Sustainable universities, from indifference to joint action: A panel data analysis
The implementation of the sustainable development concept within academic environments is one of the top priorities of the national and international academic management. The aim of the article was the analysis of the weights of the five Universitas Indonesia GreenMetric criteria used to assess the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Amfiteatru economic 2020-05, Vol.22 (54), p.376-390 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 390 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 54 |
| container_start_page | 376 |
| container_title | Amfiteatru economic |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Ṣerban, Elena-Claudia Hristea, Anca-Maria Curea, Ştefania-Cristina Crețu, Raluca Florentina |
| description | The implementation of the sustainable development concept within academic environments is one of the top priorities of the national and international academic management. The aim of the article was the analysis of the weights of the five Universitas Indonesia GreenMetric criteria used to assess the academic sustainability level, which determine the final ranking score. The initial observance period was ten years but since the individual criteria weights were not included in the 2010-2013 reports, the analysis period was reduced to six years. The sample encompassed universities from Europe. This choice was determined by the fact that the highest ranked universities in the rankings used for the research were European universities. The selection included 58 universities from 18 countries. The data was processed through the Eviews software using the Ordinary Least Square method, with corrections for the fixed effects panel data. The results of the research confirm that the strength of the connection between the five criteria for assessing sustainability at the university level and the total score of hierarchy of sustainable universities is very high. The purpose of this paper is finding conclusions concerning the probability, for some universities included in this ranking system, of gradually adjusting their sustainability level through the most susceptible indicators by the human factor. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.24818/EA/2020/54/376 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2399206857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2399206857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cfd5de4728b6f2abb231ea35ed1770abf41259426ce25ba242ee471e0be65b533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhhdRsNSePQkBr66bTJLN1lsp9QMKgh_nkN2dhZRtUpOs0H_v1grqXN45PO8wPFl2yegtiIpVxWpRAAVaSFFwVZ5kEwCh8jmj4vTPfp7NYtzQcZTkTMhJ9vI6xGSsM3WPZHD2E0O0yWK8IV3wW2Jda7sOA7oGSfJk461LxDTJendHFmRnHPakNckQ40y_jzZeZGed6SPOfnKavd-v3paP-fr54Wm5WOeNAEh507WyRaGgqssOTF0DZ2i4xJYpRU3dCQZyLqBsEGRtQACONENaYylryfk0uz7e3QX_MWBMeuOHMD4RNfD5HGhZSTVSxZFqgo8xYKd3wW5N2GtG9bc7vVrogzsthR7djQ1ybGDjnY2_vFIlcGCqGpGrf8ghYvJBQ8Uk5fwL6Kd1jA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399206857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainable universities, from indifference to joint action: A panel data analysis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ṣerban, Elena-Claudia ; Hristea, Anca-Maria ; Curea, Ştefania-Cristina ; Crețu, Raluca Florentina</creator><creatorcontrib>Ṣerban, Elena-Claudia ; Hristea, Anca-Maria ; Curea, Ştefania-Cristina ; Crețu, Raluca Florentina ; The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania</creatorcontrib><description>The implementation of the sustainable development concept within academic environments is one of the top priorities of the national and international academic management. The aim of the article was the analysis of the weights of the five Universitas Indonesia GreenMetric criteria used to assess the academic sustainability level, which determine the final ranking score. The initial observance period was ten years but since the individual criteria weights were not included in the 2010-2013 reports, the analysis period was reduced to six years. The sample encompassed universities from Europe. This choice was determined by the fact that the highest ranked universities in the rankings used for the research were European universities. The selection included 58 universities from 18 countries. The data was processed through the Eviews software using the Ordinary Least Square method, with corrections for the fixed effects panel data. The results of the research confirm that the strength of the connection between the five criteria for assessing sustainability at the university level and the total score of hierarchy of sustainable universities is very high. The purpose of this paper is finding conclusions concerning the probability, for some universities included in this ranking system, of gradually adjusting their sustainability level through the most susceptible indicators by the human factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2247-9104</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1582-9146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2247-9104</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24818/EA/2020/54/376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</publisher><subject>Climate change ; College campuses ; College presidents ; Colleges & universities ; Conceptual development ; evaluation criteria ; Higher education ; Literacy ; Literature reviews ; Longitudinal studies ; Natural resources ; Panel data ; ranking ; Ratings & rankings ; Regression analysis ; regression equation ; score ; Society ; Sustainability ; sustainability policy ; Sustainable development ; sustainable university ; Webometrics</subject><ispartof>Amfiteatru economic, 2020-05, Vol.22 (54), p.376-390</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cfd5de4728b6f2abb231ea35ed1770abf41259426ce25ba242ee471e0be65b533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cfd5de4728b6f2abb231ea35ed1770abf41259426ce25ba242ee471e0be65b533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ṣerban, Elena-Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hristea, Anca-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curea, Ştefania-Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crețu, Raluca Florentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainable universities, from indifference to joint action: A panel data analysis</title><title>Amfiteatru economic</title><description>The implementation of the sustainable development concept within academic environments is one of the top priorities of the national and international academic management. The aim of the article was the analysis of the weights of the five Universitas Indonesia GreenMetric criteria used to assess the academic sustainability level, which determine the final ranking score. The initial observance period was ten years but since the individual criteria weights were not included in the 2010-2013 reports, the analysis period was reduced to six years. The sample encompassed universities from Europe. This choice was determined by the fact that the highest ranked universities in the rankings used for the research were European universities. The selection included 58 universities from 18 countries. The data was processed through the Eviews software using the Ordinary Least Square method, with corrections for the fixed effects panel data. The results of the research confirm that the strength of the connection between the five criteria for assessing sustainability at the university level and the total score of hierarchy of sustainable universities is very high. The purpose of this paper is finding conclusions concerning the probability, for some universities included in this ranking system, of gradually adjusting their sustainability level through the most susceptible indicators by the human factor.