Similar Bird Communities Across Grazing Systems in the Nebraska Sandhills

Much of the remaining native rangeland in the Great Plains in the United States is privately owned and managed for beef production, and this single priority for land use may be contributing to declining avian biodiversity through a loss of structural heterogeneity. One proposed solution is to use mu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2020-05, Vol.84 (4), p.802-812
Hauptverfasser: SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S., POWELL, LARKIN A., SCHACHT, WALTER H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 812
container_issue 4
container_start_page 802
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 84
creator SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S.
POWELL, LARKIN A.
SCHACHT, WALTER H.
description Much of the remaining native rangeland in the Great Plains in the United States is privately owned and managed for beef production, and this single priority for land use may be contributing to declining avian biodiversity through a loss of structural heterogeneity. One proposed solution is to use multiple grazing systems across ranches, under the assumption that this approach will increase heterogeneity of vegetation structure and avian diversity across the landscape. We tested the relationship between grazing systems and avian diversity in the Nebraska Sandhills during 2014 and 2015 on a landscape that included 11 management units containing 5 different grazing systems. We used multivariate models to examine the relationship of bird diversity and communities to grazing systems at the management unit scale, and we used simulations to combine empirical data from ≥1 grazing system into virtual landscapes to test the hypothesis that multiple grazing systems would result in greater heterogeneity. The 5 most common avian species made up 84% of observations (28 species), and songbird richness was 5–6 species/7.06 ha at 53% of our plots. Variation in each of the diversity measures (Shannon diversity range = 0.41–2.2, Simpson’s diversity range = 0.24–0.88) was best explained by the previous dormant season’s stocking rate, and richness declined by about 1 species/plot with an increase in 1 animal unit month (AUM)/ha. Songbird community structure showed the most variance between management unit, but grazing system explained little community variation. None of the simulated landscapes consistently had greater structural heterogeneity of visual obstruction reading, litter depth, and cover of bare ground than others, and there was a limited level of heterogeneity overall in the simulated landscapes. In contrast to our predictions, a variety of grazing systems did not increase heterogeneity of vegetation structure across the landscape. Thus, conservation practitioners should encourage the use of other strategies to create structural heterogeneity, such as prescribed fires and extreme stocking rates, which will support a diverse grassland songbird community (i.e., a greater variety of bird species) across the landscape.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.21825
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2395574434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26934888</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26934888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-fc85179a5d889f8c0ebc692a8061fd7a13ffb4269dc36e8d80c388e78c2dc443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAURi0EEqWwsCNZYkNK8SNObsZSQSkqMLQSbJbrOK1DHsVOVZVfT9oAI9Md7jn38SF0ScmAEsJu8225HDAKTByhHk14HDCg8THqtU0WiJC-n6Iz73NCOKUQ9dBkZktbKIfvrEvxqC7LTWUbazweald7j8dOfdlqiWc735jSY1vhZmXwi1k45T8UnqkqXdmi8OfoJFOFNxc_tY_mD_fz0WMwfR1PRsNpoLlIRJBpEDROlEgBkgw0MQsdJUwBiWiWxoryLFuELEpSzSMDKRDNAUwMmqU6DHkfXXdj167-3BjfyLzeuKrdKBlPhIhbZk_ddNThCWcyuXa2VG4nKZH7pOQ-KXlIqoVpB29tYXb_kPLp7Xn861x1Tu6b2v057d08BAD-DW9EdPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395574434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Similar Bird Communities Across Grazing Systems in the Nebraska Sandhills</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S. ; POWELL, LARKIN A. ; SCHACHT, WALTER H.</creator><creatorcontrib>SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S. ; POWELL, LARKIN A. ; SCHACHT, WALTER H.</creatorcontrib><description>Much of the remaining native rangeland in the Great Plains in the United States is privately owned and managed for beef production, and this single priority for land use may be contributing to declining avian biodiversity through a loss of structural heterogeneity. One proposed solution is to use multiple grazing systems across ranches, under the assumption that this approach will increase heterogeneity of vegetation structure and avian diversity across the landscape. We tested the relationship between grazing systems and avian diversity in the Nebraska Sandhills during 2014 and 2015 on a landscape that included 11 management units containing 5 different grazing systems. We used multivariate models to examine the relationship of bird diversity and communities to grazing systems at the management unit scale, and we used simulations to combine empirical data from ≥1 grazing system into virtual landscapes to test the hypothesis that multiple grazing systems would result in greater heterogeneity. The 5 most common avian species made up 84% of observations (28 species), and songbird richness was 5–6 species/7.06 ha at 53% of our plots. Variation in each of the diversity measures (Shannon diversity range = 0.41–2.2, Simpson’s diversity range = 0.24–0.88) was best explained by the previous dormant season’s stocking rate, and richness declined by about 1 species/plot with an increase in 1 animal unit month (AUM)/ha. Songbird community structure showed the most variance between management unit, but grazing system explained little community variation. None of the simulated landscapes consistently had greater structural heterogeneity of visual obstruction reading, litter depth, and cover of bare ground than others, and there was a limited level of heterogeneity overall in the simulated landscapes. In contrast to our predictions, a variety of grazing systems did not increase heterogeneity of vegetation structure across the landscape. Thus, conservation practitioners should encourage the use of other strategies to create structural heterogeneity, such as prescribed fires and extreme stocking rates, which will support a diverse grassland songbird community (i.e., a greater variety of bird species) across the landscape.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>beef production ; Biodiversity ; Birds ; Community structure ; Computer simulation ; Controlled burning ; disturbance process ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; grazing systems ; Habitat Relations ; Heterogeneity ; Land use ; Land use management ; Landscape ; Landscape preservation ; Population decline ; Prescribed fire ; Rangelands ; songbird communities ; Songbirds ; Species ; Stocking ; Stocking rates ; Vegetation ; vegetation structure ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2020-05, Vol.84 (4), p.802-812</ispartof><rights>2020 The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-fc85179a5d889f8c0ebc692a8061fd7a13ffb4269dc36e8d80c388e78c2dc443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-fc85179a5d889f8c0ebc692a8061fd7a13ffb4269dc36e8d80c388e78c2dc443</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7686-3441</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26934888$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26934888$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POWELL, LARKIN A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHACHT, WALTER H.</creatorcontrib><title>Similar Bird Communities Across Grazing Systems in the Nebraska Sandhills</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Much of the remaining native rangeland in the Great Plains in the United States is privately owned and managed for beef production, and this single priority for land use may be contributing to declining avian biodiversity through a loss of structural heterogeneity. One proposed solution is to use multiple grazing systems across ranches, under the assumption that this approach will increase heterogeneity of vegetation structure and avian diversity across the landscape. We tested the relationship between grazing systems and avian diversity in the Nebraska Sandhills during 2014 and 2015 on a landscape that included 11 management units containing 5 different grazing systems. We used multivariate models to examine the relationship of bird diversity and communities to grazing systems at the management unit scale, and we used simulations to combine empirical data from ≥1 grazing system into virtual landscapes to test the hypothesis that multiple grazing systems would result in greater heterogeneity. The 5 most common avian species made up 84% of observations (28 species), and songbird richness was 5–6 species/7.06 ha at 53% of our plots. Variation in each of the diversity measures (Shannon diversity range = 0.41–2.2, Simpson’s diversity range = 0.24–0.88) was best explained by the previous dormant season’s stocking rate, and richness declined by about 1 species/plot with an increase in 1 animal unit month (AUM)/ha. Songbird community structure showed the most variance between management unit, but grazing system explained little community variation. None of the simulated landscapes consistently had greater structural heterogeneity of visual obstruction reading, litter depth, and cover of bare ground than others, and there was a limited level of heterogeneity overall in the simulated landscapes. In contrast to our predictions, a variety of grazing systems did not increase heterogeneity of vegetation structure across the landscape. Thus, conservation practitioners should encourage the use of other strategies to create structural heterogeneity, such as prescribed fires and extreme stocking rates, which will support a diverse grassland songbird community (i.e., a greater variety of bird species) across the landscape.</description><subject>beef production</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Controlled burning</subject><subject>disturbance process</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>grazing systems</subject><subject>Habitat Relations</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>songbird communities</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stocking</subject><subject>Stocking rates</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation structure</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAURi0EEqWwsCNZYkNK8SNObsZSQSkqMLQSbJbrOK1DHsVOVZVfT9oAI9Md7jn38SF0ScmAEsJu8225HDAKTByhHk14HDCg8THqtU0WiJC-n6Iz73NCOKUQ9dBkZktbKIfvrEvxqC7LTWUbazweald7j8dOfdlqiWc735jSY1vhZmXwi1k45T8UnqkqXdmi8OfoJFOFNxc_tY_mD_fz0WMwfR1PRsNpoLlIRJBpEDROlEgBkgw0MQsdJUwBiWiWxoryLFuELEpSzSMDKRDNAUwMmqU6DHkfXXdj167-3BjfyLzeuKrdKBlPhIhbZk_ddNThCWcyuXa2VG4nKZH7pOQ-KXlIqoVpB29tYXb_kPLp7Xn861x1Tu6b2v057d08BAD-DW9EdPQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S.