Quantifying Ecological Well-Being Loss under Rural–Urban Land Conversion: A Study from Choice Experiments in China
Rural–urban land conversion has led to the degradation of agricultural system ecological services, and therefore human ecological well-being. There is a need to transform the non-marketed value of ecosystem services provision into a monetary loss of ecological well-being in rural–urban land conversi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3378 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3378 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Han, Manman Song, Min |
description | Rural–urban land conversion has led to the degradation of agricultural system ecological services, and therefore human ecological well-being. There is a need to transform the non-marketed value of ecosystem services provision into a monetary loss of ecological well-being in rural–urban land conversion, which could serve as a basis for ecological compensation. In this paper, a choice experiment method is adopted to investigate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of rural and urban residents in six cities of three provinces selected from different regions in China. The results reveal that the attributes reflecting the ecological well-being of rural and urban residents are experiencing different degrees of decline. Two attributes, health and security, show the most obvious decline among all ecological well-being attributes for urban residents. In view of stakeholders, rural residents are facing a greater decline in ecological well-being than urban residents, which is mainly driven by their different linkages and interactions with the agro-ecosystem. In terms of regional comparisons, residents in the central region (Hubei Province) of China are subject to the sharpest decline in ecological well-being, followed by those living in the western region (Guizhou Province) and the eastern region (Guangdong Province). These differences are basically determined by their land resource conditions and socioeconomic circumstances. This paper argues that it is pressing to establish an ecological compensation mechanism to regulate rural–urban land conversion and maintain human ecological well-being. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12083378 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2394641124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2394641124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-ff87b2b89ec5b0b3cca30921c666d68b6330bcdac22b2303bb1af79235fc76d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN1KxDAQhYMouOje-AQB74RqktmmrXdrWX-gIP4sXpYkTdYs3WRNWnHvfAff0Cexywo6NzMcPmbOHIROKDkHKMhF7CkjOUCW76ERIxlNKEnJ_r_5EI1jXJKhAGhB-Qh1D71wnTUb6xZ4pnzrF1aJFr_otk2u9FatfIy4d40O-LEPov3-_JoHKRyuhGtw6d27DtF6d4mn-Knrmw02wa9w-eqt0nj2sdbBrrTrIrZuUK0Tx-jAiDbq8W8_QvPr2XN5m1T3N3fltEoUY2mXGJNnksm80CqVRIJSAkjBqOKcNzyXHIBI1YiBlgwISEmFyQoGqVEZbygcodPd3nXwb72OXb30fXDDyZpBMeETStlkoM52lArDp0Gbej0YFmFTU1Jvg63_goUfmDdsIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394641124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying Ecological Well-Being Loss under Rural–Urban Land Conversion: A Study from Choice Experiments in China</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Han, Manman ; Song, Min</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Manman ; Song, Min</creatorcontrib><description>Rural–urban land conversion has led to the degradation of agricultural system ecological services, and therefore human ecological well-being. There is a need to transform the non-marketed value of ecosystem services provision into a monetary loss of ecological well-being in rural–urban land conversion, which could serve as a basis for ecological compensation. In this paper, a choice experiment method is adopted to investigate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of rural and urban residents in six cities of three provinces selected from different regions in China. The results reveal that the attributes reflecting the ecological well-being of rural and urban residents are experiencing different degrees of decline. Two attributes, health and security, show the most obvious decline among all ecological well-being attributes for urban residents. In view of stakeholders, rural residents are facing a greater decline in ecological well-being than urban residents, which is mainly driven by their different linkages and interactions with the agro-ecosystem. In terms of regional comparisons, residents in the central region (Hubei Province) of China are subject to the sharpest decline in ecological well-being, followed by those living in the western region (Guizhou Province) and the eastern region (Guangdong Province). These differences are basically determined by their land resource conditions and socioeconomic circumstances. This paper argues that it is pressing to establish an ecological compensation mechanism to regulate rural–urban land conversion and maintain human ecological well-being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12083378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agriculture ; Compensation ; Conversion ; Developing countries ; Ecological effects ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental economics ; Experiments ; Land use ; LDCs ; Rural areas ; Rural populations ; Security ; Socioeconomic factors ; Sustainability ; Theory ; Urban areas ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3378</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-ff87b2b89ec5b0b3cca30921c666d68b6330bcdac22b2303bb1af79235fc76d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-ff87b2b89ec5b0b3cca30921c666d68b6330bcdac22b2303bb1af79235fc76d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3135-981X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Manman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Min</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying Ecological Well-Being Loss under Rural–Urban Land Conversion: A Study from Choice Experiments in China</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Rural–urban land conversion has led to