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>College presidents</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Conceptual development</subject><subject>evaluation criteria</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>ranking</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>regression equation</subject><subject>score</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>sustainability policy</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>sustainable university</subject><subject>Webometrics</subject><issn>2247-9104</issn><issn>1582-9146</issn><issn>2247-9104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhhdRsNSePQkBr66bTJLN1lsp9QMKgh_nkN2dhZRtUpOs0H_v1grqXN45PO8wPFl2yegtiIpVxWpRAAVaSFFwVZ5kEwCh8jmj4vTPfp7NYtzQcZTkTMhJ9vI6xGSsM3WPZHD2E0O0yWK8IV3wW2Jda7sOA7oGSfJk461LxDTJendHFmRnHPakNckQ40y_jzZeZGed6SPOfnKavd-v3paP-fr54Wm5WOeNAEh507WyRaGgqssOTF0DZ2i4xJYpRU3dCQZyLqBsEGRtQACONENaYylryfk0uz7e3QX_MWBMeuOHMD4RNfD5HGhZSTVSxZFqgo8xYKd3wW5N2GtG9bc7vVrogzsthR7djQ1ybGDjnY2_vFIlcGCqGpGrf8ghYvJBQ8Uk5fwL6Kd1jA</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Ṣerban, Elena-Claudia</creator><creator>Hristea, Anca-Maria</creator><creator>Curea, Ştefania-Cristina</creator><creator>Crețu, Raluca Florentina</creator><general>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</general><general>Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Faculty of Commerce</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Sustainable universities, from indifference to joint action: A panel data analysis</title><author>Ṣerban, Elena-Claudia ; Hristea, Anca-Maria ; Curea, Ştefania-Cristina ; Crețu, Raluca Florentina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cfd5de4728b6f2abb231ea35ed1770abf41259426ce25ba242ee471e0be65b533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>College presidents</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Conceptual development</topic><topic>evaluation criteria</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>ranking</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>regression equation</topic><topic>score</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>sustainability policy</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>sustainable university</topic><topic>Webometrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ṣerban, Elena-Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hristea, Anca-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curea, Ştefania-Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crețu, Raluca Florentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Amfiteatru economic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ṣerban, Elena-Claudia</au><au>Hristea, Anca-Maria</au><au>Curea, Ştefania-Cristina</au><au>Crețu, Raluca Florentina</au><aucorp>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainable universities, from indifference to joint action: A panel data analysis</atitle><jtitle>Amfiteatru economic</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>54</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>376-390</pages><issn>2247-9104</issn><issn>1582-9146</issn><eissn>2247-9104</eissn><abstract>The implementation of the sustainable development concept within academic environments is one of the top priorities of the national and international academic management. The aim of the article was the analysis of the weights of the five Universitas Indonesia GreenMetric criteria used to assess the academic sustainability level, which determine the final ranking score. The initial observance period was ten years but since the individual criteria weights were not included in the 2010-2013 reports, the analysis period was reduced to six years. The sample encompassed universities from Europe. This choice was determined by the fact that the highest ranked universities in the rankings used for the research were European universities. The selection included 58 universities from 18 countries. The data was processed through the Eviews software using the Ordinary Least Square method, with corrections for the fixed effects panel data. The results of the research confirm that the strength of the connection between the five criteria for assessing sustainability at the university level and the total score of hierarchy of sustainable universities is very high. The purpose of this paper is finding conclusions concerning the probability, for some universities included in this ranking system, of gradually adjusting their sustainability level through the most susceptible indicators by the human factor.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</pub><doi>10.24818/EA/2020/54/376</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2247-9104 |
| ispartof | Amfiteatru economic, 2020-05, Vol.22 (54), p.376-390 |
| issn | 2247-9104 1582-9146 2247-9104 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2399206857 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Climate change College campuses College presidents Colleges & universities Conceptual development evaluation criteria Higher education Literacy Literature reviews Longitudinal studies Natural resources Panel data ranking Ratings & rankings Regression analysis regression equation score Society Sustainability sustainability policy Sustainable development sustainable university Webometrics |
| title | Sustainable universities, from indifference to joint action: A panel data analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A21%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainable%20universities,%20from%20indifference%20to%20joint%20action:%20A%20panel%20data%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Amfiteatru%20economic&rft.au=%E1%B9%A2erban,%20Elena-Claudia&rft.aucorp=The%20Bucharest%20University%20of%20Economic%20Studies,%20Romania&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=54&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=376-390&rft.issn=2247-9104&rft.eissn=2247-9104&rft_id=info:doi/10.24818/EA/2020/54/376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2399206857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399206857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |