Application of the Soil Security Concept to Two Contrasting Soil Landscape Systems—Implications for Soil Capability and Sustainable Land Management

Soil security identifies global challenges and a series of dimensions that are necessary requirements to meet those global challenges using sustainable land management. The soil security concept is applied to two contrasting soil landscape systems with varying climate, landform and soil types. Previ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2019-10, Vol.11 (20), p.5706
Hauptverfasser: Murphy, Brian, Fogarty, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 20
container_start_page 5706
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 11
creator Murphy, Brian
Fogarty, Peter
description Soil security identifies global challenges and a series of dimensions that are necessary requirements to meet those global challenges using sustainable land management. The soil security concept is applied to two contrasting soil landscape systems with varying climate, landform and soil types. Previous methodologies for assessing land and soil capability are combined within the soil security conceptual approach. The land and soil capability methodologies are used to assess how the soil condition changes in response to the stresses and forcing associated with land management and land and soil degradation processes. It is the soil capability that defines how the soil condition changes between the reference state of the soil condition, or the genoform, and the soil condition under land use, or the phenoform. The conclusion is that soil capability, which is one of the dimensions used to apply the soil security concept, is a complex dimension and has several aspects or further facets to be considered to achieve sustainable land management. It is apparent that in assessing soil capability, the following facets are relevant. I: The capacity of the soil to provide ecosystem services to meet the global challenges outlined for Soil Security. II: The stability of the soil condition to land degradation processes resulting from the effects of land management practices and the environmental stresses on the soil. III: The capacity to recover following degradation. Facets II and III can be considered the resilience. An important conclusion is that the soil capability cannot be assessed without taking into account features of the landscape including climate and landform. Two examples from south eastern Australia of the application of these facets of soil capability to on-ground situations are presented. The Cowra Trough Red Soils in the Australian wheat belt are a set of soils, primarily contributing to meeting the global challenge of food security. The major degradation processes threatening the stability of these soils are water erosion and soil acidification. The Kosciusko National Park in the Snowy Mountains region is primarily contributing to meeting the challenges of water security for the irrigation industry in the Murray Darling Basins and energy security through the production of hydroelectricity. The set of soil landscapes also contributes to biodiversity protection and human health and well-being. The major degradation processes threatening the stability of thes
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su11205706
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2398158613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2398158613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-891a6de69419f73e8b4e1b8290a778ab447f704567f2c42aebbdd39b823b0a563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM9KxDAQh4MouKx78QkC3oTVpGmb5rgU_yyseNj1XCZtumZpk5qkyN58CH1Bn8SuFXUuMwPf7xsYhM4puWJMkGvfUxqRhJP0CE0iwumckoQc_5tP0cz7HRmKMSpoOkEfi65rdAlBW4NtjcOzwmurG7xWZe902OPcmlJ1AQeLN6_2sAYHPmizHcEVmMqX0A25vQ-q9Z9v78v2V-pxbd1I5tCB1M1BOmTwuvcBtAHZqG8JfgADW9UqE87QSQ2NV7OfPkVPtzeb_H6-erxb5ovVvIxEEuaZoJBWKhUxFTVnKpOxojKLBAHOM5BxzGtO4iTldVTGESgpq4qJgWCSQJKyKboYvZ2zL73yodjZ3pnhZBExkdEkSykbqMuRKp313qm66Jxuwe0LSorD54u_z7Mv4Bt4uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2398158613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of the Soil Security Concept to Two Contrasting Soil Landscape Systems—Implications for Soil Capability and Sustainable Land Management</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Murphy, Brian ; Fogarty, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Brian ; Fogarty, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Soil security identifies global challenges and a series of dimensions that are necessary requirements to meet those global challenges using sustainable land management. The soil security concept is applied to two contrasting soil landscape systems with varying climate, landform and soil types. Previous methodologies for assessing land and soil capability are combined within the soil security conceptual approach. The land and soil capability methodologies are used to assess how the soil condition changes in response to the stresses and forcing associated with land management and land and soil degradation processes. It is the soil capability that defines how the soil condition changes between the reference state of the soil condition, or the genoform, and the soil condition under land use, or the phenoform. The conclusion is that soil capability, which is one of the dimensions used to apply the soil security concept, is a complex dimension and has several aspects or further facets to be considered to achieve sustainable land management. It is apparent that in assessing soil capability, the following facets are relevant. I: The capacity of the soil to provide ecosystem services to meet the global challenges outlined for Soil Security. II: The stability of the soil condition to land degradation processes resulting from the effects of land management practices and the environmental stresses on the soil. III: The capacity to recover following degradation. Facets II and III can be considered the resilience. An important conclusion is that the soil capability cannot be assessed without taking into account features of the landscape including climate and landform. Two examples from south eastern Australia of the application of these facets of soil capability to on-ground situations are presented. The Cowra Trough Red Soils in the Australian wheat belt are a set of soils, primarily contributing to meeting the global challenge of food security. The major degradation processes threatening the stability of these soils are water erosion and soil acidification. The