Effect of Net-Gun Capture on Survival of Mule Deer

Capture techniques to deploy radio-collars often risk mortality and injury to the animal. Capture-induced mortality can affect population sizes but also introduces bias in survival estimates based on data from captured animals. In recent years, a large-scale research and monitoring project in Utah,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2020-05, Vol.84 (4), p.813-820
Hauptverfasser: VAN DE KERK, MADELON, MCMILLAN, BROCK R., HERSEY, KENT R., ROUG, ANNETTE, LARSEN, RANDY T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 820
container_issue 4
container_start_page 813
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 84
creator VAN DE KERK, MADELON
MCMILLAN, BROCK R.
HERSEY, KENT R.
ROUG, ANNETTE
LARSEN, RANDY T.
description Capture techniques to deploy radio-collars often risk mortality and injury to the animal. Capture-induced mortality can affect population sizes but also introduces bias in survival estimates based on data from captured animals. In recent years, a large-scale research and monitoring project in Utah, USA, has involved capturing and radio-collaring hundreds of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), a species of great interest in large parts of North America. Our objective was to investigate how the survival rates of these mule deer were affected by capture and handling. During winters of 2014–2018, an experienced capture crew net-gunned and fitted 1,805 animals with global positioning system (GPS)-collars. We estimated survival rates during the first 6 weeks after capture using Cox proportional hazard regression, and compared the survival rates of animals that were captured in a particular year to those of animals that were not captured but fitted with a GPS-collar in a previous year. We used a model selection framework to evaluate how long survival rates of captured animals were different from those of animals that were not captured. Our results indicated that weekly survival rates of captured animals were 0.985 ± 0.003 (SE), 0.988 ± 0.002, and 0.990 ± 0.001 in weeks 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Weekly survival rates of captured deer during weeks 4–6 were 0.993 ± 0.001, the same as those of deer that were not captured at the same time. Furthermore, post-capture survival rates were positively influenced by body size and negatively influenced by age. We conclude that the mortality resulting from helicopter capture was low but recommend comparing newly captured and previously captured individuals to examine what proportion of observed mortality is likely capture-related.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.21838
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2395575683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26934889</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26934889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3648-7e74315fecbf2e06f7528c213b69a5b6314116e183f3777b18e7e3a6aa286fc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFYv3oWANyF1Zyf7kaPUWhWrBxW9LZswKw1pUzdJS_97U6MePc3h_d57w2PsFPgIOBeXxWbxMRJg0OyxAaSoY2FA77NBJ4pYJvB-yI7quuAcAYwaMDHxnvImqnz0SE08bZfR2K2aNlBULaPnNqzna1fu5FlbUnRNFI7ZgXdlTSc_d8hebyYv49v44Wl6N756iHNUiYk16QRBdumZF8SV11KYXABmKnUyUwgJgKLuV49a6wwMaUKnnBNG-dzgkJ33uatQfbZUN7ao2rDsKq3AVEotlcGOuuipPFR1HcjbVZgvXNha4Ha3id1tYr836WDo4c28pO0_pL1_m01_PWe9p6ibKvx5hEoxMSbFL_nBav4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395575683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Net-Gun Capture on Survival of Mule Deer</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>VAN DE KERK, MADELON ; MCMILLAN, BROCK R. ; HERSEY, KENT R. ; ROUG, ANNETTE ; LARSEN, RANDY T.</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN DE KERK, MADELON ; MCMILLAN, BROCK R. ; HERSEY, KENT R. ; ROUG, ANNETTE ; LARSEN, RANDY T.</creatorcontrib><description>Capture techniques to deploy radio-collars often risk mortality and injury to the animal. Capture-induced mortality can affect population sizes but also introduces bias in survival estimates based on data from captured animals. In recent years, a large-scale research and monitoring project in Utah, USA, has involved capturing and radio-collaring hundreds of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), a species of great interest in large parts of North America. Our objective was to investigate how the survival rates of these mule deer were affected by capture and handling. During winters of 2014–2018, an experienced capture crew net-gunned and fitted 1,805 animals with global positioning system (GPS)-collars. We estimated survival rates during the first 6 weeks after capture using Cox proportional hazard regression, and compared the survival rates of animals that were captured in a particular year to those of animals that were not captured but fitted with a GPS-collar in a previous year. We used a model