Soil parent material controls organic matter stocks and retention patterns in subtropical China
Purpose The influence of parent material on soil organic carbon (SOC) retention remains largely unstudied. Here, we aimed to reveal the role of soil parent material on SOC stocks and elucidate the underlying SOC retention patterns for soils derived from limestone, quaternary red earth, granite, basa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of soils and sediments 2020-05, Vol.20 (5), p.2426-2438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2438 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2426 |
container_title | Journal of soils and sediments |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Mao, Xiali Van Zwieten, Lukas Zhang, Mingkui Qiu, Zhiteng Yao, Yucai Wang, Hailong |
description | Purpose
The influence of parent material on soil organic carbon (SOC) retention remains largely unstudied. Here, we aimed to reveal the role of soil parent material on SOC stocks and elucidate the underlying SOC retention patterns for soils derived from limestone, quaternary red earth, granite, basalt, and tertiary red sandstone in subtropical China.
Materials and methods
The study assessed 110 topsoils (0–20 cm) under two land uses (forest and cultivated), but with similar topography. We compared soil properties (pH, oxides, multivalent cations, texture, aggregates) and SOC stocks, total SOC concentration as well as three organic C fractions (active, slow, and passive C). Factors influencing SOC concentration were explored using a combination of stepwise multiple regression analysis and redundancy analysis.
Results and discussion
Topsoil SOC stocks and SOC concentration varied significantly among the five parent materials, with the greatest values all observed in limestone-derived soils and the lowest in tertiary red sandstone–derived soils. While parent material significantly influenced both quantity and quality of SOC, there was no land use effect on the proportion of organic C fractions. Our results have also shown that parent material mediates land use impacts on SOC. The SOC stocks and SOC concentration in limestone, quaternary red earth, and basalt-derived soils were significantly higher in forest than in arable soils, while no significant land use effect was found for soils derived on granite and tertiary red sandstone. Soil aggregates, texture, content of Fe oxides, and multivalent cations accounted for 67.8% of the variation in SOC concentration, and both SOC stocks and SOC concentration were more closely related to aggregation and soil texture. The major influencing factors for SOC retention differed with parent material, with Ca
2+
/Mg
2+
-mediated interactions between organic matter and mineral surfaces being the main regulating processes for limestone-derived soils and oxide-mediated mechanisms to form stable aggregates being the likely SOC protecting patters for quaternary red earth and basalt-derived soils. Due to the coarse texture and low aggregate stability, the soils derived from granite and tertiary red sandstone lacked the properties for SOC preservation, with pH the main predictor for SOC concentration. Macroaggregates (> 2 mm) played especially important role in shaping SOC stocks.
Conclusions
Parent material exerts an influence on |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11368-020-02578-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2394634673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2394634673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-d7535fa9260617c492918c961fe711ae4a12d4f3b7311fb12750864f289522c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9VMkibpURb_wYIH9Ryy2XTN2k1q0h789qZW8OZhmIH3fm_gIXQJ5BoIkTcZgAlVEUrK1FJV7AgtQACvJFfkuNycNRUBok7RWc57Qpgs8gLpl-g73JvkwoAPZnDJmw7bGIYUu4xj2png7aQUCech2o-MTdji5IaC-BgKPGkhYx9wHjcF7L0tIat3H8w5OmlNl93F716it_u719VjtX5-eFrdrivDOB2qraxZ3ZqGCiJAWt7QBpRtBLROAhjHDdAtb9lGMoB2A1TWRAneUtXUlFrFluhqzu1T_BxdHvQ-jimUl5qyhgvGhWTFRWeXTTHn5FrdJ38w6UsD0VORei5SlyL1T5F6gtgM5WIOO5f-ov-hvgEhUnX5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394634673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil parent material controls organic matter stocks and retention patterns in subtropical China</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Mao, Xiali ; Van Zwieten, Lukas ; Zhang, Mingkui ; Qiu, Zhiteng ; Yao, Yucai ; Wang, Hailong</creator><creatorcontrib>Mao, Xiali ; Van Zwieten, Lukas ; Zhang, Mingkui ; Qiu, Zhiteng ; Yao, Yucai ; Wang, Hailong</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The influence of parent material on soil organic carbon (SOC) retention remains largely unstudied. Here, we aimed to reveal the role of soil parent material on SOC stocks and elucidate the underlying SOC retention patterns for soils derived from limestone, quaternary red earth, granite, basalt, and tertiary red sandstone in subtropical China.
Materials and methods
The study assessed 110 topsoils (0–20 cm) under two land uses (forest and cultivated), but with similar topography. We compared soil properties (pH, oxides, multivalent cations, texture, aggregates) and SOC stocks, total SOC concentration as well as three organic C fractions (active, slow, and passive C). Factors influencing SOC concentration were explored using a combination of stepwise multiple regression analysis and redundancy analysis.
Results and discussion
Topsoil SOC stocks and SOC concentration varied significantly among the five parent materials, with the greatest values all observed in limestone-derived soils and the lowest in tertiary red sandstone–derived soils. While parent material significantly influenced both quantity and quality of SOC, there was no land use effect on the proportion of organic C fractions. Our results have also shown that parent material mediates land use impacts on SOC. The SOC stocks and SOC concentration in limestone, quaternary red earth, and basalt-derived soils were significantly higher in forest than in arable soils, while no significant land use effect was found for soils derived on granite and tertiary red sandstone. Soil aggregates, texture, content of Fe oxides, and multivalent cations accounted for 67.8% of the variation in SOC concentration, and both SOC stocks and SOC concentration were more closely related to aggregation and soil texture. The major influencing factors for SOC retention differed with parent material, with Ca
2+
/Mg
2+
-mediated interactions between organic matter and mineral surfaces being the main regulating processes for limestone-derived soils and oxide-mediated mechanisms to form stable aggregates being the likely SOC protecting patters for quaternary red earth and basalt-derived soils. Due to the coarse texture and low aggregate stability, the soils derived from granite and tertiary red sandstone lacked the properties for SOC preservation, with pH the main predictor for SOC concentration. Macroaggregates (> 2 mm) played especially important role in shaping SOC stocks.
Conclusions
Parent material exerts an influence on SOC stocks and retention patterns, and should be used in determining SOC storage potential for soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-020-02578-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aggregates ; Aggregation ; Arable land ; Basalt ; Calcium ; Calcium ions ; Cations ; Earth ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Physics ; Granite ; Land use ; Limestone ; Magnesium ; Multiple regression analysis ; Organic carbon ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Oxides ; pH effects ; Preservation ; Quaternary ; Redundancy ; Regression analysis ; Retention ; Sandstone ; Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article ; Sedimentary rocks ; Soil aggregates ; Soil properties ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil stability ; Soil texture ; Soils ; Stocks ; Stone ; Storage ; Tertiary ; Texture ; Topsoil</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2020-05, Vol.20 (5), p.2426-2438</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-d7535fa9260617c492918c961fe711ae4a12d4f3b7311fb12750864f289522c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-d7535fa9260617c492918c961fe711ae4a12d4f3b7311fb12750864f289522c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11368-020-02578-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11368-020-02578-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mao, Xiali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Zwieten, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mingkui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Zhiteng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yucai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hailong</creatorcontrib><title>Soil parent material controls organic matter stocks and retention patterns in subtropical China</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Purpose
The influence of parent material on soil organic carbon (SOC) retention remains largely unstudied. Here, we aimed to reveal the role of soil parent material on SOC stocks and elucidate the underlying SOC retention patterns for soils derived from limestone, quaternary red earth, granite, basalt, and tertiary red sandstone in subtropical China.
Materials and methods
The study assessed 110 topsoils (0–20 cm) under two land uses (forest and cultivated), but with similar topography. We compared soil properties (pH, oxides, multivalent cations, texture, aggregates) and SOC stocks, total SOC concentration as well as three organic C fractions (active, slow, and passive C). Factors influencing SOC concentration were explored using a combination of stepwise multiple regression analysis and redundancy analysis.
Results and discussion
Topsoil SOC stocks and SOC concentration varied significantly among the five parent materials, with the greatest values all observed in limestone-derived soils and the lowest in tertiary red sandstone–derived soils. While parent material significantly influenced both quantity and quality of SOC, there was no land use effect on the proportion of organic C fractions. Our results have also shown that parent material mediates land use impacts on SOC. The SOC stocks and SOC concentration in limestone, quaternary red earth, and basalt-derived soils were significantly higher in forest than in arable soils, while no significant land use effect was found for soils derived on granite and tertiary red sandstone. Soil aggregates, texture, content of Fe oxides, and multivalent cations accounted for 67.8% of the variation in SOC concentration, and both SOC stocks and SOC concentration were more closely related to aggregation and soil texture. The major influencing factors for SOC retention differed with parent material, with Ca
2+
/Mg
2+
-mediated interactions between organic matter and mineral surfaces being the main regulating processes for limestone-derived soils and oxide-mediated mechanisms to form stable aggregates being the likely SOC protecting patters for quaternary red earth and basalt-derived soils. Due to the coarse texture and low aggregate stability, the soils derived from granite and tertiary red sandstone lacked the properties for SOC preservation, with pH the main predictor for SOC concentration. Macroaggregates (> 2 mm) played especially important role in shaping SOC stocks.