the degradation of agricultural system ecological services, and therefore human ecological well-being. There is a need to transform the non-marketed value of ecosystem services provision into a monetary loss of ecological well-being in rural–urban land conversion, which could serve as a basis for ecological compensation. In this paper, a choice experiment method is adopted to investigate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of rural and urban residents in six cities of three provinces selected from different regions in China. The results reveal that the attributes reflecting the ecological well-being of rural and urban residents are experiencing different degrees of decline. Two attributes, health and security, show the most obvious decline among all ecological well-being attributes for urban residents. In view of stakeholders, rural residents are facing a greater decline in ecological well-being than urban residents, which is mainly driven by their different linkages and interactions with the agro-ecosystem. In terms of regional comparisons, residents in the central region (Hubei Province) of China are subject to the sharpest decline in ecological well-being, followed by those living in the western region (Guizhou Province) and the eastern region (Guangdong Province). These differences are basically determined by their land resource conditions and socioeconomic circumstances. This paper argues that it is pressing to establish an ecological compensation mechanism to regulate rural–urban land conversion and maintain human ecological well-being.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN1KxDAQhYMouOje-AQB74RqktmmrXdrWX-gIP4sXpYkTdYs3WRNWnHvfAff0Cexywo6NzMcPmbOHIROKDkHKMhF7CkjOUCW76ERIxlNKEnJ_r_5EI1jXJKhAGhB-Qh1D71wnTUb6xZ4pnzrF1aJFr_otk2u9FatfIy4d40O-LEPov3-_JoHKRyuhGtw6d27DtF6d4mn-Knrmw02wa9w-eqt0nj2sdbBrrTrIrZuUK0Tx-jAiDbq8W8_QvPr2XN5m1T3N3fltEoUY2mXGJNnksm80CqVRIJSAkjBqOKcNzyXHIBI1YiBlgwISEmFyQoGqVEZbygcodPd3nXwb72OXb30fXDDyZpBMeETStlkoM52lArDp0Gbej0YFmFTU1Jvg63_goUfmDdsIA</recordid><startdate>20200421</startdate><enddate>20200421</enddate><creator>Han, Manman</creator><creator>Song, Min</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3135-981X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200421</creationdate><title>Quantifying Ecological Well-Being Loss under Rural–Urban Land Conversion: A Study from Choice Experiments in China</title><author>Han, Manman ; Song, Min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-ff87b2b89ec5b0b3cca30921c666d68b6330bcdac22b2303bb1af79235fc76d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Manman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Min</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Manman</au><au>Song, Min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying Ecological Well-Being Loss under Rural–Urban Land Conversion: A Study from Choice Experiments in China</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-04-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3378</spage><pages>3378-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Rural–urban land conversion has led to the degradation of agricultural system ecological services, and therefore human ecological well-being. There is a need to transform the non-marketed value of ecosystem services provision into a monetary loss of ecological well-being in rural–urban land conversion, which could serve as a basis for ecological compensation. In this paper, a choice experiment method is adopted to investigate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of rural and urban residents in six cities of three provinces selected from different regions in China. The results reveal that the attributes reflecting the ecological well-being of rural and urban residents are experiencing different degrees of decline. Two attributes, health and security, show the most obvious decline among all ecological well-being attributes for urban residents. In view of stakeholders, rural residents are facing a greater decline in ecological well-being than urban residents, which is mainly driven by their different linkages and interactions with the agro-ecosystem. In terms of regional comparisons, residents in the central region (Hubei Province) of China are subject to the sharpest decline in ecological well-being, followed by those living in the western region (Guizhou Province) and the eastern region (Guangdong Province). These differences are basically determined by their land resource conditions and socioeconomic circumstances. This paper argues that it is pressing to establish an ecological compensation mechanism to regulate rural–urban land conversion and maintain human ecological well-being.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12083378</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3135-981X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.12 (8), p.3378 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2394641124 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Agricultural ecosystems Agriculture Compensation Conversion Developing countries Ecological effects Economic development Economic growth Ecosystem services Ecosystems Environmental degradation Environmental economics Experiments Land use LDCs Rural areas Rural populations Security Socioeconomic factors Sustainability Theory Urban areas Urbanization |
title | Quantifying Ecological Well-Being Loss under Rural–Urban Land Conversion: A Study from Choice Experiments in China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A40%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20Ecological%20Well-Being%20Loss%20under%20Rural%E2%80%93Urban%20Land%20Conversion:%20A%20Study%20from%20Choice%20Experiments%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Han,%20Manman&rft.date=2020-04-21&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3378&rft.pages=3378-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12083378&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2394641124%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394641124&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |