Observations of Hail–Wind Ratios from Convective Storm Reports across the Continental United States

The objective of this study is to provide guidance on when hail and/or wind is climatologically most likely (temporally and spatially) based on the ratio of severe hail reports to severe wind reports, which can be used by National Weather Forecast (NWS) forecasters when issuing severe convective war...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weather and forecasting 2020-04, Vol.35 (2), p.635-656
Hauptverfasser: Bunkers, Matthew J., Fleegel, Steven R., Grafenauer, Thomas, Schultz, Chauncy J., Schumacher, Philip N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 656
container_issue 2
container_start_page 635
container_title Weather and forecasting
container_volume 35
creator Bunkers, Matthew J.
Fleegel, Steven R.
Grafenauer, Thomas
Schultz, Chauncy J.
Schumacher, Philip N.
description The objective of this study is to provide guidance on when hail and/or wind is climatologically most likely (temporally and spatially) based on the ratio of severe hail reports to severe wind reports, which can be used by National Weather Forecast (NWS) forecasters when issuing severe convective warnings. Accordingly, a climatology of reported hail-to-wind ratios (i.e., number of hail reports divided by the number of wind reports) for observed severe convective storms was derived using U.S. storm reports from 1955 to 2017. Owing to several temporal changes in reporting and warning procedures, the 1996–2017 period was chosen for spatiotemporal analyses, yielding 265 691 hail and 294 449 wind reports. The most notable changes in hail–wind ratios occurred around 1996 as the NWS modernized and deployed new radars (leading to more hail reports relative to wind) and in 2010 when the severe hail criterion increased nationwide (leading to more wind reports relative to hail). One key finding is that hail–wind ratios are maximized (i.e., relatively more hail than wind) during the late morning through midafternoon and in the spring (March–May), with geographical maxima over the central United States and complex/elevated terrain. Otherwise, minimum ratios occur overnight, during the late summer (July–August) as well as November–December, and over the eastern United States. While the results reflect reporting biases (e.g., fewer wind than hail reports in low-population areas but more wind reports where mesonets are available), meteorological factors such as convective mode and cool spring versus warm summer environments also appear associated with the hail–wind ratio climatology.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/WAF-D-19-0136.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2395570345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2395570345</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-1624b76a551711a5f1677826ffa8f3dd2948370f23fc963d2065be1f4eac46a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMFqAjEURUNpodZ23W2g62heMsnMLEWrFgTBVlyGOJPQiE5sEoXu-g_9w35JZ2pXDy6Hex8HoUegA4BcDDejKZkQKAkFLgdwhXogGCU049k16tGiYKQAIW_RXYw7SikTrOwhs9xGE846Od9E7C2ea7f_-freuKbGqy6O2AZ_wGPfnE2V3Nng1-TDAa_M0YcUsa6CjxGnd9MxyTWmSXqP141Lpm5ZnUy8RzdW76N5-L99tJ4-v43nZLGcvYxHC1JxoImAZNk2l1oIyAG0sCDzvGDSWl1YXteszAqeU8u4rUrJa0al2BqwmdFVJjXlffR06T0G_3EyMamdP4WmnVSMl0LklGeipYYX6u_zYKw6BnfQ4VMBVZ1L1bpUEwWl6lwq4L9FXmhm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395570345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Observations of Hail–Wind Ratios from Convective Storm Reports across the Continental United States</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bunkers, Matthew J. ; Fleegel, Steven R. ; Grafenauer, Thomas ; Schultz, Chauncy J. ; Schumacher, Philip N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunkers, Matthew J. ; Fleegel, Steven R. ; Grafenauer, Thomas ; Schultz, Chauncy J. ; Schumacher, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study is to provide guidance on when hail and/or wind is climatologically most likely (temporally and spatially) based on the ratio of severe hail reports to severe wind reports, which can be used by National Weather Forecast (NWS) forecasters when issuing severe convective warnings. Accordingly, a climatology of reported hail-to-wind ratios (i.e., number of hail reports divided by the number of wind reports) for observed severe convective storms was derived using U.S. storm reports from 1955 to 2017. Owing to several temporal changes in reporting and warning procedures, the 1996–2017 period was chosen for spatiotemporal analyses, yielding 265 691 hail and 294 449 wind reports. The most notable changes in hail–wind ratios occurred around 1996 as the NWS modernized and deployed new radars (leading to more hail reports relative to wind) and in 2010 when the severe hail criterion increased nationwide (leading to more wind reports relative to hail). One key finding is that hail–wind ratios are maximized (i.e., relatively more hail than wind) during the late morning through midafternoon and in the spring (March–May), with geographical maxima over the central United States and complex/elevated terrain. Otherwise, minimum ratios occur overnight, during the late summer (July–August) as well as November–December, and over the eastern United States. While the results reflect reporting biases (e.g., fewer wind than hail reports in low-population areas but more wind reports where mesonets are available), meteorological factors such as convective mode and cool spring versus warm summer environments also appear associated with the hail–wind ratio climatology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0882-8156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-19-0136.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Bias ; Climatology ; Convective storms ; Hail ; Modernization ; Population ; Ratios ; Spring ; Storms ; Summer ; Temporal variations ; Weather ; Weather forecasting ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Weather and forecasting, 2020-04, Vol.35 (2), p.635-656</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-1624b76a551711a5f1677826ffa8f3dd2948370f23fc963d2065be1f4eac46a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-1624b76a551711a5f1677826ffa8f3dd2948370f23fc963d2065be1f4eac46a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7954-6695</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3679,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunkers, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleegel, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grafenauer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Chauncy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><title>Observations of Hail–Wind Ratios from Convective Storm Reports across the Continental United States</title><title>Weather and forecasting</title><description>The objective of this study is to provide guidance on when hail and/or wind is climatologically most likely (temporally and spatially) based on the ratio of severe hail reports to severe wind reports, which can be used by National Weather Forecast (NWS) forecasters when issuing severe convective warnings. Accordingly, a climatology of reported hail-to-wind ratios (i.e., number of hail reports divided by the number of wind reports) for observed severe convective storms was derived using U.S. storm reports from 1955 to 2017. Owing to several temporal changes in reporting and warning procedures, the 1996–2017 period was chosen for spatiotemporal analyses, yielding 265 691 hail and 294 449 wind reports. The most notable changes in hail–wind ratios occurred around 1996 as the NWS modernized and deployed new radars (leading to more hail reports relative to wind) and in 2010 when the severe hail criterion increased nationwide (leading to more wind reports relative to hail). One key finding is that hail–wind ratios are maximized (i.e., relatively more hail than wind) during the late morning through midafternoon and in the spring (March–May), with geographical maxima over the central United States and complex/elevated terrain. Otherwise, minimum ratios occur overnight, during the late summer (July–August) as well as November–December, and over the eastern United States. While the results reflect reporting biases (e.g., fewer wind than hail reports in low-population areas but more wind reports where mesonets are available), meteorological factors such as convective mode and cool spring versus warm summer environments also appear associated with the hail–wind ratio climatology.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Convective storms</subject><subject>Hail</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0882-8156</issn><issn>1520-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMFqAjEURUNpodZ23W2g62heMsnMLEWrFgTBVlyGOJPQiE5sEoXu-g_9w35JZ2pXDy6Hex8HoUegA4BcDDejKZkQKAkFLgdwhXogGCU049k16tGiYKQAIW_RXYw7SikTrOwhs9xGE846Od9E7C2ea7f_-freuKbGqy6O2AZ_wGPfnE2V3Nng1-TDAa_M0YcUsa6CjxGnd9MxyTWmSXqP141Lpm5ZnUy8RzdW76N5-L99tJ4-v43nZLGcvYxHC1JxoImAZNk2l1oIyAG0sCDzvGDSWl1YXteszAqeU8u4rUrJa0al2BqwmdFVJjXlffR06T0G_3EyMamdP4WmnVSMl0LklGeipYYX6u_zYKw6BnfQ4VMBVZ1L1bpUEwWl6lwq4L9FXmhm</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Bunkers, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Fleegel, Steven R.</creator><creator>Grafenauer, Thomas</creator><creator>Schultz, Chauncy J.</creator><creator>Schumacher, Philip N.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7954-6695</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Observations of Hail–Wind Ratios from Convective Storm Reports across the Continental United States</title><author>Bunkers, Matthew J. ; Fleegel, Steven R. ; Grafenauer, Thomas ; Schultz, Chauncy J. ; Schumacher, Philip N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-1624b76a551711a5f1677826ffa8f3dd2948370f23fc963d2065be1f4eac46a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Convective storms</topic><topic>Hail</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunkers, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleegel, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grafenauer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Chauncy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunkers, Matthew J.</au><au>Fleegel, Steven R.</au><au>Grafenauer, Thomas</au><au>Schultz, Chauncy J.</au><au>Schumacher, Philip N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Observations of Hail–Wind Ratios from Convective Storm Reports across the Continental United States</atitle><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>635-656</pages><issn>0882-8156</issn><eissn>1520-0434</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study is to provide guidance on when hail and/or wind is climatologically most likely (temporally and spatially) based on the ratio of severe hail reports to severe wind reports, which can be used by National Weather Forecast (NWS) forecasters when issuing severe convective warnings. Accordingly, a climatology of reported hail-to-wind ratios (i.e., number of hail reports divided by the number of wind reports) for observed severe convective storms was derived using U.S. storm reports from 1955 to 2017. Owing to several temporal changes in reporting and warning procedures, the 1996–2017 period was chosen for spatiotemporal analyses, yielding 265 691 hail and 294 449 wind reports. The most notable changes in hail–wind ratios occurred around 1996 as the NWS modernized and deployed new radars (leading to more hail reports relative to wind) and in 2010 when the severe hail criterion increased nationwide (leading to more wind reports relative to hail). One key finding is that hail–wind ratios are maximized (i.e., relatively more hail than wind) during the late morning through midafternoon and in the spring (March–May), with geographical maxima over the central United States and complex/elevated terrain. Otherwise, minimum ratios occur overnight, during the late summer (July–August) as well as November–December, and over the eastern United States. While the results reflect reporting biases (e.g., fewer wind than hail reports in low-population areas but more wind reports where mesonets are available), meteorological factors such as convective mode and cool spring versus warm summer environments also appear associated with the hail–wind ratio climatology.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/WAF-D-19-0136.1</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7954-6695</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0882-8156
ispartof Weather and forecasting, 2020-04, Vol.35 (2), p.635-656
issn 0882-8156
1520-0434
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2395570345
source American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bias
Climatology
Convective storms
Hail
Modernization
Population
Ratios
Spring
Storms
Summer
Temporal variations
Weather
Weather forecasting
Wind
title Observations of Hail–Wind Ratios from Convective Storm Reports across the Continental United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A57%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Observations%20of%20Hail%E2%80%93Wind%20Ratios%20from%20Convective%20Storm%20Reports%20across%20the%20Continental%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Weather%20and%20forecasting&rft.au=Bunkers,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=635-656&rft.issn=0882-8156&rft.eissn=1520-0434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/WAF-D-19-0136.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2395570345%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395570345&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true