Kosciusko National Park in the Snowy Mountains region is primarily contributing to meeting the challenges of water security for the irrigation industry in the Murray Darling Basins and energy security through the production of hydroelectricity. The set of soil landscapes also contributes to biodiversity protection and human health and well-being. The major degradation processes threatening the stability of these soils and their capacity to meet the global challenges are water and wind erosion. A major limitation is the poor capacity of these soils to recover once degraded. Identifying the main ecosystem services provided by the two examples, together with the major risks of land degradation can clarify extension, economic and policy aspects of sustainable land management for the two sets of soil landscapes. For the Cowra Trough Red Soils, management of water erosion and soil acidification are essential for maintaining the contribution of the area to food security. For the Kosciusko National Park, the control of water and wind erosion are essential to maintain the contribution of the area to water and energy security.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11205706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acidic soils ; Acidification ; Biodiversity ; Climate change ; Economic conditions ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental changes ; Environmental management ; Environmental stress ; Food security ; Hydroelectric power ; Hydroelectricity ; Irrigation water ; Land degradation ; Land management ; Land use ; Land use planning ; Landforms ; Landscape ; Mountains ; National parks ; Soil acidification ; Soil conditions ; Soil degradation ; Soil fertility ; Soil management ; Soil stability ; Soil stresses ; Soil types ; Soil water ; Sustainability ; Water erosion ; Water security ; Wind erosion</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-10, Vol.11 (20), p.5706</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-891a6de69419f73e8b4e1b8290a778ab447f704567f2c42aebbdd39b823b0a563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-891a6de69419f73e8b4e1b8290a778ab447f704567f2c42aebbdd39b823b0a563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogarty, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Application of the Soil Security Concept to Two Contrasting Soil Landscape Systems—Implications for Soil Capability and Sustainable Land Management</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Soil security identifies global challenges and a series of dimensions that are necessary requirements to meet those global challenges using sustainable land management. The soil security concept is applied to two contrasting soil landscape systems with varying climate, landform and soil types. Previous methodologies for assessing land and soil capability are combined within the soil security conceptual approach. The land and soil capability methodologies are used to assess how the soil condition changes in response to the stresses and forcing associated with land management and land and soil degradation processes. It is the soil capability that defines how the soil condition changes between the reference state of the soil condition, or the genoform, and the soil condition under land use, or the phenoform. The conclusion is that soil capability, which is one of the dimensions used to apply the soil security concept, is a complex dimension and has several aspects or further facets to be considered to achieve sustainable land management. It is apparent that in assessing soil capability, the following facets are relevant. I: The capacity of the soil to provide ecosystem services to meet the global challenges outlined for Soil Security. II: The stability of the soil condition to land degradation processes resulting from the effects of land management practices and the environmental stresses on the soil. III: The capacity to recover following degradation. Facets II and III can be considered the resilience. An important conclusion is that the soil capability cannot be assessed without taking into account features of the landscape including climate and landform. Two examples from south eastern Australia of the application of these facets of soil capability to on-ground situations are presented. The Cowra Trough Red Soils in the Australian wheat belt are a set of soils, primarily contributing to meeting the global challenge of food security. The major degradation processes threatening the stability of these soils are water erosion and soil acidification. The Kosciusko National Park in the Snowy Mountains region is primarily contributing to meeting the challenges of water security for the irrigation industry in the Murray Darling Basins and energy security through the production of hydroelectricity. The set of soil landscapes also contributes to biodiversity protection and human health and well-being. The major degradation processes threatening the stability of these soils and their capacity to meet the global challenges are water and wind erosion. A major limitation is the poor capacity of these soils to recover once degraded. Identifying the main ecosystem services provided by the two examples, together with the major risks of land degradation can clarify extension, economic and policy aspects of sustainable land management for the two sets of soil landscapes. For the Cowra Trough Red Soils, management of water erosion and soil acidification are essential for maintaining the contribution of the area to food security. For the Kosciusko National Park, the control of water and wind erosion are essential to maintain the contribution of the area to water and energy security.