Microbial diversity in soils from antimony mining sites: geochemical control promotes species enrichment
Elevated soil concentrations of antimony (Sb) and co-contaminants are frequently encountered where antimony has been mined on a large scale. For instance, the Xikuangshan antimony mine in central South China has sustained, over many centuries, dispersed and spatially variable input of toxic elements...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental chemistry letters 2020-05, Vol.18 (3), p.911-922 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 922 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 911 |
container_title | Environmental chemistry letters |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Deng, Renjian Tang, Zhie Hou, Baolin Ren, Bozhi Wang, Zhenghua Zhu, Chuanqu Kelly, Steven Hursthouse, Andrew |
description | Elevated soil concentrations of antimony (Sb) and co-contaminants are frequently encountered where antimony has been mined on a large scale. For instance, the Xikuangshan antimony mine in central South China has sustained, over many centuries, dispersed and spatially variable input of toxic elements into the soil ecosystem. We utilized this unique environment to assess the impact of geochemical conditions on soil microbiology. Geochemical conditions were assessed by monitoring absolute and available fractions of toxic elements and disrupted soil properties. Soil microbiology was studied by high-throughput sequencing and statistical analysis, including principle component analysis and canonical correspondence analysis. Results show that Sb concentrations were ranged from 970 to more than 24,000 mg/kg. As concentrations were three times higher than the regional background values and ten times higher for Pb, 590 times higher for Cd and 30 times higher for Hg. About 5–10% of the total soil Sb was environmentally mobile. Microbial diversity was high, and soil properties such as pH, organic matter, iron and sulfate controlled the absolute microbial activity. We identified strong positive and negative correlations with specific bacterial taxonomic groups which show: (1) an intolerance of available fractions for all elements, e.g.,
Gemmatimonas, Pirellula, Spartobacteria
; (2) a good tolerance of available fractions for all elements, e.g.,
Povalibacter, Spartobacteria
; and (3) a mixed response, tolerating available Sb, Hg and Cd and inhibition by As, Pb, e.g.,
Escherichia/Shigella
and
Arthrobacter
, and in reverse, e.g.,
Gemmatimonas
and
Sphingomonas
. The site hosts great diversity dominated by Gram-negative organisms, many with rod (bacillus) morphologies but also some filamentous forms, and a wide range of metabolic capabilities: anaerobes, e.g.,
Saccharibacteria
, metal oxidizing, e.g.,
Geobacter
, chemoautotrophs, e.g.,
Gemmata
, and sulfur reducing, e.g.,
Desulfuromonas
. The bioremediation potential of
Arthrobacter
and
Escherichia/Shigella
for Sb control is highlighted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10311-020-00975-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2395154397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2395154397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-ed846f3ccce73f9cd10138d3891e0eb7b77201bb6ce3dd4ab63eaaefcf94b5ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwBThF4lyIk7ZZuaGJfxKIC5yjJHW3TG0ykg5p355AEdw42ZJ_79l-hJwDuwTG5FUCJgAKxlnBWCOrAg7IDGpghahrOPztK3FMTlLaMMa55HxG1s_OxmCc7mnrPjAmN-6p8zQF1yfaxTBQ7Uc3BL-ng_POr2hGMF3TFQa7xsHZLLXBjzH0dJv5kKc0bdG6XNFHZ9cD-vGUHHW6T3j2U-fk7e72dflQPL3cPy5vngorajEW2C7KuhPWWpSia2wLDMSiFYsGkKGRRkrOwJjaomjbUptaoNbY2a4pTWW0mJOLyTff8r7DNKpN2EWfVyoumgqqUjQyU3yi8vMpRezUNrpBx70Cpr4SVVOiKieqvhNVkEViEqUM-xXGP-t_VJ9gSHx2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395154397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbial diversity in soils from antimony mining sites: geochemical control promotes species enrichment</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Deng, Renjian ; Tang, Zhie ; Hou, Baolin ; Ren, Bozhi ; Wang, Zhenghua ; Zhu, Chuanqu ; Kelly, Steven ; Hursthouse, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Deng, Renjian ; Tang, Zhie ; Hou, Baolin ; Ren, Bozhi ; Wang, Zhenghua ; Zhu, Chuanqu ; Kelly, Steven ; Hursthouse, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Elevated soil concentrations of antimony (Sb) and co-contaminants are frequently encountered where antimony has been mined on a large scale. For instance, the Xikuangshan antimony mine in central South China has sustained, over many centuries, dispersed and spatially variable input of toxic elements into the soil ecosystem. We utilized this unique environment to assess the impact of geochemical conditions on soil microbiology. Geochemical conditions were assessed by monitoring absolute and available fractions of toxic elements and disrupted soil properties. Soil microbiology was studied by high-throughput sequencing and statistical analysis, including principle component analysis and canonical correspondence analysis. Results show that Sb concentrations were ranged from 970 to more than 24,000 mg/kg. As concentrations were three times higher than the regional background values and ten times higher for Pb, 590 times higher for Cd and 30 times higher for Hg. About 5–10% of the total soil Sb was environmentally mobile. Microbial diversity was high, and soil properties such as pH, organic matter, iron and sulfate controlled the absolute microbial activity. We identified strong positive and negative correlations with specific bacterial taxonomic groups which show: (1) an intolerance of available fractions for all elements, e.g.,
Gemmatimonas, Pirellula, Spartobacteria
; (2) a good tolerance of available fractions for all elements, e.g.,
Povalibacter, Spartobacteria
; and (3) a mixed response, tolerating available Sb, Hg and Cd and inhibition by As, Pb, e.g.,
Escherichia/Shigella
and
Arthrobacter
, and in reverse, e.g.,
Gemmatimonas
and
Sphingomonas
. The site hosts great diversity dominated by Gram-negative organisms, many with rod (bacillus) morphologies but also some filamentous forms, and a wide range of metabolic capabilities: anaerobes, e.g.,
Saccharibacteria
, metal oxidizing, e.g.,
Geobacter
, chemoautotrophs, e.g.,
Gemmata
, and sulfur reducing, e.g.,
Desulfuromonas
. The bioremediation potential of
Arthrobacter
and
Escherichia/Shigella
for Sb control is highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1610-3653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1610-3661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-00975-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Anaerobes ; Analytical Chemistry ; Antimony ; Arthrobacter ; Biodiversity ; Biological activity ; Bioremediation ; Cadmium ; Contaminants ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental impact ; Escherichia ; Geochemistry ; Heavy metals ; Intolerance ; Lead ; Mercury ; Microbial activity ; Microbiology ; Microorganisms ; Morphology ; Next-generation sequencing ; Organic matter ; Original Paper ; Oxidation ; Pollution ; Principal components analysis ; Shigella ; Soil biology ; Soil conditions ; Soil contamination ; Soil properties ; Soils ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Sulfates ; Sulfur ; Sulphur</subject><ispartof>Environmental chemistry letters, 2020-05, Vol.18 (3), p.911-922</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-ed846f3ccce73f9cd10138d3891e0eb7b77201bb6ce3dd4ab63eaaefcf94b5ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-ed846f3ccce73f9cd10138d3891e0eb7b77201bb6ce3dd4ab63eaaefcf94b5ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3690-2957</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10311-020-00975-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10311-020-00975-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deng, Renjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Zhie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Baolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Bozhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Chuanqu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hursthouse, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Microbial diversity in soils from antimony mining sites: geochemical control promotes species enrichment</title><title>Environmental chemistry letters</title><addtitle>Environ Chem Lett</addtitle><description>Elevated soil concentrations of antimony (Sb) and co-contaminants are frequently encountered where antimony has been mined on a large scale. For instance, the Xikuangshan antimony mine in central South China has sustained, over many centuries, dispersed and spatially variable input of toxic elements into the soil ecosystem. We utilized this unique environment to assess the impact of geochemical conditions on soil microbiology. Geochemical conditions were assessed by monitoring absolute and available fractions of toxic elements and disrupted soil properties. Soil microbiology was studied by high-throughput sequencing and statistical analysis, including principle component analysis and canonical correspondence analysis. Results show that Sb concentrations were ranged from 970 to more than 24,000 mg/kg. As concentrations were three times higher than the regional background values and ten times higher for Pb, 590 times higher for Cd and 30 times higher for Hg. About 5–10% of the total soil Sb was environmentally mobile. Microbial diversity was high, and soil properties such as pH, organic matter, iron and sulfate controlled the absolute microbial activity. We identified strong positive and negative correlations with specific bacterial taxonomic groups which show: (1) an intolerance of available fractions for all elements, e.g.,
Gemmatimonas, Pirellula, Spartobacteria
; (2) a good tolerance of available fractions for all elements, e.g.,
Povalibacter, Spartobacteria
; and (3) a mixed response, tolerating available Sb, Hg and Cd and inhibition by As, Pb, e.g.,
Escherichia/Shigella
and
Arthrobacter
, and in reverse, e.g.,
Gemmatimonas
and
Sphingomonas
. The site hosts great diversity dominated by Gram-negative organisms, many with rod (bacillus) morphologies but also some filamentous forms, and a wide range of metabolic capabilities: anaerobes, e.g.,
Saccharibacteria
, metal oxidizing, e.g.,
Geobacter
, chemoautotrophs, e.g.,
Gemmata
, and sulfur reducing, e.g.,
Desulfuromonas
. The bioremediation potential of
Arthrobacter
and
Escherichia/Shigella
for Sb control is highlighted.</description><subject>Anaerobes</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Antimony</subject><subject>Arthrobacter</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Escherichia</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Intolerance</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Shigella</subject><subject>Soil biology</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulphur</subject><issn>1610-3653</issn><issn>1610-3661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwBThF4lyIk7ZZuaGJfxKIC5yjJHW3TG0ykg5p355AEdw42ZJ_79l-hJwDuwTG5FUCJgAKxlnBWCOrAg7IDGpghahrOPztK3FMTlLaMMa55HxG1s_OxmCc7mnrPjAmN-6p8zQF1yfaxTBQ7Uc3BL-ng_POr2hGMF3TFQa7xsHZLLXBjzH0dJv5kKc0bdG6XNFHZ9cD-vGUHHW6T3j2U-fk7e72dflQPL3cPy5vngorajEW2C7KuhPWWpSia2wLDMSiFYsGkKGRRkrOwJjaomjbUptaoNbY2a4pTWW0mJOLyTff8r7DNKpN2EWfVyoumgqqUjQyU3yi8vMpRezUNrpBx70Cpr4SVVOiKieqvhNVkEViEqUM-xXGP-t_VJ9gSHx2</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Deng, Renjian</creator><creator>Tang, Zhie</creator><creator>Hou, Baolin</creator><creator>Ren, Bozhi</creator><creator>Wang, Zhenghua</creator><creator>Zhu, Chuanqu</creator><creator>Kelly, Steven</creator><creator>Hursthouse, Andrew</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-2957</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Microbial diversity in soils from antimony mining sites: geochemical control promotes species enrichment</title><author>Deng, Renjian ; Tang, Zhie ; Hou, Baolin ; Ren, Bozhi ; Wang, Zhenghua ; Zhu, Chuanqu ; Kelly, Steven ; Hursthouse, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-ed846f3ccce73f9cd10138d3891e0eb7b77201bb6ce3dd4ab63eaaefcf94b5ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anaerobes</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Antimony</topic><topic>Arthrobacter</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Escherichia</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Intolerance</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Shigella</topic><topic>Soil biology</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulphur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deng, Renjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Zhie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Baolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Bozhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Chuanqu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hursthouse, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental chemistry letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deng, Renjian</au><au>Tang, Zhie</au><au>Hou, Baolin</au><au>Ren, Bozhi</au><au>Wang, Zhenghua</au><au>Zhu, Chuanqu</au><au>Kelly, Steven</au><au>Hursthouse, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbial diversity in soils from antimony mining sites: geochemical control promotes species enrichment</atitle><jtitle>Environmental chemistry letters</jtitle><stitle>Environ Chem Lett</stitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>911</spage><epage>922</epage><pages>911-922</pages><issn>1610-3653</issn><eissn>1610-3661</eissn><abstract>Elevated soil concentrations of antimony (Sb) and co-contaminants are frequently encountered where antimony has been mined on a large scale. For instance, the Xikuangshan antimony mine in central South China has sustained, over many centuries, dispersed and spatially variable input of toxic elements into the soil ecosystem. We utilized this unique environment to assess the impact of geochemical conditions on soil microbiology. Geochemical conditions were assessed by monitoring absolute and available fractions of toxic elements and disrupted soil properties. Soil microbiology was studied by high-throughput sequencing and statistical analysis, including principle component analysis and canonical correspondence analysis. Results show that Sb concentrations were ranged from 970 to more than 24,000 mg/kg. As concentrations were three times higher than the regional background values and ten times higher for Pb, 590 times higher for Cd and 30 times higher for Hg. About 5–10% of the total soil Sb was environmentally mobile. Microbial diversity was high, and soil properties such as pH, organic matter, iron and sulfate controlled the absolute microbial activity. We identified strong positive and negative correlations with specific bacterial taxonomic groups which show: (1) an intolerance of available fractions for all elements, e.g.,
Gemmatimonas, Pirellula, Spartobacteria
; (2) a good tolerance of available fractions for all elements, e.g.,
Povalibacter, Spartobacteria
; and (3) a mixed response, tolerating available Sb, Hg and Cd and inhibition by As, Pb, e.g.,
Escherichia/Shigella
and
Arthrobacter
, and in reverse, e.g.,
Gemmatimonas
and
Sphingomonas
. The site hosts great diversity dominated by Gram-negative organisms, many with rod (bacillus) morphologies but also some filamentous forms, and a wide range of metabolic capabilities: anaerobes, e.g.,
Saccharibacteria
, metal oxidizing, e.g.,
Geobacter
, chemoautotrophs, e.g.,
Gemmata
, and sulfur reducing, e.g.,
Desulfuromonas
. The bioremediation potential of
Arthrobacter
and
Escherichia/Shigella
for Sb control is highlighted.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10311-020-00975-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-2957</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1610-3653 |
ispartof | Environmental chemistry letters, 2020-05, Vol.18 (3), p.911-922 |
issn | 1610-3653 1610-3661 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2395154397 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Anaerobes Analytical Chemistry Antimony Arthrobacter Biodiversity Biological activity Bioremediation Cadmium Contaminants Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental impact Escherichia Geochemistry Heavy metals Intolerance Lead Mercury Microbial activity Microbiology Microorganisms Morphology Next-generation sequencing Organic matter Original Paper Oxidation Pollution Principal components analysis Shigella Soil biology Soil conditions Soil contamination Soil properties Soils Statistical analysis Statistical methods Sulfates Sulfur Sulphur |
title | Microbial diversity in soils from antimony mining sites: geochemical control promotes species enrichment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A11%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbial%20diversity%20in%20soils%20from%20antimony%20mining%20sites:%20geochemical%20control%20promotes%20species%20enrichment&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20chemistry%20letters&rft.au=Deng,%20Renjian&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=911&rft.epage=922&rft.pages=911-922&rft.issn=1610-3653&rft.eissn=1610-3661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10311-020-00975-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2395154397%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395154397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |