ihAViO_BDR-AgNbWdSApgbcYocYphjNa2nG12j6UZXQ09rZNZIos8ZXZgHGozdZt9JX1qBn35Y7VHXBtn6JHqwDeRIcaVk3MPrew-D1ZvqS3YWzx9v7bDILFYuJD0GLBAuhCQeqaFRyQgsZsSQGygsVE50CVjQBLalUaZlgRXikIqEUY12JsmFwtr-7cfa9hcbnK9s6073MKRMijhhJeup8Tylnm8aBzjeuWku3ywnOe6n5r9QOvtjDWyisblTVC_gpdFI541ykSZfSqKPT_9NZ5b-UZbY1nn0CCiGIgQ</recordid><startdate>20200414</startdate><enddate>20200414</enddate><creator>Kim, Ju-Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Sin-Young</creator><creator>Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-219X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200414</creationdate><title>Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea</title><author>Kim, Ju-Hee ; Kim, Sin-Young ; Yoo, Seung-Hoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef97099f15e2c24d512ba4376e25bc61f8e0c27efa2ac8d70c154c49cc33f1523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity consumption</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Studies</topic><topic>Green &amp; Sustainable Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Natural &amp; organic foods</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Seung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Ju-Hee</au><au>Kim, Sin-Young</au><au>Yoo, Seung-Hoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><stitle>SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL</stitle><date>2020-04-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3151</spage><pages>3151-</pages><artnum>3151</artnum><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>South Korea is promoting the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan" to expand the proportion of renewable energy (RE) from 2.2% in 2016 to 20% in 2030. Since the plan could lead to an increase in electricity rates, public acceptance of it is an important key to determining its success. This article examines the public acceptance of the plan by employing contingent valuation (CV). A nationwide CV survey of 1000 households was performed to collect the data on the willingness to pay (WTP) for implementing the plan using electricity charges as a payment vehicle during October 2018. More specifically, a dichotomous choice question to ask interviewees whether they have an intention of paying an offered bid and a spike model to treat the zero WTP observations were employed. The estimate for monthly WTP was KRW 3646 (USD 3.27) per household. When 10 years of the payment period presented in the survey and forecasted values of residential RE electricity consumption from 2018 to 2030 were used, the WTP was worth KRW 60.4 (USD 0.05) per kWh in 2018 constant price. The WTP amounts to 56.5% of the price for residential electricity (KRW 106.9 or USD 0.10 per kWh). That is, the RE electricity produced through implementing the plan has a premium of 56.5% over the current electricity. Overall, it is concluded that public acceptance of the plan has been secured.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><doi>10.3390/su12083151</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-219X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3151, Article 3151
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2399643172
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Coal-fired power plants
Electricity
Electricity consumption
Electricity pricing
Energy
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Environmental Studies
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
Households
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Methods
Motivation
Natural & organic foods
Nuclear energy
Nuclear power plants
Polls & surveys
Preferences
Questionnaires
Residential energy
Science & Technology
Science & Technology - Other Topics
Solar energy
Studies
Sustainability
Theory
Valuation
Willingness to pay
title Public Acceptance of the "Renewable Energy 3020 Plan": Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A43%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20Acceptance%20of%20the%20%22Renewable%20Energy%203020%20Plan%22:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Contingent%20Valuation%20Study%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Kim,%20Ju-Hee&rft.date=2020-04-14&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3151&rft.pages=3151-&rft.artnum=3151&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12083151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2399643172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399643172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true