</creator><creator>POWELL, LARKIN A.</creator><creator>SCHACHT, WALTER H.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7686-3441</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Similar Bird Communities Across Grazing Systems in the Nebraska Sandhills</title><author>SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S. ; POWELL, LARKIN A. ; SCHACHT, WALTER H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3595-fc85179a5d889f8c0ebc692a8061fd7a13ffb4269dc36e8d80c388e78c2dc443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>beef production</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Controlled burning</topic><topic>disturbance process</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>grazing systems</topic><topic>Habitat Relations</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>songbird communities</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stocking</topic><topic>Stocking rates</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation structure</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POWELL, LARKIN A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHACHT, WALTER H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SLIWINSKI, MAGGI S.</au><au>POWELL, LARKIN A.</au><au>SCHACHT, WALTER H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Similar Bird Communities Across Grazing Systems in the Nebraska Sandhills</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>802</spage><epage>812</epage><pages>802-812</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Much of the remaining native rangeland in the Great Plains in the United States is privately owned and managed for beef production, and this single priority for land use may be contributing to declining avian biodiversity through a loss of structural heterogeneity. One proposed solution is to use multiple grazing systems across ranches, under the assumption that this approach will increase heterogeneity of vegetation structure and avian diversity across the landscape. We tested the relationship between grazing systems and avian diversity in the Nebraska Sandhills during 2014 and 2015 on a landscape that included 11 management units containing 5 different grazing systems. We used multivariate models to examine the relationship of bird diversity and communities to grazing systems at the management unit scale, and we used simulations to combine empirical data from ≥1 grazing system into virtual landscapes to test the hypothesis that multiple grazing systems would result in greater heterogeneity. The 5 most common avian species made up 84% of observations (28 species), and songbird richness was 5–6 species/7.06 ha at 53% of our plots. Variation in each of the diversity measures (Shannon diversity range = 0.41–2.2, Simpson’s diversity range = 0.24–0.88) was best explained by the previous dormant season’s stocking rate, and richness declined by about 1 species/plot with an increase in 1 animal unit month (AUM)/ha. Songbird community structure showed the most variance between management unit, but grazing system explained little community variation. None of the simulated landscapes consistently had greater structural heterogeneity of visual obstruction reading, litter depth, and cover of bare ground than others, and there was a limited level of heterogeneity overall in the simulated landscapes. In contrast to our predictions, a variety of grazing systems did not increase heterogeneity of vegetation structure across the landscape. Thus, conservation practitioners should encourage the use of other strategies to create structural heterogeneity, such as prescribed fires and extreme stocking rates, which will support a diverse grassland songbird community (i.e., a greater variety of bird species) across the landscape.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21825</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7686-3441</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2020-05, Vol.84 (4), p.802-812
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2395574434
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects beef production
Biodiversity
Birds
Community structure
Computer simulation
Controlled burning
disturbance process
Grasslands
Grazing
grazing systems
Habitat Relations
Heterogeneity
Land use
Land use management
Landscape
Landscape preservation
Population decline
Prescribed fire
Rangelands
songbird communities
Songbirds
Species
Stocking
Stocking rates
Vegetation
vegetation structure
Wildlife
Wildlife management
title Similar Bird Communities Across Grazing Systems in the Nebraska Sandhills
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T14%3A49%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Similar%20Bird%20Communities%20Across%20Grazing%20Systems%20in%20the%20Nebraska%20Sandhills&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=SLIWINSKI,%20MAGGI%20S.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=802&rft.epage=812&rft.pages=802-812&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21825&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26934888%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395574434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26934888&rfr_iscdi=true