</description><subject>Acidic soils</subject><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental stress</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hydroelectricity</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Soil acidification</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil degradation</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Soil stresses</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Water erosion</subject><subject>Water security</subject><subject>Wind erosion</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM9KxDAQh4MouKx78QkC3oTVpGmb5rgU_yyseNj1XCZtumZpk5qkyN58CH1Bn8SuFXUuMwPf7xsYhM4puWJMkGvfUxqRhJP0CE0iwumckoQc_5tP0cz7HRmKMSpoOkEfi65rdAlBW4NtjcOzwmurG7xWZe902OPcmlJ1AQeLN6_2sAYHPmizHcEVmMqX0A25vQ-q9Z9v78v2V-pxbd1I5tCB1M1BOmTwuvcBtAHZqG8JfgADW9UqE87QSQ2NV7OfPkVPtzeb_H6-erxb5ovVvIxEEuaZoJBWKhUxFTVnKpOxojKLBAHOM5BxzGtO4iTldVTGESgpq4qJgWCSQJKyKboYvZ2zL73yodjZ3pnhZBExkdEkSykbqMuRKp313qm66Jxuwe0LSorD54u_z7Mv4Bt4uw</recordid><startdate>20191016</startdate><enddate>20191016</enddate><creator>Murphy, Brian</creator><creator>Fogarty, Peter</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191016</creationdate><title>Application of the Soil Security Concept to Two Contrasting Soil Landscape Systems—Implications for Soil Capability and Sustainable Land Management</title><author>Murphy, Brian ; Fogarty, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-891a6de69419f73e8b4e1b8290a778ab447f704567f2c42aebbdd39b823b0a563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acidic soils</topic><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental stress</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hydroelectricity</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Soil acidification</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil degradation</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Soil stresses</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Water erosion</topic><topic>Water security</topic><topic>Wind erosion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogarty, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murphy, Brian</au><au>Fogarty, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of the Soil Security Concept to Two Contrasting Soil Landscape Systems—Implications for Soil Capability and Sustainable Land Management</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-10-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>5706</spage><pages>5706-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Soil security identifies global challenges and a series of dimensions that are necessary requirements to meet those global challenges using sustainable land management. The soil security concept is applied to two contrasting soil landscape systems with varying climate, landform and soil types. Previous methodologies for assessing land and soil capability are combined within the soil security conceptual approach. The land and soil capability methodologies are used to assess how the soil condition changes in response to the stresses and forcing associated with land management and land and soil degradation processes. It is the soil capability that defines how the soil condition changes between the reference state of the soil condition, or the genoform, and the soil condition under land use, or the phenoform. The conclusion is that soil capability, which is one of the dimensions used to apply the soil security concept, is a complex dimension and has several aspects or further facets to be considered to achieve sustainable land management. It is apparent that in assessing soil capability, the following facets are relevant. I: The capacity of the soil to provide ecosystem services to meet the global challenges outlined for Soil Security. II: The stability of the soil condition to land degradation processes resulting from the effects of land management practices and the environmental stresses on the soil. III: The capacity to recover following degradation. Facets II and III can be considered the resilience. An important conclusion is that the soil capability cannot be assessed without taking into account features of the landscape including climate and landform. Two examples from south eastern Australia of the application of these facets of soil capability to on-ground situations are presented. The Cowra Trough Red Soils in the Australian wheat belt are a set of soils, primarily contributing to meeting the global challenge of food security. The major degradation processes threatening the stability of these soils are water erosion and soil acidification. The Kosciusko National Park in the Snowy Mountains region is primarily contributing to meeting the challenges of water security for the irrigation industry in the Murray Darling Basins and energy security through the production of hydroelectricity. The set of soil landscapes also contributes to biodiversity protection and human health and well-being. The major degradation processes threatening the stability of these soils and their capacity to meet the global challenges are water and wind erosion. A major limitation is the poor capacity of these soils to recover once degraded. Identifying the main ecosystem services provided by the two examples, together with the major risks of land degradation can clarify extension, economic and policy aspects of sustainable land management for the two sets of soil landscapes. For the Cowra Trough Red Soils, management of water erosion and soil acidification are essential for maintaining the contribution of the area to food security. For the Kosciusko National Park, the control of water and wind erosion are essential to maintain the contribution of the area to water and energy security.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11205706</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2019-10, Vol.11 (20), p.5706
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2398158613
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Acidic soils
Acidification
Biodiversity
Climate change
Economic conditions
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental changes
Environmental management
Environmental stress
Food security
Hydroelectric power
Hydroelectricity
Irrigation water
Land degradation
Land management
Land use
Land use planning
Landforms
Landscape
Mountains
National parks
Soil acidification
Soil conditions
Soil degradation
Soil fertility
Soil management
Soil stability
Soil stresses
Soil types
Soil water
Sustainability
Water erosion
Water security
Wind erosion
title Application of the Soil Security Concept to Two Contrasting Soil Landscape Systems—Implications for Soil Capability and Sustainable Land Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A33%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20the%20Soil%20Security%20Concept%20to%20Two%20Contrasting%20Soil%20Landscape%20Systems%E2%80%94Implications%20for%20Soil%20Capability%20and%20Sustainable%20Land%20Management&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Murphy,%20Brian&rft.date=2019-10-16&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=5706&rft.pages=5706-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11205706&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2398158613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2398158613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true