selection framework to evaluate how long survival rates of captured animals were different from those of animals that were not captured. Our results indicated that weekly survival rates of captured animals were 0.985 ± 0.003 (SE), 0.988 ± 0.002, and 0.990 ± 0.001 in weeks 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Weekly survival rates of captured deer during weeks 4–6 were 0.993 ± 0.001, the same as those of deer that were not captured at the same time. Furthermore, post-capture survival rates were positively influenced by body size and negatively influenced by age. We conclude that the mortality resulting from helicopter capture was low but recommend comparing newly captured and previously captured individuals to examine what proportion of observed mortality is likely capture-related.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>Aircraft accidents ; Animals ; Body size ; capture mortality ; capture myopathy ; Collars ; Deer ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Helicopters ; Mortality ; mule deer ; net‐gun capture ; Odocoileus ; Odocoileus hemionus ; post‐capture survival ; Satellite navigation systems ; Survival ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2020-05, Vol.84 (4), p.813-820</ispartof><rights>2020 The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3648-7e74315fecbf2e06f7528c213b69a5b6314116e183f3777b18e7e3a6aa286fc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3648-7e74315fecbf2e06f7528c213b69a5b6314116e183f3777b18e7e3a6aa286fc83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4939-4162</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26934889$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26934889$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN DE KERK, MADELON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMILLAN, BROCK R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERSEY, KENT R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUG, ANNETTE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARSEN, RANDY T.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Net-Gun Capture on Survival of Mule Deer</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Capture techniques to deploy radio-collars often risk mortality and injury to the animal. Capture-induced mortality can affect population sizes but also introduces bias in survival estimates based on data from captured animals. In recent years, a large-scale research and monitoring project in Utah, USA, has involved capturing and radio-collaring hundreds of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), a species of great interest in large parts of North America. Our objective was to investigate how the survival rates of these mule deer were affected by capture and handling. During winters of 2014–2018, an experienced capture crew net-gunned and fitted 1,805 animals with global positioning system (GPS)-collars. We estimated survival rates during the first 6 weeks after capture using Cox proportional hazard regression, and compared the survival rates of animals that were captured in a particular year to those of animals that were not captured but fitted with a GPS-collar in a previous year. We used a model selection framework to evaluate how long survival rates of captured animals were different from those of animals that were not captured. Our results indicated that weekly survival rates of captured animals were 0.985 ± 0.003 (SE), 0.988 ± 0.002, and 0.990 ± 0.001 in weeks 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Weekly survival rates of captured deer during weeks 4–6 were 0.993 ± 0.001, the same as those of deer that were not captured at the same time. Furthermore, post-capture survival rates were positively influenced by body size and negatively influenced by age. We conclude that the mortality resulting from helicopter capture was low but recommend comparing newly captured and previously captured individuals to examine what proportion of observed mortality is likely capture-related.</description><subject>Aircraft accidents</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>capture mortality</subject><subject>capture myopathy</subject><subject>Collars</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Helicopters</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>mule deer</subject><subject>net‐gun capture</subject><subject>Odocoileus</subject><subject>Odocoileus hemionus</subject><subject>post‐capture survival</subject><subject>Satellite navigation systems</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFYv3oWANyF1Zyf7kaPUWhWrBxW9LZswKw1pUzdJS_97U6MePc3h_d57w2PsFPgIOBeXxWbxMRJg0OyxAaSoY2FA77NBJ4pYJvB-yI7quuAcAYwaMDHxnvImqnz0SE08bZfR2K2aNlBULaPnNqzna1fu5FlbUnRNFI7ZgXdlTSc_d8hebyYv49v44Wl6N756iHNUiYk16QRBdumZF8SV11KYXABmKnUyUwgJgKLuV49a6wwMaUKnnBNG-dzgkJ33uatQfbZUN7ao2rDsKq3AVEotlcGOuuipPFR1HcjbVZgvXNha4Ha3id1tYr836WDo4c28pO0_pL1_m01_PWe9p6ibKvx5hEoxMSbFL_nBav4</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>VAN DE KERK, MADELON</creator><creator>MCMILLAN, BROCK R.</creator><creator>HERSEY, KENT R.</creator><creator>ROUG, ANNETTE</creator><creator>LARSEN, RANDY T.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4939-4162</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Effect of Net-Gun Capture on Survival of Mule Deer</title><author>VAN DE KERK, MADELON ; MCMILLAN, BROCK R. ; HERSEY, KENT R. ; ROUG, ANNETTE ; LARSEN, RANDY T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3648-7e74315fecbf2e06f7528c213b69a5b6314116e183f3777b18e7e3a6aa286fc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aircraft accidents</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>capture mortality</topic><topic>capture myopathy</topic><topic>Collars</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Helicopters</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>mule deer</topic><topic>net‐gun capture</topic><topic>Odocoileus</topic><topic>Odocoileus hemionus</topic><topic>post‐capture survival</topic><topic>Satellite navigation systems</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN DE KERK, MADELON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMILLAN, BROCK R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERSEY, KENT R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUG, ANNETTE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARSEN, RANDY T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN DE KERK, MADELON</au><au>MCMILLAN, BROCK R.</au><au>HERSEY, KENT R.</au><au>ROUG, ANNETTE</au><au>LARSEN, RANDY T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Net-Gun Capture on Survival of Mule Deer</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>813</spage><epage>820</epage><pages>813-820</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Capture techniques to deploy radio-collars often risk mortality and injury to the animal. Capture-induced mortality can affect population sizes but also introduces bias in survival estimates based on data from captured animals. In recent years, a large-scale research and monitoring project in Utah, USA, has involved capturing and radio-collaring hundreds of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), a species of great interest in large parts of North America. Our objective was to investigate how the survival rates of these mule deer were affected by capture and handling. During winters of 2014–2018, an experienced capture crew net-gunned and fitted 1,805 animals with global positioning system (GPS)-collars. We estimated survival rates during the first 6 weeks after capture using Cox proportional hazard regression, and compared the survival rates of animals that were captured in a particular year to those of animals that were not captured but fitted with a GPS-collar in a previous year. We used a model selection framework to evaluate how long survival rates of captured animals were different from those of animals that were not captured. Our results indicated that weekly survival rates of captured animals were 0.985 ± 0.003 (SE), 0.988 ± 0.002, and 0.990 ± 0.001 in weeks 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Weekly survival rates of captured deer during weeks 4–6 were 0.993 ± 0.001, the same as those of deer that were not captured at the same time. Furthermore, post-capture survival rates were positively influenced by body size and negatively influenced by age. We conclude that the mortality resulting from helicopter capture was low but recommend comparing newly captured and previously captured individuals to examine what proportion of observed mortality is likely capture-related.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21838</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4939-4162</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2020-05, Vol.84 (4), p.813-820
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2395575683
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Aircraft accidents
Animals
Body size
capture mortality
capture myopathy
Collars
Deer
Global positioning systems
GPS
Helicopters
Mortality
mule deer
net‐gun capture
Odocoileus
Odocoileus hemionus
post‐capture survival
Satellite navigation systems
Survival
Wildlife
title Effect of Net-Gun Capture on Survival of Mule Deer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A22%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Net-Gun%20Capture%20on%20Survival%20of%20Mule%20Deer&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=VAN%20DE%20KERK,%20MADELON&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=813&rft.epage=820&rft.pages=813-820&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21838&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26934889%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395575683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26934889&rfr_iscdi=true