A Classification of Streamflow Patterns Across the Coastal Gulf of Alaska

Streamflow controls many freshwater and marine processes, including salinity profiles, sediment composition, fluxes of nutrients, and the timing of animal migrations. Watersheds that border the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) comprise over 400,000 km2 of largely pristine freshwater habitats and provide ecosyst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2020-02, Vol.56 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Sergeant, Christopher J., Falke, Jeffrey A., Bellmore, Rebecca A., Bellmore, J. Ryan, Crumley, Ryan L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 56
creator Sergeant, Christopher J.
Falke, Jeffrey A.
Bellmore, Rebecca A.
Bellmore, J. Ryan
Crumley, Ryan L.
description Streamflow controls many freshwater and marine processes, including salinity profiles, sediment composition, fluxes of nutrients, and the timing of animal migrations. Watersheds that border the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) comprise over 400,000 km2 of largely pristine freshwater habitats and provide ecosystem services such as reliable fisheries for local and global food production. Yet no comprehensive watershed‐scale description of current temporal and spatial patterns of streamflow exists within the coastal GOA. This is an immediate need because the spatial distribution of future streamflow patterns may shift dramatically due to warming air temperature, increased rainfall, diminishing snowpack, and rapid glacial recession. Our primary goal was to describe variation in streamflow patterns across the coastal GOA using an objective set of descriptors derived from flow predictions at the downstream‐most point within each watershed. We leveraged an existing hydrologic runoff model and Bayesian mixture model to classify 4,140 watersheds into 13 classes based on seven streamflow statistics. Maximum discharge timing (annual phase shift) and magnitude relative to mean discharge (amplitude) were the most influential attributes. Seventy‐six percent of watersheds by number showed patterns consistent with rain or snow as dominant runoff sources, while the remaining watersheds were driven by rain‐snow, glacier, or low‐elevation wetland runoff. Streamflow classes exhibited clear mechanistic links to elevation, ice coverage, and other landscape features. Our classification identifies watersheds that might shift streamflow patterns in the near future and, importantly, will help guide the design of studies that evaluate how hydrologic change will influence coastal GOA ecosystems. Plain Language Summary Streams provide society with many benefits, but they are being dramatically altered by climate change and human development. The volume of flowing water and the timing of high and low flows are important to monitor because we depend on reliable streamflow for drinking water, hydroelectric power, and healthy fish populations. Organizations that manage water supplies need extensive information on streamflow to make decisions. Yet directly measuring flow is cost‐prohibitive in remote regions like the Gulf of Alaska, which drains freshwater from an area greater than 400,000 km2, roughly the size of California. To overcome these challenges, a series of previous studies developed a tool
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019WR026127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2395337320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2395337320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-ebee3eafc6d32b843db385c210df299bc3234fdd064e4fbcdd60230705f0940a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFLwzAUBvAgCs7pzT8g4NXqS16aLMdSdA4GSlV2LGmbYGe3ziRj7L-3cx48eXqXH9_3-Ai5ZnDHgOt7DkwvCuCScXVCRkwLkSit8JSMAAQmDLU6JxchLAGYSKUakVlG886E0Lq2NrHt17R39DV6a1au63f0xcRo_TrQrPZ9CDR-WJr3JkTT0em2cweeDQGf5pKcOdMFe_V7x-T98eEtf0rmz9NZns0TgwgysZW1aI2rZYO8mghsKpykNWfQOK51VSNH4ZoGpLDCVXXTSOAIClIHWoDBMbk55m58_7W1IZbLfuvXQ2XJUaeICjkM6vaoft721pUb366M35cMysNY5d-xBo5Hvms7u__XlosiL7gQKPEbkkZqVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395337320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Classification of Streamflow Patterns Across the Coastal Gulf of Alaska</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Sergeant, Christopher J. ; Falke, Jeffrey A. ; Bellmore, Rebecca A. ; Bellmore, J. Ryan ; Crumley, Ryan L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sergeant, Christopher J. ; Falke, Jeffrey A. ; Bellmore, Rebecca A. ; Bellmore, J. Ryan ; Crumley, Ryan L.</creatorcontrib><description>Streamflow controls many freshwater and marine processes, including salinity profiles, sediment composition, fluxes of nutrients, and the timing of animal migrations. Watersheds that border the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) comprise over 400,000 km2 of largely pristine freshwater habitats and provide ecosystem services such as reliable fisheries for local and global food production. Yet no comprehensive watershed‐scale description of current temporal and spatial patterns of streamflow exists within the coastal GOA. This is an immediate need because the spatial distribution of future streamflow patterns may shift dramatically due to warming air temperature, increased rainfall, diminishing snowpack, and rapid glacial recession. Our primary goal was to describe variation in streamflow patterns across the coastal GOA using an objective set of descriptors derived from flow predictions at the downstream‐most point within each watershed. We leveraged an existing hydrologic runoff model and Bayesian mixture model to classify 4,140 watersheds into 13 classes based on seven streamflow statistics. Maximum discharge timing (annual phase shift) and magnitude relative to mean discharge (amplitude) were the most influential attributes. Seventy‐six percent of watersheds by number showed patterns consistent with rain or snow as dominant runoff sources, while the remaining watersheds were driven by rain‐snow, glacier, or low‐elevation wetland runoff. Streamflow classes exhibited clear mechanistic links to elevation, ice coverage, and other landscape features. Our classification identifies watersheds that might shift streamflow patterns in the near future and, importantly, will help guide the design of studies that evaluate how hydrologic change will influence coastal GOA ecosystems. Plain Language Summary Streams provide society with many benefits, but they are being dramatically altered by climate change and human development. The volume of flowing water and the timing of high and low flows are important to monitor because we depend on reliable streamflow for drinking water, hydroelectric power, and healthy fish populations. Organizations that manage water supplies need extensive information on streamflow to make decisions. Yet directly measuring flow is cost‐prohibitive in remote regions like the Gulf of Alaska, which drains freshwater from an area greater than 400,000 km2, roughly the size of California. To overcome these challenges, a series of previous studies developed a tool to predict historical river flows across the entire region. In this study, we used 33 years of those predictions to categorize different types of streams based on the amount, variability, and timing of streamflow throughout the year. We identified 13 unique streamflow patterns among 4,140 coastal streams, reflecting different contributions of rain, snow, and glacial ice. This new catalog of streamflow patterns will allow scientists to assess changes in streamflow over time and their impact to humans and other organisms that depend on freshwater. Key Points Using a freshwater runoff model suited for snow and ice melt, we classified 13 flow regimes across coastal Gulf of Alaska watersheds In a region of rapid environmental change, fuzzy classification identified watersheds with potential transitional streamflow patterns Our results provide context for future studies evaluating the influence of hydrologic change on coastal Gulf of Alaska ecosystems</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019WR026127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Alaska ; Animal migration ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic habitats ; Atmospheric precipitations ; AutoClass ; Bayesian analysis ; Classification ; Climate and human activity ; Climate change ; Coastal plains ; Coastal streams ; coastal watersheds ; Discharge ; Drinking water ; Ecosystem services ; Fish ; Fish populations ; Fisheries ; flow regime ; Fluxes ; Food production ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Freshwater environments ; fuzzy classification ; Glacial runoff ; Glacier ice ; Glaciers ; Glaciohydrology ; Hydroelectric power ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrologic studies ; Hydrology ; Ice cover ; Inland water environment ; Low flow ; Migrations ; Nutrients ; Probabilistic models ; Probability theory ; Profiles ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Remote regions ; River flow ; Rivers ; Runoff ; Salinity profiles ; Sediment composition ; Snow ; Snowpack ; Spatial distribution ; Statistical methods ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streams ; Water supply ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2020-02, Vol.56 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-ebee3eafc6d32b843db385c210df299bc3234fdd064e4fbcdd60230705f0940a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-ebee3eafc6d32b843db385c210df299bc3234fdd064e4fbcdd60230705f0940a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7124-3937 ; 0000-0002-3363-3213 ; 0000-0002-5140-6460 ; 0000-0002-6670-8250</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019WR026127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019WR026127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,11495,27905,27906,45555,45556,46449,46873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sergeant, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falke, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellmore, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellmore, J. Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crumley, Ryan L.</creatorcontrib><title>A Classification of Streamflow Patterns Across the Coastal Gulf of Alaska</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Streamflow controls many freshwater and marine processes, including salinity profiles, sediment composition, fluxes of nutrients, and the timing of animal migrations. Watersheds that border the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) comprise over 400,000 km2 of largely pristine freshwater habitats and provide ecosystem services such as reliable fisheries for local and global food production. Yet no comprehensive watershed‐scale description of current temporal and spatial patterns of streamflow exists within the coastal GOA. This is an immediate need because the spatial distribution of future streamflow patterns may shift dramatically due to warming air temperature, increased rainfall, diminishing snowpack, and rapid glacial recession. Our primary goal was to describe variation in streamflow patterns across the coastal GOA using an objective set of descriptors derived from flow predictions at the downstream‐most point within each watershed. We leveraged an existing hydrologic runoff model and Bayesian mixture model to classify 4,140 watersheds into 13 classes based on seven streamflow statistics. Maximum discharge timing (annual phase shift) and magnitude relative to mean discharge (amplitude) were the most influential attributes. Seventy‐six percent of watersheds by number showed patterns consistent with rain or snow as dominant runoff sources, while the remaining watersheds were driven by rain‐snow, glacier, or low‐elevation wetland runoff. Streamflow classes exhibited clear mechanistic links to elevation, ice coverage, and other landscape features. Our classification identifies watersheds that might shift streamflow patterns in the near future and, importantly, will help guide the design of studies that evaluate how hydrologic change will influence coastal GOA ecosystems. Plain Language Summary Streams provide society with many benefits, but they are being dramatically altered by climate change and human development. The volume of flowing water and the timing of high and low flows are important to monitor because we depend on reliable streamflow for drinking water, hydroelectric power, and healthy fish populations. Organizations that manage water supplies need extensive information on streamflow to make decisions. Yet directly measuring flow is cost‐prohibitive in remote regions like the Gulf of Alaska, which drains freshwater from an area greater than 400,000 km2, roughly the size of California. To overcome these challenges, a series of previous studies developed a tool to predict historical river flows across the entire region. In this study, we used 33 years of those predictions to categorize different types of streams based on the amount, variability, and timing of streamflow throughout the year. We identified 13 unique streamflow patterns among 4,140 coastal streams, reflecting different contributions of rain, snow, and glacial ice. This new catalog of streamflow patterns will allow scientists to assess changes in streamflow over time and their impact to humans and other organisms that depend on freshwater. Key Points Using a freshwater runoff model suited for snow and ice melt, we classified 13 flow regimes across coastal Gulf of Alaska watersheds In a region of rapid environmental change, fuzzy classification identified watersheds with potential transitional streamflow patterns Our results provide context for future studies evaluating the influence of hydrologic change on coastal Gulf of Alaska ecosystems</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Alaska</subject><subject>Animal migration</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>AutoClass</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Climate and human activity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Coastal streams</subject><subject>coastal watersheds</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>flow regime</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater environments</subject><subject>fuzzy classification</subject><subject>Glacial runoff</subject><subject>Glacier ice</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Glaciohydrology</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrologic studies</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Ice cover</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Low flow</subject><subject>Migrations</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Probabilistic models</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Remote regions</subject><subject>River flow</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Salinity profiles</subject><subject>Sediment composition</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snowpack</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MFLwzAUBvAgCs7pzT8g4NXqS16aLMdSdA4GSlV2LGmbYGe3ziRj7L-3cx48eXqXH9_3-Ai5ZnDHgOt7DkwvCuCScXVCRkwLkSit8JSMAAQmDLU6JxchLAGYSKUakVlG886E0Lq2NrHt17R39DV6a1au63f0xcRo_TrQrPZ9CDR-WJr3JkTT0em2cweeDQGf5pKcOdMFe_V7x-T98eEtf0rmz9NZns0TgwgysZW1aI2rZYO8mghsKpykNWfQOK51VSNH4ZoGpLDCVXXTSOAIClIHWoDBMbk55m58_7W1IZbLfuvXQ2XJUaeICjkM6vaoft721pUb366M35cMysNY5d-xBo5Hvms7u__XlosiL7gQKPEbkkZqVA</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Sergeant, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Falke, Jeffrey A.</creator><creator>Bellmore, Rebecca A.</creator><creator>Bellmore, J. Ryan</creator><creator>Crumley, Ryan L.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7124-3937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3363-3213</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-6460</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-8250</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>A Classification of Streamflow Patterns Across the Coastal Gulf of Alaska</title><author>Sergeant, Christopher J. ; Falke, Jeffrey A. ; Bellmore, Rebecca A. ; Bellmore, J. Ryan ; Crumley, Ryan L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-ebee3eafc6d32b843db385c210df299bc3234fdd064e4fbcdd60230705f0940a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Alaska</topic><topic>Animal migration</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>AutoClass</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Climate and human activity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Coastal streams</topic><topic>coastal watersheds</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>flow regime</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater environments</topic><topic>fuzzy classification</topic><topic>Glacial runoff</topic><topic>Glacier ice</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Glaciohydrology</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrologic studies</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Ice cover</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Low flow</topic><topic>Migrations</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Probabilistic models</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Remote regions</topic><topic>River flow</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Salinity profiles</topic><topic>Sediment composition</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snowpack</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sergeant, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falke, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellmore, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellmore, J. Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crumley, Ryan L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sergeant, Christopher J.</au><au>Falke, Jeffrey A.</au><au>Bellmore, Rebecca A.</au><au>Bellmore, J. Ryan</au><au>Crumley, Ryan L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Classification of Streamflow Patterns Across the Coastal Gulf of Alaska</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Streamflow controls many freshwater and marine processes, including salinity profiles, sediment composition, fluxes of nutrients, and the timing of animal migrations. Watersheds that border the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) comprise over 400,000 km2 of largely pristine freshwater habitats and provide ecosystem services such as reliable fisheries for local and global food production. Yet no comprehensive watershed‐scale description of current temporal and spatial patterns of streamflow exists within the coastal GOA. This is an immediate need because the spatial distribution of future streamflow patterns may shift dramatically due to warming air temperature, increased rainfall, diminishing snowpack, and rapid glacial recession. Our primary goal was to describe variation in streamflow patterns across the coastal GOA using an objective set of descriptors derived from flow predictions at the downstream‐most point within each watershed. We leveraged an existing hydrologic runoff model and Bayesian mixture model to classify 4,140 watersheds into 13 classes based on seven streamflow statistics. Maximum discharge timing (annual phase shift) and magnitude relative to mean discharge (amplitude) were the most influential attributes. Seventy‐six percent of watersheds by number showed patterns consistent with rain or snow as dominant runoff sources, while the remaining watersheds were driven by rain‐snow, glacier, or low‐elevation wetland runoff. Streamflow classes exhibited clear mechanistic links to elevation, ice coverage, and other landscape features. Our classification identifies watersheds that might shift streamflow patterns in the near future and, importantly, will help guide the design of studies that evaluate how hydrologic change will influence coastal GOA ecosystems. Plain Language Summary Streams provide society with many benefits, but they are being dramatically altered by climate change and human development. The volume of flowing water and the timing of high and low flows are important to monitor because we depend on reliable streamflow for drinking water, hydroelectric power, and healthy fish populations. Organizations that manage water supplies need extensive information on streamflow to make decisions. Yet directly measuring flow is cost‐prohibitive in remote regions like the Gulf of Alaska, which drains freshwater from an area greater than 400,000 km2, roughly the size of California. To overcome these challenges, a series of previous studies developed a tool to predict historical river flows across the entire region. In this study, we used 33 years of those predictions to categorize different types of streams based on the amount, variability, and timing of streamflow throughout the year. We identified 13 unique streamflow patterns among 4,140 coastal streams, reflecting different contributions of rain, snow, and glacial ice. This new catalog of streamflow patterns will allow scientists to assess changes in streamflow over time and their impact to humans and other organisms that depend on freshwater. Key Points Using a freshwater runoff model suited for snow and ice melt, we classified 13 flow regimes across coastal Gulf of Alaska watersheds In a region of rapid environmental change, fuzzy classification identified watersheds with potential transitional streamflow patterns Our results provide context for future studies evaluating the influence of hydrologic change on coastal Gulf of Alaska ecosystems</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019WR026127</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7124-3937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3363-3213</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-6460</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-8250</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2020-02, Vol.56 (2), p.n/a
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2395337320
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Air temperature
Alaska
Animal migration
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic habitats
Atmospheric precipitations
AutoClass
Bayesian analysis
Classification
Climate and human activity
Climate change
Coastal plains
Coastal streams
coastal watersheds
Discharge
Drinking water
Ecosystem services
Fish
Fish populations
Fisheries
flow regime
Fluxes
Food production
Fresh water
Freshwater
Freshwater ecosystems
Freshwater environments
fuzzy classification
Glacial runoff
Glacier ice
Glaciers
Glaciohydrology
Hydroelectric power
Hydrologic models
Hydrologic studies
Hydrology
Ice cover
Inland water environment
Low flow
Migrations
Nutrients
Probabilistic models
Probability theory
Profiles
Rain
Rainfall
Remote regions
River flow
Rivers
Runoff
Salinity profiles
Sediment composition
Snow
Snowpack
Spatial distribution
Statistical methods
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Streams
Water supply
Watersheds
title A Classification of Streamflow Patterns Across the Coastal Gulf of Alaska
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T04%3A52%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Classification%20of%20Streamflow%20Patterns%20Across%20the%20Coastal%20Gulf%20of%20Alaska&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Sergeant,%20Christopher%20J.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019WR026127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2395337320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395337320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true