Conclusions
Parent material exerts an influence on SOC stocks and retention patterns, and should be used in determining SOC storage potential for soils.</description><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Basalt</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium ions</subject><subject>Cations</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Granite</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Limestone</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Multiple regression analysis</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Quaternary</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Soil aggregates</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Soil texture</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Stone</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Tertiary</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>Topsoil</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9VMkibpURb_wYIH9Ryy2XTN2k1q0h789qZW8OZhmIH3fm_gIXQJ5BoIkTcZgAlVEUrK1FJV7AgtQACvJFfkuNycNRUBok7RWc57Qpgs8gLpl-g73JvkwoAPZnDJmw7bGIYUu4xj2png7aQUCech2o-MTdji5IaC-BgKPGkhYx9wHjcF7L0tIat3H8w5OmlNl93F716it_u719VjtX5-eFrdrivDOB2qraxZ3ZqGCiJAWt7QBpRtBLROAhjHDdAtb9lGMoB2A1TWRAneUtXUlFrFluhqzu1T_BxdHvQ-jimUl5qyhgvGhWTFRWeXTTHn5FrdJ38w6UsD0VORei5SlyL1T5F6gtgM5WIOO5f-ov-hvgEhUnX5</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Mao, Xiali</creator><creator>Van Zwieten, Lukas</creator><creator>Zhang, Mingkui</creator><creator>Qiu, Zhiteng</creator><creator>Yao, Yucai</creator><creator>Wang, Hailong</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Soil parent material controls organic matter stocks and retention patterns in subtropical China</title><author>Mao, Xiali ; Van Zwieten, Lukas ; Zhang, Mingkui ; Qiu, Zhiteng ; Yao, Yucai ; Wang, Hailong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-d7535fa9260617c492918c961fe711ae4a12d4f3b7311fb12750864f289522c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Basalt</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium ions</topic><topic>Cations</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Granite</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Limestone</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Multiple regression analysis</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Quaternary</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Soil aggregates</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Soil texture</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Stone</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Tertiary</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>Topsoil</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mao, Xiali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Zwieten, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mingkui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Zhiteng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yucai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hailong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mao, Xiali</au><au>Van Zwieten, Lukas</au><au>Zhang, Mingkui</au><au>Qiu, Zhiteng</au><au>Yao, Yucai</au><au>Wang, Hailong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil parent material controls organic matter stocks and retention patterns in subtropical China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2426</spage><epage>2438</epage><pages>2426-2438</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The influence of parent material on soil organic carbon (SOC) retention remains largely unstudied. Here, we aimed to reveal the role of soil parent material on SOC stocks and elucidate the underlying SOC retention patterns for soils derived from limestone, quaternary red earth, granite, basalt, and tertiary red sandstone in subtropical China.
Materials and methods
The study assessed 110 topsoils (0–20 cm) under two land uses (forest and cultivated), but with similar topography. We compared soil properties (pH, oxides, multivalent cations, texture, aggregates) and SOC stocks, total SOC concentration as well as three organic C fractions (active, slow, and passive C). Factors influencing SOC concentration were explored using a combination of stepwise multiple regression analysis and redundancy analysis.
Results and discussion
Topsoil SOC stocks and SOC concentration varied significantly among the five parent materials, with the greatest values all observed in limestone-derived soils and the lowest in tertiary red sandstone–derived soils. While parent material significantly influenced both quantity and quality of SOC, there was no land use effect on the proportion of organic C fractions. Our results have also shown that parent material mediates land use impacts on SOC. The SOC stocks and SOC concentration in limestone, quaternary red earth, and basalt-derived soils were significantly higher in forest than in arable soils, while no significant land use effect was found for soils derived on granite and tertiary red sandstone. Soil aggregates, texture, content of Fe oxides, and multivalent cations accounted for 67.8% of the variation in SOC concentration, and both SOC stocks and SOC concentration were more closely related to aggregation and soil texture. The major influencing factors for SOC retention differed with parent material, with Ca
2+
/Mg
2+
-mediated interactions between organic matter and mineral surfaces being the main regulating processes for limestone-derived soils and oxide-mediated mechanisms to form stable aggregates being the likely SOC protecting patters for quaternary red earth and basalt-derived soils. Due to the coarse texture and low aggregate stability, the soils derived from granite and tertiary red sandstone lacked the properties for SOC preservation, with pH the main predictor for SOC concentration. Macroaggregates (> 2 mm) played especially important role in shaping SOC stocks.
Conclusions
Parent material exerts an influence on SOC stocks and retention patterns, and should be used in determining SOC storage potential for soils.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-020-02578-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-0108 |
ispartof | Journal of soils and sediments, 2020-05, Vol.20 (5), p.2426-2438 |
issn | 1439-0108 1614-7480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2394634673 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aggregates Aggregation Arable land Basalt Calcium Calcium ions Cations Earth Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental Physics Granite Land use Limestone Magnesium Multiple regression analysis Organic carbon Organic matter Organic soils Oxides pH effects Preservation Quaternary Redundancy Regression analysis Retention Sandstone Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article Sedimentary rocks Soil aggregates Soil properties Soil Science & Conservation Soil stability Soil texture Soils Stocks Stone Storage Tertiary Texture Topsoil |
title | Soil parent material controls organic matter stocks and retention patterns in subtropical China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T01%3A20%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20parent%20material%20controls%20organic%20matter%20stocks%20and%20retention%20patterns%20in%20subtropical%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Mao,%20Xiali&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2426&rft.epage=2438&rft.pages=2426-2438&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-020-02578-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2394634673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394634673&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |