A phenological comparison of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and polar bears (Ursus maritimus) as waterfowl nest predators in Wapusk National Park

Relatively little is known about the feeding ecology of grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) in Wapusk National Park. Other ursids, polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ), are well known predators of waterfowl nests in the area, and grizzly bears could feasibly make use of such resources. However, since the arri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polar biology 2020-05, Vol.43 (5), p.457-465
Hauptverfasser: Barnas, Andrew F., Iles, David T., Stechmann, Tanner J., Wampole, Erin M., Koons, David N., Rockwell, Robert F., Ellis-Felege, Susan N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 465
container_issue 5
container_start_page 457
container_title Polar biology
container_volume 43
creator Barnas, Andrew F.
Iles, David T.
Stechmann, Tanner J.
Wampole, Erin M.
Koons, David N.
Rockwell, Robert F.
Ellis-Felege, Susan N.
description Relatively little is known about the feeding ecology of grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) in Wapusk National Park. Other ursids, polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ), are well known predators of waterfowl nests in the area, and grizzly bears could feasibly make use of such resources. However, since the arrival of polar bears on land in the spring is largely dependent on date of sea-ice breakup, the timing of predation by each bear species may differ. We investigated the timing of bear predation in common eider ( Somateria mollissima sedentaria ) and lesser snow goose ( Anser caerulescens caerulescens ) colonies from 2012 to 2018 using nest cameras. We observed grizzlies consuming eggs of both species in all years except 2013 and confirmed that at least two individual grizzlies occupied the park in 2016. In the 3 years when both grizzly and polar bears were detected, grizzlies were observed earlier in the year than polar bears and had greater overlap with an estimated availability index of incubating waterfowl. We hypothesize that grizzly bears could have earlier access to waterfowl eggs in the park, potentially reducing availability of these terrestrial foods to polar bears.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00300-020-02647-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2399055415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2399055415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-dadf553eb0da0135ff75b3b728ef08a8b7a09d2b355bfc65e08eb20c7560f76b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL9OwzAQxi0EEqXwAkyWWGAIXOw4bsaq4p9UAQMVo2UndkmbxsFOFLVvwFvjEhAbw-mG-313330IncdwHQPwGw9AASIg-0oTHvUHaBQnlEQEWHqIRsAJiRJI4RideL8CiHmaZCP0OcXNu65tZZdlLiuc200jXeltja3BS1fudtUWXy6c7zyWLm-tv8KyLnBjK-mw0tL53_EmCNty0-0Jj3vZamdsX-Fa-xY3TheytYEua_wmm86v8ZNsS1uHqy_SrU_RkZGV12c_fYwWd7evs4do_nz_OJvOo5zGWRsVsjCMUa2gkBBTZgxniipOJtrARE4Ul5AVRFHGlMlTpmGiFYGcsxQMTxUdo4thb-PsRxesiZXtXHDhBaFZBowlMQsUGajcWe-dNqJxZXhwK2IQ-8jFELkIkYvvyEUfRHQQ-QDXS-3-Vv-j-gIYhocp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399055415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A phenological comparison of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and polar bears (Ursus maritimus) as waterfowl nest predators in Wapusk National Park</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Barnas, Andrew F. ; Iles, David T. ; Stechmann, Tanner J. ; Wampole, Erin M. ; Koons, David N. ; Rockwell, Robert F. ; Ellis-Felege, Susan N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnas, Andrew F. ; Iles, David T. ; Stechmann, Tanner J. ; Wampole, Erin M. ; Koons, David N. ; Rockwell, Robert F. ; Ellis-Felege, Susan N.</creatorcontrib><description>Relatively little is known about the feeding ecology of grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) in Wapusk National Park. Other ursids, polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ), are well known predators of waterfowl nests in the area, and grizzly bears could feasibly make use of such resources. However, since the arrival of polar bears on land in the spring is largely dependent on date of sea-ice breakup, the timing of predation by each bear species may differ. We investigated the timing of bear predation in common eider ( Somateria mollissima sedentaria ) and lesser snow goose ( Anser caerulescens caerulescens ) colonies from 2012 to 2018 using nest cameras. We observed grizzlies consuming eggs of both species in all years except 2013 and confirmed that at least two individual grizzlies occupied the park in 2016. In the 3 years when both grizzly and polar bears were detected, grizzlies were observed earlier in the year than polar bears and had greater overlap with an estimated availability index of incubating waterfowl. We hypothesize that grizzly bears could have earlier access to waterfowl eggs in the park, potentially reducing availability of these terrestrial foods to polar bears.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0722-4060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2056</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00300-020-02647-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Aquatic birds ; Aquatic mammals ; Availability ; Bears ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cameras ; Colonies ; Ecology ; Eggs ; Grizzly bears ; Ice breakup ; Interspecific relationships ; Life Sciences ; Marine mammals ; Microbiology ; National parks ; Nests ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Polar bears ; Predation ; Predators ; Sea ice ; Sedentary species ; Ursus arctos ; Ursus maritimus ; Waterfowl ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Polar biology, 2020-05, Vol.43 (5), p.457-465</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-dadf553eb0da0135ff75b3b728ef08a8b7a09d2b355bfc65e08eb20c7560f76b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-dadf553eb0da0135ff75b3b728ef08a8b7a09d2b355bfc65e08eb20c7560f76b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9788-461X ; 0000-0001-9394-8623 ; 0000-0002-4534-0055 ; 0000-0001-5767-0222 ; 0000-0003-0990-4666 ; 0000-0002-7251-4938</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00300-020-02647-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00300-020-02647-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnas, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iles, David T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stechmann, Tanner J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wampole, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koons, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockwell, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis-Felege, Susan N.</creatorcontrib><title>A phenological comparison of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and polar bears (Ursus maritimus) as waterfowl nest predators in Wapusk National Park</title><title>Polar biology</title><addtitle>Polar Biol</addtitle><description>Relatively little is known about the feeding ecology of grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) in Wapusk National Park. Other ursids, polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ), are well known predators of waterfowl nests in the area, and grizzly bears could feasibly make use of such resources. However, since the arrival of polar bears on land in the spring is largely dependent on date of sea-ice breakup, the timing of predation by each bear species may differ. We investigated the timing of bear predation in common eider ( Somateria mollissima sedentaria ) and lesser snow goose ( Anser caerulescens caerulescens ) colonies from 2012 to 2018 using nest cameras. We observed grizzlies consuming eggs of both species in all years except 2013 and confirmed that at least two individual grizzlies occupied the park in 2016. In the 3 years when both grizzly and polar bears were detected, grizzlies were observed earlier in the year than polar bears and had greater overlap with an estimated availability index of incubating waterfowl. We hypothesize that grizzly bears could have earlier access to waterfowl eggs in the park, potentially reducing availability of these terrestrial foods to polar bears.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Grizzly bears</subject><subject>Ice breakup</subject><subject>Interspecific relationships</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Polar bears</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Sea ice</subject><subject>Sedentary species</subject><subject>Ursus arctos</subject><subject>Ursus maritimus</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0722-4060</issn><issn>1432-2056</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL9OwzAQxi0EEqXwAkyWWGAIXOw4bsaq4p9UAQMVo2UndkmbxsFOFLVvwFvjEhAbw-mG-313330IncdwHQPwGw9AASIg-0oTHvUHaBQnlEQEWHqIRsAJiRJI4RideL8CiHmaZCP0OcXNu65tZZdlLiuc200jXeltja3BS1fudtUWXy6c7zyWLm-tv8KyLnBjK-mw0tL53_EmCNty0-0Jj3vZamdsX-Fa-xY3TheytYEua_wmm86v8ZNsS1uHqy_SrU_RkZGV12c_fYwWd7evs4do_nz_OJvOo5zGWRsVsjCMUa2gkBBTZgxniipOJtrARE4Ul5AVRFHGlMlTpmGiFYGcsxQMTxUdo4thb-PsRxesiZXtXHDhBaFZBowlMQsUGajcWe-dNqJxZXhwK2IQ-8jFELkIkYvvyEUfRHQQ-QDXS-3-Vv-j-gIYhocp</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Barnas, Andrew F.</creator><creator>Iles, David T.</creator><creator>Stechmann, Tanner J.</creator><creator>Wampole, Erin M.</creator><creator>Koons, David N.</creator><creator>Rockwell, Robert F.</creator><creator>Ellis-Felege, Susan N.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-461X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-8623</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4534-0055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-0222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0990-4666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7251-4938</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>A phenological comparison of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and polar bears (Ursus maritimus) as waterfowl nest predators in Wapusk National Park</title><author>Barnas, Andrew F. ; Iles, David T. ; Stechmann, Tanner J. ; Wampole, Erin M. ; Koons, David N. ; Rockwell, Robert F. ; Ellis-Felege, Susan N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-dadf553eb0da0135ff75b3b728ef08a8b7a09d2b355bfc65e08eb20c7560f76b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Grizzly bears</topic><topic>Ice breakup</topic><topic>Interspecific relationships</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Polar bears</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Sea ice</topic><topic>Sedentary species</topic><topic>Ursus arctos</topic><topic>Ursus maritimus</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnas, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iles, David T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stechmann, Tanner J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wampole, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koons, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockwell, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis-Felege, Susan N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Polar biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnas, Andrew F.</au><au>Iles, David T.</au><au>Stechmann, Tanner J.</au><au>Wampole, Erin M.</au><au>Koons, David N.</au><au>Rockwell, Robert F.</au><au>Ellis-Felege, Susan N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A phenological comparison of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and polar bears (Ursus maritimus) as waterfowl nest predators in Wapusk National Park</atitle><jtitle>Polar biology</jtitle><stitle>Polar Biol</stitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>457-465</pages><issn>0722-4060</issn><eissn>1432-2056</eissn><abstract>Relatively little is known about the feeding ecology of grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) in Wapusk National Park. Other ursids, polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ), are well known predators of waterfowl nests in the area, and grizzly bears could feasibly make use of such resources. However, since the arrival of polar bears on land in the spring is largely dependent on date of sea-ice breakup, the timing of predation by each bear species may differ. We investigated the timing of bear predation in common eider ( Somateria mollissima sedentaria ) and lesser snow goose ( Anser caerulescens caerulescens ) colonies from 2012 to 2018 using nest cameras. We observed grizzlies consuming eggs of both species in all years except 2013 and confirmed that at least two individual grizzlies occupied the park in 2016. In the 3 years when both grizzly and polar bears were detected, grizzlies were observed earlier in the year than polar bears and had greater overlap with an estimated availability index of incubating waterfowl. We hypothesize that grizzly bears could have earlier access to waterfowl eggs in the park, potentially reducing availability of these terrestrial foods to polar bears.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00300-020-02647-w</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-461X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-8623</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4534-0055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-0222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0990-4666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7251-4938</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0722-4060
ispartof Polar biology, 2020-05, Vol.43 (5), p.457-465
issn 0722-4060
1432-2056
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2399055415
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal behavior
Aquatic birds
Aquatic mammals
Availability
Bears
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cameras
Colonies
Ecology
Eggs
Grizzly bears
Ice breakup
Interspecific relationships
Life Sciences
Marine mammals
Microbiology
National parks
Nests
Oceanography
Original Paper
Plant Sciences
Polar bears
Predation
Predators
Sea ice
Sedentary species
Ursus arctos
Ursus maritimus
Waterfowl
Zoology
title A phenological comparison of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and polar bears (Ursus maritimus) as waterfowl nest predators in Wapusk National Park
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20phenological%20comparison%20of%20grizzly%20(Ursus%20arctos)%20and%20polar%20bears%20(Ursus%20maritimus)%20as%20waterfowl%20nest%20predators%20in%20Wapusk%20National%20Park&rft.jtitle=Polar%20biology&rft.au=Barnas,%20Andrew%20F.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=457-465&rft.issn=0722-4060&rft.eissn=1432-2056&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00300-020-02647-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2399055415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399055415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true